1
|
Rand S, Towers AM, Allan S, Webster L, Palmer S, Carroll R, Gordon A, Akdur G, Goodman C. Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (ASCOT-Proxy) completed by care home staff. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1555-1567. [PMID: 38507142 PMCID: PMC11116179 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03631-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rasch analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to evaluate the structural validity of the ASCOT-Proxy measures completed by staff on behalf of older adults resident in care homes, by comparison to the ASCOT-SCT4, the measure of social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) from which the ASCOT-Proxy was developed. METHODS EFA was conducted on the ASCOT-SCT4 and the two ASCOT-Proxy measures (Proxy-Proxy, Proxy-Resident), to determine if they retained the single factor of the original ASCOT-SCT4 measure found in samples of older community-dwelling adults. Rasch analysis was also applied to measures with a single factor structure in the EFA. RESULTS ASCOT-Proxy-Resident had a single factor structure, as did the original ASCOT-SCT4 (also, found in this analysis when completed by care home staff). The ASCOT-Proxy-Proxy had a two factor structure. Rasch analysis of ASCOT-Proxy-Resident and ASCOT-SCT4 had an acceptable model fit, internal consistency and met the assumptions of unidimensionality and local independence. There was evidence of less than optimal distinguishability at some thresholds between responses, and low frequency of rating of the 'high level needs'. CONCLUSION The ASCOT-Proxy-Resident is a valid instrument of SCRQoL for older adults resident in care homes, completed by staff proxies. Due to the two-factor structure, which differs from the original ASCOT-SCT4, we do not recommend the use of the ASCOT-Proxy-Proxy measure, although collecting data as part of the ASCOT-Proxy questionnaire may support its feasibility and acceptability. Further qualitative study of how care home staff complete and perceive the ASCOT-Proxy is encouraged for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
| | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Stephen Allan
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Lucy Webster
- Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Sinead Palmer
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hughes SE, Aiyegbusi OL, McMullan C, Turner GM, Anderson N, Cruz Rivera S, Collis P, Glasby J, Lasserson D, Calvert M. Patient-reported outcomes in integrated health and social care: A scoping review. JRSM Open 2024; 15:20542704241232866. [PMID: 38529208 PMCID: PMC10962043 DOI: 10.1177/20542704241232866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have potential to support integrated health and social care research and practice; however, evidence of their utilisation has not been synthesised. Objective To identify PRO measures utilised in integrated care and adult social care research and practice and to chart the evidence of implementation factors influencing their uptake. Design Scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Data sources Six databases (01 January 2010 to 19 May 2023). Study selection Articles reporting PRO use with adults (18+ years) in integrated care or social care settings. Review methods We screened articles against pre-specified eligibility criteria; 36 studies (23%) were extracted in duplicate for verification. We summarised the data using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results We identified 159 articles reporting on 216 PRO measures deployed in a social care or integrated care setting. Most articles used PRO measures as research tools. Eight (5.0%) articles used PRO measures as an intervention. Articles focused on community-dwelling participants (35.8%) or long-term care home residents (23.9%), with three articles (1.9%) focussing on integrated care settings. Stakeholders viewed PROs as feasible and acceptable, with benefits for care planning, health and wellbeing monitoring as well as quality assurance. Patient-reported outcome measure selection, administration and PRO data management were perceived implementation barriers. Conclusion This scoping review showed increasing utilisation of PROs in adult social care and integrated care. Further research is needed to optimise PROs for care planning, design effective training resources and develop policies and service delivery models that prioritise secure, ethical management of PRO data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Hughes
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan L Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christel McMullan
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Grace M Turner
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicola Anderson
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- DEMAND Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jon Glasby
- School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- IMPACT (Improving Adult Social Care Together), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel Lasserson
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- DEMAND Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Engel L, Kosowicz L, Bogatyreva E, Batchelor F, Devlin N, Dow B, Gilbert AS, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, Viney R. Face Validity of Four Preference-Weighted Quality-of-Life Measures in Residential Aged Care: A Think-Aloud Study. THE PATIENT 2023; 16:655-666. [PMID: 37803217 PMCID: PMC10570159 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00647-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is an increased use of preference-weighted quality-of-life measures in residential aged care to guide resource allocation decisions or for quality-of-care assessments. However, little is known about their face validity (i.e., how understandable, appropriate and relevant the measures are 'on their face' when respondents complete them). The aim of this study was to assess the face validity of four preference-weighted measures (i.e., EQ-5D-5L, EQ-HWB, ASCOT, QOL-ACC) in older people living in residential aged care. METHODS Qualitative cognitive think-aloud interviews were conducted using both concurrent and retrospective think-aloud techniques. To reduce burden, each resident completed two measures, with the four measures randomised across participants. Audio recordings were transcribed and framework analysis was used for data analysis, based on an existing framework derived from the Tourangeau four-stage response model. RESULTS In total, 24 interviews were conducted with residents living across three residential aged care facilities in Melbourne, Australia. Response issues were identified across all four measures, often related to comprehension and difficulty selecting a response level due to double-barrelled and ambiguous items that have different meanings in the residential aged care context. We also identified issues related to understanding instructions, non-adherence to the recall period, and noted positive responding that requires attention when interpreting the data. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide further evidence on the appropriateness of existing measures, indicating numerous response issues that require further research to guide the selection process for research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Engel
