1
|
Ghalavand H, Nabiolahi A. Exploring online health information quality criteria on social media: a mixed method approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:1311. [PMID: 39478573 PMCID: PMC11523579 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11838-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 10/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This article outlines a research study that ranked health information quality criteria on social media from experts' perspectives. METHODOLOGY A mixed-method approach (qualitative-quantitative) used in current research. In the qualitative phase a literature review explored existing dimensions for evaluating social media content quality, focusing on identifying common dimensions and attributes. Furthermore, a quantitative method involving experts was utilized to rank the health information quality criteria for social media. RESULTS The findings indicated various dimensions of health information quality in the literature. Out of 17 criteria, accuracy, credibility, and reliability had the highest ranks, while originality, value-added, and amount of data had the lowest ranks, respectively, according to experts. CONCLUSION The endeavor to bolster the dissemination of reliable health information on social media demands a sustained commitment to enhancing accountability, transparency, and accuracy, ensuring that users have access to information that is not only informative but also trustworthy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Ghalavand
- Department of Medical library and Information Science, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.
| | - Abdolahad Nabiolahi
- Department of Medical library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin H, Xie S, Xu D, Wu F, Huang R, Wu H, Zhang Y, An J, Yang M, Deng N. Evaluation of a workplace weight management program based on WeChat platform for obese/overweight people in China using the RE-AIM framework. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102275. [PMID: 37334210 PMCID: PMC10276157 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
A Weight Management Program (WMP) is a critical and promising approach to losing excess weight and maintaining a healthy lifestyle for obese/overweight people. This study used the RE-AIM framework to retrospectively evaluate a WeChat-based workplace WMP that include low- and high-intensity interventions - self-management (SM) and intensive support (IS) - designed for employees with varying levels of health risk at a Chinese company. Both interventions incorporated with a variety of m-health technologies and behavioral strategies. While the IS group additionally received personalized feedback on diet record and intensive social support. Approximately 26% of all overweight/obese employees in the company enrolled in the program. Both groups lost a significant amount of weight at the endpoint (P < 0.001). In comparison to the SM group, the IS group had significantly higher level of compliance with self-monitoring. At six-month, 67% of individuals reported no additional weight gain. The WeChat-based WMP has received widespread praise from program participants and intervention providers in spite of difficulties encountered. This comprehensive and meticulous evaluation revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of the program, which will assist in improving implementation and balancing the cost and effectiveness of online WMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Lin
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sasa Xie
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dongdong Xu
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feiyan Wu
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Hua Wu
- Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Moray House School of Education and Sport, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jiye An
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Min Yang
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ning Deng
- College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Binjiang Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
EGFR mutation testing and TKI treatment patterns among veterans with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27:100327. [PMID: 33549984 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing is recommended in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to assess changes in EGFR mutation testing patterns and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use in US veterans with stage III-IV NSCLC between 2013 and 2017. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective study using linked data from Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cancer Registry System, Corporate Data Warehouse, commercial laboratories, and clinical notes. Generalized linear mixed models accounting for clustering by VA facility were used to determine factors associated with EGFR mutation testing. RESULTS From 2013 to 2017, EGFR mutation testing increased from 29.5% to 38.4% among veterans with stage III-IV NSCLC and from 47.0% to 57.4% among veterans with stage IV non-squamous disease. Factors associated with increased odds of testing included being married, Medicare enrollment, and adenocarcinoma histology. Factors associated with decreased odds of testing included Medicaid eligibility, stage III disease, increasing age, being a current or former smoker, increasing Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, and receiving cancer care in the South. Appropriate use of a TKI rose from 2013 to 2017 (17.2% to 74.1%). CONCLUSION EGFR mutation testing rates increased to almost 60% in the stage IV non-squamous NSCLC population in 2017, with residual opportunity for further increase. Several sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and geographic regions were associated with EGFR mutation testing suggestive of inequitable testing decisions. Appropriate use of TKI improved drastically from 2013 to 2017 demonstrating rapidly changing practice patterns through the adoption phase of new treatment options.