SIESTA: a quick interprofessional learning activity fostering collaboration and communication between paediatric nursing trainees and medical students

The effectiveness of interprofessional peer-led teaching and learning for therapeutic radiography students and Speech and Language Therapy students

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic Radiographers (RT) and Speech and Language Therapists (SLT) work closely together in caring for people with head and neck cancer and need a strong understanding of each others' roles. Peer teaching has been shown to be one of the most effective methods of teaching; however, no studies to date, have involved RT and SLT students. This research aims to establish the effectiveness and perceptions of peer-led teaching between undergraduate RT and SLT students in Ulster University.

METHODS

Twenty SLT students and 14 RT students participated. Knowledge tests were taken online before the peer-led teaching session (T1), after the session (T2) and 3 months later (T3). Students' perceptions of the experience were collected at the end of the session. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyse the impact of the intervention on knowledge scores. Qualitative content analysis was used for open text response data.

RESULTS

RT students' own professional knowledge score at T2 was statistically significantly higher than the score at T1; the score at T3 was not deemed to be statistically significantly higher. RT students' SLT knowledge score at T2 and T3 was found to be statistically significantly higher than the score at T1. SLT students' own professional knowledge score was not statistically significantly higher at T2 or T3 than T1. They did have a statistically significantly higher score at T2 on the RT test, but score at T3 was not deemed to be statistically significantly higher. The majority of students across both professions agreed or strongly agreed that the peer-led teaching experience had a positive impact on their learning.

CONCLUSION

This investigation highlights the benefits of an interprofessional peer-led teaching intervention for RT and SLT students and the findings add to the evidence of more objective study of knowledge gain as a result of interprofessional peer teaching.

Team Stress and Its Impact on Interprofessional Teams: A Narrative Review

Phenomenon: Interprofessional healthcare team (IHT) collaboration can produce powerful clinical benefits for patients; however, these benefits are difficult to harness when IHTs work in stressful contexts. Research about stress in healthcare typically examines stress as an individual psychological phenomenon, but stress is not only a person-centered experience. Team stress also affects the team's performance. Unfortunately, research into team stress is limited and scattered across many disciplines. We cannot prepare future healthcare professionals to work as part of IHTs in high-stress environments (e.g., emergency medicine, disaster response) unless we review how this dispersed literature is relevant to medical education. Approach: The authors conducted a narrative review of the literature on team stress experienced by interprofessional teams. The team searched five databases between 1 Jan 1990 and 16 August 2021 using the search terms: teams AND stress AND performance. Guided by four research questions, the authors reviewed and abstracted data from the 22 relevant manuscripts. Findings: Challenging problems, time pressure, life threats, environmental distractors, and communication issues are the stressors that the literature reports that teams faced. Teams reacted to team stress with engagement/cohesion and communication/coordination. Stressors impact team stress by either hindering or improving team performance. Critical thinking/decision-making, team behaviors, and time for task completion were the areas of performance affected by team stress. High-quality communication, non-technical skills training, and shared mental models were identified as performance safeguards for teams experiencing team stress. Insights: The review findings adjust current models explaining drivers of efficient and effective teams within the context of interprofessional teams. By understanding how team stress impacts teams, we can better prepare healthcare professionals to work in IHTs to meet the demands placed on them by the ever-increasing rate of high-stress medical situations.

Challenges and opportunities of evaluating work based interprofessional learning: insights from a pediatric interprofessional training ward

Introduction

Interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals is fostered through interprofessional education (IPE). Work-based IPE has demonstrated effectiveness within interprofessional training wards. We developed the Interprofessional Training Ward in Pediatrics (IPAPED) and employ a combination of established assessment tools and a newly created IPAPED questionnaire, directed at to assess both students' learning experiences and program structure. This paper presents the development and analysis of the psychometric properties of the IPAPED questionnaire.

Methods

Nursing trainees and medical students participated in IPAPED. The IPAPED questionnaire was developed to complement established instruments, based on IPE frameworks. Interprofessional collaboration and communication were represented in subscales in part 1 of the questionnaire. Part 2 focused on the IPAPED program itself. Statistical analyses included calculation of internal consistency for part 1 and exploratory factor analyses for part 2.

Results

All IPAPED participants between November 2017 and November 2022 completed the questionnaire (n = 105). 94 of 105 questionnaires were analyzed. Internal consistency for part 1 was low (Cronbach's α <0.58). Exploratory factor analyses revealed three distinct factors: teaching and learning material, interprofessional learning facilitation and professional guidance by nurses on the ward.

Discussion

Our results illustrate the challenge of performing high quality, theory based evaluation in a work-based setting. However, exploratory factor analyses highlighted the opportunity of focusing on both learning facilitators and staff on the wards to ensure a maximum learning output for participants. Developing program-specific questionnaires to gain insight into local structures has the potential to improve work-based IPE formats.

'We just did it as a team': Learning and working on a paediatric interprofessional training ward improves interprofessional competencies in the short- and in the long-term

PURPOSE

Interprofessional (IP) education is essential for healthcare professionals to prepare them for future IP collaboration. IP training wards (ITWs) have been established for work-based IP education. Short-term effects of ITW placements have been published but long-term results are scarce. There are no reports on ITWs in paediatrics. We established the Interprofessional Training Ward in Paediatrics (IPAPAED) for paediatric nursing trainees and medical students. The aim of the study is to evaluate both short- and long-term outcomes regarding IP competencies of IPAPAED participants.

METHODS

The study was designed as a prospective, non-randomized trial, using a mixed-methods design. The Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS-9A/B) and the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS) were used for quantitative evaluation, qualitative data were gathered from structured group discussions and free-text comments. Data were collected from 68 IPAPAED participants, before and after the rotation, and 6-34 months later.Results: IPAPAED participants showed increased global scores in the ISVS 9 A/B and rated their communication competencies and their accommodation in IP teams better (ICS). Improvements in communication competency and accommodation persisted at 6-34 months.Conclusions: IP learning and working on IPAPAED had positive short-term effects on interprofessional competencies. Some of these effects persisted on a long-term.

Black Women Faculty and Administrators Navigating COVID-19, Social Unrest, and Academia: Challenges and Strategies

Black women faculty and administrators in the United States are tackling a force of socioeconomic and racial disparities, emotional tolls and invisible burdens within academia, political turmoil, social unrest, and public health crises. COVID-19 has added an additional layer related to work responsibilities, the overall well-being of Black women faculty and administrators and the diverse students they encounter, and management of work and home responsibilities. This paper discusses perspectives and evidence-based strategies regarding Black women faculty and administrators who navigate academia and teach during times of COVID-19 and social unrest. We also outline strategies for university leaders to mitigate cultural and racial gaps in the classroom or workplace and foster diversity and inclusion in academia.