Translatability and validation of non-technical skills scale for trauma (T-NOTECHS) for assessing simulated multi-professional trauma team resuscitations

The human factor and ergonomics in Patient Safety

The human condition is linked to error in any activity that is performed, and the healthcare world is no exception. The origin of human error does not lie within the perversity of human nature, instead, it has its origins in latent failures in the healthcare environment and is a consequence of the processes and procedures applied. The science of the Human Factor deals with the application of knowledge to people (capabilities, characteristics and limitations), with the design and the management of the equipment they use and with the environments in which they work and the activities they carry out. Part of the Human Factor are the non-technical skills. These skills greatly influence people's behavior and, therefore, their performance and the quality of healthcare in a very complex socio-technical system.

From Emergency Room to Operating Room: Multidisciplinary Simulation Training in Emergency Laparotomy for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - Learning Outcomes and Costs

BACKGROUND

Opportunities to practice emergency laparotomy (EL) and open surgical repair (OSR) for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) are limited. While simulation-based training (SBT) is effective in educating healthcare professionals in medical emergencies, SBT specifically in EL and OSR for rAAA is scarce. It takes a team to diagnose a patient with massive abdominal bleeding, such as in rAAA, to organize primary care, and to provide definite treatment without unnecessary delays. This study investigated the effects of multidisciplinary EL simulation training in OSR for rAAA, from the emergency room (ER) to the operating room (OR), on trainees' learning outcomes and the costs of the training.

METHODS

A total of 162 healthcare professionals in 21 simulated emergency laparotomy teams participated in a structured 2-hour course consisting of an introductory lecture and a simulation scenario followed by debriefing. Data were collected using a pre-post self-assessment questionnaire and the T-NOTECHS scale. Implementation costs and the cost of education were calculated.

RESULTS

Simulation training improved knowledge, skills, and attitudes of both physicians and nurses. Most of the non-technical skills studied were significantly enhanced in both professional groups. The total cost of the simulation training was €29 415, cost per team €1,400 and cost per participant €182.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary EL simulation training in OSR for rAAA from the ER to the OR is effective in improving knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as non-technical skills among both physicians and nurses. The overall costs of training seem reasonable given the significant learning outcomes.

Study protocol for a Prospective Observational study of Safety Threats and Adverse events in Trauma (PrO-STAT): a pilot study at a level-1 trauma centre in Canada

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic injuries are a significant public health concern globally, resulting in substantial mortality, hospitalisation and healthcare burden. Despite the establishment of specialised trauma centres, there remains considerable variability in trauma-care practices and outcomes, particularly in the initial phase of trauma resuscitation in the trauma bay. This stage is prone to preventable errors leading to adverse events (AEs) that can impact patient outcomes. Prior studies have identified common causes of these errors, including delayed diagnostics, disorganisation of staff, equipment issues and communication breakdowns, which collectively contribute to AEs. This study addresses gaps in understanding the root causes of these errors by evaluating the most frequent AEs in trauma care through real-time video reviews of resuscitations in the trauma bay. Insights from this evaluation will inform targeted interventions to improve procedural adherence, communication and overall team performance, ultimately reducing preventable errors and improving patient safety.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective observational study will be conducted at St. Michael's Hospital, a level-1 trauma centre, to evaluate resuscitations in the trauma bay. All consecutive trauma team activations over 12 months will be included, with data collected using audio-visual recordings and physiological monitoring. A synchronised data capture and analysis platform will comprehensively assess AEs, errors and human and environmental factors during trauma resuscitations. The study aims to detect recurring error patterns, evaluate practice variations and correlate trauma team performance with in-hospital outcomes. Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics, logistic regression models and multivariable analyses to identify associations and predictors of AEs and patient outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Institutional research ethics approval was obtained (SMH REB # 21-009). A modified consent model will be employed for participants. Staff, physicians and learners will be provided with information regarding the study and will have the option to opt-out or withdraw consent. Similarly, trauma patients and their next of kin will be informed about the study, with provisions for opting out or withdrawing consent within 48 hours of recording. Measures will be implemented to ensure data confidentiality, anonymity and respect for participants' autonomy and privacy. The study results will be shared through peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations, and key institutional stakeholders will be informed about developing strategies to improve patient safety in trauma care.

