1
|
Anderson CB, Fatone S, Mañago MM, Swink LA, Kittelson AJ, Magnusson DM, Christiansen CL. Development and alpha testing of a patient shared decision aid for prosthesis design for new lower limb prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2024:00006479-990000000-00229. [PMID: 38506643 DOI: 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After lower limb amputation, several prosthesis design options exist. However, prosthesis design decisions do not always reflect a prosthesis user's needs, values, and preferences. OBJECTIVE To develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype for prosthetists and new prosthesis users facing prosthesis design decisions after lower limb amputation, and to assess its usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility. STUDY DESIGN Exploratory mixed methods. METHODS PDA development was informed by a qualitative needs assessment and guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The PDA was evaluated by steering groups of experienced prosthesis users and prosthetic professionals (prosthetists and researchers) to test usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility through focus groups, individual interviews, and rating on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10. RESULTS The resulting PDA included 6 sections: (1) Amputation and Early Recovery, (2) Communication, (3) Values, (4) Prosthesis Design, (5) Preferences, and (6) Prosthetic Journey. Usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility were rated as 9.2, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthetic professionals, and 9.4, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthesis users. DISCUSSION The PDA incorporated guidance by relevant stakeholders and was rated favorably, emphasizing a need for shared decision-making support in prosthesis design. One challenge was determining the amount of information in the PDA, highlighting the diversity in end users' informational needs. Future iterations of the PDA should undergo beta testing in clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS A standardized, iterative method was used to develop a PDA for new lower limb prosthesis users and prosthetists when considering prosthesis design decisions. The PDA was considered useable, accurate, and comprehensible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsey B Anderson
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence and the Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Stefania Fatone
- Division of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Mark M Mañago
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| | - Laura A Swink
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| | - Andrew J Kittelson
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
| | - Dawn M Magnusson
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Cory L Christiansen
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oprea N, Ardito V, Ciani O. Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:164. [PMID: 37612645 PMCID: PMC10463920 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02263-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) is a collaborative process whereby patients and clinicians jointly deliberate on the best treatment option that takes into account patients' preferences and values. In breast cancer care, different treatment options have become available to patients in the last decade. Various interventions, including patient decision aids (PtDAs), have been designed to promote SDM in this disease area. This study aimed at investigating the factors that influence the successful adoption and implementation of SDM interventions in real-world healthcare delivery settings. METHODS A scoping review of scientific and grey literature was conducted for the period 2006-2021 to analyse the support for SDM interventions and their adoption in breast cancer clinical practice. The interpretation of findings was based on the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. RESULTS Overall, 19 studies were included for data synthesis, with more than 70% published since 2017. The availability of SDM tools does not automatically translate into their actual use in clinical settings. Factors related to users' co-creation, the clinical team's attitude and knowledge, organisational support and regulatory provisions facilitate the adoption of SDM interventions. However, overlooking aspects such as the re-organisation of care pathways, patient characteristics, and assigning of resources (human, financial, and facilities) can hinder implementation efforts. CONCLUSIONS Compared to the mounting evidence on the efficacy of SDM interventions, knowledge to support their sustained implementation in daily care is still limited, albeit results show an increasing interest in strategies that facilitate their uptake in breast cancer care over time. These findings highlight different strategies that can be used to embed SDM interventions in clinical practice. Future work should investigate which approaches are more effective in light of organisational conditions and external factors, including an evaluation of costs and healthcare system settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Oprea
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CeRGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, 20136, Italy.
