Development and testing of indicators to measure coordination of clinical information and management across levels of care

Impact of coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies on cross-level clinical coordination: A scoping review

Background

Coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies (ICTs) are gaining attention, especially since the pandemic, due to their potential to improve communication between health professionals. However, their impact on cross-level clinical coordination remains unclear. The aim is to synthesize the evidence on the impact of ICT-based coordination mechanisms on clinical coordination between primary care and secondary care (SC) doctors and to identify knowledge gaps.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted by searching for original articles in six electronic databases and a manual search, with no restrictions regarding time, area, or methodology. Titles and abstracts were screened. Full texts of the selected articles were reviewed and analysed to assess the impact of each mechanism, according to the cross-level clinical coordination conceptual framework.

Results

Of the 6555 articles identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria. All had been conducted in high-income countries, most (n = 26) evaluated the impact of a single mechanism - asynchronous electronic consultations via electronic health records (EHR) - and were limited in terms of design and types and dimensions of cross-level clinical coordination analysed. The evaluation of electronic consultations showed positive impacts on the appropriateness of referrals and accessibility to SC, yet the qualitative studies also highlighted potential risks. Studies on other mechanisms were scarce (shared EHR, email consultations) or non-existent (videoconferencing, mobile applications).

Conclusions

Evidence of the impact of ICT-based mechanisms on clinical coordination between levels is limited. Rigorous evaluations are needed to inform policies and strategies for improving coordination between healthcare levels, thus contributing to high-quality, efficient healthcare.

Common Features of Selection Processes of Health System Performance Indicators in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Health system performance indicators are widely used to assess primary healthcare (PHC) performance. Despite the numerous tools and some convergence on indicator criteria, there is not a clear understanding of the common features of indicator selection processes. We aimed to review the literature to identify papers that document indicator selection processes for health system performance indicators in PHC.

METHODS

We searched the online databases Scopus, Medline, and CINAHL, as well as the grey literature, without time restrictions, initially on July 31, 2019 followed by an update November 13, 2020. Empirical studies or reports were included if they described the selection of health system performance indicators or frameworks, that included PHC indicators. A combination of the process focussed research question and qualitative analysis meant a quality appraisal tool or assessment of bias could not meaningfully be applied to assess individual studies. We undertook an inductive analysis based on potential indicator selection processes criteria, drawn from health system performance indicator appraisal tools reported in the literature.

RESULTS

We identified 16 503 records of which 28 were included in the review. Most studies used a descriptive case study design. We found no consistent variations between indicator selection processes of health systems of high income and low- or lower-middle income countries. Identified common features of selection processes for indicators in PHC include literature review or adaption of an existing framework as an initial step; a consensus building process with stakeholders; structuring indicators into categories; and indicator criteria focusing on validity and feasibility. The evidence around field testing with utility and consideration of reporting burden was less clear.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight several characteristics of health system indicator selection processes. These features provide the groundwork to better understand how to value indicator selection processes in PHC.

Evaluating the effectiveness of care coordination interventions designed and implemented through a participatory action research process: Lessons learned from a quasi-experimental study in public healthcare networks in Latin America

Background

Despite increasing recommendations for health professionals to participate in intervention design and implementation to effect changes in clinical practice, little is known about this strategy’s effectiveness. This study analyses the effectiveness of interventions designed and implemented through participatory action research (PAR) processes in healthcare networks of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay to improve clinical coordination across care levels, and offers recommendations for future research.

Methods

The study was quasi-experimental. Two comparable networks, one intervention (IN) and one control (CN), were selected in each country. Baseline (2015) and evaluation (2017) surveys of a sample of primary and secondary care doctors (174 doctors/network/year) were conducted using the COORDENA^® questionnaire. Most of the interventions chosen were based on joint meetings, promoting cross-level clinical agreement and communication for patient follow-up. Outcome variables were: a) intermediate: interactional and organizational factors; b) distal: experience of cross-level clinical information coordination, of clinical management coordination and general perception of coordination between levels. Poisson regression models were estimated.

Results

A statistically significant increase in some of the interactional factors (intermediate outcomes) -knowing each other personally and mutual trust- was observed in Brazil and Chile INs; and in some organizational factors -institutional support- in Colombia and Mexico. Compared to CNs in 2017, INs of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico showed significant differences in some factors. In distal outcomes, care consistency items improved in Brazil, Colombia and Uruguay INs; and patient follow-up improved in Chile and Mexico. General perception of clinical coordination increased in Brazil, Colombia and Mexico INs. Compared to CNs in 2017, only Brazil showed significant differences.