Bridging the Gap: The Importance of Non-technical Skills in Cardiology for Enhanced Patient Care and Team Performance

Cardiology, a high-acuity medical specialty, has traditionally emphasised technical expertise, often overshadowing the critical role of non-technical skills (NTS). This imbalance stems from the historical focus on procedural competence and clinical knowledge in cardiology training and practice, leaving a significant gap in the development of crucial interpersonal and cognitive abilities. However, emerging evidence highlights the significant impact of NTS on patient outcomes, team dynamics, and overall healthcare efficiency. This review explores the importance of NTS in cardiology whilst drawing parallels with other high-stakes fields, such as aviation, surgery, and emergency medicine, which have successfully integrated NTS frameworks. These fields are particularly relevant due to their similar requirements for rapid decision-making under pressure, team-based approaches, and the potential for severe consequences in case of errors. Key NTS domains relevant to cardiology include leadership, such as in guiding cardiac teams effectively during procedures and emergencies; cooperation and resource management, such as focusing on optimising team performance and resource allocation in cardiac care units; communication and interaction, such as clear and concise information exchange during complex cardiac interventions; assessment and decision-making such as making critical choices in time-sensitive situations; situational awareness (SA) that maintains a comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and surrounding environment; and coping with stress, which involves managing personal and team stress during and after high-pressure situations. The integration of NTS into cardiology practice is essential for improving patient care, reducing healthcare costs, and preventing clinician burnout. Despite the recognition of NTS' importance, there is a notable lack of structured training and validated assessment tools in cardiology. This absence poses a significant challenge to the implementation of NTS, as it hinders the systematic development and evaluation of these crucial skills amongst cardiologists. For instance, whilst technical skills in procedures like angiography are rigorously assessed, there is limited formal evaluation of NTS, for instance, a cardiologist's ability to lead a team effectively during a cardiac emergency. This review advocates for the development and implementation of NTS training and evaluation methods suitable for cardiology, emphasising the need for a balanced skill set that complements technical proficiency with social and cognitive abilities. Future research should focus on adapting existing tools or developing new ones to address the unique challenges of cardiology teams and foster safer, more effective patient care. Specific areas for investigation include developing cardiology-specific NTS assessment tools, creating structured NTS training programmes for cardiology fellows, evaluating the impact of NTS training on patient outcomes in cardiac care, and exploring the relationship between NTS proficiency and technical skill performance in cardiology procedures. By addressing these research gaps and developing targeted NTS interventions, cardiology can foster a more comprehensive approach to professional development, ultimately leading to improved patient care and healthcare efficiency in this critical field.

Nontechnical Skills Assessment in Acute Care Trauma Simulations: A Mixed Methods Approach Using Eye Tracking and Behavioral Marker Systems

INTRODUCTION

The condition of trauma patients and the urgent need for timely resuscitation present unique challenges to trauma teams. These difficulties are exacerbated for military trauma teams in combat environments. Consequently, there is a need for continued improvement of nontechnical skills (NTS) training for trauma teams. However, current approaches to NTS assessment rely on subjective ratings, which can introduce bias. Accordingly, objective methods of NTS evaluation are needed. Eye-tracking (ET) methods have been applied to studying communication, situation awareness, and leadership in many health care settings, and could be applied to studying physicians' NTS during trauma situations. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between trauma team leaders' objective gaze patterns and subjective expert NTS ratings during patient care simulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, 9 trauma teams from first-year post-graduate general surgery and emergency medicine residents were recruited to participate in 1 of 2 trauma simulations (a difficult airway case and a multi-patient trauma). Each scenario lasted approximately 15 minutes. All team leaders wore a mobile ET system to evaluate gaze metrics-time to first fixation (TTFF), average fixation duration (AFD), and total percentage of the scenario (TPS) focused on Areas of Interest (AOI), which included patient, care team, diagnostic equipment, and patient care equipment. Trained faculty raters completed the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) assessment tool and the Trauma Non-Technical Skills (T-NOTECHS) scale. One-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and appropriate post-hoc pairwise comparison tests were run to assess differences between ET metrics across AOI groups. Spearman's Rho tests were used to assess correlations between ET and subjective NTS ratings.

