1
|
Senghor AS, Racine E. How to evaluate the quality of an ethical deliberation? A pragmatist proposal for evaluation criteria and collaborative research. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2022; 25:309-326. [PMID: 35679005 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10091-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Ethics designates a structured process by which important human values and meanings of life are understood and tackled. Therein, the ability to discuss openly and reflect on (aka deliberation) understandings of moral problems, on solutions to these problems, and to explore what a meaningful resolution could amount to is highly valued. However, the indicators of what constitutes a high-quality ethical deliberation remain vague and unclear. This article proposes and develops a pragmatist approach to evaluate the quality of deliberation. Deliberation features three important moments: (1) broadening and deepening the understanding of the situation, (2) envisioning action scenarios, (3) coming to a judgment based on the comparative evaluation of scenarios. In this paper, we propose seven criteria to evaluate ethical deliberations: (1) collaborative diversity, (2) experiential literacy, (3) organization of experiences, (4) reflective capacity to instrumentalize the experiences of others, (5) interactional creativity, (6) openness of agents, (7) quality of the reformulation of scenarios. These criteria are explained and applied to the three moments of deliberation. Based on these criteria, three kinds of outcomes for deliberations are identified and discussed: good ethical deliberations, partial ethical deliberations, bad ethical deliberations. Our proposal will guide researchers and practitioners interested in the evaluation of the quality of ethical deliberations. It provides a reference tool that allows them to identify the possible limitations of a deliberation and to implement actions aimed at correcting these limitations in order to achieve the desired qualitative objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdou Simon Senghor
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Eric Racine
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kok N, Zegers M, van der Hoeven H, Hoedemaekers C, van Gurp J. Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2022; 48:medethics-2021-107943. [PMID: 35584897 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
There is a claim that clinical ethics support services (CESS) improve healthcare quality within healthcare organisations. However, there is lack of strong evidence supporting this claim. Rather, the current focus is on the quality of CESS themselves or on individual learning outcomes. In response, this article proposes a theoretical framework leading to empirical hypotheses that describe the relationship between a specific type of CESS, moral case deliberation and the quality of care at the organisational level. We combine insights from the literature on CESS, organisational learning and quality improvement and argue that moral case deliberation causes healthcare professionals to acquire practical wisdom. At the organisational level, where improving quality is a continuous and collective endeavour, this practical wisdom can be aggregated into morisprudence, which is an ongoing formulation of moral judgements across cases encountered within the organisation. Focusing on the development of morisprudence enables refined scrutinisation of CESS-related quality claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niek Kok
- IQ healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Snoo-Trimp JC, van Gurp JLP, Molewijk AC. Conceptualizing the impact of moral case deliberation: a multiple-case study in a health care institution for people with intellectual disabilities. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:10. [PMID: 35120509 PMCID: PMC8817498 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00747-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As moral case deliberations (MCDs) have increasingly been implemented in health care institutions as a form of ethics support, it is relevant to know whether and how MCDs actually contribute to positive changes in care. Insight is needed on what actually happens in daily care practice following MCD sessions. This study aimed at investigating the impact of MCD and exploring how ‘impact of MCD’ should be conceptualized for future research. Methods A multiple-case study was conducted in a care organization for people with intellectual disabilities and/or acquired brain injury, by observing MCD sessions as ‘cases’, followed by interviews with health care professionals concerning the follow-up to these cases, and a focus group with involved MCD facilitators. A conceptual scheme concerning the possible impact formed the basis for analysis: (1) individual moral awareness; (2) the actions of health care professionals; (3) collaboration among health care professionals; (4) the concrete situation of the client; (5) the client’s quality of care and life; (6) the organizational and policy level. Results According to interviewees, their moral awareness and their collaboration, both among colleagues and with clients’ relatives, improved after MCD. Perceived impact on client situation, quality