| | - Vittoria Ardito
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CeRGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, 20136, Italy
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CeRGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, 20136, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Longcoy LTH, Mathew A, Jang MK, Mayahara M, Doorenbos AZ. Experiences of Using Patient Decision Aids for Decisions About Cancer Treatment: A Meta-Aggregation of Qualitative Studies. Cancer Nurs 2023:00002820-990000000-00156. [PMID: 37430415 PMCID: PMC10782815 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inconsistent results have been found regarding the effects of patient decision aids (PtDAs) in supporting patients' decision-making for cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE This qualitative meta-aggregation presents the experiences of using PtDAs, as perceived by adult patients with cancer, and highlights the components they perceived as important. METHODS We used the 3-phase process for meta-aggregation suggested by Joanna Briggs Institute to identify published studies with qualitative evidence from CINAHL, Ovid-MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, and EMBASE databases. The selected studies involved adults with various cancer diagnoses. The phenomenon of interest and the context for this review were people's experiences of using PtDAs for decisions about first-line cancer treatment. RESULTS A total of 16 studies were included. The authors achieved consensus on 5 synthesized findings about PtDAs: (1) improved understanding of treatment options and patient values and preferences; (2) served as platforms for expressing concerns, obtaining support, and having meaningful conversations with healthcare providers; (3) facilitated active personal and family engagement in decision-making; (4) enabled recall of information and evaluation of satisfaction with decisions; and (5) presented potential structural barriers. CONCLUSIONS This study used qualitative evidence to demonstrate the usefulness of PtDAs and identify aspects patients with cancer find particularly beneficial. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Nurses play a crucial role in supporting patients and family caregivers throughout the decision-making process for cancer treatment. Patient decision aids that balance complex treatment information with simple language and illustrations or graphs can enhance patients' comprehension. The integration of values clarification exercises into care can further improve patients' decisional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ting Huang Longcoy
- Author Affiliations: College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago (Drs Longcoy and Doorenbos); Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Dr Jang); College of Nursing, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India (Dr Mathew); College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Mayahara)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hershberger PE, Gallo AM, Adlam K, Driessnack M, Grotevant HD, Klock SC, Pasch L, Gruss V. Development of the Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool): A digital decision aid intervention about children's origins from donated gametes or embryos. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231194934. [PMID: 37654721 PMCID: PMC10467186 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231194934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to create and develop a well-designed, theoretically driven, evidence-based, digital, decision Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool) prototype. Methods This developmental study used an inclusive, systematic, and iterative process to formulate a prototype TELL Tool: the first digital decision aid for parents who have children 1 to 16 years of age and used donated gametes or embryos to establish their families. Recommendations from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration and from experts in decision aid development, digital health interventions, design thinking, and instructional design guided the process. Results The extensive developmental process incorporated researchers, clinicians, parents, children, and other stakeholders, including donor-conceived adults. We determined the scope and target audience of the decision aid and formed a steering group. During design work, we used the decision-making process model as the guiding framework for selecting content. Parents' views and decisional needs were incorporated into the prototype through empirical research and review, appraisal, and synthesis of the literature. Clinicians' perspectives and insights were also incorporated. We used the experiential learning theory to guide the delivery of the content through a digital distribution plan. Following creation of initial content, including storyboards and scripts, an early prototype was redrafted and redesigned based on feedback from the steering group. A final TELL Tool prototype was then developed for alpha testing. Conclusions Detailing our early developmental processes provides transparency that can benefit the donor-conceived community as well as clinicians and researchers, especially those designing digital decision aids. Future research to evaluate the efficacy of the TELL Tool is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia E. Hershberger
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Agatha M. Gallo
- Department of Human Development Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kirby Adlam
- Department of Human Development Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Martha Driessnack
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Harold D. Grotevant
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Susan C. Klock
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lauri Pasch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Gruss
