"Can virtue be taught?": a content analysis of medical students' opinions of the professional and ethical challenges to their professional identity formation

Professional Identity Formation in Medical Education: Some Virtue-Based Insights

Issue: In 2010, the Carnegie Foundation published a call to reorient medical education in terms of the formation of identities rather than mere competencies, and the medical education literature on professional identity formation (PIF) has since grown rapidly. As medical learners navigate a hectic clinical learning environment fraught with challenges to professionalism and ethics, they must simultaneously orient their skills, behaviors, and evolving sense of professional identity. The medical education literature on PIF describes the psychosocial dimensions of that identity formation well. However, in its conceptual formulations, the literature risks underappreciating the pedagogical significance of the moral basis of identity formation-that is, the developing moral agencies and aspirations of learners to be good physicians. Evidence: Our conceptual analysis and argument build on a critical review of the medical education literature on PIF and draw on relevant insights from virtue ethics to deepen the conceptualization of PIF in moral, and not just psychosocial, terms. We show that a narrowly psychosocial view risks perpetuating institutional perceptions that can conceive professionalism norms primarily as standards of discipline or social control. By drawing on the conceptual resources of virtue ethics, we highlight not just the psychosocial development of medical learners but also their self-reflective, critical development as particular moral agents aspiring to embody the excellences of a good physician and, ultimately, to exhibit those traits and behaviors in the practice of medicine. Implications: We consider the pedagogical relevance of this insight. We show that drawing on virtue theory can more adequately orient medical pedagogy to socialize learners into the medical community in ways that nurture their personal growth as moral agents-in terms of their particular, restless aspirations to be a good physician and to flourish as such.

Virtues in Competency-Based Assessment Frameworks: A Text Analysis

Introduction

Official documentation of specialty training provides comprehensive and elaborate criteria to assess residents. These criteria are commonly described in terms of competency roles and entrustable professional activities (EPA's), but they may also implicitly encompass virtues. Virtues are desirable personal qualities that enable a person, in this case, a medical specialist, to make and act on the right decisions. We articulate these virtues and explore the resulting implied ideal of a medical professional.

Method

We applied a two-staged virtue ethical content analysis to analyze documents, specific to the Dutch training program of the Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) specialty. First, we identified explicit references to virtues. Next, we articulated implicit virtues through interpretation. The results were categorized into cardinal, intellectual, moral, and professional virtues.

Results

Thirty virtues were identified in the ENT- training program. Amongst them, practical wisdom, temperance, and commitment. Furthermore, integrity, curiosity, flexibility, attentiveness, trustworthiness and calmness are often implicitly assumed. Notable findings are the emphasis on efficiency and effectiveness. Together, these virtues depict an ideal of a future medical specialist.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that competency-frameworks and EPA's implicitly appeal to virtues and articulate a specific ideal surgeon. Explicit attention for virtue development and discussion of the role and relevance of implied ideal professionals in terms of virtues could further improve specialty training.

Sustaining the Intrinsic Motivations of the "Good Physician": A Content Analysis of Medical Students' and Physicians' Responses from Two National Surveys

OBJECTIVE

Physician motivation has been described as the reason, purpose, and force that drives people to pursue their work, and motivating factors include those that are intrinsic or extrinsic to the work. Social forces may contribute to motivational disparities between medical school and actual practice.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis of two national surveys (medical students and practicing physicians from various specialties) was conducted. Content analysis was performed on open-ended survey items that elicited students' and physicians' responses to meaningful experiences in medicine.

RESULTS

In the medical student sample, four themes were identified as factors intrinsic to medicine: role models, clinical experiences, patient interactions, and peer interactions. In total, intrinsic factors comprised 86.5% (193/208) of coded responses. In the practicing physician sample, five themes were identified as factors intrinsic to medicine: difficult patient interactions, conflict with colleagues or staff, meaningful patient interactions, involvement in medical education-research-academia, and medicine as a calling/mission. In total, intrinsic factors comprised 24.0% (140/582) of coded responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the reality of social forces in medicine threatens the ability of practicing physicians to derive meaning from their work, although students and physicians still report intrinsic motivation from establishing meaningful relationships. Further research is needed to explore what strategies enable physicians to wisely navigate the dynamic interactions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators over various stages of their careers. These strategies could include encouraging reflective spaces in physicians' workplaces that have a specific focus on sustaining intrinsic motivation in medicine.

Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review

BACKGROUND

Despite its ubiquity in academic research, the phrase 'ethical challenge(s)' appears to lack an agreed definition. A lack of a definition risks introducing confusion or avoidable bias. Conceptual clarity is a key component of research, both theoretical and empirical. Using a rapid review methodology, we sought to review definitions of 'ethical challenge(s)' and closely related terms as used in current healthcare research literature.

METHODS

Rapid review to identify peer-reviewed reports examining 'ethical challenge(s)' in any context, extracting data on definitions of 'ethical challenge(s)' in use, and synonymous use of closely related terms in the general manuscript text. Data were analysed using content analysis. Four databases (MEDLINE, Philosopher's Index, EMBASE, CINAHL) were searched from April 2016 to April 2021.

RESULTS

393 records were screened, with 72 studies eligible and included: 53 empirical studies, 17 structured reviews and 2 review protocols. 12/72 (17%) contained an explicit definition of 'ethical challenge(s), two of which were shared, resulting in 11 unique definitions. Within these 11 definitions, four approaches were identified: definition through concepts; reference to moral conflict, moral uncertainty or difficult choices; definition by participants; and challenges linked to emotional or moral distress. Each definition contained one or more of these approaches, but none contained all four. 68/72 (94%) included studies used terms closely related to synonymously refer to 'ethical challenge(s)' within their manuscript text, with 32 different terms identified and between one and eight different terms mentioned per study.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 12/72 studies contained an explicit definition of 'ethical challenge(s)', with significant variety in scope and complexity. This variation risks confusion and biasing data analysis and results, reducing confidence in research findings. Further work on establishing acceptable definitional content is needed to inform future bioethics research.

Core elements of character education essential for doctors suggested by medical students in Korea: a preliminary study

This preliminary study aimed to determine how medical students perceive character education in Korea. A structured survey questionnaire was distributed to 10 medical students between September and December 2018, of whom 6 students replied. Students’ responses were classified into elements, which were also categorized. Twenty-nine core elements of characters in 8 categories were verified as essential for doctors and as needs for character education. The most frequently suggested categories were “care and respect,” “empathy and communication,” and “responsibility and calling.” Participants also stated that various forms of character education are necessary and that they were not satisfied with the teaching methods of the character education that they had received. These results verified the most essential character traits for doctors and identified problems related to current character education. The results of this study will be helpful for preparing the character education curriculum in medical schools.