Using a mixed method to develop consensus-based aims, contents, intended learning outcomes, teaching, and evaluation methods for a course on epilepsy for postgraduate or continuing education in community health nursing programs

"Walking the Journey Together": Creating a unique learning module in provider-patient communication for the care of epilepsy in Uganda

OBJECTIVE

This report documents the creation of a practical communication skills module about epilepsy care, specifically targeted at first-line care providers who treat patients with epilepsy in Uganda.

METHODS

Our team conducted semi-structured interviews, utilizing Zoom video conferencing, with Ugandan physicians specializing in epilepsy care. Our interview guide promoted a semi-structured conversational interview that explored aspects related to developing a patient-provider relationship, how epilepsy is described in a culturally appropriate manner, exploration of alternative treatments, the impact of the stigma of epilepsy, and facilitators and barriers to antiepileptic drug treatment adherence. Each interview was then transcribed, and an inductive thematic content analysis approach was utilized to facilitate the development of thematic communication and care subcategories. The resulting PowerPoint presentation included numerous short audio clips of our Ugandan experts suggesting effective ways of communicating with patients and their families.

RESULTS

Our interviews with experts yielded valuable results to customize the WHO mhGAP v2.0 training program to be culturally relevant and effective in Uganda. The educational content consisted of topic summaries integrated with audio clips taken directly from our interviews with the Ugandan providers. Six themes emerged that would serve as the outline for the communication module we co-created with our Ugandan colleagues: The six major themes of the module included: (1) Greeting the patient, (2) Getting the story, (3) Traditional healers, (4) Stigma of epilepsy, (5) Explaining epilepsy, and (6) Treatment adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

The communications skills teaching module addresses the most critical aspects of communicating with patients and families living with epilepsy. The format of the presentation, which includes the written and spoken words of experts in epilepsy care, provides a practical approach to the provider-patient interaction, and confronts the stigma associated with this disease. This formatting highlights an effective way for international groups to co-create content in a culturally effective manner.

Development of Consensus-Based Recommendations to Prevent/Minimize Medication Errors in the Perioperative Care of Patients with Epilepsy: A Mixed-Method

BACKGROUND

This study explored medication errors in the perioperative care of patients with epilepsy and developed consensus-based recommendations to prevent/minimize these errors.

METHODS

A mixed method was used in this study. Medication error situations were explored in semi-structured in-depth interviews with nurses (n = 12), anesthesiologists (n = 5), anesthesia technicians (n = 5), surgeons (n = 4), neurologists (n = 4), and patients with epilepsy (n = 10). The qualitative data were analyzed using the qualitative interpretive description approach. A two-round Delphi technique was used among nurses (n = 22), anesthesiologists (n = 9), anesthesia technicians (n = 7), surgeons (n = 7), and neurologists (n = 5).

RESULTS

A total of 1400 minutes of interview time was analyzed in this study. Of the panelists, 39 (78.0%) agreed that patients with epilepsy present unique challenges to providers of perioperative care that make them prone to medication errors. The interviewees in this study described 32 different medication error situations that occurred while providing perioperative care services to patients with epilepsy. In this study, 35 consensus-based recommendations to prevent/minimize medication errors in the perioperative care of patients with epilepsy were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study are informative to decision-makers in health care facilities and other stakeholders in health regulatory authorities who need to design measures to prevent/minimize medication errors and improve perioperative outcomes of patients with epilepsy. Studies are needed to investigate if these recommendations can be effective in preventing/reducing medication errors in the perioperative care of patients with epilepsy.

Development of the Practice of Pharmaceutical Care for Cancer Pain Management in Outpatient Clinics Using the Delphi Method

Background: There exists no broad agreement of experts on the practice of pharmaceutical care for cancer pain management in outpatient clinics. Objectives: This study aimed to use the Delphi consensus process to provide expert recommendations on the practice of cancer pain management in outpatient clinics from the point of view of pharmaceutical care in clinical practice and future clinical trials. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to draft the initial practice. In this process, 30-40 senior experts from various provinces in China were invited to rank the items of practice during the two Delphi consultations. The definitions of consensus included a combination with an average score of ≥4, the percentage of experts rating the scores at >4 points, and the coefficient of variation of the scores. Results: The expert panel comprised 18 pharmacists, 3 anesthesiologists, 6 oncologists, and 9 nurses. As a result of a comprehensive review, 33 items were initially formed. Among them, the consensus was reached for 27 items after the first Delphi round. The other six items and a total of five items for supplementation entered the second round, among which consensus was reached for eight items and three items were excluded. Expert consensus was achieved on 35 items after two rounds of consultation, which involved the collection of patient basic information, comprehensive pain assessment, breakthrough or neuropathic pain assessment, analgesic treatment evaluation, out-of-hospital follow-up, medical records, and evidence-based documents for reference. Conclusion: The final list of 35 items could be used to develop the practice of pharmaceutical care for cancer pain management in outpatient clinics in China. The practice may aid in the standardization of pharmaceutical care for pain, relieve pain to the greatest extent possible, and enhance the level of pain management in China.