RESULTS

Compared to other NTS domains, trauma teams scored relatively poorly on communication across both T-NOTECHS (3.29$ \pm $0.61, maximum = 5) and NOTSS (2.87$ \pm $0.66, maximum = 4). We found significant differences in trauma team leaders' TTFF between teammates and the patient (Team: 1.56 vs Patient: 29.82 seconds, P < .001). TTFF on the diagnostic equipment was negatively correlated (P < .05) to multiple measures of subjective NTS assessments. There were no significant differences in AFD between AOIs, and AFD on teammates was positively correlated (P < .05) to communication and teamwork. There were significant differences in TPS across most AOI pairs (P < .05), and the average TPS fixated was highest on the patient (32%). Finally, there were several significant correlations between additional ET and NTS metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study utilized a mixed methods approach to assess trauma team leaders' NTS in simulated acute care trauma simulations. Our results provide several objective insights into trauma team leaders' NTS behaviors during patient care simulations. Such objective insights provide a more comprehensive understanding of NTS behaviors and can be leveraged to guide NTS training of trauma physicians in the future. More studies are needed to apply these methods to capture NTS from a larger sample of teams in both simulated and real trauma environments.

Mastering multicasualty trauma care with the Trauma Non-technical Skills Scale

BACKGROUND

Multicasualty events present complex medical challenges. This is the first study to investigate the role of nontechnical skills in prehospital multicasualty trauma care. We assessed the feasibility of using the Trauma Nontechnical Skills Scale (T-NOTECHS) instrument, which has not yet been investigated to evaluate these scenarios.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study involving military medical teams with Israel Defense Forces Military Trauma Life Support training to assess the T-NOTECHS' utility in predicting prehospital medical team performance during multicasualty event simulations. These teams were selected from a pool of qualified military Advanced Life Support providers. Simulations were conducted in a dedicated facility resembling a field setting, with video recordings to ensure data accuracy. Teams faced a single multicasualty scenario, assessed by two instructors, and were evaluated using a 37-item checklist. The T-NOTECHS scores were analyzed using regression models to predict simulation performance.

RESULTS

We included 27 teams for analysis, led by 28% physicians and 72% paramedics. Interrater reliability for simulation performance and T-NOTECHS scores showed good agreement. Overall T-NOTECHS scores were positively correlated with simulation performance scores ( R = 0.546, p < 0.001). Each T-NOTECHS domain correlated with simulation performance. The Communication and Interaction domain explained a unique part of the variance ( β = 0.406, p = 0.047). Assessment and Decision Making had the highest correlation ( R = 0.535, p < 0.001). These domains significantly predicted specific items on the simulation performance checklist. Cooperation and Resource Management showed the least correlation with checklist items.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the T-NOTECHS' reliability in predicting prehospital trauma team performance during multicasualty scenarios. Key nontechnical skills, especially Communication and Interaction, and Assessment and Decision Making, play vital roles. These findings underscore the importance of training in these skills to enhance trauma care in such scenarios, offering valuable insights for medical team preparation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.

Training for a mass casualty incident: Conception, development, and implementation of a crew-resource management course for forward surgical teams

BACKGROUND

Since 2021, the predeployment training of French FSTs has included a simulation-based curriculum consisting of organizational and human factors. The purpose of this article is to describe the development of a crew-resource management (CRM) training course dedicated for the forward surgical teams (FSTs) of the French Military Health Service.