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Leona Kosowicz
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ekaterina Bogatyreva
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| | - Frances Batchelor
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Nancy Devlin
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew S Gilbert
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Social Inquiry, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- The Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rosalie Viney
- The Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lay K, Crocker M, Engel L, Ratcliffe J, Charlton S, Hutchinson C. How do older adults receiving aged care services understand and respond to the EQ-5D-5L? A think-aloud study in residential care. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:3161-3170. [PMID: 37386266 PMCID: PMC10522713 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03466-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based instrument for measuring and valuing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The EQ-5D-5L has been used extensively in economic evaluation, including in aged care. However, older adults' understanding of the EQ-5D-5L has not been comprehensively investigated to date. This research aimed to assess older adults' understanding of the EQ-5D-5L using a think-aloud protocol with two cognition groups: no cognitive impairment and mild/moderate cognitive impairment. METHODS Participants' cognition was assessed using the Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). Face-to face interviews were conducted with concurrent and retrospective think-aloud encouraged through verbal probing. Audio recordings were transcribed, and qualitative analysis, informed by the Tourangeau four-stage Response Model (comprehension, retrieval, decision process, response process) was conducted in NVivo. RESULTS In total, 46 older adults (age 65 +) were recruited from 10 residential care facilities across South Australia (n = 25 no cognitive impairment, n = 21 mild/moderate cognitive impairment). Comprehension, retrieval, judgement and response mapping issues were common across all cognition levels and EQ-5D-5L dimensions. The two dimensions resulting in the most response issues were usual activities and personal care. CONCLUSION Older adults may bring a different understanding to the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system than that expected given testing with general population samples. Dimension descriptors that are more relevant to this population may facilitate responses that better align with the underlying EQ-5D-5L concept model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiri Lay
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| | - Matthew Crocker
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | | | - Claire Hutchinson
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Towers AM, Rand S, Collins G, Smith N, Palmer S, Cassell J. Measuring quality of life in care homes when self-report is challenging: the construct validity, structural characteristics and internal consistency of the mixed-methods adult social care outcomes toolkit. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad168. [PMID: 37659095 PMCID: PMC10474903 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 09/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) measures social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) using self-completion questionnaires and interviews. Many care home residents find such methods inaccessible, leading to a reliance on proxy-reporting. This study aimed to establish the psychometric properties of the mixed-methods toolkit [ASCOT-Care Homes, 4 outcome (CH4)] for measuring SCRQoL when residents cannot self-report. METHODS Two cross-sectional, mixed-methods studies were undertaken in care homes for older people in England between 2015 and 2020. We used the ASCOT-CH4 (observation, and interviews with residents and proxies) to collect information about SCRQoL and collected additional data on residents' needs and characteristics, and variables hypothesised to be related to SCRQoL.Hypothesis testing was applied to establish construct validity, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and exploratory factor analysis for structural validity. RESULTS The combined dataset included 475 residents from 54 care homes (34 nursing, 20 residential). Half had a diagnosis of dementia. Less than a third of residents were able to complete an ASCOT interview. Observations and proxy interviews informed researcher ratings, meaning there were no missing ASCOT-CH4 scores. ASCOT-CH4 was found to be a weak unidimensional scale, consistent with other ASCOT measures, with acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.77, 8 items). Construct validity was supported by the findings. CONCLUSIONS The ASCOT-CH4 is an alternative to conventional proxy-questionnaires for measuring the SCRQoL of care home residents, with good psychometric properties. A limitation is that users need a range of data collection skills. Future research should explore whether findings are replicable when data are collected by other researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS), University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - Grace Collins
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - Nick Smith
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - Sinead Palmer
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - Jackie Cassell
- Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kelly S, Cowan A, Akdur G, Irvine L, Peryer G, Welsh S, Rand S, Lang IA, Towers AM, Spilsbury K, Killett A, Gordon AL, Hanratty B, Jones L, Meyer J, Goodman C, Burton JK. Outcome measures from international older adult care home intervention research: a scoping review. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad069. [PMID: 37192505 PMCID: PMC10187991 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care homes are increasingly important settings for intervention research to enhance evidence-informed care. For such research to demonstrate effectiveness, it is essential that measures are appropriate for the population, setting and practice contexts. OBJECTIVE To identify care home intervention studies and describe the resident outcome measures used. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS We reviewed international care home research published from 2015 to August 2022. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and ASSIA. We included any intervention study conducted in a care home, reporting resident outcomes. We extracted resident outcome measures, organised these using the domains of an adapted framework and described their use. RESULTS From 7,330 records screened, we included 396 datasets reported in 436 publications. These included 12,167 care homes and 836,842 residents, with an average of 80 residents per study. The studies evaluated 859 unique resident outcomes 2,030 times using 732 outcome measures. Outcomes were evaluated between 1 and 112 times, with 75.1% of outcomes evaluated only once. Outcome measures were used 1-120 times, with 68.4% of measures used only once. Only 14 measures were used ≥20 times. Functional status, mood & behaviour and medications were the commonest outcome domains assessed. More than half of outcomes were assessed using scales, with a fifth using existing records or administrative data. CONCLUSIONS There is significant heterogeneity in the choice and assessment of outcomes for intervention research in care homes. There is an urgent need to develop a consensus on useful and sensitive tools for care homes, working with residents, families and friends and staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kelly
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK
- THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK
| | - Andy Cowan
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Guy Peryer
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, CB2 8AH, UK
| | - Silje Welsh
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Cornwallis Central, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Iain A Lang
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, South West Peninsula, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, Cornwallis Central, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Kent Surrey and Sussex, BN3 7HZ, UK
| | - Karen Spilsbury
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Yorkshire and Humber, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, CB2 8AH, UK
| | - Adam Lee Gordon
- Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences (IRIS), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3DT, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East Midlands, LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5PL, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, North East and North Cumbria, NE3 3XT, UK
| | - Liz Jones
- National Care Forum, Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry CV1 2TE, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- National Care Forum, Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry CV1 2TE, UK
- City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, CB2 8AH, UK
| | - Jennifer Kirsty Burton
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Towers AM, Gordon A, Wolters AT, Allan S, Rand S, Webster LA, Crellin E, Brine RJ, De Corte K, Akdur G, Irvine L, Burton J, Hanratty B, Killett A, Meyer J, Jones L, Goodman C. Piloting of a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: protocol for a longitudinal, mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071686. [PMID: 36849214 PMCID: PMC9972423 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health and care data are routinely collected about care home residents in England, yet there is no way to collate these data to inform benchmarking and improvement. The Developing research resources And minimum data set for Care Homes' Adoption and use study has developed a prototype minimum data set (MDS) for piloting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed-methods longitudinal pilot study will be conducted in 60 care homes (approximately 960 residents) in 3 regions of England, using resident data from cloud-based digital care home records at two-time points. These will be linked to resident and care home level data held within routine National Health Service and social care data sets. Two rounds of focus groups with care home staff (n=8-10 per region) and additional interviews with external stakeholders (n=3 per region) will explore implementation and the perceived utility of the MDS. Data will be assessed for completeness and timeliness of completion. Descriptive statistics, including percentage floor and ceiling effects, will establish data quality. For validated scales, construct validity will be assessed by hypothesis testing and exploratory factor analysis will establish structural validity. Internal consistency will be established using Cronbach's alpha. Longitudinal analysis of the pilot data will demonstrate the value of the MDS to each region. Qualitative data will be analysed inductively using thematic analysis to understand the complexities of implementing an MDS in care homes for older people. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received ethical approval from the London Queen's Square Research Ethics Committee (22/LO/0250). Informed consent is required for participation. Findings will be disseminated to: academics working on data use and integration in social care, care sector organisations, policy makers and commissioners. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Partner NIHR Applied Research Collaborations, the National Care Forum and the British Geriatrics Society will disseminate policy briefs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Kent, Surrey and Sussex, Hove, UK
| | - Adam Gordon
- Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby Medical School, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Stephen Allan
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Lucy Anne Webster
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | | | - Kaat De Corte
- Improvement Analytics Unit, The Health Foundation, London, UK
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Jennifer Burton
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria, Gosforth, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, City University of London, London, UK
- National Care Forum, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Darvell C, Bradshaw J. Exploring the social care-related quality of life outcomes of adults with intellectual disabilities through the use of Talking Mats®. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2022; 36:39-49. [PMID: 36124783 PMCID: PMC10087874 DOI: 10.1111/jar.13032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Views on social care related quality of life (SCRQol) are typically gathered directly from individuals or from proxy informants. Easy-read options are available, although such methods may not be accessible to those with greater communication challenges. METHODS Fifteen people with intellectual disabilities were interviewed about their SCRQoL using Talking Mats® (TM). A descriptive approach was taken to exploring what people had to say. RESULTS Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with living conditions and personal care routines. They were mostly satisfied with the level of choice and control they had and with their carers. CONCLUSIONS People with intellectual disabilities who have greater communication challenges can make meaningful contributions to the assessment of the care they receive. Talking Mats is one tool which can be used to support people with intellectual disabilities to give their views.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Darvell