Conclusions

Although more research is needed, results show that PAR-based interventions improved some outcomes regarding clinical coordination at network level, with differences between countries. However, a PAR process is, by definition, slow and gradual, and longer implementation periods are needed to achieve greater penetration and quantifiable changes. The participatory and flexible nature of interventions developed through PAR processes poses methodological challenges (such as defining outcomes or allocating individuals to different groups in advance), and requires a comprehensive mixed-methods approach that simultaneously evaluates effectiveness and the implementation process to better understand its outcomes.

[Does the integration of health services management improve clinical coordination? Experience in Catalonia]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the experience and perception of clinical coordination across care levels and doctor's organizational and interactional related factors, according to the type of management integration of the healthcare services of the area, in Catalonia.

METHOD

Cross-sectional study based on an online survey by self-administration of the questionnaire COORDENA-CAT.

DATA COLLECTION

October-December 2017.

STUDY POPULATION

primary and secondary care (acute and long-term care) doctors of the public Catalan health system.

SAMPLE

3308 doctors.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

experience and perception of clinical coordination, knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms and organizational and interactional factors; explanatory variables: area according to type of management (integrated, semi-integrated, non-integrated), socio-demographic, employment characteristics and attitude toward work. Descriptive analysis by type of area and multivariate analysis by robust Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Better clinical coordination was observed in integrated areas compared to those semi-integrated, mainly in relation to information transfer, adequate follow-up and perception of coordination in the area. No differences were found between integrated and non-integrated areas in the clinical coordination experience, although there were differences in perception and some related factors. There are common problems across areas, such as accessibility to secondary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Few differences were found between integrated and non-integrated areas, revealing that management integration may facilitate clinical coordination but is not enough. Differences with semi-integrated areas indicate the need to promote cooperation formulas between all the providers of the territory, with common objectives and coordination mechanisms, in order to avoid inequalities in quality of care.

[Communicational relations between healthcare professionals and their influence on coordination of care]

The study aims to understand the influence of communicational relations among healthcare professionals in the coordination of care between levels. This is a qualitative study with data from the international multicenter study Equity-LA II, with dialectic hermeneutics as the theoretical reference. The authors listened to the audios from 15 interviews with professionals (7 physicians from primary care and 5 from specialized care, and 3 institutional supporters from primary care) in a municipal network in the Agreste region of the state of Pernambuco, Brazil, in 2016. The mixed categories were submitted to content analysis. The analysis revealed a lack of recognition, by nearly all of the professionals, of primary care as the organizational backbone for care, and the perception of coordination revealed obstacles related to disconnects in establishing dialogical relations. Knowledge of the physician's role in primary care is incomplete, and its praxis is viewed with distrust by specialists, while the reciprocal is not true. There was a visibly non-dialogical interpersonal relationship, based on asymmetric relations reflected in the specialist's authoritarian stance and that of inferiority of primary care physicians. The basis for the communicative action relates to pretensions of validity rather than of power, which is external to language, and impedes the discussion of reasons and arguments. There was little disposition for dialogue and reciprocal recognition between the parties involved, with interdiction of a communicative situation in which there is symmetry of participation. The results revealed communicational weaknesses, thus requiring strategies that allow achieving communicative understanding among the professionals and promoting satisfactory patient follow-up between levels of care.

MONITORING OF CERVICAL CANCER CONTROL ACTIONS AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS

ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze factors associated with the monitoring of actions to control cervical cancer in the Family Health Strategy, in a health region of northeastern Brazil. Method: a cross-sectional study conducted from January to March 2019 by means of interviews with 241 physicians and nurses from the Family Health Teams of the Vitória da Conquista health region, Bahia, Brazil. Adequate monitoring was assessed by the degree of actions taken to promote, prevent and actively seek to control cervical cancer. Three blocks of variables were tested as explanatory: professional characterization and training; organization of the unit and access to cytopathological exam; and care coordination and integration. Poisson regression with robust variance was employed, adopting hierarchical entry of variables. Results: 51.9% (95% CI: 45.5-58.2) of the professionals performed adequate monitoring for the control of cervical cancer. Being a nurse, working in the municipality’s primary care network (≥2 years), disclosure of results collection through posters and other communication means, existence of a high-grade lesion, time to perform the biopsy ≤1 month, and agility in the release of the reports were elements associated to the outcome. Conclusion: even with the extended coverage of the Family Health Strategy, small municipalities in the Northeast have characteristics that impose obstacles to comprehensiveness, favoring the incidence of high-grade lesions and greater difficulty in the control of cervical cancer. Assessing the assistance quality in this level revealed challenges in the regionalized network.