METHODS

The approach was based on three steps: (1) establishment of a conceptual framework of FSTs deployment; (2) development of an aircrew-like CRM training combining lectures, laboratory exercises, and situational training exercises to consider four fundamental "nontechnical" (cognitive and social) skills for effective and safe combat casualty care: (a) leadership, (b) decision-making, (c) coordination, and (d) situational awareness; (3) Implementation of teamwork evaluation tools.

RESULTS

A multidisciplinary team designed a conceptual framework for FST preparedness, 24 French FSTs completed a high-quality training that takes into account both technical and nontechnical skills to maintain quality of combat care during mass-casualty incidents, FSTs' CRM skills were assessed using an audio/video recording of a simulated mass-casualty incident.

The Assessment and Response of Rehabilitation Professionals to Sudden Deterioration in Symptoms: An Analysis of the National Database in Japan

OBJECTIVE

There are few analyses of the current status of and responses to acute deteriorations encountered by physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists (rehabilitation professions [RPs]). The purpose of this study was to analyze the responses of RPs to acute deterioration in patients using the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) based on the descriptions in "the Medical Accident Database".

METHODS

Subjects were 413 cases with medical incidents reported by RPs to the database from 2012 to 2021. Life-threatening cases with changes in consciousness, circulation, and respiration were selected. Descriptions regarding findings assessed by RPs and support team, and requests for assistance were extracted. We also attempted to construct appropriate respond in RPs by using the FRAM.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine cases of acute deterioration were included in the analysis, and descriptions by RPs of consciousness (35 cases), circulation (18 cases), and respiration (36 cases) were identified. Blood pressure and percutaneous oxygen saturation measurement were frequently presented in the assessment by RPs, whereas the support team assessed cardiac arrest and respiratory arrest in high frequency. The FRAM analysis indicated that appropriate and rapid post-response by RPs requires patient information in prior, appropriate assessment and integration/interpretation.

CONCLUSION

We attempted to identify problems analyzing the response by RPs to acute deterioration using the database and construct an appropriate response model. It resulted that RPs need to obtain patient information in advance and integrate/interpret it appropriately based on accurate assessment of conscious, circulation and respiration for rapid response. A model including integration/interpretation for appropriate post-response by RPs was constructed using the FRAM.

Getting out of the bay faster: Assessing trauma team performance using trauma video review

BACKGROUND

Minutes matter for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock. How trauma team function impacts time to the next phase of care has not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized better team performance scores to be associated with decreased time to the next phase of trauma care.

METHODS

This retrospective secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study included hypotensive trauma patients at 19 centers. Using trauma video review, we analyzed team performance with the validated Non-Technical Skills for Trauma scale: leadership, cooperation and resource management, communication, assessment/decision making, and situational awareness. The primary outcome was minutes from patient arrival to next phase of care; deaths in the bay were excluded. Secondary outcomes included time to initiation and completion of first unit of blood and inpatient mortality. Associations between team dynamics and outcomes were assessed with a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for Injury Severity Score, mechanism, initial blood pressure and heart rate, number of team members, and trauma team lead training level and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients were included. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (interquartile range, 10-34), and most (61%) sustained blunt trauma. The median time to next phase of care was 23.5 minutes (interquartile range, 17-35 minutes). Better leadership, communication, assessment/decision making, and situational awareness scores were associated with faster times to next phase of care (all p < 0.05). Each 1-point worsening in the Non-Technical Skills for Trauma scale score (scale, 5-15) was associated with 1.6 minutes more in the bay. The median resuscitation team size was 12 (interquartile range, 10-15), and larger teams were slower ( p < 0.05). Better situational awareness was associated with faster completion of first unit of blood by 4 to 5 minutes ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Better team performance is associated with faster transitions to next phase of care in hypotensive trauma patients, and larger teams are slower. Trauma team training should focus on optimizing team performance to facilitate faster hemorrhage control.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Use of video review in medicine is established in contexts such as surgery. Although not widely used in the emergency department (ED), some centres use it to evaluate non-technical skills (NTS) to support teaching and quality improvement.

