Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus

A Monte-Carlo planning strategy for medical follow-up optimization: Illustration on multiple myeloma data

Designing patient-specific follow-up strategies is key to personalized cancer care. Tools to assist doctors in treatment decisions and scheduling follow-ups based on patient preferences and medical data would be highly beneficial. These tools should incorporate realistic models of disease progression under treatment, multi-objective optimization of treatment strategies, and efficient algorithms to personalize follow-ups by considering patient history. We propose modeling cancer evolution using a Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process, where patients alternate between remission and relapse phases, and control the model via long-term cost function optimization. This considers treatment side effects, visit burden, and quality of life, using noisy blood marker measurements for feedback. Instead of discretizing the problem with a discrete Markov Decision Process, we apply the Partially-Observed Monte-Carlo Planning algorithm to solve the continuous-time, continuous-state problem, leveraging the near-deterministic nature of cancer progression. Our approach, tested on multiple myeloma patient data, outperforms exact solutions of the discrete model and allows greater flexibility in cost function modeling, enabling patient-specific follow-ups. This method can also be adapted to other diseases.

The application of artificial intelligence in health policy: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Policymakers require precise and in-time information to make informed decisions in complex environments such as health systems. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a novel approach that makes collecting and analyzing data in complex systems more accessible. This study highlights recent research on AI's application and capabilities in health policymaking.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science databases to find relevant studies from 2000 to 2023, using the keywords "artificial intelligence" and "policymaking." We used Walt and Gilson's policy triangle framework for charting the data.

RESULTS

The results revealed that using AI in health policy paved the way for novel analyses and innovative solutions for intelligent decision-making and data collection, potentially enhancing policymaking capacities, particularly in the evaluation phase. It can also be employed to create innovative agendas with fewer political constraints and greater rationality, resulting in evidence-based policies. By creating new platforms and toolkits, AI also offers the chance to make judgments based on solid facts. The majority of the proposed AI solutions for health policy aim to improve decision-making rather than replace experts.

CONCLUSION

Numerous approaches exist for AI to influence the health policymaking process. Health systems can benefit from AI's potential to foster the meaningful use of evidence-based policymaking.