Can care coordination across levels be improved through the implementation of participatory action research interventions? Outcomes and conditions for sustaining changes in five Latin American countries

BACKGROUND

Finding new strategies for care integration has become a policy priority for many fragmented health systems in Latin America. Although the implementation of interventions through a participatory action research (PAR) approach is considered to be more effective in achieving organizational change, its application is scarce. This study, part of the research project Equity-LA II, aims to analyze the impact of PAR interventions on care coordination across levels, and key aspects for their sustainability and transferability, from the stakeholder viewpoint in healthcare networks of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay. Different interventions were designed and implemented through a PAR process to improve communication and clinical agreement between primary care and secondary care doctors: joint meetings to discuss clinical cases and/or training; shared care guidelines; offline virtual consultations; a referral and reply letter; and an induction program.

METHODS

A qualitative, descriptive-interpretative study was conducted in the healthcare network of each country. Focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with a criterion sample of participants: local steering committee (29) and professional platform members (28), other health professionals (49) and managers (28). Thematic content analysis was conducted, segmented by country and type of intervention.

RESULTS

Informants highlighted that joint meetings based on reflexive methods contributed substantially to improving contextually relevant elements of clinical management coordination - communication in patient follow-up, clinical agreement, appropriateness of referrals - and also administrative coordination. The meetings, alongside the PAR process, also helped to improve interaction between professionals - knowing each other personally and mutual trust - thus fostering willingness to collaborate. The PAR approach, moreover, served to spread awareness of the coordination problems and need for intervention, encouraging greater commitment and interest in participating. No noteworthy contributions were identified in remaining interventions due to low uptake. A necessary condition for the sustainability and replicability was that PAR process had to be used appropriately in a favourable context.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is provided on the substantial contribution of interventions to improving locally relevant clinical coordination elements and professional interaction when implemented through an adequate PAR process (in terms of time, method and participation levels), a necessary condition for their sustainability and replicability.

Do primary and secondary care doctors have a different experience and perception of cross-level clinical coordination? Results of a cross-sectional study in the Catalan National Health System (Spain)

BACKGROUND

Clinical coordination across care levels is a priority for health systems around the world, especially for those based on primary health care. The aim of this study is to analyse the degree of clinical information and clinical management coordination across healthcare levels in the Catalan national health system experienced by primary (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors and explore the associated factors.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study based on an online survey using the self-administered questionnaire COORDENA-CAT.

DATA COLLECTION

October-December 2017.

STUDY POPULATION

PC and SC (acute and long term) doctors of the Catalan national health system. Participation rate was 21%, with a sample of 3308 doctors.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

cross-level clinical information coordination, clinical management coordination, and perception of cross-level coordination within the area. Explanatory variables: socio-demographic, employment characteristics, attitude towards job, type of area (according to type of hospital and management), interactional factors, organizational factors and knowledge of existing coordination mechanisms. Stratification variable: level of care. Descriptive and multivariate analysis by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The degree of clinical coordination experienced across levels of care was high for both PC and SC doctors, although PC doctors experienced greater exchange and use of information and SC doctors experienced greater consistency of care. However, only 32.13% of PC and 35.72% of SC doctors found that patient care was coordinated across care levels within their area. In both levels of care, knowing the doctors of the other level, working in an area where the same entity manages SC and majority of PC, and holding joint clinical case conferences were factors positively associated with perceiving high levels of clinical coordination. Other associated factors were specific to the care level, such as being informed of a patient's discharge from hospital for PC doctors, or trusting in the clinical skills of the other care level for SC doctors.

CONCLUSIONS

Interactional and organizational factors are positively associated with perceiving high levels of clinical coordination. Introducing policies to enhance such factors can foster clinical coordination between different health care levels. The COORDENA questionnaire allows us to identify fields for improvement in clinical coordination.

Organizational Coordination and Patient Experiences of Specialty Care Integration

BACKGROUND

Delivering care to patients with complex healthcare needs benefits from coordination among healthcare providers. Greater levels of care coordination have been associated with more favorable patient experiences, cost management, and lower utilization of services. Organizational approaches consider how systems, practices, and relationships influence coordination and associated outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Examine measures of organizational coordination and their association with patient experiences of care coordination involving specialists.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional surveys of patients and primary care providers (PCPs).