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.,Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burton JK, Wolters AT, Towers AM, Jones L, Meyer J, Gordon AL, Irvine L, Hanratty B, Spilsbury K, Peryer G, Rand S, Killett A, Akdur G, Allan S, Biswas P, Goodman C. Developing a minimum data set for older adult care homes in the UK: exploring the concept and defining early core principles. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2022; 3:e186-e193. [PMID: 35282598 PMCID: PMC8901193 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00010-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Reforms to social care in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in the UK and internationally, place data at the heart of proposed innovations and solutions. The principles are not well established of what constitutes core, or minimum, data to support care home residents. Often, what is included privileges data on resident health over day-to-day care priorities and quality of life. This Personal View argues for evidence-based principles on which to base the development of a UK minimum data set (MDS) for care homes. Co-produced work involving care home staff and older people working with stakeholders is required to define and agree the format, content, structure, and operationalisation of the MDS. Implementation decisions will determine the success of the MDS, affecting aspects including data quality, completeness, and usability. Care home staff who collect the data need to benefit from the MDS and see value in their contribution, and residents must derive benefit from data collection and synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kirsty Burton
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK,Correspondence to: Dr Jennifer Kirsty Burton, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
| | | | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, Cornwallis Central, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Kent Surrey and Sussex, UK
| | | | - Julienne Meyer
- National Care Forum, Coventry, UK,School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Adam Lee Gordon
- Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby Medical School, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria, UK
| | - Karen Spilsbury
- School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber, UK
| | - Guy Peryer
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Central, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, UK
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Stephen Allan
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Central, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Priti Biswas
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Towers AM, Smith N, Allan S, Vadean F, Collins G, Rand S, Bostock J, Ramsbottom H, Forder J, Lanza S, Cassell J. Care home residents’ quality of life and its association with CQC ratings and workforce issues: the MiCareHQ mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Care home staff have a critical bearing on quality. The staff employed, the training they receive and how well they identify and manage residents’ needs are likely to influence outcomes. The Care Act 2014 (Great Britain. The Care Act 2014. London: The Stationery Office; 2014) requires services to improve ‘well-being’, but many residents cannot self-report and are at risk of exclusion from giving their views. The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit enables social care-related quality of life to be measured using a mixed-methods approach. There is currently no equivalent way of measuring aspects of residents’ health-related quality of life. We developed new tools for measuring pain, anxiety and depression using a mixed-methods approach. We also explored the relationship between care home quality, residents’ outcomes, and the skill mix and employment conditions of the workforce who support them.
Objectives
The objectives were to develop and test measures of pain, anxiety and depression for residents unable to self-report; to assess the extent to which regulator quality ratings reflect residents’ care-related quality of life; and to assess the relationship between aspects of the staffing of care homes and the quality of care homes.
Design
This was a mixed-methods study.
Setting
The setting was care homes for older adults in England.
Participants
Care home residents participated.
Results
Three measures of pain, anxiety and low mood were developed and tested, using a mixed-methods approach, with 182 care home residents in 20 care homes (nursing and residential). Psychometric testing found that the measures had good construct validity. The mixed-methods approach was both feasible and necessary with this population, as the majority of residents could not self-report. Using a combined data set (n = 475 residents in 54 homes) from this study and the Measuring Outcomes in Care Homes study (Towers AM, Palmer S, Smith N, Collins G, Allan S. A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between regulator quality ratings and care home residents’ quality of life in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019;17:22) we found a significant positive association between residents’ social care-related quality of life and regulator (i.e. Care Quality Commission) quality ratings. Multivariate regression revealed that homes rated ‘good/outstanding’ are associated with a 12% improvement in mean current social care-related quality of life among residents who have higher levels of dependency. Secondary data analysis of a large, national sample of care homes over time assessed the impact of staffing and employment conditions on Care Quality Commission quality ratings. Higher wages and a higher prevalence of training in both dementia and dignity-/person-centred care were positively associated with care quality, whereas high staff turnover and job vacancy rates had a significant negative association. A 10% increase in the average care worker wage increased the likelihood of a ‘good/outstanding’ rating by 7%.
Limitations
No care homes rated as inadequate were recruited to the study.
Conclusions
The most dependent residents gain the most from homes rated ‘good/outstanding’. However, measuring the needs and outcomes of these residents is challenging, as many cannot self-report. A mixed-methods approach can reduce methodological exclusion and an over-reliance on proxies. Improving working conditions and reducing staff turnover may be associated with better outcomes for residents.