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus on assessment of NTS using video review in the ED and the purpose of this review was to identify tools used in this context.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Studies were identified using Embase, Medline, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Inclusion criterion for the review was NTS of resuscitation teams working within the ED were assessed using video review. A systematic search method was used, and results were synthesised after search criteria was checked by two independent reviewers. Authors settled on the same 9 studies eligible for inclusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS

Reliability and validity of tools identified for use in this context. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, no meta-analysis occurred.

MAIN RESULTS

There are 9 studies included in the review. The review was registered with PROSPERO (Ref No: CRD42022306129). Four unique tools were identified - 6 studies used T-NOTECHS, 1 used TTCA-24, 1 used CALM and 1 used the Communication tool. T-NOTECHS is validated in the literature for use in this context.

CONCLUSION

T-NOTECHS is the tool of choice for assessing ED teams in this context.

Instruments to evaluate non-technical skills during high fidelity simulation: A systematic review

Introduction

High Fidelity Simulations (HFS) are increasingly used to develop Non-Technical Skills (NTS) in healthcare providers, medical and nursing students. Instruments to measure NTS are needed to evaluate the healthcare providers' (HCPs) performance during HFS. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the domains, items, characteristics and psychometric properties of instruments devised to evaluate the NTS of HCPs during HFS.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Cinahl, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ProQuest and PubPsych. Studies evaluating the measurement properties of instruments used to assess NTS during HFS training were included. Pairs of independent reviewers determined the eligibility, extracted and evaluated the data. Risk of bias and appraisal of the methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, and the quality of the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

A total of 3,953 articles were screened. A total of 110 reports were assessed for eligibility and 26 studies were included. Studies were conducted in Europe/United Kingdom (n = 13; 50%), North America/Australia (n = 12; 46%) and Thailand (n = 1; 4%). The NTS instruments reported in this review included from 1 to 14 domains (median of 4, Q1 = 3.75, Q3 = 5) and from 3 to 63 items (median of 15, Q1 = 10, Q3 = 19.75). Out of 19 NTS assessment instruments for HFS, the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) can be recommended for use to assess NTS. All the other instruments require further research to assess their quality in order to be recommended for use during HFS training. Eight NTS instruments had a positive overall rating of their content validity with at least a moderate quality of evidence.

Conclusion

Among a large variety of published instruments, TEAM can be recommended for use to assess NTS during HFS. Evidence is still limited on essential aspects of validity and reliability of all the other NTS instruments included in this review. Further research is warranted to establish their performance in order to be reliably used for HFS.

The development and measurement properties of the trauma NOn-TECHnical skills (T-NOTECHS) scale: A scoping review

PURPOSE

Conduct a scoping review to critically appraise the development and summarize the evidence on the measurement properties of T-NOTECHS including sensibility, reliability, and validity.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Pubmed and Ovid databases. Studies that described the development process of T-NOTECHS and primary studies that presented evidence of reliability and validity were identified and included. Measurement properties of T-NOTECHS was assessed and summarized under the following: scale development, sensibility, reliability, and validity.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 245 articles with 24 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The T-NOTECHS was developed with an acceptable robust methodology. It has good sensibility with adequate content, face validity, and feasibility. It is a reliable measure of non-technical skills in the setting of trauma video review, which improves with expert raters or extensive training. The T-NOTECHS is a valid discriminative and evaluative instrument that measures non-technical skills of multidisciplinary trauma teams.

CONCLUSIONS

T-NOTECHS provides reliable and valid measurements of non-technical skills of trauma teams, particularly when assessing trauma video review and non-technical skills training interventions by expert raters.