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Austria M, Kimberlin C, Le T, Lynch KA, Ehdaie B, Atkinson TM, Vickers AJ, Carlsson SV. Patient Perceptions of a Decision Support Tool for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. MDM Policy Pract 2023; 8:23814683231156427. [PMID: 36922982 PMCID: PMC10009039 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231156427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose. To evaluate patient perceptions of a Web-based decision aid for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Methods. We assessed patient perceptions of a multicomponent, Web-based decision aid with a preference elicitation/values clarification exercise using adaptive conjoint analysis, the generation of a summary report, and provision of information about localized prostate cancer treatment options. Using a think-aloud approach, we conducted 21 cognitive interviews with prostate cancer patients presented with the decision aid prior to seeing their urologist. Thematic content analysis was used to examine patient perceptions of the tool's components and content prior to engaging in shared decision making with their clinician. Results. Five themes were identified: 1) patients had some negative emotional reactions to the tool, pointing out what they perceived to be unnecessarily negative framing and language used; 2) patients were forced to stop and think about preferences while going through the tool and found this deliberation to be useful; 3) patients were confused by the tool; 4) patients tried to discern the intent of the conjoint analysis questions; and 5) there was a disconnect between patients' negative reactions while using the tool and a contrasting general satisfaction with the final "values profile" created by the tool. Conclusions. Studies are needed to explore the disconnect between patients' expressing negative reactions while going through some components of decision aids but satisfaction with the final output. In particular, we hypothesize that this effect might be explained by cognitive biases such as choice-supportive bias, hindsight bias, and the "IKEA effect." This is one of the first projects to elicit patient reactions while they were completing a decision aid, and we recommend further similar, qualitative postprocess evaluation studies. Highlights We explored perceptions of a decision aid with education about localized prostate cancer treatment and preference elicitation using adaptive conjoint analysis.Patients found the tool useful but were also confused by it, tried to discern the intent of the questions, and expressed negative emotional reactions.In particular, there was a disconnect between patients' negative reactions while using the tool and general satisfaction with the final values profile generated by the tool, which is an area for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Austria
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Colin Kimberlin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Tiffany Le
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Kathleen A Lynch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Thomas M Atkinson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.,Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shen C, Li N, Zhou S, Stahl K, Dodge D, Zhao H. Endocrine therapy initiation and overall survival outcomes with omission of radiation therapy in older Medicare patients with early‐stage hormone‐receptor‐positive breast cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 12:6935-6944. [PMID: 36428284 PMCID: PMC10067080 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines allow for the omission of radiotherapy in older women with early-stage, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, given that the patients receive adequate endocrine therapy (ET). However, the initiation of ET and survival outcomes after forgoing radiation therapy among these patients have not been well-studied. METHODS We identified patients aged 70 to 90 years old newly diagnosed in 2010-2015 with early-stage, hormone receptor positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (HR+/Her2-) breast cancer who received lumpectomy and omitted radiation therapy using the SEER-Medicare database. We examined the initiation of ET and the utilization patterns of ET using a multivariable logistic regression. We further examined the overall survival outcomes using Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazard model with inverse probability weighting. RESULTS Of the 2618 patients, 808 (30.9%) received no ET. The multivariable logistic regression showed that more recent years had better ET initiation (2013-2015 vs. 2010-2012: OR = 1.39, 95% CI:[1.16, 1.66]), while older patients (81-90 vs. 70-80: OR = 0.45, 95% CI:[0.38, 0.54]) were less likely to receive ET. Both the Kaplan-Meier estimation (log-rank p-value<0.0001) and the Cox proportional hazard model with inverse probability weighting (HR = 0.76, 95% CI:[0.58, 0.99]) showed that receiving ET was associated with better overall survival. CONCLUSION This population-based study suggests that a sizable proportion of patients who omitted radiation did not receive endocrine therapy and receiving endocrine therapy was beneficial among these patients. Although ET initiation has improved in more recent years, certain patient groups were still especially susceptible to no endocrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Shen
- Department of Surgery The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA
- Penn State Cancer Institute Hershey Pennsylvania USA
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Economics and Finance Salisbury University Salisbury Maryland USA
| | - Shouhao Zhou
- Department of Public Health Sciences The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA
- Penn State Cancer Institute Hershey Pennsylvania USA
| | - Kelly Stahl
- Department of Surgery The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA
- Penn State Cancer Institute Hershey Pennsylvania USA
| | - Daleela Dodge
- Department of Surgery The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA
- Penn State Cancer Institute Hershey Pennsylvania USA
| | - Hui Zhao
- Department of Health Services Research University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hershberger PE, Gallo AM, Adlam K, Steffen AD, Driessnack M, Grotevant HD, Klock SC, Pasch L, Gruss V. Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2022; 51:536-547. [PMID: 35922017 PMCID: PMC9474702 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2022.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct an alpha test of the prototype of a digital decision aid to help parents disclose donor conception to their children, the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool). DESIGN Convergent mixed-methods design. SETTING Virtual interviews in places convenient to the participants. PARTICIPANTS A purposeful sample (N = 16) of nine gamete-donor and embryo-recipient parents and eight clinicians, as one parent was also a clinician. METHODS We conducted cognitive interviews to explore participants' perceptions about the TELL Tool prototype and observe patterns of use. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (i.e., usability, comprehensibility, and acceptability) guided the development of the qualitative interview guide and directed the qualitative analysis. We also collected data about participants' perceptions and ratings of the helpfulness of each of the prototype's webpages regarding parents' decision making about disclosure. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the helpfulness ratings before we merged the two data sets to optimize understanding. RESULTS Participants reported that the TELL Tool was a helpful digital decision aid to help parents tell their children how they were conceived. Most (93.7%) webpage rating scores indicated that the content was very helpful or helpful. The participants identified content and technical areas that needed refinement and provided specific recommendations such as adding concise instructions (usability), tailoring adolescent language (comprehensibility), and softening verbiage (acceptability). CONCLUSION Alpha testing guided by the International Patient Decision Aid standards was an essential step in refining and improving the TELL Tool prototype before beta testing.