of care/life and the organizational level varied among interviewees or was difficult to define or link to MCD. Three aspects were added to the conceptual scheme concerning the impact of MCD: (a) preparations and expectations prior to the MCD session; (b) a translational step between the conclusions of the MCD session and practical events in the following period, and (c) collaboration with clients’ relatives. A negative impact of MCD was also found on misunderstandings among participants and disappointment about lack of follow-up. Conclusions Concretizing and conceptualizing the ‘impact’ of MCD is complicated as many factors play a role either before or during the transition from MCD to practice. It is important to consider ‘impact’ in a broad sense and to relate it to the goals and context of the MCD in question. Future studies in this field should pay additional attention to the preparations, content and process involved in ethics support, including clients’ and relatives’ experiences. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-022-00747-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C de Snoo-Trimp
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J L P van Gurp
- Department IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A C Molewijk
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center of Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohammadi MMD, Sheikhasadi H, Mahani SA, Taheri A, Sheikhbardsiri H, Abdi K. The effect of bio ethical principles education on ethical attitude of prehospital paramedic personnel. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2021; 10:289. [PMID: 34667789 PMCID: PMC8459844 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_708_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethical attitude of paramedic personnel is one of the most important factors in their effective and useful performance. Therefore, according to the importance of this issue and immense effect of religious culture on the formation of ethics, this study aimed to effect bio-ethical principles teaching on moral attitude of paramedic emergency personnel in Iran. MATERIAL AND METHODS The present study was an experimental study carried out in 2020 on 60 of paramedic emergency personnel. Samples were available, randomly selected and assigned to two groups of control and intervention. The intervention was performed for a 2-h workshop of bioethical principles in 4 day based on Quran verses. Moral attitude of both groups was studied before and after each intervention. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Simonov, Chi-square, t-test, one-way, and paired t-test with SPSS version 16 (P ≤ 0/05). RESULTS Ethical attitude means for both groups of control and intervention demonstrated that ethical attitude has meaningfully increased after the workshop. Demographic variables such as age, gender, and work experience of participants in workshops were not different between these two groups (P < 0/05). The study of these two groups showed that there is no relationship among work experience, gender, marital status, age, and ethical attitude. CONCLUSION Prehospital emergency is quite different from the other occupations in health-care system and the ethical issues of this field are more important. Therefore, teaching in workplace and through ethical principles based on religious teachings will have a profound effect on improving biological ethics of paramedic prehospital staffs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Mahdi Doust Mohammadi
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Hakimeh Sheikhasadi
- Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Shahla Ayoubi Mahani
- Department of Dental Public Health, Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Abolfazl Taheri
- Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Hojjat Sheikhbardsiri
- Health in Disasters and Emergencies Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Kamel Abdi
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Komar University of Science and Technology, Sulimaniya, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Evans N, Marusic A, Foeger N, Lofstrom E, van Hoof M, Vrijhoef-Welten S, Inguaggiato G, Dierickx K, Bouter L, Widdershoven G. Virtue-based ethics and integrity of research: train-the-trainer programme for upholding the principles and practices of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (VIRT2UE). RESEARCH IDEAS AND OUTCOMES 2021. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.7.e68258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recognising the importance of addressing ethics and research integrity (ERI) in Europe, in 2017, the All European Academies (ALLEA) published a revised and updated European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ECoC). Consistent application of the ECoC by researchers across Europe will require its widespread dissemination, as well as an innovative training programme and novel tools to enable researchers to truly uphold and internalise the principles and practices listed in the Code.
Aim: VIRT2UE aims to develop a sustainable train-the-trainer blended learning programme enabling contextualised ERI teaching across Europe focusing on understanding and upholding the principles and practices of the ECoC.