PARTICIPANTS

Final sample included 3183 patients matched to 233 PCPs from the Veterans Health Administration. All patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and one of four other conditions: hypertension; congestive heart failure; depression/anxiety; or severe mental illness/posttraumatic stress disorder.

MAIN MEASURES

Patients completed a survey assessing perceptions of coordinated care. We examined ratings on three domains: specialist knowledge management; knowledge integration across settings and time; and knowledge fragmentation across settings and time. We created care coordination measures involving the PCP and three specialty provider types. PCPs provided ratings on relational coordination for specialists, feedback coordination, and team coordination. We aligned patient's specialty services used with corresponding PCP ratings of that specialty.

KEY RESULTS

Patient ratings were significantly lower on specialist knowledge management and knowledge integration when either PCPs did not use feedback coordination (b = - .20; b = - .17, respectively) or rated feedback coordination lower (b = - .08 for both). Teamwork was significantly related to specialist knowledge management (b = .06), knowledge integration (b = .04); and knowledge fragmentation (b = - .04). Relational coordination was related to coordination between the primary care provider and (i) diabetes specialist (b = .09) and (ii) mental health provider (b = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

Practices to improve provider coordination within and across primary care and specialty care services may improve patient experiences of care coordination. Improvements in these areas may improve care efficiency and effectiveness.

Developing a Care Coordination Model Using a Hybrid DEMATEL and PLS-SEM Approach

The aim of this article is to develop and assess a model for care coordination (CC). A novel hybrid approach of Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) has been used to assess the CC model. The study has been conducted in four phases: (a) literature review, (b) Delphi session, (c) development of CC model through DEMATEL and (d) validation of the model through PLS-SEM. The study involves perspectives of service providers as well as service receivers, for which data were collected from hospitals across India. The literature review and Delphi session helped in finalising the seven measures of CC. Identified measures of CC are: IT-enabled coordination, inter-professional teamwork and consistency, patient centredness, communication and information transfer, physical infrastructural facilities and requirements, delivery of quality care, and facilitating transitions and accountability. Patient-centredness was found to be the most important construct of CC. Delivery of quality care is the most influenced construct and is affected by all the other constructs. Based on the results, practitioners may develop an overarching strategy to deliver seamless care and better health outcomes. This understanding may help in designing processes which in turn would deliver health as a social good.

Percursos e obstáculos na Rede de Atenção à Saúde: trajetórias assistenciais de mulheres em região de saúde do Nordeste brasileiro

Resumo: O artigo tem como objetivo avaliar a organização e o acesso à Rede de Atenção à Saúde em uma região de saúde, na perspectiva das usuárias. Foram construídas trajetórias assistenciais de mulheres com lesão intraepitelial escamosa de alto grau do colo do útero, adscritas a diferentes modalidades de atenção primária à saúde (APS) de zonas urbana e rural, em municípios do interior e da sede de região de saúde do Nordeste do Brasil. As mulheres utilizavam a APS como serviço de busca regular para ações preventivas e assistenciais, mas reportaram barreiras de acesso para consultas médicas, sobretudo nas zonas rurais. Avaliações positivas foram vinculadas ao acolhimento e à representação da unidade básica de saúde/unidade de saúde da família (UBS/USF) como lócus disponível para cuidados. Percepção de baixa resolutividade da APS esteve ligada à demora para o agendamento das referências, abastecimento irregular/insuficiente de medicamentos e rotatividade de médicos. As mulheres indicaram dificuldade de acesso à atenção especializada, mais evidente nos municípios do interior da região, com utilização de serviços públicos e privados. Todas as usuárias da sede da região realizaram exames de confirmação diagnóstica e cirurgia pelo Sistema Único de Saúde. Apoio de familiares, amigos e políticos atravessaram as trajetórias assistenciais. Comunicação interprofissional foi quase inexistente e entre profissional/usuária, precária. A rede regionalizada apresentou-se desarticulada e com fluxos desordenados, não garantindo acesso oportuno às usuárias dos municípios do interior e apresentando dificuldades adicionais àquelas da área rural, mesmo no município sede, desvelando a incompletude dos arranjos regionais e a manutenção de desigualdades de acesso inter e intramunicipal.