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ter Stege JA, Raphael DB, Oldenburg HSA, van Huizum MA, van Duijnhoven FH, Hahn DEE, The R, Karssen K, Corten EML, Krabbe-Timmerman IS, Huikeshoven M, Ruhé QPQ, Kimmings NAN, Maarse W, Sherman KA, Witkamp AJ, Woerdeman LAE, Bleiker EMA. Development of a patient decision aid for patients with breast cancer who consider immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Health Expect 2021; 25:232-244. [PMID: 34708487 PMCID: PMC8849254 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to develop a patient decision aid (pDA) that could support patients with breast cancer (BC) in making an informed decision about breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy. Methods The development included four stages: (i) Establishment of a multidisciplinary team; (ii) Needs assessment consisting of semi‐structured interviews in patients and a survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs); (iii) Creation of content, design and technical system; and (iv) Acceptability and usability testing using a think‐aloud approach in patients and interviews among HCPs and representatives of the Dutch Breast Cancer Patient Organization. Results From the needs assessment, three themes were identified: Challenging period to make a decision, Diverse motivations for a personal decision and Information needed to make a decision about BR. HCPs valued the development of a pDA, especially to prepare patients for consultation. The pDA that was developed contained three parts: first, a consultation sheet for oncological breast surgeons to introduce the choice; second, an online tool including an overview of reconstructive options, the pros and cons of each option, information on the consequences of each option for daily life, exercises to clarify personal values and patient stories; and third, a summary sheet with patients’ values, preferences and questions to help inform and guide the discussion between the patient and her plastic surgeon. The pDA was perceived to be informative, helpful and easy to use by patients and HCPs. Conclusion Consistent with information needs, a pDA was developed to support patients with BC who consider immediate BR in making an informed decision together with their plastic surgeon. Patient or Public Contribution Patients participated in the needs assessment and in acceptability and usability testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline A Ter Stege
- Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela B Raphael
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester S A Oldenburg
- Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine A van Huizum
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniela E E Hahn
- Psychosocial Counseling, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Eveline M L Corten
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Menno Huikeshoven
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Quinten P Q Ruhé
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wies Maarse
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kerry A Sherman
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie A E Woerdeman
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aarts JWM, Thompson R, Alam SS, Dannenberg M, Elwyn G, Foster TC. Encounter decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making with women experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding or symptomatic uterine fibroids: A before-after study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2259-2265. [PMID: 33632633 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Is the level of shared decision-making (SDM) higher after introduction of a SDM package (including encounter decision aids on treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding and training for clinicians) than before?. METHODS This before-after study, performed in OB-GYN practice, compared consultations before and after introduction of a SDM package. The target sample size was 25 patients per group. Women seeking treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding were eligible. After their appointments, patients filled out a three-item patient-reported SDM measure. Treatment discussions were audio-recorded and rated for SDM using Observer OPTION5. Consultation transcripts in the 'after' group were checked for adherence to the steps required for intended use of decision aids. RESULTS 16 gynaecologists participated. 25 patients participated before introduction of the decision aids and 28 after. The proportion of women reporting optimal SDM was higher after introduction (75 %) than before (50 %;p < 0.001). The mean observer-rated level of SDM was also significantly higher after than before (MD = 12.50,95 % CI 5.53-19.47). CONCLUSION The level of SDM was higher after the introduction of the package than before. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This study was conducted in a real-life setting in three clinics, both large academic and small rural, offering opportunities for implementation in different type of organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna W M Aarts
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Shama S Alam
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA
| | - Michelle Dannenberg
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA
| | - Tina C Foster
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA; Department Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Witteman HO, Maki KG, Vaisson G, Finderup J, Lewis KB, Dahl Steffensen K, Beaudoin C, Comeau S, Volk RJ. Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:736-754. [PMID: 34148384 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211014163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2013 update of the evidence informing the quality dimensions behind the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) offered a model process for developers of patient decision aids. OBJECTIVE To summarize and update the evidence used to inform the systematic development of patient decision aids from the IPDAS Collaboration. METHODS To provide further details about design and development methods, we summarized findings from a subgroup (n = 283 patient decision aid projects) in a recent systematic review of user involvement by Vaisson et al. Using a new measure of user-centeredness (UCD-11), we then rated the degree of user-centeredness reported in 66 articles describing patient decision aid development and citing the 2013 IPDAS update on systematic development. We contacted the 66 articles' authors to request their self-reports of UCD-11 