Identifying the relative impact of process- and outcome-related team performance antecedents: a meta-analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to identify, through an exploratory meta-analysis, which process- and outcome-related antecedents have the strongest relationship to overall team performance. The secondary objective is to create an understanding of the extent to which relative research interest in each construct to date has aligned with its reported effects.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses a random-effects meta-analysis on studies that have measured the relationship between at least one process or outcome factor and overall team performance. The number of studies, effect size and between-study variances are captured and analyzed for each process/outcome factor. Prior literature has explored relationships between various process/outcome factors and overall team performance. This study expands on previous literature by examining a comprehensive set of process/outcome factors and their relative impact on overall team performance.

Findings

A meta-analysis of 190 effect sizes extracted from 52 empirical studies over the past two decades (1999–2020) showed the specific process and outcome factors that most strongly contributed to overall team performance were efficiency, schedule and innovation. In addition, only a weak correlation was found between process and outcome factors’ relationships with overall team performance and how often they are studied in the research community.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the body of knowledge on team performance by examining prior research to identify the relevant impact of various process and outcome factors on overall team performance. In addition, this study also assesses the extent to which research interest in these factors has appeared to match their relative impact. Analyzing the relative impact of various process and outcome factors allows researchers and practitioners to better identify methods to create improvement in overall team performance. Based on the findings, prioritizing efficiency, schedule and innovation may promote overall team performance.

Integrative Review of Non-Technical Skills Frameworks to Apply for Air Medical Transfer of Pregnant Women

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most suitable non-technical skills framework to adapt and apply to the air medical transfer of pregnant women.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Science Direct, and Google Scholar.

STUDY SELECTION

We retrieved potentially relevant articles using a predefined combination of keywords extended with truncation and Boolean operators. Database and manual reference searches yielded 569 peer-reviewed articles. We included articles if they presented empirical data and described non-technical or cognitive competency skills frameworks for health care professionals. We discussed any ambiguities regarding inclusion, and they were resolved by consensus. We retained 71 full-text articles for final review.

DATA EXTRACTION

We coded extracted data under four criteria: non-technical skill categories, context of use, psychometric properties, and rating system. We generated descriptive summary tables of the characteristics of existing non-technical skills frameworks based on publication year, method of development, clinical setting, clinical specialty, routine/crisis-based performance, and team/individual performance.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified 42 non-technical skills frameworks from a variety of health care settings. We critically examined context of use and how use in various clinical settings may align with air transfers of pregnant women. Our findings illustrate the importance of team-based and routine performance rather than crisis-focused skills. Maintaining situational awareness throughout all stages of the transfer and communicating effectively with team members, the pregnant woman, and her partner are skills that are particularly important to ensure good outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We selected the Global Assessment of Obstetric Team Performance as the most suitable non-technical skills framework to adapt to the clinical setting of air medical transfer of pregnant women. We considered the clinical specialty, specific non-technical skills required in the setting, the framework's properties, and the requirement to focus on routine team performance.

A scoping review of nontechnical skill assessment tools to evaluate trauma team performance

BACKGROUND

The objective of this scoping review was to identify assessment tools of trauma team performance (outside of technical skills) and assess the validity and reliability of each tool in assessing trauma team performance.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to June 1, 2021. English studies that evaluated trauma team performance using nontechnical skill assessment tools in a simulation or real-world setting were included. Studies were assessed by two independent reviewers for meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data regarding team assessment tools were extracted and synthesized into behavior domains. Each tool was then assessed for validity and reliability.

RESULTS

The literature search returned 4,215 articles with 29 meeting inclusion criteria. Our search identified 12 trauma team performance assessment tools. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 20 [69%]). Twenty studies (69%) assessed trauma team performance in a simulation setting; Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) and Trauma Nontechnical Skills Scale (T-NOTECHS) were the only tools to be applied in a simulation and real-world setting. Most studies assessed trauma team performance using video review technology (n = 17 [59%]). Five overarching themes were designed to encompass behavioral domains captured across the 12 tools: (1) Leadership, (2) Communication, (3) Teamwork, (4) Assessment, and (5) Situation Awareness. The reliability and validity of T-NOTECHS were investigated by the greatest number of studies (n = 13); however, TEAM had the most robust evidence of reliability and validity.