Caring for women with epilepsy in Palestine: A qualitative study of the current status

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study was conducted to explore the current status of caring for women with epilepsy (WWE) in the Palestinian healthcare system.

METHODS

This study used an explorative qualitative design. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit the participants. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with neurologists (n = 6), gynecologists (n = 5), psychiatrists (n = 3), an internist (n = 1), and clinical pharmacists (n = 5). The interpretive description methodology was used to thematically analyze the qualitative data.

RESULTS

A total of 745 min (12.4 h) of interview time were analyzed. The qualitative data collected in this study were categorized under 3 major themes and multiple subthemes. The 3 major themes were: (1) diagnosis and care for patients with epilepsy, (2) general issues in caring for patients with epilepsy, and (3) consideration of women's issues in the pharmacotherapy of epilepsy. Formally adopted protocols/criteria for the diagnosis and care for WWE were lacking.

CONCLUSION

Findings of this qualitative study showed a need to formally adopt uniform guidelines that can guide the diagnosis and care of WWE in the Palestinian healthcare system. The findings of this study might be informative to healthcare providers, decision-makers in healthcare authorities, WWE, and patient advocacy groups who could be interested in improving and benchmarking healthcare services provided to WWE. Future studies are still needed to quantitatively measure adherence to the international guidelines in caring for WWE.

Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) are being developed as a response to artemisinin and partner drug resistance in Southeast Asia. However, the desirability, timing and practical feasibility of introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia is subject to debate. This study systematically assesses perspectives of malaria experts towards the introduction of TACTs as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Southeast Asia.

METHODS

A two-round Delphi study was conducted. In the first round, 53 malaria experts answered open-ended questions on what they consider the most important advantages, disadvantages, and implementation barriers for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia. In the second round, the expert panel rated the relevance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Malaria experts identified 15 advantages, 15 disadvantages and 13 implementation barriers for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia in the first round of data collection. In the second round, consensus was reached on 13 advantages (8 perceived as relevant, 5 as not-relevant), 12 disadvantages (10 relevant, 2 not-relevant), and 13 implementation barriers (all relevant). Advantages attributed highest relevance related to the clinical and epidemiological rationale of introducing TACTs. Disadvantages attributed highest relevance related to increased side-effects, unavailability of fixed-dose TACTs, and potential cost increases. Implementation barriers attributed highest relevance related to obtaining timely regulatory approval, timely availability of fixed-dose TACTs, and generating global policy support for introducing TACTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides a structured oversight of malaria experts' perceptions on the major advantages, disadvantages and implementation challenges for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia, over current practices of rotating ACTs when treatment failure is observed. The findings can benefit strategic decision making in the battle against drug-resistant malaria.

Caring for women with epilepsy: Qualitative exploration of key challenges and future directions in a resource poor healthcare system

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative explorative study was conducted to explore the key challenges and future directions of caring for women with epilepsy (WWE) from the perspectives of healthcare professionals who provide care for WWE in Palestine.

METHODS

A qualitative explorative design was used in this study in adherence to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. The study participants were interviewed in semi-structured in-depth interviews using a pre-validated and pilot-tested interview schedule. The interpretative description approach was used to qualitatively analyze the contents of the interviews.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 6 neurologists, 5 gynecologists, 3 psychiatrists, 5 clinical pharmacists, and 1 internal medicine specialist. The current challenges and future directions in caring for WWE were grouped under healthcare system-, healthcare provider-, patient-, and society-related. Lack of adequate availability, accessibility, and affordability of neurology services and safe antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were the main challenges. Increasing access of WWE to specialized neurology services and improving acceptance in the society were the main future directions.

CONCLUSION

Findings of this study highlighted the key challenges and future directions of caring for WWE in a resource-poor healthcare system. Decision makers in health authorities, professional bodies, and patient advocacy groups should consider improving availability, accessibility, and affordability of neurology services and safe AEDs for WWE. Future studies are still needed to investigate if addressing these challenges can improve the care of WWE in Palestine.