items. RESULTS The 283 development processes varied substantially from minimal iteration cycles to more complex processes, with multiple iterations, needs assessments, and extensive involvement of end users. We summarized minimal, medium, and maximal processes from the data. Authors of 54 of 66 articles (82%) provided self-reported UCD-11 ratings. Self-reported scores were significantly higher than reviewer ratings (reviewers: mean [SD] = 6.45 [3.10]; authors: mean [SD] = 9.62 [1.16], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Decision aid developers have embraced principles of user-centered design in the development of patient decision aids while also underreporting aspects of user involvement in publications about their tools. Templates may reduce the need for extensive development, and new approaches for rapid development of aids have been proposed when a more detailed approach is not feasible. We provide empirically derived benchmark processes and a reporting checklist to support developers in more fully describing their development processes.[Box: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly O Witteman
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.,VITAM Research Centre, Quebec City, Canada.,CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Kristin G Maki
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gratianne Vaisson
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement & Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University & Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Krystina B Lewis
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making/Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Caroline Beaudoin
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sandrine Comeau
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert J Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Geerts PAF, van der Weijden T, Savelberg W, Altan M, Chisari G, Launert DR, Mesters H, Pisters Y, van Heumen M, Hermanns R, Bos GMJ, Moser A. The Next Step Toward Patient-Centeredness in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings: An Interview Study with Professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14:1311-1324. [PMID: 34113119 PMCID: PMC8187002 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s286044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-centeredness is essential in complex oncological multidisciplinary team decision-making. Improvement seems to be needed, while there is a lack of knowledge about health care providers’ needs for improvement. Objective To explore multidisciplinary team members’ perspectives on the need to improve patient-centeredness in complex decision-making, and subsequently the strategies to enhance it. Methods This was a qualitative descriptive interview study. The participants were twenty-four professionals who attended multidisciplinary cancer team meetings weekly. The setting was five multidisciplinary teams (gastrointestinal, gynecological, urological, head and neck, and hematological cancer) in a Dutch academic hospital. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and were analyzed with a combination of inductive and deductive content analysis. Results The participants voiced the need for additional information (patient-centered information, patients’s needs and preferences, individualized medical information) during the multidisciplinary team meeting, to be more patient-centered in the decision-making conversation with the patient following the meeting, and for more information following the meeting to support patient-centeredness. The strategies, which mostly originated from the needs, were categorized as organization, decision-making, and communication. The most prominent strategies were those aimed at collecting and using patient-centered information, and to facilitate the decision-making conversation with the patient following the multidisciplinary team meeting. Conclusion Our findings highlighted the need to improve patient-centeredness in oncological multidisciplinary teams and provided a comprehensive overview of strategies for improvement, supported by multidisciplinary team members. These strategies emphasize involvement of patients throughout the continuous process of decision-making for patients with cancer. These strategies may be implemented in other oncological multidisciplinary teams, taking in mind the local needs. Future research may help to prioritize the strategies and to determine and evaluate the effect on endpoints, like patient or professional satisfaction, shared decision-making, and on the decision that was made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulus A F Geerts
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and School GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wilma Savelberg
- Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Melis Altan
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Chisari
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Diana Ricarda Launert
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hannah Mesters
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ylva Pisters
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mike van Heumen
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Raoul Hermanns
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard M J Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and School GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Albine Moser
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li J, Yuan B, Wang Y, Zhang J, Yang S, Wu Y, Zhang J, Xiao Y. Research progress in decision-making aids for breast cancer patients. ZHONG NAN DA XUE XUE BAO. YI XUE BAN = JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY. MEDICAL SCIENCES 2021; 46:176-182. [PMID: 33678655 PMCID: PMC10929783 DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Decision-making aid for cancer patients is of great significance in the diagnosis and treatment for diseases. Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women all over the world, and breast cancer patients have become the main target population for decision-aided research. Application of decision-making assistance for patients in Western countries has developed to a certain extent, while relevant research in China is still at the early stage. There are kinds of intervention forms for patients' decision aids, including traditional brochures and videos, decision aids systems, decision coaching, multidisciplinary breast cancer teams, etc. The tools for decision-making quality evaluation include the patients' awareness for decision-making, participation, decision-making conflict, decision-making satisfaction, decision-making regret, which can provide important guidance for the application of decision-making aid treatment in breast cancer patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Li
- Research Center of Nursing Psychology, Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha 410013.