CONCLUSION

We identified 12 trauma team performance tools that assessed nontechnical skills to varying degrees. Trauma Nontechnical Skills Scale and TEAM tools had the most evidence to support their reliability and validity. Considering the limited research in the impact of trauma team performance on patient outcomes, future studies could use video review technology in authentic trauma cases to further study this important relationship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, level IV.

Hand dominance and experience improve bimanual performance on arthroscopic simulator task

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify if experience in arthroscopy confers ambidexterity to the operator and the role of baseline characteristics in arthroscopic simulator performance.

METHODS

A prospective comparative study was carried out across four regional Orthopaedic training centres. Participants were divided into novice, intermediate or experienced groups based on arthroscopic experience. Baseline demographics including age, sex, handedness, and gaming history were also collected. Following familiarisation with the procedure, participants were asked to complete a simulated task requiring bimanual control consisting of visualisation with camera control and manipulation of highlighted objects using a grasping instrument. One attempt using camera control and grasping accuracy per hand was performed by each participant, with scores for each hand collected for analysis. Performance scores for camera alignment, camera path length, grasper path length and grasping efficiency were collected. Time taken to completion was also noted for each attempt.

RESULTS

Fifty-six participants were recruited to the study. A significant difference in grasping efficiency between groups in the dominant hand was demonstrated (p = 0.013). Novices demonstrated laterality with superior performance in grasping efficiency in the dominant hand (p = 0.001). No significant difference was noted between dominant and non-dominant hand performance in the experienced group.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic simulation-based training is a valuable learning tool for orthopaedic training. This study demonstrated that experienced orthopaedic surgeons have a greater degree of ambidexterity than intermediate or novice groups, hypothesised by authors to be conferred through conventional orthopaedic training. Dedicated bimanual control tasks to reduce laterality in trainees should be incorporated in simulated surgical curricula.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Validation in Spanish of the Ottawa scale for non-technical skills in health personnel in crisis situations

INTRODUCTION

Non-technical skills are related to morbi-mortality in medicine; it has been proposed that 46% of fatal outcomes are explained to limitations in non-technical skills and only 5% to technical skills deficiencies, however, there is no validated instrument or scale in spanish that allows its evaluation in the management of medical crisis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of a Spanish-adapted version of the "Ottawa crisis resource management (CRM) global rating scale (GRS)" in medical staff involved in critical decision-making based in high-fidelity simulation, which could be beneficial to impact patient safety and improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Transversal cultural instrument validation and adaptation study, included 91 participants who simulated a medical crisis between 2018 and 2019, and to whom the Spanish version of the CRM-GRS was applied in order to evaluate its psychometric properties.

RESULTS

A cultural adaptation with translation into Spanish of the CRM-GRS was made. Subsequently, the scale was applied to 91 participants. An internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) greater than 0.9 was found in each dimension. The level of inter-rater reliability, evaluated by the interclass coefficient was 0.59 to 0.69, and test-retest reliability with an interclass coefficient greater than 0.7. The validity of the convergent construct was moderate (interclass coefficient between 0.6 and 0.7 for all domains) and the validity of the divergent construct between 0.4 and 0.5 was found adequate.

CONCLUSION

The translated and adapted Spanish version of the CRM-GRS in crisis had adequate internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity.

