Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section

Outcomes of Vaginal Repair and Vaginal Repair Combined With GnRHa Administration in the Treatment of Cesarean Section Scar Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To prospectively investigate whether the application of vaginal repair (VR) of cesarean section scar defect (CSD) combined with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) achieve better clinical outcomes than VR alone.

DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University Hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 124 women with CSD were undergoing expectant management from December 2016 to September 2021. 61 were randomized to VR+ GnRHa and 63 to VR alone.

INTERVENTION

Vaginal repair combined with GnRHa and vaginal repair alone.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the duration of menstruation and thickness of the remaining muscular layer (TRM) at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the length, width, and depth of the CSD; operation time; estimated blood loss; hospitalization time; and operative complications. Women were treated with either VR (n = 63) or VR + GnRHa (n = 61). Menstruation and TRM in patients pre vs post comparisons either with VR or VR + GnRHa are significantly improved (p <.05). Significant differences in menstruation duration and TRM occurred in patients treated with VR + GnRHa compared with those treated with VR (p <.05). Moreover, the rate of CSD after surgery in the VR group was significantly higher than that in the VR + GnRHa group (p = .033), and CSD patients in the VR + GnRHa group achieved better therapeutic effects than those in the VR group (p = .017). Patients who received VR + GnRHa had a shorter menstruation duration and a greater increment of TRM postoperatively than patients treated with VR alone (p = .021; p = .002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

VR + GnRHa therapy has a greater potential to improve scar healing and reduce the number of menstruation days than VR alone for symptomatic women with CSD.

Association of caesarean scar defect with risk of abnormal uterine bleeding: results from meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between caesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding through systematic literature review.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched based on PRISMA 2020 to include studies exploring abnormal uterine bleeding in women with caesarean scar defects. The combined relative risk (RR) of uterine bleeding, combined prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding and combined RR of intermenstrual uterine bleeding were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1,183 women with caesarean scar defects met the inclusion criteria for this study. Compared with women without caesarean scar defects, those with caesarean scar defects had a higher risk of abnormal uterine bleeding (RR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.83-5.66) and intermenstrual bleeding (RR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.91-4.50). The prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding was approximately 0.46 (95% CI: 0.27-0.64), and across populations, women with a previous caesarean section who had undergone imaging specifically for gynaecological disease had a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding (0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.89) than those with at least one caesarean Sect. (0.25, 95% CI: 0.10-0.39).

CONCLUSION

A significant association was observed between caesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding, with the former being a risk factor for the latter. However, previous studies have differed in the definition of caesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding, and more high-quality studies are needed to further investigate the relevant definitions and study results in the future.

Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The role of barbed sutures in preventing myometrial defects and enhancing postpartum outcomes after cesarean section (C-section) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of uterine scar defects after C-section with barbed and conventional smooth thread sutures.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Four obstetrics and gynecology departments across three Japanese healthcare regions were included. The participants were women requiring their first cesarean delivery between May 2020 and March 2023. Of the 1211 participants enrolled, 298 underwent C-section and 253 were followed up until July 2023. Participants with singleton pregnancies were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either conventional or spiral thread sutures with a double-layer continuous suture. The study period comprised the time of consent to the 6- to 7-month examination. The primary endpoint was the rate of scar niches >2 mm evaluated using transvaginal ultrasonography at 6 to 7 months after surgery. Additional metrics included the total operative time, suture application time, operative blood loss, number of additional sutures required for hemostasis, maternal surgical complications, postoperative infections, surgeon's years of experience, and individual subscale scores.

