Analyzing barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an action plan to strengthen the midwifery professional role: a Moroccan case study

Facilitators influencing midwives to leadership positions in policy, education and practice: A systematic integrative literature review

The development of midwives as leaders is a crucial step towards achieving equality in sexual, reproductive, maternal, and neonatal health, Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). However, many midwives work only to implement policies made by others rather than being drivers of policy changes. Little is known and researched about why midwives are not involved in decision and policymaking related to sexual, reproductive, maternal, and neonatal health. Hence, with a focus on midwifery leadership within the global community and the limited opportunities for women to hold leadership positions, this research explores the facilitators influencing midwives' opportunities to become leaders in policy development, education and practice. Inspired by Whittemore and Knafl, this integrative literature review was conducted after twenty-two relevant articles were identified through a search of the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus. Inductive content analysis was applied to analyze data. The result indicates that for midwives to become influential leaders, they must be active in strategic planning at the highest level. This inevitably effects how far midwives can act as agents for change, even if they possess the knowledge and skills for a leadership position. Policies and regulations influence how midwives' status in society is acknowledged and recognized. A clearly articulated educational pathway will enable their professional growth and expertise, making them knowledgeable and skillful as leaders. Enabling midwives to step into leadership positions at government level requires reforms which include midwives in decision-making. Excluding midwives from decision-making processes is detrimental to the goal of achieving universal health coverage. The first step is to provide midwives with a protected title, enabling them to work autonomously in an enabling environment with normal pregnancy and birth to achieve the SDG 2030 goals.

Midwives' experiences of the consequences of navigating barriers to maternity care

Midwives in Low- and middle-income countries, experience myriad barriers that have consequences for them and for maternity care. This article provides insight into the consequences of the barriers that Ghanaian midwives face in their workplaces. Glaserian Grounded Theory methodology using semi-structured interviews and non-participant observations was applied in this study. The study participants comprised of 29 midwives and a pharmacist, a social worker, a health services manager, and a National Insurance Scheme manager in Ghana. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently while building on already analyzed data. In this study it was identified that barriers to Ghanaian midwives' ability to provide maternity care can have physiological, psychological, and socioeconomic consequences for midwives. It also negatively impacted maternity care. Implementing new ameliorating measures to mitigate the barriers that Ghanaian midwives encounter, and the consequences that those barriers have on them would improve midwife retention and care quality.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of midwife-led care for childbearing women in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review

BACKGROUND

Evidence from high-income countries demonstrate improvements in maternal and neonatal health with midwife-led care. Midwife-led care is pivotal to meet the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Despite this, successful implementation of midwife-led care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been limited. It is therefore necessary to understand the factors that influence the implementation of midwife-led care.

AIM

This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of midwife-led care for childbearing women in LMICs from the perspectives of care recipients, providers and wider stakeholders.

METHODS

A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted of primary research studies that expressed the views of those involved in or affected by the implementation of midwife-led care in LMICs. Reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care database (MIDIRS), Global Health and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data was analysed and synthesized using the Supporting the Use of Research Evidence (SURE) framework to identify barriers and enabling factors to implementing midwife-led care.

FINDINGS

A total of 31 studies from 21 LMICs were included. At the care recipient level, women need adequate knowledge and confidence about midwife-led care to utilise services. At the care provider level, strengthening midwifery education and practice by employing experienced educators and supervisors is essential. Findings also suggest that increased collaboration between funders, professional organisations, practitioners, communities, and the government is necessary for successful implementation. However, adequate and sustained funding for midwife-led care programs is often lacking and political instability contributes to poor implementation in LMICs.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

There are several enabling factors which increase the success and sustainability of the midwife-led model of care in LMICs. However, current practice guidelines and strategic frameworks need to better reflect the infrastructure and resource limitations of health settings in LMICs.

Midwifery in Middle Eastern and North African countries: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

While midwives are positioned as critical providers for improving sexual, reproductive, maternal and newborn health outcomes in the Middle East and North African (MENA) countries, the standards of midwifery have not been explored systematically in this region.

AIM

The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of existing literature on midwifery practice, education, and regulation in MENA countries in the context of ICM standards.

METHODS

A search was conducted inclusive of English and Persian written studies published between 2000 and 2019 in CINAHL plus; Ovid MEDLINE; PubMed; Scopus; and grey literature. Title and abstract and full-text review were performed in Covidence, and data extraction and synthesis performed using NVivo 12.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 7,994 articles. Overall, 139 studies were included in the review. Although, the primary concept of most included studies was "midwifery practice", "midwifery regulation" was addressed in limited way. Approximately 90% were from Middle Eastern countries. Forty-two per cent of studies used cross-sectional designs, and most originated from Iran, Jordan, and Palestine. Diversity was found in midwifery education, practice and regulation across the MENA countries. Midwives from different nations had uneven levels of proficiency, scope of practice, and education. Midwifery curricula were aligned with ICM competencies in some countries. Most countries had midwifery associations and were members of ICM. Some countries had regulations recognising midwifery as an autonomous profession.