Integração de rede e coordenação do cuidado: o caso do sistema de saúde do Chile

Resumo O artigo analisa a implementação de redes integradas de serviços de saúde (RISS) e de estratégias para a coordenação do cuidado pela APS no sistema de saúde do Chile em seu segmento público. Foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas com “policymakers” do sistema público de saúde e academia, complementado por análise documental e revisão bibliográfica. O país destaca-se pela institucionalização de instrumentos de coordenação do cuidado amplamente reconhecidos como mapas de derivação, médico gestor de demanda, prontuários eletrônicos e, sobretudo, definição de protocolos, sob forte liderança do Ministério da Saúde e condução pelos gestores dos “Servicios de Salud”, espaço regional de construção das RISS. Contudo, identificam-se camadas de segmentação e fragmentação no interior do subsistema público com a manutenção da livre-eleição para consultas especializadas e duplas filas de espera – uma para os procedimentos com garantias explícitas de acesso e outra para os demais. A experiência chilena demonstra a necessidade de maior protagonismo da APS para que seja capaz de assumir a condução das RISS. No país, as redes parecem orbitar ao redor de grandes e potentes hospitais. Elementos do contexto mais amplo do sistema de saúde também condicionam avanços e impasses no desenvolvimento das estratégias analisadas.

Relational continuity with primary and secondary care doctors: a qualitative study of perceptions of users of the Catalan national health system

Background

In the current context of increasingly fragmented healthcare systems where patients are seen by multiple doctors in different settings, patients’ relational continuity with one doctor is regaining relevance; however little is known about relational continuity with specialists. The aim of this study is to explore perceptions of relational continuity with primary care and secondary care doctors, its influencing factors and consequences from the viewpoint of users of the Catalan national health system (Spain).

Methods

We conducted a descriptive-interpretative qualitative study using a two-stage theoretical sample; (i) contexts: three healthcare areas in the Catalan national health system with differing characteristics; (ii) informants: users 18 years or older attended to at both care levels. Sample size (n = 49) was reached by saturation. Data were collected by individual semi-structured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was carried out segmenting data by study area, and leaving room for new categories to emerge from the data.

Results

Patients across the areas studied generally experienced consistency of primary care doctors (PCD), alongside some inconsistency of specialists. Consistency of specialists did not seem to be relevant to some patients when their clinical information was shared and used. Patients who experienced consistency and frequent visits with the same PCD or specialist described and valued having established an ongoing relationship characterised by personal trust and mutual accumulated knowledge. Identified consequences were diverse and included, for example, facilitated diagnosis or improved patient-doctor communication. The ascription to a PCD, a health system-related factor, facilitated relational continuity with the PCD, whereas organizational factors (for instance, the size of the primary care centre) favoured consistency of PCD and specialists. Doctor-related factors (for example, high technical competence or commitment to patient care) particulary fostered the development of an ongoing relationship.

Conclusions

Consistency of doctors differs depending on the care level as does the relevance attributed to it. Most influencing factors can be applied to both care levels and might be addressed by healthcare managers to foster relational continuity. More research is needed to fully understand the relevance patients assign to relational continuity with specialists.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3042-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Percepção dos profissionais sobre a coordenação entre níveis de atenção à saúde em dois municípios pernambucanos de grande porte

Objetivou-se conhecer a percepção de profissionais de saúde sobre a coordenação da atenção entre níveis assistenciais em dois municípios do estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Pesquisa qualitativa foi realizada por meio de entrevistas em profundidade, com 51 profissionais de atenção básica (AB) e especializada (AE) quanto à coordenação da gestão clínica e fatores que a influenciam. Os resultados mostraram que, embora se observe compreensão insuficiente do termo Coordenação da atenção entre níveis, há reconhecimento da importância e do esforço em investir nesse processo. A insuficiência de comunicação entre AB e AE é vista como causa e consequência de problemas que dificultam a coordenação da gestão clínica nas dimensões do seguimento, acessibilidade e coerência da atenção. Não se observaram iniciativas de aproximação entre profissionais da AB e AE, no sentido de promover conhecimento mútuo, fortalecer a qualificação profissional e o manejo conjunto dos casos.