Future work
Further work is required to explore the relationship between pain, anxiety and low mood and other indicators of care homes quality and to examine the relationship between wages, training and social care outcomes.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 19. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Nick Smith
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Stephen Allan
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Florin Vadean
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Grace Collins
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | | | - Julien Forder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nguyen L, Jokimäki H, Linnosmaa I, Saloniki EC, Batchelder L, Malley J, Lu H, Burge P, Trukeschitz B, Forder J. Do You Prefer Safety to Social Participation? Finnish Population-Based Preference Weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for Service Users. MDM Policy Pract 2021; 6:23814683211027902. [PMID: 34291174 PMCID: PMC8274113 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211027902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) was developed in England to measure people’s social care–related quality of life (SCRQoL). Objectives. The aim of this article is to estimate preference weights for the Finnish ASCOT for service users (ASCOT). In addition, we tested for learning and fatigue effects in the choice experiment used to elicit the preference weights. Methods. The analysis data (n = 1000 individuals) were obtained from an online survey sample of the Finnish adult general population using gender, age, and region as quotas. The questionnaire included a best-worst scaling (BWS) experiment using ASCOT. Each respondent sequentially selected four alternatives (best, worst; second-best, second-worst) for eight BWS tasks (n = 32,000 choice observations). A scale multinomial logit model was used to estimate the preference parameters and to test for fatigue and learning. Results. The most and least preferred attribute-levels were “I have as much control over my daily life as I want” and “I have no control over my daily life.” The preference weights were not on a cardinal scale. The ordering effect was related to the second-best choices. Learning effect was in the last four tasks. Conclusions. This study has developed a set of preference weights for the ASCOT instrument in Finland, which can be used for investigating outcomes of social care interventions on adult populations. The learning effect calls for the development of study designs that reduce possible bias relating to preference uncertainty at the beginning of sequential BWS tasks. It also supports the adaptation of a modelling strategy in which the sequence of tasks is explicitly modelled as a scale factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lien Nguyen
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Jokimäki
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ismo Linnosmaa
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Laurie Batchelder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - Juliette Malley
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Hui Lu
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Birgit Trukeschitz
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julien Forder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Kent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rand S, Smith N, Jones K, Dargan A, Hogan H. Measuring safety in older adult care homes: a scoping review of the international literature. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043206. [PMID: 33707269 PMCID: PMC7957135 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safety is a key concern in older adult care homes. However, it is a less developed concept in older adult care homes than in healthcare settings. As part of study of the collection and application of safety data in the care home sector in England, a scoping review of the international literature was conducted. OBJECTIVES The aim of the review was to identify measures that could be used as indicators of safety for quality monitoring and improvement in older adult residential or nursing care homes. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE Systematic searches for journal articles published in English language from 1 January 1970, without restriction to the study location or country, were conducted in Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed on 28 July 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed journal articles; qualitative or quantitative studies of older adult nursing and/or residential care homes; and related to any aspect of safety in care homes, including the safety of healthcare provision in the care home. A total of 45 articles were included after review of the title/abstract or full text against the inclusion criteria. CHARTING METHODS Key information was extracted and charted. These findings were then mapped to the Safety Measurement and Monitoring Framework in healthcare (SMMF), adapted by the research team to reflect the care home context, to determine the coverage of different aspects of safety, as well as potential gaps. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Systematic searches for journal articles published in English language from 1 January 1970, without restriction to the study location or country, were conducted in Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed on 28 July 2019. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed journal articles; qualitative or quantitative studies of older adult nursing and/or residential care homes; and related to any aspect of safety in care homes, including the safety of healthcare provision in the care home.A total of 45 articles were included after review of the title/abstract or full text against the inclusion criteria. Key information was extracted and charted. These findings were then mapped to the Safety Measurement and Monitoring Framework in healthcare (SMMF), adapted by the research team to reflect the care home context, to determine the coverage of different aspects of safety, as well as potential gaps.The findings indicate that there are a range of available safety measures used for quality monitoring and improvement in older adult care homes. These cover all five domains of safety in the SMMF. However, there are potential gaps. These include user experience, psychological harm related to the care home environment, abusive or neglectful care practice and the processes for integrated learning. Some of these gaps may relate to challenges and feasibility of measurement in the care home context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Nick Smith
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Karen Jones
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Alan Dargan
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Helen Hogan
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rand S, Towers A, Caiels J. Letter to the Editor re: McEwan et al (2019) Moving on from Quality Assurance: Exploring Systems — Outcomes in Disability Services. JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU) University of Kent Canterbury UK
| | - Ann‐Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS) University of Kent Canterbury UK
| | - James Caiels
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU) University of Kent Canterbury UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Trukeschitz B, Litschauer J, Hajji A, Kieninger J, Schoch A, Malley J, Rand S, Linnosmaa I, Forder J. Cross-cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for service users (German ASCOT). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:326. [PMID: 33023573 PMCID: PMC7541247 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01533-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been considerable interest in using the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT), developed in England, to measure quality-of-life outcomes of long-term care (LTC-QoL) service provision in national and cross-national studies. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the original ASCOT service user measure into German and to evaluate its content and construct validity in Austrian home care service users. METHODS The translation and cultural adaptation process followed the ISPOR TCA guidelines. We used qualitative data from six cognitive debriefing interviews with Austrian recipients of home care services to assess linguistic and content validity. In addition, cross-sectional survey data (n = 633) were used to evaluate construct validity by testing hypothesized associations established in a previous study for the original English ASCOT service user instrument. RESULTS Cognitive debriefing interviews confirmed that the German adaptation of the ASCOT service user instrument was understood as intended, although two domains ('Control over daily life' and 'Dignity') and selected phrases of the response options were challenging to translate into German. All ASCOT domains were statistically significantly associated with related constructs and sensitive to service user sub-group differences. CONCLUSIONS We found good evidence for a valid cross-cultural adaptation of the German version of ASCOT for service users. The analysis also supports the construct validity of the translated instrument and its use in evaluations of QoL-effects of LTC service provision in German-speaking countries. Further research on the reliability and feasibility in different care settings is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Trukeschitz