CONCLUSION

Midwifery practice, education and regulation in MENA countries were not always comparable with ICM standards, although some progress was evident.

Implementation science in maternity care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Despite wide recognition that clinical care should be informed by the best available evidence, this does not always occur. Despite a myriad of theories, models and frameworks to promote evidence-based population health, there is still a long way to go, particularly in maternity care. The aim of this study is to appraise the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of evidence-based interventions in maternity care. This is achieved by clarifying if and how implementation science theories, models, and frameworks are used.

METHODS

To map relevant literature, a scoping review was conducted of articles published between January 2005 and December 2019, guided by Peters and colleagues' (2015) approach. Specifically, the following academic databases were systematically searched to identify publications that presented findings on implementation science or the implementation process (rather than just the intervention effect): Business Source Complete; CINAHL Plus with Full Text; Health Business Elite; Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition; Medline; PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; and PubMed. Information about each study was extracted using a purposely designed data extraction form.

RESULTS

Of the 1181 publications identified, 158 were included in this review. Most of these reported on factors that enabled implementation, including knowledge, training, service provider motivation, effective multilevel coordination, leadership and effective communication-yet there was limited expressed use of a theory, model or framework to guide implementation. Of the 158 publications, 144 solely reported on factors that helped and/or hindered implementation, while only 14 reported the use of a theory, model and/or framework. When a theory, model or framework was used, it typically guided data analysis or, to a lesser extent, the development of data collection tools-rather than for instance, the design of the study.

CONCLUSION

Given that models and frameworks can help to describe phenomenon, and theories can help to both describe and explain it, evidence-based maternity care might be promoted via the greater expressed use of these to ultimately inform implementation science. Specifically, advancing evidence-based maternity care, worldwide, will require the academic community to make greater explicit and judicious use of theories, models, and frameworks.

REGISTRATION

Registered with the Joanna Briggs Institute (registration number not provided).

Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a determinants framework that may require adaptation or contextualization to fit the needs of implementation scientists in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The purpose of this review is to characterize how the CFIR has been applied in LMIC contexts, to evaluate the utility of specific constructs to global implementation science research, and to identify opportunities to refine the CFIR to optimize utility in LMIC settings.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the use of the CFIR in LMICs. Citation searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Data abstraction included study location, study design, phase of implementation, manner of implementation (ex., data analysis), domains and constructs used, and justifications for use, among other variables. A standardized questionnaire was sent to the corresponding authors of included studies to determine which CFIR domains and constructs authors found to be compatible with use in LMICs and to solicit feedback regarding ways in which CFIR performance could be improved for use in LMICs.

RESULTS

Our database search yielded 504 articles, of which 34 met final inclusion criteria. The studies took place across 21 countries and focused on 18 different health topics. The studies primarily used qualitative study designs (68%). Over half (59%) of the studies applied the CFIR at study endline, primarily to guide data analysis or to contextualize study findings. Nineteen (59%) of the contacted authors participated in the survey. Authors unanimously identified culture and engaging as compatible with use in global implementation research. Only two constructs, patient needs and resources and individual stages of change were commonly identified as incompatible with use. Author feedback centered on team level influences on implementation, as well as systems characteristics, such as health system architecture. We propose a "Characteristics of Systems" domain and eleven novel constructs be added to the CFIR to increase its compatibility for use in LMICs.

CONCLUSIONS

These additions provide global implementation science practitioners opportunities to account for systems-level determinants operating independently of the implementing organization. Newly proposed constructs require further reliability and validity assessments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42018095762.

[Construction of a common vision of nurses and midwives training in Democratic Republic of the Congo.]

OBJECTIVE

To present the activities that facilitate the development of a public policy by public health and higher and university education ministry stakeholders - based on a common vision of nurses and midwives training in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

METHODS

An operational research using different methods applied by experts called ?policy brokers? according to a framework covering the advocacy mechanisms (Advocacy Coalition Framework) designed to promote the development of a public policy. The population comprised 2 types of common interest groups (coalitions), derived from 3 systems (sociocultural-legal, educational, professional), involved in the choice of the ?secondary AND higher? or ?secondary OR higher? training profile for the concerned professionals. The methods comprised: workshops (discussion, training, restitution, validation, negotiation, scientific, reflection group meetings), training activities (programme development, training of nursing and midwives trainers-supervisors) and a variety of media coverage and marketing activities.

RESULTS

The nurses and midwives profiles required in the DRC have been established. The levels required for their training have been validated and defined by a common vision of the two ministries concerned. A formal consultation framework was set up to launch the required reform for the review of these two professional's profiles.

CONCLUSION

The public policy experts' activities based on the advocacy framework are complex, lengthy and time-consuming. In DRC, a Ministerial decree is currently being finalized to address the creation of a formal consultation framework concerning the training and utilisation of human health resources.