Patients' expectations of and experiences with psychosocial care needs in perioperative nursing: a descriptive study

Surgical patients' assessment of healthcare encounters after elective surgery: A descriptive study

INTRODUCTION

A Norwegian-Danish research team identified a gap in research regarding how surgical patients felt about their post-operative care needs being met in hospitals. A study was subsequently developed to understand their subjective assessments of how they value the perceived fulfilment of their actual care needs. The study was further informed by international calls to focus on the fundamentals of care practice. Our aim was to determine the extent to which surgical patients receiving elective treatment experience the physical environment, atmosphere and collaboration with staff as supportive of their care and treatment, and what this means for them after treatment. In addition, we aimed to document the extent to which patients experienced being understood and having influence in their care.

METHODS

A descriptive observation study using a cross-sectional design. The validated Perioperative User Participation Perspectives (POUP) questionnaire was completed on the day of discharge by 194 adult (male and female) patients (mean age: 56 years) who had undergone elective surgery on gynaecological, internal medicine or orthopaedic wards. Agreement between the subjective importance of nursing care for patients and the perceived reality was determined.

RESULTS

Agreement regarding the physical environment, a clean bed and clean surroundings was between 91.7 and 96.2%, and agreement with regard to a good relational atmosphere with staff it was 94.2 to 96.7%. In terms of the relational aspects of care, being understood and having influence the agreement was calculated to be 89.4 to 94.4%. However, 42.6% of the patients reported they were involved in drawing up a care plan. For those patients who valued collaborating in their care planning the congruency was 80%.

CONCLUSION

A conducive atmosphere and a keen eye for the patients' wishes and needs is of particular importance at the time of discharge after elective surgery.

Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Factors Affecting the Psychological Well-Being of Preoperative Surgical Patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the subjective psychological well-being levels and sociodemographic and psychosocial factors affecting the psychological well-being of preoperative surgical patients.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

This study was conducted between January 15, 2021 and July 15, 2021. The sample consisted of 236 surgical patients in a public hospital in the Thrace region of Turkey. Data were collected using a personal information form and the five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The data were analyzed using numbers, percentages, mean, standard deviation, independent samples t test, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey's multiple comparison test, and linear regression analysis.

FINDINGS

Participants had a mean WHO-5 score of 10.76 ± 6.21, indicating low subjective psychological well-being. Economic status, chronic disease status, history of surgery, having been on psychiatric medication or receiving professional psychological support, tobacco use, experiencing a significant life change in the last 3 months, and reporting experiencing frequent stress in everyday life were significant predictors of WHO-5 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative surgical patients have low subjective psychological well-being, and their sociodemographic and psychosocial factors affect their psychological well-being.

Patients' sense of security from clinical factors in Iran: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

One of the clinical responsibilities and goals of hospitals is to provide patients with comfort and security. The present study aims to assess patients' sense of security among patients in Iranian hospitals.

METHODS

The present research employed a cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 830 patients visiting public, private, and social security hospitals in Mazandaran in the North of Iran. The required data were collected using a questionnaire developed by the researcher of this study.This questionnaire consisted of 4 dimensions:nursing, medical, advanced facilities and patient rights. The participants were selected using a proportional stratified random sampling method. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, and ANOVA were used for data analysis using SPSS version 22.

RESULTS

The mean scores of patients' sense of security in social security, private, and public hospitals were 4.16 ± 0.89, 3.78 ± 0.67, and 3.60 ± 0.89, respectively. Medical factors with a mean and standard deviation of 3.92 ± 0.76, advanced facilities and equipment with 3.89 ± 0.89, nursing factors with 3.87 ± 0.73, and patient rights with 3.71 ± 0.90 were the highest to the lowest scores, respectively. The results showed that the type of hospital significantly affected the mean dimensions of security (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed variations in the sense of securityacross the sampled hospitals. Particularly, the sense of security attributed to the patient rights factors was lower than other factors. Therefore, to enhance the sense of security for patients, it is recommended to focus on staff training and fostering a culturethat emphasizes obtaining informed consent, demonstrating respect for the patient, and introducing the medical team to the patient before initiating any treatment.