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chambers P, Man KK, Lui VW, Mpima S, Nasuti P, Forster MD, Wong IC. Understanding Molecular Testing Uptake Across Tumor Types in Eight Countries: Results From a Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e770-e778. [PMID: 32160136 PMCID: PMC7427415 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The growth in understanding of molecular biology and genomics has augmented the development of targeted cancer treatments; however, challenges exist in access to molecular testing, an essential precursor to treatment decision-making. We used data from a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the differences in uptake of molecular testing. METHODS Using the aggregated results of a questionnaire developed and distributed to clinicians by IQVIA, including treatment details and investigations undertaken for patients, we compared proportions of patients receiving molecular testing and targeted treatment by cancer type for the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Japan, and China. We used multivariable logistic regression methods to understand the effect of country on the odds of receiving a molecular test. RESULTS There was a total of 61,491 cases. Across countries and cancer types, uptake rates for molecular testing ranged between 2% and 98%, with the greatest differences seen in gastric cancers (range, 23% to 70%), and significant variations were observed for both European and Asian countries. China consistently demonstrated a significantly reduced uptake for all molecular tests assessed; however; uptake of drug treatment in gastric cancers after testing positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene was higher than in some European countries (China, 85%; European range, 8% to 66%). The uptake of epidermal growth factor receptor gene testing was greater in some Asian countries relative to the United Kingdom, where incidence of lung cancer is higher (Japan: odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.6 to 3.8]; South Korea: odds ratio, 2.7 [95% CI, 2 to 3.4]). CONCLUSION We have highlighted inequity in access to molecular testing and subsequent treatments across countries, which warrants improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pinkie Chambers
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
- University College London Hospitals (UCLH) National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust/University College London Hospital-UCL Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, Cancer Division, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth K.C. Man
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Safe Medication and Practice Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vivian W.Y. Lui
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sheila Mpima
- IQVIA Real-World & Analytics Solutions, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paola Nasuti
- IQVIA Real-World & Analytics Solutions, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin D. Forster
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute/UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian C.K. Wong
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
- University College London Hospitals (UCLH) National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust/University College London Hospital-UCL Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, Cancer Division, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Safe Medication and Practice Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Burnett-Hartman AN, Udaltsova N, Kushi LH, Neslund-Dudas C, Rahm AK, Pawloski PA, Corley DA, Knerr S, Feigelson HS, Hunter JE, Tabano DC, Epstein MM, Honda SA, Ter-Minassian M, Lynch JA, Lu CY. Clinical Molecular Marker Testing Data Capture to Promote Precision Medicine Research Within the Cancer Research Network. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 3:1-10. [PMID: 31487201 DOI: 10.1200/cci.19.00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate health care systems for the availability of population-level data on the frequency of use and results of clinical molecular marker tests to inform precision cancer care. METHODS We assessed cancer-related molecular marker test data availability across 12 US health care systems in the Cancer Research Network. Overall, these systems provide care to a diverse population of more than 12 million people in the United States. We performed qualitative analyses of test data availability for five blood-based protein, nine germline, and 14 tissue-based tumor marker tests in each health care system's electronic health record and tumor registry using key informants, test code lists, and manual review of data types and output. We then performed quantitative analyses to estimate the proportion of patients with cancer with test utilization data and results for specific molecular marker tests. RESULTS Health systems were able to systematically capture population-level data on all five blood protein markers, six of 14 tissue-based tumor markers, and none of the nine germline markers. Successful, systematic data capture was achievable for tests with electronic data feeds for test results (blood protein markers) or through prior manual abstraction by tumor registrars (select tumor-based markers). For test results stored in scanned image files (particularly germline and tumor marker tests), information on which test was performed and test results was not readily accessible in an electronic format. CONCLUSION Even in health care systems with sophisticated electronic health records, there were few codified data elements available for evaluating precision cancer medicine test use and results at the population level. Health care organizations should establish standards for electronic reporting of precision medicine tests to expedite cancer research and facilitate the implementation of precision medicine approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sarah Knerr
- University of Washington and Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - David C Tabano
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Mara M Epstein
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | | | | | - Julie A Lynch
- Department of Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health System, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christine Y Lu
- Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|