| | - Bo Yuan
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Xinzheng Public People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 451100
| | - Yishu Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011
| | - Jie Zhang
- Research Center of Nursing Psychology, Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha 410013
| | - Silan Yang
- Research Center of Nursing Psychology, Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha 410013
| | - Yuchen Wu
- Research Center of Nursing Psychology, Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha 410013
| | - Jingping Zhang
- Research Center of Nursing Psychology, Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha 410013
| | - Yao Xiao
- Department of Orthopedics, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Savelberg W, Boersma LJ, Smidt M, van der Weijden T. Implementing a breast cancer patient decision aid: Process evaluation using medical files and the patients' perspective. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 30:e13387. [PMID: 33314448 PMCID: PMC8365645 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective Although patient decision aids (PtDAs) have been shown to improve shared decision‐making, integration into clinical care pathways remains limited. This study investigated, among other outcomes, the uptake of the PtDA by professionals and the uptake as perceived by patients. Methods We performed a process evaluation among four breast cancer care teams that had been exposed to a multifaceted implementation strategy. Data were gathered by auditing patient files using a standardised data extraction sheet and conducting telephone interviews with patients using a structured interview guide. We analysed the data by using descriptive statistics. Results We found that the implementation strategies, including advice on how and when to present the PtDA to the patient, were followed for 14% of the included patients (N = 84); 92% of the patients reported to have received a login code for the web‐based PtDA, while 67% logged in and used the PtDA at home. An important factor influencing the use was the clinician promoting it when delivering the PtDA (OR 9.95 95% CI 3.03–37.72). Discussion The implementation strategies were followed in 14% of the patients, and a high delivery of the PtDA was achieved. Redesigning the care pathway and providing personal instruction on using PtDAs seem crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilma Savelberg
- Department of Quality and Safety, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Department of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Smidt
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Savelberg W, Smidt M, Boersma LJ, van der Weijden T. Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:635. [PMID: 32646422 PMCID: PMC7346491 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is known that the use of a Patient Decision Aid (PtDA), combined with advice for professionals on how and when to use it, can enhance the involvement of patients in the treatment decision. However, we need more knowledge with respect to the intention-behaviour gap. This study aims to analyse patients' experiences with the Shared Decision Making (SDM) process to find clues to close this gap. METHODS This qualitative study was part of a pilot study aiming to implement SDM in early adopter breast cancer teams. Patients were given access to a personalised PtDA. Breast cancer teams were instructed on how and when to deliver the PtDA. We interviewed 20 patients about their experience with the PtDA and SDM in general. RESULTS Most patients experienced SDM, though to a certain extent. Choice talk and option talk were commonly experienced, however the elicitation of preferences and decision talk was rare. The PtDA was used by the majority of patients (N = 13), all indicating that it was useful, especially to recall all the information given. Patients appreciated the contribution of breast cancer nurses in the SDM process. They considered them as true case managers, easy to approach and supportive. CONCLUSION Although patients felt well-informed and satisfied about risk-communication, the elicitation of preferences appeared very limited to non-existent. We recommend that breast cancer teams divide tasks in the SDM process and reallocate the elicitation of preferences to the nurses in a well-defined clinical pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. Savelberg
- Department of Quality and Safety, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Smidt
- Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L. J. Boersma
- Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Dr. Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - T. van der Weijden
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Debyeplein 1, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van Leersum CM, Moser A, van Steenkiste B, Reinartz M, Stoffers E, Wolf JRLM, van der Weijden T. What matters to me - a web-based preference elicitation tool for clients in long-term care: a user-centred design. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:57. [PMID: 32183786 PMCID: PMC7077015 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1067-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background During the process of decision-making for long-term care, clients are often dependent on informal support and available information about quality ratings of care services. However, clients do not take ratings into account when considering preferred care, and need assistance to understand their preferences. A tool to elicit preferences for long-term care could be beneficial. Therefore, the aim of this qualitative descriptive study is to understand the user requirements and develop a web-based preference elicitation tool for clients in need of long-term care. Methods We applied a user-centred design in which end-users influence the development of the tool. The included end-users were clients, relatives, and healthcare professionals. Data collection took place between November 2017 and March 2018 by means of meetings with the development team consisting of four users, walkthrough interviews with 21 individual users, video-audio recordings, field notes, and observations during the use of the tool. Data were collected during three phases of iteration: Look and feel, Navigation, and Content. A deductive and inductive content analysis approach was used for data analysis. Results The layout was considered accessible and easy during the Look and feel phase, and users asked for neutral images. Users found navigation easy, and expressed the need for concise and shorter text blocks. Users reached consensus about the categories of preferences, wished to adjust the content with propositions about well-being, and discussed linguistic difficulties. Conclusion By incorporating the requirements of end-users, the user-centred design proved to be useful in progressing from the prototype to the finalized tool ‘What matters to me’. This tool may assist the elicitation of client’s preferences in their search for long-term care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharina M van Leersum
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Albine Moser
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Ben van Steenkiste
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Reinartz
- Zorgbelang inclusief, P.O. Box 5310, 6802 EH, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Stoffers
- Burgerkracht Limburg, P.O. Box 5185, 6130 PD, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Judith R L M Wolf