Vision: The VIRT2UE project recognises that researchers not only need to have knowledge of the ECoC, but also to be able to truly uphold and internalise the principles underpinning the code. They need to learn how to integrate them into their everyday practice and understand how to act in concrete situations. VIRT2UE addresses this challenge by providing ERI trainers and researchers with an innovative blended (i.e. combined online and off-line approaches) learning programme that draws on a toolbox of educational resources and incorporates an e-learning course (including a YouTube channel) and face-to-face sessions designed to foster moral virtues. ERI trainers and researchers from academia and industry will have open access to online teaching material. Moreover, ERI trainers will learn how to facilitate face-to-face sessions of researchers, which focus on learning how to apply the content of the teaching material to concrete situations in daily practice.
Objectives: VIRT2UE’s work packages (WP) will: conduct a conceptual mapping amongst stakeholders to identify and rank the virtues which are essential for good scientific practice and their relationship to the principles and practices of the ECoC (WP1); identify and consult ERI trainers and the wider scientific community to understand existing capacity and deficiencies in ERI educational resources (WP2); develop the face-to-face component of the train-the-trainer programme which provides trainers with tools to foster researchers’ virtues and promote the ECoC and iteratively develop the programme based on evaluations (WP3); produce educational materials for online learning by researchers and trainers (WP4); implement and disseminate the train-the-trainer programme across Europe, ensuring the training of sufficient trainers for each country and build capacity and consistency by focusing on underdeveloped regions and unifying fragmented efforts (WP5); and develop the online training platform and user interface, which will be instrumental in evaluation of trainers’ and researchers’ needs and project sustainability (WP6).
Impact: The VIRT2UE training programme will promote consistent application of the ECoC across Europe. The programme will affect behaviour on the individual level of trainers and researchers – simultaneously developing an understanding of the ECoC and other ERI issues, whilst also developing scientific virtues, enabling the application of the acquired knowledge to concrete situations and complex moral dilemmas. Through a dedicated embedding strategy, the programme will also have an impact on an institutional level. The train-the-trainer approach multiplies the impact of the programme by reaching current and future European ERI trainers and, subsequently, the researchers they train.
Collapse
|
6
|
Charre D, Cano N, Malzac P, Habbachi M, Fond G, Boyer L. Mise en place et évaluation de séances d’éthique appliquée dans un service de psychiatrie générale en France. ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2019.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
7
|
Field-Testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Important Outcomes According to Participants Before and After Moral Case Deliberation. HEC Forum 2020; 34:1-24. [PMID: 32770330 PMCID: PMC8813689 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-020-09421-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Ethics support services like Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) intend to support healthcare professionals in ethically difficult situations. To assess outcomes of MCD, the Euro-MCD Instrument has been developed. Field studies to test this instrument are needed and have been conducted, examining important outcomes before MCD participation and experienced outcomes. The current study aimed to (1) describe how participants’ perceive the importance of MCD outcomes after MCD; (2) compare these perceptions with those before MCD participation; and (3) test the factor structure of these outcomes. Swedish, Norwegian and Dutch healthcare professionals rated the importance of outcomes in the Euro-MCD Instrument after four and eight MCDs. Ratings were compared with those before MCD participation using paired and independent samples t-tests. The factor structure was tested using exploratory factor analyses. After 4 and 8 MCDs, 443 respectively 247 respondents completed the instrument. More than 69% rated all MCD outcomes as ‘quite’ or ‘very’ important, especially outcomes from Enhanced Collaboration, Improved Moral Reflexivity and Improved Moral Attitude. Significant differences for 16 outcomes regarding ratings before and after MCD participation were not considered meaningful. Factor analyses suggested three categories, which seemingly resemble the domains Improved Moral Reflexivity, Enhanced Collaboration and a combination of Improved Moral Attitude and Enhanced Emotional Support. After participation in MCDs, respondents confirmed the importance of outcomes in the Euro-MCD Instrument. The question on perceived importance and the categorization of outcomes need reconsideration. The revised instrument will be presented elsewhere, based on all field studies and theoretical reflections.