RESULTS

All data of the 220 participants (barbed suture group: 110; conventional suture group: 110) were available, thus enabling a full analysis set. A comparison of the barbed and conventional suture groups, respectively, revealed the following: niche length, 2.45±1.65 mm (range: 1.0-6.7) vs 3.79±1.84 mm (range: 1.0-11.0) (P<.001); niche depth, 1.78±1.07 mm (range: 1.0-5.7) vs 2.70±1.34 mm (range: 1.0-7.3) (P<.001); residual myometrial thickness (RMT), 8.46±1.74 mm (range: 4.8-13.0) vs 7.07±2.186 mm (range: 2.2-16.2) (P<.001); and niche width, 1.58±2.73 mm (range: 0.0-14.0) vs 2.88±2.36 mm (range: 0.0-11.0) (P<.001), respectively. The barbed suture group exhibited no defects and an RMT <3 mm. Furthermore, the barbed suture group had a lower rate of uterine niches (29.1%; n=32/110) than the conventional suture group (68.2%; n=75/110). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in operative times, maternal surgical complications, or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Double-layer barbed sutures during cesarean delivery may prevent C-section scar defects and postoperative complications.

The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the association between post-cesarean sonographic uterine measures, dysmenorrhea, and bleeding disorders.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study where 500 women with a history of only one cesarean section (CS) were recruited. A transvaginal transducer, GE RIC6-12-D was used for the acquisition of volumetric datasets 18 ± 7 months postpartum. Uterine length (UL), cervical length (CL), niche length (L), niche depth (D), niche width (W), fibrosis length (FL), fibrosis depth (FD), residual myometrial thickness (RMT), endometrial thickness (EM), scar to internal os distance (SO), anterior myometrial thickness superior (sAMT) and inferior (iAMT) to the scar, and the posterior myometrial thickness opposite the scar (PMT), superior (sPMT), and inferior to it (iPMT) were measured. Logistic regression with odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and ROC curves were utilized.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with incident post-cesarean bleeding disorders and dysmenorrhoea was 36% (CI 32%, 40%) and 17% (CI 14%, 21%) respectively. Univariate logistic regression showed that only UL was associated with bleeding disorders [OR 1.04 (CI 1.01,10.7) p value 0.005], whereas dysmenorrhea was associated with RMT [OR 0.82 (CI 0.71,0.95) p value 0.008], SO [OR 0.91 (CI 0.86,0.98) p value 0.01], and RMT ratio [OR 0.98 (CI 0.97,0.99) p value 0.03]. Multivariate logistic regression for dysmenorrhoea including SO and RMT remains statistically significant with p values <0.05 and area under the curve of 0.66.

CONCLUSION

There is an association between sonographic appearance of CS scars and dysmenorrhoea. Nevertheless, the association is weak and other biological post-cesarean characteristics should be explored as potential causes.

A Prediction Model for the Efficacy of Transvaginal Repair in Patients With Cesarean Scar Defect: An Evidence-Based Proposal for Patient Selection

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To establish a prediction model to help doctors determine which patients with cesarean scar defect are more suitable for transvaginal repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Xinhua Hospital and Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital between June 2014 and May 2021.

PATIENTS

1015 women who underwent transvaginal repair of cesarean scar defect (CSD).

INTERVENTIONS

All enrolled patients underwent CSD repair performed by the same gynecologist and his team. And followed up a clinic visit at 6 months to record their menstruation and measure multiple parameters of the CSD by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

CSD patients are categorized as optimal healing group when the menstruation duration is no more than 7 days, meanwhile the thickness of residual myometrium is no less than 5.39 mm after vaginal repair. The final nomogram is constructed to predict surgical outcomes based on preoperative variables.

RESULTS

The key factors that determine optimal healing are the timing of cesarean section (elective or emergency), menstrual cycle, CSD length, width, depth, and the thickness of the lower uterine segment. With the prediction model, scores are given to each parameter according to the statistics. Total scores range from 0 to 25 points, with a cutoff point of 16.5. When a score is greater than 16.5, the transvaginal repair can achieve optimal healing. Uterine position (anteflexion or retroflexion) and preoperative thickness of residual myometrium are the key factors affecting postoperative thickness of residual myometrium. The width of the CSD and the thickness of the lower uterine segment are the key factors affecting abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we established a prediction model system that may predict the repair effect of CSD and can potentially be useful in future clinical trials to determine which patients are more suitable for surgery or other treatment options.