- Impuls - Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, 117, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Murphy C, Laine C, Macaulay M, Fader M. Development and randomised controlled trial of a Continence Product Patient Decision Aid for men postradical prostatectomy. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29:2251-2259. [DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Murphy
- School of Health Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Christine Laine
- School of Health Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | | | - Mandy Fader
- School of Health Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dreesens D, Kremer L, van der Weijden T. The Dutch chaos case: A scoping review of knowledge and decision support tools available to clinicians in the Netherlands. Health Policy 2019; 123:1288-1297. [PMID: 31722782 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To keep clinicians up-to-date with the latest evidence, clinical practice and patient preferences, more and more knowledge tools - aiming to synthesise knowledge and support (shared) decision-making - are being developed. Unfortunately, it seems that in the Netherlands, and possibly elsewhere, the amount of different knowledge tool types makes it difficult to see the forest through the trees. METHODS A scoping review, exploring types of knowledge tools available to Dutch clinicians (and patients) and how these tools are described. The search terms were collected from thesauri and textbooks, and used to search the websites and documents of selected national tool developing organisations. RESULTS The review yielded 126 tool types. We included 67 different tool types, such as guidelines, protocols, standards and clinical pathways. Half of those tool types were aimed at clinicians, 14 at patients and 18 at both. In general, descriptions of the tool types were hard to find or incomplete. CONCLUSIONS There exists a myriad of knowledge tool types and their descriptions are mostly unclear. The information overload experienced by clinicians is not addressed effectively by developing numerous unclearly defined knowledge tools. We recommend limiting the number of tool types and making a greater effort in clearly defining them. This abundance of poorly defined tools does not seem to be restricted to the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dunja Dreesens
- Maastricht University/School CAPHRI, Department of Family Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, P.O. Box 3320, 3502 ZB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Leontien Kremer
- Department of Paediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital/Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Maxima Centre, Postbus 113, 3720 AC, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Maastricht University/School CAPHRI, Department of Family Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Woudstra AJ, Smets EMA, Dekker E, Broens THF, Penning J, Smith S, McCaffery K, Fransen MP. Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1847-1858. [PMID: 31064682 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Making an informed decision about colorectal cancer screening requires health literacy. Our aim was to develop and pilot-test a computer-based decision aid to support informed decision making about whether or not to participate in colorectal cancer screening for individuals with varying health literacy levels in the Netherlands. METHODS First, we designed and adapted the decision aid prototype among 25 individuals with low (n = 15) and adequate (n = 10) health literacy. Second, we used a before/after study to assess changes in knowledge, attitude, intention, decisional conflict, deliberation, anxiety and risk perception in an online survey among 81 individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening with low (n = 35) and adequate (n = 46) health literacy. RESULTS The decision aid was acceptable, comprehensible, reduced decisional conflict, increased deliberation and improved knowledge about colorectal cancer screening, but not about colorectal cancer, among individuals with adequate and low health literacy. Usability was slightly higher for participants with adequate health literacy compared to those with low health literacy. CONCLUSION The decision aid is promising in supporting informed decision making about colorectal cancer screening, also among individuals with lower health literacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Further refinement of interactive features, such as videos, animations and the values clarification exercise, is needed to increase the usability of the decision aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke J Woudstra
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tom H F Broens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judith Penning
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sian Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Lowy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Mirjam P Fransen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Desmarais P, Herrmann N, Alam F, Choi S, Avramescu S. Future Directions for Geriatric Anesthesiology. Anesthesiol Clin 2019; 37:581-592. [PMID: 31337487 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
"With a rapidly aging world population, it is critical for physicians of every specialty to adapt the ways they provide medical and perioperative care to patients. Older adults represent the largest population of health care users, and they have very different needs and preferences compared with their younger counterparts. In this article, the authors discuss some of the current gaps in geriatric anesthesia and perioperative care, as they elaborate on what can be expected in the near future at different levels of the health care system: the patient, the environment, and the anesthesia specialty."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Desmarais
- Cognitive & Movement Disorders Clinic, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room A455, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada; L.C. Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada; Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Nathan Herrmann
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room FG19, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Fahad Alam
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room M3200, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Stephen Choi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room M3200, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Sinziana Avramescu