Collapse
|
8
|
Spronk B, Widdershoven G, Alma H. Addressing harm in moral case deliberation: the views and experiences of facilitators. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:10. [PMID: 32000784 PMCID: PMC6993317 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-0450-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In healthcare practice, care providers are confronted with decisions they have to make, directly affecting patients and inevitably harmful. These decisions are tragic by nature. This study investigates the role of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in dealing with tragic situations. In MCD, caregivers reflect on real-life dilemmas, involving a choice between two ethical claims, both resulting in moral damage and harm. One element of the reflection process is making explicit the harm involved in the choice. How harmful are our decisions? We investigated how facilitators of MCD experience the importance of addressing harm in MCD and what participants learn from reflecting on harm. METHODS The study was qualitative, focusing on the views and experiences of the facilitators of MCD. Semi-structured interviews (N = 12) were conducted with facilitators of MCD. The research focuses on the subjective experiences of facilitators. Grounded Theory was used for analysis. RESULTS The results show two main categories. The first concerns the awareness of tragedy. Within this category, five themes were discerned: making explicit that there is no solution, visualizing consequences, uncovering pain, focusing on emotion, and exploring perspectives on harm. The second category concerns the support for healthcare professionals in dealing with the tragedy of the choices they face. In this category, five themes came forward: acknowledging, offering comfort, managing harm, consideration through dialogue and repairing harm. CONCLUSION Our study shows that addressing harm in MCD in tragic situations provides an important moral learning opportunity for participants. By formulating and becoming aware of harm, MCD aids healthcare professionals in the task they are faced with, namely making difficult and painful choices. MCD helps healthcare professionals to repair moral damage, making clear at the same time that harm cannot be undone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benita Spronk
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Guy Widdershoven
- Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1089 a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hans Alma
- Department of Philosophy and Ethics, VUB (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hartman L, Widdershoven G, de Vries A, Wensing-Kruger A, Heijer MD, Steensma T, Molewijk B. Integrative Clinical Ethics Support in Gender Affirmative Care: Lessons Learned. HEC Forum 2019; 31:241-260. [PMID: 31098934 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-019-09376-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Clinical ethics support (CES) for health care professionals and patients is increasingly seen as part of good health care. However, there is a key drawback to the way CES services are currently offered. They are often performed as isolated and one-off services whose ownership and impact are unclear. This paper describes the development of an integrative approach to CES at the Center of Expertise and Care for Gender Dysphoria (CEGD) at Amsterdam University Medical Center. We specifically aimed to integrate CES into daily work processes at the CEGD. In this paper, we describe the CES services offered there in detail and elaborate on the 16 lessons we learned from the process of developing an integrative approach to CES. These learning points can inform and inspire CES professionals, who wish to bring about greater integration of CES services into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Hartman
- Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Guy Widdershoven
- Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelou de Vries
- Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelijn Wensing-Kruger
- Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin den Heijer
- Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Steensma
- Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert Molewijk
- Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brännström M, Fischer Grönlund C, Zingmark K, Söderberg A. Meeting in a ‘free-zone’: Clinical ethical support in integrated heart-failure and palliative care. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2019; 18:577-583. [DOI: 10.1177/1474515119851621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Integrating heart-failure and palliative care combines expertise from two cultures, life-saving cardiology and palliative care, and involves ethically difficult situations that have to be considered from various perspectives. We found no studies describing experiences of clinical ethical support (CES) in integrated cardiology and palliative care teams. Objective: Our aim is to describe experiences of CES among professionals after a period of three years working in a multidisciplinary team in integrated heart-failure and palliative homecare. Method: The study design was descriptive qualitative, comprising interviews with seven professionals from one integrated heart-failure and palliative care team who received CES over a three-year period. The interview data were subjected to qualitative content analysis. Results: The CES was found to offer possibilities for meeting in an ethical ‘free-zone’ where the participants could relate to each other beyond their various professional roles and specialties. The trust within the team seemed to increase and the participants were confident enough to express their points of view. Together they developed an integrated understanding, and acquired more knowledge and a comprehensive view of the ethically difficult situation of concern. The CES sessions were considered a means of becoming better prepared to deal with ethical care issues and developing action strategies to apply in practice, from shared standpoints. Conclusion: Participating in CES was experienced as meeting in an ethical ‘free-zone’ and seemed to be a means of facilitating integration of palliative and heart-failure care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margareta Brännström