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
| | - Judith Litschauer
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
| | - Assma Hajji
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
| | - Judith Kieninger
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
| | - Adiam Schoch
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Malley
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Ismo Linnosmaa
- Centre for Health and Social Economics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Julien Forder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Helter TM, Coast J, Łaszewska A, Stamm T, Simon J. Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:1433-1464. [PMID: 31875309 PMCID: PMC7253529 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02393-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Given increasing interest in using the capability approach for health economic evaluations and a growing literature, this paper aims to synthesise current information about the characteristics of capability instruments and their application in health economic evaluations. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to assess studies that contained information on the development, psychometric properties and valuation of capability instruments, or their application in economic evaluations. RESULTS The review identified 98 studies and 14 instruments for inclusion. There is some evidence on the psychometric properties of most instruments. Most papers found moderate-to-high correlation between health and capability measures, ranging between 0.41 and 0.64. ASCOT, ICECAP-A, -O and -SCM instruments have published valuation sets, most frequently developed using best-worst scaling. Thirteen instruments were originally developed in English and one in Portuguese; however, some translations to other languages are available. Ten economic evaluations using capability instruments were identified. The presentation of results show a lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate way to use capability instruments in economic evaluations with discussion about capability-adjusted life years (CALYs), years of capability equivalence and the trade-off between maximisation of capability versus sufficient capability. CONCLUSION There has been increasing interest in applying the capability-based approach in health economic evaluations, but methodological and conceptual issues remain. There is still a need for direct comparison of the different capability instruments and for clear guidance on when and how they should be used in economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timea Mariann Helter
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Joanna Coast
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK
| | - Agata Łaszewska
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hajji A, Trukeschitz B, Malley J, Batchelder L, Saloniki E, Linnosmaa I, Lu H. Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for service users for Austria: Findings from a best-worst experiment. Soc Sci Med 2020; 250:112792. [PMID: 32114259 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) measures quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes of long-term care (LTC) service provision. Country-specific preference weights are required to calculate ASCOT scores. ASCOT has been translated into German, but lacks preference weights for German-speaking countries. OBJECTIVES This paper aims to establish Austrian preference weights for the German version of the ASCOT service user measure, using best-worst scaling (BWS). METHODS Data were collected using an online BWS-experiment from a general population sample (n=1,000) of Austrian adults. We use a scale-adjusted multinomial logit model (S-MNL) accounting for positioning effects to estimate preference weights. RESULTS Austrians value the top attribute-levels in the ASCOT domains 'being meaningfully occupied during the day' and 'having control over daily life' most highly, whereas high needs were the least preferred in the domains 'dignity' and 'social participation'. From a methods perspective, we found significant positioning effects only for 'best' choices, with statements at the top of a list being picked more often than those further down in the list. Factors related to survey completion (self-assessed understanding of the tasks and survey completion time) were shown to have the greatest effect on individual choice consistency. DISCUSSION The paper provides Austrian preference weights for the German version of ASCOT for service users. The weights also provide insight into how Austrians value different LTC-QoL states. Future research may investigate how values for different LTC-QoL states differ between socioeconomic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assma Hajji
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria
| | - Birgit Trukeschitz
- Research Institute for Economics of Aging, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Juliette Malley
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Laurie Batchelder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Eirini Saloniki
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Ismo Linnosmaa
- Centre for Health and Social Economics, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland; Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hui Lu
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rand S, Malley J, Vadean F, Forder J. Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:184. [PMID: 31842952 PMCID: PMC6916016 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1254-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The ASCOT-Carer and Carer Experience Scale are instruments designed to capture aspects of quality of life ‘beyond health’ for family carers. The aim of this study was to compare and validate these two carer care-related measures, with a secondary aim to compare both instruments to the three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3 L) measure of health-related quality of life. Methods An interview survey was conducted with 387 carers of adults who used long-term care (also known as social care) support in England. Construct validity by hypothesis testing was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was also applied to investigate the dimensionality of the combined items from the ASCOT-Carer and CES (as measures of carer quality of life ‘beyond health’) and the EQ-5D (as a measure of health-related quality of life). Results In the construct validity analysis, hypothesised differences in correlations were observed with two exceptions. The exploratory factor analysis indicated that the ASCOT-Carer, CES and EQ-5D-3 L items loaded onto three separate factors. The first factor comprised the seven ASCOT-Carer items plus two CES items (activities outside caring, support from friends and family). The second factor comprised three of the six CES items (fulfilment from caring, control over caring and getting on with the person you care for). The third factor included four of the five EQ-5D-3 L items. Conclusion The findings indicate that the ASCOT-Carer, CES and EQ-5D-3 L capture separate constructs of social care-related quality of life (ASCOT-Carer) and carer experience (CES), which partially overlap in relation to activities outside caring and social support, and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3 L). The ASCOT-Carer and CES are both promising measures for the evaluation of social care support for carers that capture aspects of quality of life ‘beyond health’. The choice of whether to use the ASCOT-Carer or CES depends on the study objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.