Doctors' opinion on the contribution of coordination mechanisms to improving clinical coordination between primary and outpatient secondary care in the Catalan national health system

BACKGROUND

Clinical coordination is considered a health policy priority as its absence can lead to poor quality of care and inefficiency. A key challenge is to identify which strategies should be implemented to improve coordination. The aim is to analyse doctors' opinions on the contribution of mechanisms to improving clinical coordination between primary and outpatient secondary care and the factors influencing their use.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study in three healthcare networks of the Catalan national health system. A two-stage theoretical sample was designed: in the first stage, networks with different management models were selected; in the second, primary care (n = 26) and secondary care (n = 24) doctors. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Final sample size was reached by saturation. A thematic content analysis was conducted, segmented by network and care level.

RESULTS

With few differences across networks, doctors identified similar mechanisms contributing to clinical coordination: 1) shared EMR facilitating clinical information transfer and uptake; 2) mechanisms enabling problem-solving communication and agreement on clinical approaches, which varied across networks (joint clinical case conferences, which also promote mutual knowledge and training of primary care doctors; virtual consultations through EMR and email); and 3) referral protocols and use of the telephone facilitating access to secondary care after referrals. Doctors identified organizational (insufficient time, incompatible timetables, design of mechanisms) and professional factors (knowing each other, attitude towards collaboration, concerns over misdiagnosis) that influence the use of mechanisms.

DISCUSSION

Mechanisms that most contribute to clinical coordination are feedback mechanisms, that is those based on mutual adjustment, that allow doctors to exchange information and communicate. Their use might be enhanced by focusing on adequate working conditions, mechanism design and creating conditions that promote mutual knowledge and positive attitudes towards collaboration.

Validation of the OPportunity for Treatment In ONcology (OPTION) questionnaire measuring continuity of care

Increasing efforts are ongoing to deliver effective cancer care through integrated networks of services. Measuring patients' experience of care is essential to identify problematic areas that require organisational adjustments. The aim of the present study was to examine the validity of OPTION questionnaire, designed to measure patient's perceived continuity of care across different phases of their care pathway. The study was carried at the Institute for Cancer Treatment and Research, Meldola and the oncology departments of the Local Health Authority of Romagna, Italy. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to identify factors underlying patients' perception of continuity of care. Factor scores were compared between patients with or without a care coordinator using Mann-Whitney test. The study sample consisted of 214 patients with breast or colorectal cancer, with a mean age of 62.3 years. Most patients identified the oncologist as their care coordinator. Five factors were extracted using PCA: (1) "trustful relationship with health care staff," (2) "information on care pathway," (3) "information on changes related to the illness," (4) "feelings of abandonment" and (5) "collaboration among health care professionals." The scores of factors 2 and 3 were significantly higher among those with a care coordinator. The OPTION questionnaire is a reliable instrument that can help clinicians and administrative stakeholder target efforts and resources in the pursuit of quality of care.

Continuity of clinical management and information across care levels: perceptions of users of different healthcare areas in the Catalan national health system

BACKGROUND

The integration of health care has become a priority in most health systems, as patients increasingly receive care from several professionals in various different settings and institutions, particularly those with chronic conditions and multi-morbidities. Continuity of care is defined as one patient experiencing care over time as connected and coherent with his or her health needs and personal circumstances. The objective is to analyse perceptions of continuity of clinical management and information across care levels and the factors influencing it, from the viewpoint of users of the Catalan national health system.

METHODS

A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted using a phenomenological approach. A two-stage theoretical sample was selected: (i) the study contexts: healthcare areas in Catalonia with different services management models; (ii) users ≥ 18 years of age who were attended to at both care levels for the same health problem. Data were collected by means of individual semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 49). All interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was conducted segmented by study area, with a mixed generation of categories and triangulation of analysts.

RESULTS

Patients in all three areas generally perceived that continuity of clinical management across levels existed, on referring to consistent care (same diagnosis and treatment by doctors of both care levels, no incompatibilities of prescribed medications, referrals across levels when needed) and accessibility across levels (timeliness of appointments). In terms of continuity of information, patients in most areas mentioned the existence of information sharing via computer and its adequate usage. Only a few discontinuity elements were reported such as long waiting times for specific tests performed in secondary care or insufficient use of electronic medical records by locum doctors. Different factors influencing continuity were identified by patients, relating to the health system itself (clear distribution of roles between primary and secondary care), health services organizations (care coordination mechanisms, co-location, insufficient resources) and physicians (willingness to collaborate, commitment to patient care, the primary care physician's technical competence).

CONCLUSIONS

Care continuity across care levels is experienced by patients in the areas studied, with certain exceptions that highlight where there is room for improvement. Influencing factors offer valuable insights on where to direct coordination efforts.