A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect

BACKGROUND

A cesarean scar defect (CSD) is incomplete healing of the myometrium at the site of a prior cesarean section (CS), complicating more than half of all cesarean sections. While transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is the most common modality for diagnosing this defect, hysteroscopy remains the gold standard. We aimed to develop an efficient diagnostic tool for CSD among women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) by integrating TVU findings and participants' demographic features.

METHODS

A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 premenopausal and non-pregnant women with a history of CS complaining of AUB without a known systemic or structural etiology. Each participant underwent a hysteroscopy followed by a TVU the next day. The defect dimensions in TVU, patients' age, and the number of previous CSs were integrated into a binary logistic regression model to evaluate their predictive ability for a hysteroscopy-confirmed CSD.

RESULTS

Hysteroscopy identified 74 (74%) participants with CSD. The variables age, the number of CSs, defect length, and defect width significantly contributed to the logistic regression model to diagnose CSD with odds ratios of 9.7, 0.7, 2.6, and 1.7, respectively. The developed model exhibited accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88.00%, 91.89%, and 76.92%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.955 (P-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among non-pregnant women suspected of CSD due to AUB, looking at age, the number of previous CSs, and TVU-based defect width and length can efficiently rule CSD out.

The definition, diagnosis, and symptoms of the uterine niche - A systematic review

Of all neonates, 21% are delivered by cesarean section (CS). A long-term maternal complication of an SC is a uterine niche. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current literature on imaging techniques and niche-related symptomatology. We performed systematic searches on imaging and niche symptoms. For both searches, 87 new studies were included. Niche evaluation by transvaginal sonography (TVS) or contrast sonohysterography (SHG) proved superior over hysteroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging. Studies that used SHG in a random population identified a niche prevalence of 42%-84%. Niche prevalence differed based on niche definition, symptomatology, and imaging technique. Most studies reported an association with gynecological symptoms, poor reproductive outcomes, obstetrical complications, and reduced quality of life. In conclusion, non-invasive TVS and SHG are the superior imaging modalities to diagnose a niche. Niches are prevalent and strongly associated with gynecological symptoms and poor reproductive outcomes.

Cesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the published literature to better understand the association between cesarean scar defects (CSDs) and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). In particular, we aimed to evaluate the risk and pattern(s) of CSD-associated AUB in addition to exploring the relationship between defect morphology with bleeding symptoms.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Patients with CSD and reports of uterine bleeding as an outcome were identified in 60 studies from database searches.

INTERVENTIONS

Studies that investigated CSD (as defined by investigators) and reported uterine bleeding, menstrual bleeding, or AUB as an outcome were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prevalence and risk of AUB (intermenstrual, postmenstrual, and unscheduled bleeding) in patients with confirmed CSD.

RESULTS

Nine studies reported on the prevalence of AUB in patients with a confirmed CSD. Patients with CSD were more likely to experience AUB, compared with those without CSD (relative risk, 3.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-5.97; 6 studies, 1,385 patients; I² = 67%). In a population of patients with at least 1 cesarean delivery, the prevalence of AUB in those with CSD was 25.5% (95% CI, 14.7-40.5; 6 studies, 667 patients, I² = 93%). However, symptom prevalence was much higher in patients presenting for imaging for a gynecologic indication where the prevalence of AUB in the presence of a CSD was 76.4% (95% CI, 67.8-83.3; 5 studies, 505 patients; I² = 71%). The mean menstrual duration in symptomatic patients with CSD was 13.4 days (95% CI, 12.6-14.2; 19 studies, 2,095 patients; I² = 96%), and the mean duration of early-cycle intermenstrual bleeding was 6.8 days (95% CI, 5.7-7.8 days; 9 studies, 759 patients; I² = 93%). The most common descriptor of CSD-associated AUB was "brown discharge". Patients with larger CSD experienced more bleeding symptoms.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong and consistent association between patients with CSD and AUB. These patients experience a unique bleeding pattern, namely prolonged menstruation and early-cycle intermenstrual bleeding. These data should provide impetus for including CSD as a distinct entity in AUB classification systems. High heterogeneity in our results calls for standardization of nomenclature and outcome reporting for this condition.