| | - Juliette Malley
- The Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Florin Vadean
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Julien Forder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Towers AM, Palmer S, Smith N, Collins G, Allan S. A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between regulator quality ratings and care home residents' quality of life in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:22. [PMID: 30704482 PMCID: PMC6357453 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1093-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The quality of life of people receiving health and social care is an important indicator of service quality, but the relationship between patient experience and outcomes and regulator quality ratings in England is unknown. In 2013, the health and social care regulator in England, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), introduced a new ratings system and by February 2017, all social care services were inspected and awarded new quality ratings (outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate). This study aimed to explore whether quality ratings were associated with residents’ quality of life, controlling for confounding variables. Methods We conducted a nested, cross-sectional study, collecting social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) data for 293 older care home residents in 34 care homes (20 nursing and 14 residential) in the South East of England. CQC ratings and other resident and home-level variables were also collected for the analysis. Multilevel modelling explored whether residents’ social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) was associated with regulator ratings, controlling for confounding variables. Results Outstanding and good homes were collapsed into one category and compared with homes requiring improvement. Nationally, only 2 % of care homes for older people are rated as inadequate and it was not possible to capture sufficient numbers for the analysis. We recruited one but it was re-inspected during the fieldwork period and its rating changed to requires improvement. The random intercept multilevel model, which accounted for 16.93% of the differences in SCRQoL within homes and 69.80% between, indicated that better SCRQoL was significantly associated with being female, better functioning, no dementia diagnosis, fewer communication difficulties, and living in a care home rated as outstanding/good by CQC. Size of home and registration category were not significant predictors. Conclusions This study found evidence that quality ratings are associated with residents’ SCRQoL. As well as aiming to improve quality and ensure minimum standards, quality ratings have the potential to inform user choice and help the public compare care homes based on quality. Future research to establish the generalisability and replicability of the results is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Marie Towers
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.
| | - Sinead Palmer
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Nick Smith
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Grace Collins
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Stephen Allan
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Evaluating the quality of care received in long-term care facilities from a consumer perspective: development and construct validity of the Consumer Choice Index – Six Dimension instrument. AGEING & SOCIETY 2017. [DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x17000861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe Consumer Choice Index – Six Dimension (CCI-6D) is a new instrument designed specifically to evaluate the quality of care received in long-term care from a consumer perspective. This study aims to demonstrate the construct validity of the CCI-6D. Older residents living in long-term care facilities and proxy family carers (where severely impaired cognition precluded resident consent) participated as consumers of long-term care. Data collected included the CCI-6D instrument, quality of life, physical function and characteristics of the care facility. Relationships between these variables and the CCI-6D dimensions were assessed and analysed through chi-squared and Kruskal–Wallis tests to assess the construct validity of each dimension. Of 430 eligible consumers, a total of 253 completed the questionnaire, of whom 68 (27%) were residents and 185 (73%) were informal carer proxy participants. There was strong evidence of construct validity of the dimensions relating to adequacy of individual care time, access to outside and gardens, access to meaningful activities and flexibility of care. There was more moderate evidence of validity of the home-like own room and shared spaces items, which may be in part due to difficulty in identifying strong discriminatory variables for comparison with these items. The results also indicate a strong association between ‘processes’ of care delivery (as measured by the CCI-6D) and quality of life of care recipients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Rand S, Malley J, Towers AM, Netten A, Forder J. Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:163. [PMID: 28821303 PMCID: PMC5562982 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) is a multi-attribute utility index designed for the evaluation of long-term social care services. The measure comprises eight attributes that capture aspects of social care-related quality of life. The instrument has previously been validated with a sample of older adults who used home care services in England. This paper aims to demonstrate the instrument's test-retest reliability and provide evidence for its validity in a diverse sample of adults who use publicly-funded, community-based social care in England. METHODS A survey of 770 social care service users was conducted in England. A subsample of 100 services users participated in a follow-up interview between 7 and 21 days after baseline. Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the ASCOT-SCT4 index score and the EQ-5D-3 L, the ICECAP-A or ICECAP-O and overall quality of life were used to assess convergent validity. Data on variables hypothesised to be related to the ASCOT-SCT4 index score, as well as rating of individual attributes, were also collected. Hypothesised relationships were tested using one-way ANOVA or Fisher's exact test. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient for the ASCOT-SCT4 index score at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS There were moderate to strong correlations between the ASCOT-SCT4 index and EQ-5D-3 L, the ICECAP-A or ICECAP-O, and overall quality of life (all correlations ≥ 0.3). The construct validity was further supported by statistically significant hypothesised relationships between the ASCOT-SCT4 index and individual characteristics in univariate and multivariate analysis. There was also further evidence for the construct validity for the revised Food and drink and Dignity items. The test-retest reliability was considered to be good (ICC = 0.783; 95% CI: 0.678-0.857). CONCLUSIONS The ASCOT-SCT4 index has good test-retest reliability for adults with physical or sensory disabilities who use social care services. The index score and the attributes appear to be valid for adults receiving social care for support reasons connected to underlying mental health problems, and physical or sensory disabilities. Further reliability testing with a wider sample of social care users is warranted, as is further exploration of the relationship between the ASCOT-SCT4, ICECAP-A/O and EQ-5D-3 L indices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Rand
- Quality and Outcomes of person-centred care policy Research Unit (QORU) and Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF UK
| | - Juliette Malley
- Quality and Outcomes of person-centred care policy Research Unit (QORU) and Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cowdray House, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE UK
| | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Quality and Outcomes of person-centred care policy Research Unit (QORU) and Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF UK
| | - Ann Netten
- Quality and Outcomes of person-centred care policy Research Unit (QORU) and Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF UK
| | - Julien Forder
- Quality and Outcomes of person-centred care policy Research Unit (QORU) and Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rand S, Forder J, Malley J. A study of dyadic interdependence of control, social participation and occupation of adults who use long-term care services and their carers. Qual Life Res 2017; 26:3307-3321. [PMID: 28786019 PMCID: PMC5681980 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1669-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Unpaid care is an important source of support of people with long-term conditions. Interdependence of carers' and care recipients' quality of life would be expected due to the relational nature of caregiving. This study aims to explore interdependence of quality of life in carer/care-recipient dyads, especially in relation to mutual interdependence due to social feedback in the caregiving relationship and also the partner effects of one partner's experience of long-term care support on the other's outcomes. METHODS Using data collected in an interview survey of 264 adults with care support needs and their unpaid carers in England, we employed regression analysis to explore whether there is mutual interdependence of care-related quality of life within carer/care-recipient dyads for three quality of life attributes: Control over daily life, Social participation and Occupation. The influence of factors, including satisfaction with long-term care, were also considered on individuals' and dyad partners' care-related quality of life. RESULTS We found mutual interdependence of quality of life at the dyad-level for Control over daily life, but not Occupation or Social participation. A partner effect of care recipients' satisfaction with long-term care on carers' Control over daily life was also observed. Higher care recipient satisfaction with care services was associated with higher Control over daily life. By contrast, for Social participation and Occupation, there were only significant effects of care recipients' satisfaction with long-term care and their own quality of life. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the importance of considering the wider impact beyond the individual of long-term care on quality of life in the evaluation of long-term care policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Cornwallis Building, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.
| | - Julien Forder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Cornwallis Building, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Juliette Malley
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science, Cowdray House, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe benefits of meaningful activity in later life are well documented. Studies show that being occupied contributes to both physical and mental health as well as quality of life. Research also suggests that activity may be beneficial to people residing in care homes, including people living with dementia. This paper presents findings from a study which used the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) to measure quality of life in six care homes located in the south-east of England. The study found, like previous ones, that care home residents’ days were characterised by a lack of activity. Drawing on observations, interviews and focus groups with residents and staff from these homes, this paper attempts to understand why care home residents do not engage in meaningful activities. We reject the idea that these low levels of activity are a natural part of the ageing process or that they can be explained by notions of resident choice. Instead, the findings point to both insufficient funding and working practices within care homes as more substantive explanations. These explanations inform a discussion of how the low levels of engagement in meaningful activity could be addressed and residents’ quality of life improved.
Collapse
|