Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions

Application of health technology assessment: a new need for an ethical neonatology

New health technologies are constantly developing. However, their impacts on health and implications for health systems are not always clear. Faced with this situation, in the last 45 years, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has taken an important role in the decision-making process related to the implementation of technologies in healthcare systems. According to the Core Model® EUnetHTA, a "full HTA" should cover nine domains: health problems and current use of technology, description and technical characteristics, safety, clinical effectiveness, costs and economic evaluation, ethical analysis, organizational aspects, patients and social aspects, legal aspects. In all domains of a HTA, the approach is evidence-based and uses epidemiological data, systematic reviews to gather the best level of proofs regarding clinical efficacy and safety of interventions and comparators and organizational and economic models. One exception is the ethical analysis, that uses value-based approach. Although in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) there are highly advanced technological environments, HTA has not yet been widely used in this field for determining the "value" of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. An example of diagnostic tool used in NICUs is the near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), a noninvasive device that enables real-time monitoring of the condition of peripheral tissues in critically ill newborns. The availability of this diagnostic tool could improve the choice of the most appropriate treatment to the clinical situation of the newborn. The expected benefit of NIRS motivates the need of a full HTA.    Conclusion: HTA is still little used in Neonatal Critical Care, but it may be the appropriate tool to determine the "value" of technologies used in this field. The implementation of clinical trials and HTA may help in an evidence-based evaluation of new technologies for the neonatal critical care. This could facilitate the rapid introduction of the best health technologies into clinical practice. What is Known: • Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has taken an important role in the decision-making process related to the implementation of technologies in healthcare systems • The centrality of ethics in HTA has been known. In fact, ethics is everywhere in HTA, and value judgments permeate all levels of HTA What is New: • HTA is still little used in Neonatal Critical Care, but it may be the appropriate tool to determine the "value" of technologies used in this field • The implementation of clinical trials and HTA may help in an evidence-based evaluation of new technologies for the neonatal critical care and in introduction of the best and ethically acceptable health technologies into clinical practice.

The role of ethical analysis in conducting a health technology assessment of medical treatments for gender dysphoria

Objectives

Treatment seeking for gender dysphoria (GD) has increased manifold in western countries. This has led to increased interest on evidence-base of treatments, but also discussions related to human rights, identity politics, gender-related structures, and medicalization. Combining these discourses into coherent health policy is difficult. Health technology assessment (HTA) is the golden standard for assessing whether a medical intervention should be included in a health system. A comprehensive HTA should include medical, safety, and cost-utility perspectives, but often also ethical, societal, organizational, and legal concerns. Still, ethics is often omitted in practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how integrated ethical analysis influenced a HTA of complex and controversial topics like GD.

Methods

A HTA of medical treatments of GD was conducted using integrated ethical analysis based on the EUnetHTA-model. This integrates ethical thinking into the whole HTA, explicitly analyses ethical topics, and balances arguments using several ethical theories.

Results

Integrating ethics had a significant impact on the HTA process and recommendations. It influenced how the HTA was planned and executed, emphasized autonomy and justice when creating the recommendations, and helped the workgroup to understand the complexity of combining different stakeholders’ discourses. Tensions between scientific evidence, expectations, and values became explicit.

Conclusions

Comprehensive HTA provides an important, integrative approach to considering complex and controversial topics in health systems. HTA emphasizes multidisciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach but simultaneously forces a pragmatic, results-oriented, and evidence-based approach on all argumentation. Ethical analysis can facilitate interactions between stakeholders, bridge different discourses, and help formulate widely acceptable guidelines and policy decisions.

Evidence-Based Decision Making 3: Health Technology Assessment

This chapter begins with a brief introduction to health technology assessment (HTA). HTA is concerned with the systematic evaluation of the consequences of the adoption and use of new health technologies and to improve the evidence on existing technologies. The objective of mainstream HTA is to support evidence-based decision- and policy-making that encourage the uptake of efficient and effective health-care technologies. This chapter provides a basic framework for conducting an HTA, as well as some fundamental concepts and challenges in assessing health technologies. Whether HTA is beneficial-supporting timely access to needed technologies-or detrimental depends on three critical issues: when the assessment is performed; how it is performed; and how the findings are used.

[Ethics in health technology assessment. Review]

INTRODUCTION

Bioethics and the health technologies assessment emerged to help make decisions. The objective of the work was to know, with respect to the health technologies assessment, the scientific production on its ethical issues, the degree of incorporation of these in practice, the inclusion of the values in the deliberative processes and the most relevant approaches to ethical analysis.

METHODOLOGY

A narrative review was made, based on a systematic search of literature in both natural and hierarchical language, using the terms technology assessment biomedical, ethics and deliberation (and its related terms). All types of papers published between May 2007 and April 2017 in Spanish, French, English or Italian that included both ethical aspects and health technology assessment were included. The PUBMED, OVID-Medline, Scopus databases and secondary searches were explored from the identified works. The information was extracted by a single researcher and managed with Mendeley and EPIINFO 7.2.

RESULTS

A total of 141 papers were identified, including 85 after revision by title and summary, with the following characteristics: 29 reviews (5 systematic), 16 frameworks, 18 methodological works and 29 with description of experiences. Multiple frameworks, approaches and methods in ethical analysis were identified.

CONCLUSION

The health technologies assessment has an approach excessively mechanistic, and can be improved by incorporating the values of the stakeholder, through deliberative processes. The methods of ethical analysis that seem most suitable are the axiological ones and those developed specifically for the health technologies assessment.