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Sweden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Karin Zingmark
- Department of Health Science, Division of Nursing, Luleå University of Technology & Norrbotten County Council, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Background: Clinical ethics committees have been broadly implemented in university
hospitals, general hospitals and nursing homes. To ensure the quality of
ethics consultations, evaluation should be mandatory. Research question/aim: The aim of this article is to evaluate the perspectives of all people
involved and the process of implementation on the wards. Research design and participants: The data were collected in two steps: by means of non-participating
observation of four ethics case consultations and by open-guided interviews
with 28 participants. Data analysis was performed according to grounded
theory. Ethical considerations: The study received approval from the local Ethics Commission (registration
no.: 32/11/10). Findings: ‘Communication problems’ and ‘hierarchical team conflicts’ proved to be the
main aspects that led to ethics consultation, involving two factors:
unresolvable differences arise in the context of team conflicts on the ward
and unresolvable differences prevent a solution being found. Hierarchical
asymmetries, which are common in the medical field, support this vicious
circle. Based on this, minor or major disagreements regarding clinical
decisions might be seen as ethical conflicts. The expectation on the
clinical ethics committee is to solve this (communication) problem, but the
participants experienced that hierarchy is maintained by the clinical ethics
committee members. Discussion: The asymmetrical structures of the clinical ethics committee reflect the
institutional hierarchical nature. They endure, despite the fact that the
clinical ethics committee should be able to detect and overcome them.
Disagreements among care givers are described as one of the most difficult
ethically relevant situations and should be recognised by the clinical
ethics committee. On the contrary, discussion of team conflicts and clinical
ethical issues should not be combined, since the first is a mandate for team
supervision. Conclusion: To avoid dominance by physicians and an excessively factual character of the
presentation, the case or conflict could be presented by both physicians and
nurses, a strategy that strengthens the interpersonal and emotional aspects
and also integrates both professional perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gabriella Marx
- Gabriella Marx, Department of General
Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Martinistraße 52, W37, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hartman LA, Metselaar S, Molewijk AC, Edelbroek HM, Widdershoven GAM. Developing an ethics support tool for dealing with dilemmas around client autonomy based on moral case deliberations. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:97. [PMID: 30577790 PMCID: PMC6303905 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0335-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Moral Case Deliberations (MCDs) are reflective dialogues with a group of participants on their own moral dilemmas. Although MCD is successful as clinical ethics support (CES), it also has limitations. 1. Lessons learned from individual MCDs are not shared in order to be used in other contexts 2. Moral learning stays limited to the participants of the MCD; 3. MCD requires quite some organisational effort, 4. MCD deals with one individual concrete case. It does not address other, similar cases (it is case based). These limitations warrant research into complementary ways of providing CES to healthcare professionals. Our research objective was therefore to develop a low threshold CES tool based on a series of MCDs on autonomy in long-term care. METHODS We used a qualitative research design in which we analyzed the process and content of a series of MCDs, combined with reflections on the theoretical background of MCD. In total 28 MCDs (10 transcripts and 18 summary reports) were analyzed by means of a thematic content analysis. In various rounds of development, the results of the analysis were combined with theoretical reflections on CES. Consequently, the tool was evaluated in three focus groups and adjusted. RESULTS The CES tool, called 'moral compass', guides the users through a series of six subsequent questions in order to methodically reflect on their concrete moral dilemma, in the form of a booklet of 23 pages. It combines a methodical element that encourages and structures a reflection process with a substantive element, including norms, values, options, strategies, and insights regarding dealing with client autonomy. CONCLUSION By using data from a series of MCDs, combined with theoretical reflections on MCD, ethics support and moral learning, we developed a thematic, low-threshold CES tool that supports healthcare professionals in daily practice in dealing with moral questions regarding client autonomy. It integrates examples and insights from earlier MCDs on the same topic. The moral compass is not a replacement of, but can be used complementary to MCD. The feasibility and impact of the moral compass need to be investigated in an evaluative follow-up study. The methodology presented in this paper may be used to develop moral compasses on different topics in various healthcare organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. A. Hartman
- Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, APH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S. Metselaar
- Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, APH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. C. Molewijk
- Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, APH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - H. M. Edelbroek
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. A. M. Widdershoven
- Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, APH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Defining and categorizing outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD): concept mapping with experienced MCD participants. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:88. [PMID: 30454047 PMCID: PMC6245560 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0324-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To support healthcare professionals in dealing with ethically difficult situations, Clinical Ethics Support (CES) services like Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) are increasingly implemented. To assess the impact of CES, it is important to evaluate outcomes. Despite general claims about outcomes from MCD experts and some qualitative research, there exists no conceptual analysis of outcomes yet. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically define and categorize MCD outcomes. An additional aim was to compare these outcomes with the outcomes in the Euro-MCD Instrument from 2014, to further validate this Instrument. METHODS The concept mapping method was used and involves qualitative and quantitative steps including brainstorming, individual structuring, computation of concept maps (by principal component analysis and cluster analysis), group interpretation and utilization. In total, 12 experienced MCD participants from a variety of professional backgrounds participated in two sessions. RESULTS The focus group brainstorm resulted in a list of 85 possible MCD outcomes, of which a point map and concept maps were constructed. After a thorough discussion of each cluster, final consensus was reached on the names and position of 8 clusters of MCD outcomes: 1) Organisation and Policy; 2) Team development; 3) Personal development focused on the Other Person; 4) Personal development as Professional, focused on Skills; 5) Personal development as Professional, focused on Knowledge; 6) Personal development as an Individual; 7) Perception and Connection; and 8) Concrete action. CONCLUSIONS This study explored and categorized MCD outcomes in a concept mapping focus group. When comparing the results with the Euro-MCD Instrument, our study confirms that outcomes of MCD can be categorized in clusters referring to the organisational level, team development, personal development (both as an individual and a professional) and the concrete case-level. In developing CES evaluation tools, it is important to be explicit if an outcome refers to the individual or the team, to knowledge or skills, to the organisation or the specific case. The findings will be used in the further validation of the Euro-MCD Instrument. The current study further contributes to the field of evaluating CES in general and defining outcomes of MCD in particular.
Collapse
|
14
|
Seekles W, Widdershoven G, Robben P, van Dalfsen G, Molewijk B. Inspectors' ethical challenges in health care regulation: a pilot study. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2017; 20:311-320. [PMID: 28130719 PMCID: PMC5569140 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-016-9736-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
There is an increasing body of research on what kind of ethical challenges health care professionals experience regarding the quality of care. In the Netherlands the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate is responsible for monitoring and regulating the quality of health care. No research exists on what kind of ethical challenges inspectors experience during the regulation process itself. In a pilot study we used moral case deliberation as method in order to reflect upon inspectors' ethical challenges. The objective of this paper is to give an overview of the ethical challenges which health care inspectors encounter in their daily work. A thematic qualitative analysis was performed on cases (n = 69) that were collected from health care inspectors in a moral case deliberation pilot study. Eight themes were identified in health care regulation. These can be divided in two categories: work content and internal collaboration. The work of the health care inspectorate is morally loaded and our recommendation is that some form of ethics support is provided for health care inspectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Seekles
- Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre (EMGO+), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- University of Humanistic Studies, Kromme Nieuwegracht 29, 3512 HD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - G Widdershoven
- Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre (EMGO+), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Robben
- The Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ), Stadsplateau 1, 3521 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G van Dalfsen
- The Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ), Stadsplateau 1, 3521 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B Molewijk
- Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre (EMGO+), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Medical Ethics, HELSAM, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3A, 0373, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|