1
|
Syed R, Eden R, Makasi T, Chukwudi I, Mamudu A, Kamalpour M, Kapugama Geeganage D, Sadeghianasl S, Leemans SJJ, Goel K, Andrews R, Wynn MT, Ter Hofstede A, Myers T. Digital Health Data Quality Issues: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42615. [PMID: 37000497 PMCID: PMC10131725 DOI: 10.2196/42615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The promise of digital health is principally dependent on the ability to electronically capture data that can be analyzed to improve decision-making. However, the ability to effectively harness data has proven elusive, largely because of the quality of the data captured. Despite the importance of data quality (DQ), an agreed-upon DQ taxonomy evades literature. When consolidated frameworks are developed, the dimensions are often fragmented, without consideration of the interrelationships among the dimensions or their resultant impact. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop a consolidated digital health DQ dimension and outcome (DQ-DO) framework to provide insights into 3 research questions: What are the dimensions of digital health DQ? How are the dimensions of digital health DQ related? and What are the impacts of digital health DQ? METHODS Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a developmental systematic literature review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature focusing on digital health DQ in predominately hospital settings. A total of 227 relevant articles were retrieved and inductively analyzed to identify digital health DQ dimensions and outcomes. The inductive analysis was performed through open coding, constant comparison, and card sorting with subject matter experts to identify digital health DQ dimensions and digital health DQ outcomes. Subsequently, a computer-assisted analysis was performed and verified by DQ experts to identify the interrelationships among the DQ dimensions and relationships between DQ dimensions and outcomes. The analysis resulted in the development of the DQ-DO framework. RESULTS The digital health DQ-DO framework consists of 6 dimensions of DQ, namely accessibility, accuracy, completeness, consistency, contextual validity, and currency; interrelationships among the dimensions of digital health DQ, with consistency being the most influential dimension impacting all other digital health DQ dimensions; 5 digital health DQ outcomes, namely clinical, clinician, research-related, business process, and organizational outcomes; and relationships between the digital health DQ dimensions and DQ outcomes, with the consistency and accessibility dimensions impacting all DQ outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The DQ-DO framework developed in this study demonstrates the complexity of digital health DQ and the necessity for reducing digital health DQ issues. The framework further provides health care executives with holistic insights into DQ issues and resultant outcomes, which can help them prioritize which DQ-related problems to tackle first.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rehan Syed
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rebekah Eden
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Tendai Makasi
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ignatius Chukwudi
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Azumah Mamudu
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mostafa Kamalpour
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dakshi Kapugama Geeganage
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sareh Sadeghianasl
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sander J J Leemans
- Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Kanika Goel
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Robert Andrews
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Moe Thandar Wynn
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Arthur Ter Hofstede
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Trina Myers
- School of Information Systems, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
European Health Data Space—An Opportunity Now to Grasp the Future of Data-Driven Healthcare. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10091629. [PMID: 36141241 PMCID: PMC9498352 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10091629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The May 2022 proposal from the European commission for a ‘European health data space’ envisages advantages for health from exploiting the growing mass of health data in Europe. However, key stakeholders have identified aspects that demand clarification to ensure success. Data will need to be freed from traditional silos to flow more easily and to cross artificial borders. Wide engagement will be necessary among healthcare professionals, researchers, and the patients and citizens that stand to gain the most but whose trust must be won if they are to allow use or transfer of their data. This paper aims to alert the wider scientific community to the impact the ongoing discussions among lawmakers will have. Based on the literature and the consensus findings of an expert multistakeholder panel organised by the European Alliance for Personalised Medicine (EAPM) in June 2022, it highlights the key issues at the intersection of science and policy, and the potential implications for health research for years, perhaps decades, to come.
Collapse
|