Evaluation of Ethical Analyses in Seven Reports from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment

OBJECTIVES

Ethics has been considered among the core domains of health technology assessment (HTA), but there are still disputes regarding ethical analysis. This study aimed to examine full final reports of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) in terms of their compliance with the ethical methodology and ethical perspective of the HTA Core Model®.

METHODS

The study examines seven full final HTA reports of EUnetHTA written based on the methodology proposed in the HTA Core Model®. The reports were analyzed using the following parameters: competency of the person/group who conducted ethical analysis, assessment elements, and the methodology of ethical analysis.

RESULTS

The results show that, although the HTA Core Model® helped to standardize the final reports of the assessment, there are still concerns regarding the competency of the ethical analysis team, the perspectives on the purpose of ethical analysis, data sources and viewpoints of various stakeholders, use of ethical analysis methodology, and the evaluation of the ethical appropriateness of the entire HTA process.

CONCLUSIONS

The HTA Core Model® helped to standardize the final reports on the HTA; however, not all issues with the content and outcomes were solved. The lack of expertise in ethics and insufficiency of the teams regarding ethical analysis are other existing problems. This study also demonstrated that stakeholder viewpoints in general and patient perspectives, in particular, have been overlooked in the HTA process.

Evaluating facts and facting evaluations: On the fact-value relationship in HTA

Health technology assessment (HTA) is an evaluation of health technologies in terms of facts and evidence. However, the relationship between facts and values is still not clear in HTA. This is problematic in an era of "fake facts" and "truth production." Accordingly, the objective of this study is to clarify the relationship between facts and values in HTA. We start with the perspectives of the traditional positivist account of "evaluating facts" and the social-constructivist account of "facting values." Our analysis reveals diverse relationships between facts and a spectrum of values, ranging from basic human values, to the values of health professionals, and values of and in HTA, as well as for decision making. We argue for sensitivity to the relationship between facts and values on all levels of HTA, for being open and transparent about the values guiding the production of facts, and for a primacy for the values close to the principal goals of health care, ie, relieving suffering. We maintain that philosophy (in particular ethics) may have an important role in addressing the relationship between facts and values in HTA. Philosophy may help us to avoid fallacies of inferring values from facts; to disentangle the normative assumptions in the production or presentation of facts and to tease out implicit value judgements in HTA; to analyse evaluative argumentation relating to facts about technologies; to address conceptual issues of normative importance; and to promote reflection on HTA's own value system. In this we argue for a(n Aristotelian) middle way between the traditional positivist account of "evaluating facts" and the social-constructivist account of "facting values," which we call "factuation." We conclude that HTA is unique in bringing together facts and values and that being conscious and explicit about this "factuation" is key to making HTA valuable to both individual decision makers and society as a whole.

Bioethics: a challenge and an opportunity for hospital pharmacists

Objectives

Traditionally, pharmacy ethics in Europe has held an insignificant place in the scheme of pharmaceutical education. We embraced the idea that bioethics should be an integral part of a pharmacist's education and professional practice, especially in hospital pharmacy where the concept of 'pharmaceutical care' should be revitalised to strengthen the broad-based and patient-oriented responsibilities of the clinical pharmacist.

Methods

We decided to structure a bioethics course tailored to pharmacists who are specialising in hospital pharmacy. We first created a training network partnership between a university and a research hospital to integrate classroom teaching with skill-specific practical experience. Our course pilot project introduces, in two of the four years of the national specialty programme, general topics and practical bioethical issues.

Results

A pilot course on ethics for the School of Specialisation in Hospital Pharmacy began at the Padua University in 2014. in February 2017 we contacted the same students again, asking them further questions about their experience. Several students asked to examine more cases and to deal with the few arguments that questioned them on an ethical level. On the whole, through the comments of trainees, the needs of those who are facing an unfamiliar subject, which is perceived as important, emerge.

Conclusion

Even if we are aware that this is a pilot project and requires more data, dissemination of this experience into a wider network will help us to define an effective educational pathway in collaboration with other Specialty Schools of Hospital Pharmacy.

Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments

Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness.

Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use.

Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations’ websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA.

Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains – the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values.

Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue.

OP104 Health Technology Assessment's Ethical Evaluation: Understanding The Diversity Of Approaches

INTRODUCTION:

The main difficulties encountered in the integration of ethics in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) were identified in our systematic review. In the process of analyzing these difficulties we then addressed the question of the diversity of ethical approaches (1) and the difficulties in their operationalization (2,3).

METHODS:

Nine ethical approaches were identified: principlism, casuistry, coherence analysis, wide reflexive equilibrium, axiology, socratic approach, triangular method, constructive technology assessment and social shaping of technology. Three criteria were used to clarify the nature of each of these approaches: 1.

RESULTS:

In HTA, both norm-based ethics and value-based ethics are mobilized. This duality is fundamental since it proposes two different ethical evaluations: the first is based on the conformity to a norm, whereas the second rests on the actualization of values. The disciplinary foundation generates diversity as philosophy, sociology and theology propose different justifications for ethical evaluation. At the operational level, ethical evaluation's characteristics are applied to the case at stake by specific practical reasoning. In a norm-based practical reasoning, one must substantiate the facts that will be correlated to a moral norm for clearly identifying conformity or non-conformity. In value-based practical reasoning, one must identify the impacts of the object of assessment that will be subject to ethical evaluation. Two difficulties arise: how to apply values to facts and prioritize amongst conflicting ethical evaluations of the impacts?

CONCLUSIONS:

Applying these three criteria to ethical approaches in HTA helps understanding their complexity and the difficulty of operationalizing them in HTA tools. The choice of any ethical evaluations is never neutral; it must be justified by a moral point of view. Developing tools for ethics in HTA is operationalizing a specific practical reasoning in ethics.