Systematic review: bioethical implications for COVID-19 research in low prevalence countries, a distinctly different set of problems

Understanding participant perspectives around HIV-1 cure-related studies involving antiretroviral analytical treatment interruptions in the United Kingdom

Background

To test efficacy, HIV cure-related trials often require a period of intensively monitored interruption of antiretroviral therapy (ART) (analytical treatment interruption or ATI). As individuals who started ART during primary HIV-1 infection (PHI) are often recruited, we have asked people already enrolled into an observational PHI study about their willingness and concerns around participating in cure-related studies involving ATIs.

Methods

People who were diagnosed with PHI and started ART, attending two London HIV clinics, provided informed consent to complete a digital survey in clinic between 21/07/21 to October 31, 2023. Questions comprised sociodemographics, motivations, concerns and practical considerations influencing willingness to participate in studies involving ATIs. Hierarchical clustering of responses was performed using the 'pheatmap' R statistical package and ranked from most to least concerned. Responses were cross-referenced with enrolment into an ATI study which recruited from this cohort.

Results

Of 352 eligible participants, 75 completed the survey. The majority were white, cisgender men who have sex with men, 34/75 (45 %) were born outside the UK. 29 (39 %) expressed interest in joining ATI studies. Participants who were interested or unsure in joining ATI studies were primarily motivated (53/65, 82 % very or moderately interested) by an altruistic desire to help scientific research. Across all participants, onward HIV transmission was the predominant concern (67/75, 89 % very or moderately concerned), and similar levels of concerns reported if the HIV-1 viral load threshold to restarting ART was increased from 500 to 50 000 copies/mL. Most participants preferred weekly (23/65, 35 %) or fortnightly (11/65, 17 %) viral load monitoring during an ATI. Before taking part in a study involving an ATI, participants stated they would prefer to discuss this with their HIV doctor (55/65, 85 %).

Conclusion

In this small survey, 39 % of respondents expressed interest in joining studies involving ATIs, primarily for altruistic reasons. Participants were more interested in joining a potential ATI study if a novel intervention was included than simply an ATI alone. The main concern expressed was risk of viral transmission. To inform practical and study design considerations for future ATI studies, unrestricted access for mitigation of transmission risk should be included, and regular, frequent viral load monitoring is preferred.

The COVID-19 Pandemic Between Bio-Ethics, Bio-Law and Bio-Politics: A Case Study on The Italian Experience of The DuPre Commission

The aim of this qualitative study was to consider the question of whether the Italian political management of the pandemic respected the European bio-ethical and bio-juridical approaches in light of the principles of autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability. As no specific consolidated literature exists on the subject, the Italian situation was taken into consideration, specifically the work of a spontaneous commission (DuPre) that collected the reflections of academics and researchers interested in discussing political decisions for the management of the emergency, which was the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The analysis took into account the contributions of scholars during two conferences (without proceedings), which were transcribed and examined. From the texts processed with a thematic analysis, three main themes emerged: ‘pandemic as a state of exception, sovereignty and crisis of democracy’, ‘the value of doubt and refutation’ and ‘elimination of informed consent between persuasion and blackmail’. In this paper, the final bio-political considerations on the European approach and the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy are presented.

Stress and Bio-Ethical Issues Perceived by Romanian Healthcare Practitioners in the COVID-19 Era

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on different areas of life, especially in the medical system. Because of the pandemic outbreak, the medical system was remodeled to treat COVID-19 patients in secure conditions. Those changes and restrictive measures have put pressure on individual adaptability. The present study investigated the stress of Romanian healthcare practitioners (HCP) and the capacity to deal with new bio-ethical issues that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Methods: We analyzed results from a survey on 97 Romanian HCP in several areas: personal experience with COVID-19, perceived emotional distress, and appraisal of bio-ethical principles respected or infringed during the pandemic in 2020. Results: Unlike previous studies, our respondents reported low to moderate stress levels. In addition, few bio-ethical principles were infringed on a personal level. Tendencies to sacrifice individual autonomy and make decisions affecting patients and co-workers were more prevalent among HCP with over 30 years of experience. Conclusions: Retrospectively, Romanian HCP in our sample appeared to share an embellished view of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Potentially related factors and coping mechanisms with stress are discussed.