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room M3200, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, Humber River Hospital, 1235 Wilson Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M3M 0B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bilodeau G, Witteman H, Légaré F, Lafontaine-Bruneau J, Voyer P, Kröger E, Tremblay MC, Giguere AMC. Reducing complexity of patient decision aids for community-based older adults with dementia and their caregivers: multiple case study of Decision Boxes. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027727. [PMID: 31072861 PMCID: PMC6528048 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patient decision aids' features to limit their complexity for older adults with dementia and their family caregivers. DESIGN Mixed method, multiple case study within a user-centred design (UCD) approach. SETTING Community-based healthcare in the province of Quebec in Canada. PARTICIPANTS 23 older persons (aged 65+ years) with dementia and their 27 family caregivers. RESULTS During three UCD evaluation-modification rounds, participants identified strengths and weaknesses of the patient decision aids' content and visual design that influenced their complexity. Weaknesses of content included a lack of understanding of the decision aids' purpose and target audience, missing information, irrelevant content and issues with terminology and sentence structure. Weaknesses of visual design included critics about the decision aids' general layout (density, length, navigation) and their lack of pictures. In response, the design team implemented a series of practical features and design strategies, comprising: a clear expression of the patient decision aids' purpose through simple text, picture and personal stories; systematic and frequent use of pictograms illustrating key points and helping structure patient decision aids' general layout; a glossary; removal of scientific references from the main document; personal stories to clarify more difficult concepts; a contact section to facilitate implementation of the selected option; GRADE ratings to convey the quality of the evidence; a values clarification exercise formatted as a checklist and presented at the beginning of the document to streamline navigation; involvement of a panel of patient/caregiver partners to guide expression of patient priorities; editing of the text to a sixth grade reading level; UCD process to optimise comprehensiveness and relevance of content and training of patients/caregivers in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The revised template for patient decision aids is designed to meet the needs of adults living with dementia and their caregivers better, which may translate into fewer evaluation-modification rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Bilodeau
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Holly Witteman
- Laval University, Family and Emergency Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group, Research Center of Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CRCHUQ), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Philippe Voyer
- Faculte des Sciences Infirmieres de l'Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Laval University Research Center on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Tremblay
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Speller B, Sissons A, Daly C, Facey M, Kennedy E, Metcalfe K, Baxter NN. An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:101. [PMID: 30728004 PMCID: PMC6366104 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3901-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients of reproductive age are at risk of infertility as a result of their treatment. Oncofertility decision support resources can assist patients with fertility decision-making before treatment yet available oncofertility resources contain varying levels of detail and different fertility options. The key information/sections needed in oncofertility resources remain unclear. To explore the information needs for oncofertility decision-making before cancer treatment, we aimed to evaluate existing oncofertility decision support resources with breast cancer patients and providers. METHODS We conducted 30 to 90-min interviews that included a survey questionnaire and open-ended questions with patients and providers between March and June 2016. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis of qualitative data. RESULTS A total of 16 participants completed interviews. Key information perceived by most participants as necessary for fertility decision-making included tailored post-treatment pregnancy rates, cost ranges and financial assistance for the fertility options based on patients' situation. However, patient and provider participants expressed differing opinions on the inclusion of all before and after treatment fertility options and the amount of fertility information required at diagnosis. CONCLUSION The evaluation identified fertility information needs among patients in addition to providers' views on patient needs. While existing oncofertility resources contain information perceived as necessary for decision-making there is an opportunity to use these findings to create or enhance resources to better meet the needs of patients. Additionally, patients and providers differing views on information needs highlight the opportunity for provider training to ensure better communication using resources in clinic to understand specific patient needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Speller
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amanda Sissons
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Corinne Daly
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcia Facey
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelly Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. .,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Berlin NL, Tandon VJ, Hawley ST, Hamill JB, MacEachern MP, Lee CN, Wilkins EG. Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Med Decis Making 2018; 39:5-20. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x18803879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. The decision-making process for women considering breast reconstruction following mastectomy is complex. Research suggests that fewer than half of women undergoing mastectomy have adequate knowledge and make treatment decisions that are concordant with their underlying values. This systematic review assesses the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative decision aids (DAs) to improve the patient decision-making process for breast reconstruction. Methods. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Databases published prior to January 4, 2018. Studies that assessed the impact of a DA on patient decision making for breast reconstruction were identified. The effect of preoperative DAs on decisional conflict in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was measured with inverse variance-weighted mean differences (mean difference [MD] ± 95% confidence interval [CI]). Results. Among 1299 unique articles identified, 1197 were excluded after reviewing titles and abstracts against selection criteria. Among the 17 studies included in this review, 11 assessed the efficacy of DAs for breast reconstruction and 6 additional studies described the development and usability of these DAs. Studies suggest that DAs reduce patient-reported decisional conflict (MD, –4.55 [95% CI, –8.65 to –0.45], P = 0.03 in the fixed-effects model and MD, –4.70 [95% CI, –10.75 to 1.34], P = 0.13 in the random-effects model). Preoperative DAs also improved patient satisfaction with information and perceived involvement in the decision-making process. Conclusions. The existing literature suggests that DAs reduce decisional conflict, improve self-reported satisfaction with information, and improve perceived involvement in the decision-making process for women considering breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah T. Hawley
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Center for Health Communications and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Mark P. MacEachern
- Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Clara N. Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Edwin G. Wilkins
- Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|