Validation in spanish of the Ottawa scale for non-techical skills in health personnel in crisis situations

INTRODUCTION

Non-technical skills are related to morbi-mortality in medicine; it has been proposed that 46% of fatal outcomes are explained to limitations in non-technical skills and only 5% to technical skills deficiencies, however, there is no validated instrument or scale in spanish that allows its evaluation in the management of medical crisis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of a Spanish-adapted version of the "Ottawa crisis resource management (CRM) global rating scale (GRS)" in medical staff involved in critical decision-making based in high-fidelity simulation, which could be beneficial to impact patient safety and improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Transversal cultural instrument validation and adaptation study, included 91 participants who simulated a medical crisis between 2018 and 2019, and to whom the Spanish version of the CRM-GRS was applied in order to evaluate its psychometric properties.

RESULTS

A cultural adaptation with translation into Spanish of the CRM-GRS was made. Subsequently, the scale was applied to 91 participants. An internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) greater than 0.9 was found in each dimension. The level of inter-rater reliability, evaluated by the interclass coefficient was 0.59 to 0.69, and test-retest reliability with an interclass coefficient greater than 0.7. The validity of the convergent construct was moderate (interclass coefficient between 0.6 and 0.7 for all domains) and the validity of the divergent construct between 0.4 and 0.5 was found adequate.

CONCLUSION

The translated and adapted Spanish version of the CRM-GRS in crisis had adequate internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity.

Physicians' perceptions of followership in resuscitation in Japan and the USA: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

While leadership is accepted as a crucial aspect of a successful resuscitation team, the role of followership has not been sufficiently explored. This study aims to explore physicians' perceptions of common favourable followership in resuscitation teams in two different countries.

DESIGN

A qualitative study with interviews and a reflexive thematic analysis.

SETTING

The authors individually interviewed critical care and emergency physicians whose clinical experience exceeded 6 years in Japan and the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 18 physicians participated in a face-to-face, semistructured and in-depth interviews.

RESULTS

Five themes and nine subthemes related to followership in resuscitation were identified. Under technical skills, two themes (being knowledgeable and skilled) and three subthemes (understanding guidelines/algorithms, clinical course and being competent with procedural skills), were generated. Under non-technical skills, three themes (assuming roles, team communication and flattening hierarchy) and six subthemes (taking roles spontaneously, calm tone of voice, sharing information, closed-loop communication, respectful attitude and speaking up), were generated. Each generated theme involved commonly perceived favourable attributes of followership in resuscitation teams by experienced critical care and emergency physicians in both countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clarified physicians' perception of common favourable followership attributes in resuscitation teams, both in Japan and in the USA. The results of this study shed light on followership-focused resuscitation education, where followership skills are generally underestimated.

Costs of hospital trauma team simulation training: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the costs of 2-hour multiprofessional in situ hospital trauma team simulation training and its effects on teams' non-technical skills using the T-NOTECHS instrument.

BACKGROUND

Simulation is a feasible and effective teaching and learning method. Calculating the costs of simulated trauma team training in medical emergency situations can yield valuable information for improving its overall cost-effectiveness.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Trauma resuscitation room in Central Finland Hospital, Finland.

PARTICIPANTS

475 medical professionals in 81 consecutive, simulated trauma teams.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Team simulation training costs in 2017 and 2018 were analysed in the following two phases: (1) start-up costs and (2) costs of education. Primary outcome measures were training costs per participant and training costs per team. Secondary outcome measures were non-technical skills, which were measured on a 5-25-point scale using the T-NOTECHS instrument.

RESULTS

The annual mean total costs of trauma team simulation training were €58 000 for 40 training sessions and 238 professionals. Mean cost per participant was €203. Mean cost per team was €1220. The annual costs of simulation training markedly decreased when at least 70-80 teams participated in the training. Mean change in T-NOTECHS score after simulation training was +2.86 points (95% CI 1.97 to 3.75;+14.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The greater the number of teams trained per year, the lower the costs per trauma team. In this study, we developed an activity-based costing method to calculate the costs of trauma team simulation training to help stakeholders make decisions about whether to initiate or increase existing trauma team simulation training or to obtain these services elsewhere.