1
|
Song J, Chen G, Khadka J, Milte R, Ratcliffe J. One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians. Soc Sci Med 2024; 353:117054. [PMID: 38908090 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Song
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Caulfield East, VIC, Australia
| | - Jyoti Khadka
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia; Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Science, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cleland J, Hutchinson C, McBain C, Khadka J, Milte R, Cameron I, Ratcliffe J. From the ground up: assessing the face validity of the Quality of Life – Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) measure with older Australians. QUALITY IN AGEING AND OLDER ADULTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1108/qaoa-07-2022-0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to assess the face validity to inform content validity of the Quality of Life – Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC), a new measure for quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care.
Design/methodology/approach
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with older adults (66–100 years) receiving aged care services at home (n = 31) and in residential care (n = 28). Participants provided feedback on draft items to take forward to the next stage of psychometric assessment. Items were removed according to several decision criteria: ambiguity, sensitive wording, not easy to answer and/or least preferred by participants.
Findings
The initial candidate set was reduced from 34 items to 15 items to include in the next stage of the QOL-ACC development alongside the preferred response category. The reduced set reflected the views of older adults, increasing the measure’s acceptability, reliability and relevance.
Originality/value
Quality of life is a key person-centred quality indicator recommended by the recent Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Responding to this policy reform objective, this study documents a key stage in the development of the QOL-ACC measure, a new measure designed to assess aged care specific quality of life.
Collapse
|
3
|
Khadka J, Hutchinson C, Milte R, Cleland J, Muller A, Bowes N, Ratcliffe J. Assessing feasibility, construct validity, and reliability of a new aged care-specific preference-based quality of life instrument: evidence from older Australians in residential aged care. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:159. [PMID: 36456953 PMCID: PMC9713096 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-02065-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) is a new older-person-specific quality of life instrument designed for application in quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. The QOL-ACC was designed from its inception with older people receiving aged care services ensuring its strong content validity. Given that the QOL-ACC has already been validated in home care settings and a preference-weighted value set developed, we aimed to assess feasibility, construct validity and reliability of the QOL-ACC in residential aged care settings. METHODS: Individuals living in residential aged care facilities participated in an interviewer-facilitated survey. The survey included the QOL-ACC, QCE-ACC (quality of aged care experience measure) and two other preference-based quality of life instruments (ASCOT and EQ-5D-5L). Feasibility was assessed using missing data and ceiling/floor effects. Construct validity was assessed by exploring the relationship between the QOL-ACC and other instruments (convergent validity) and the QOL-ACC's ability to discriminate varying levels of self-rated health and quality of life. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α). RESULTS Of the 200 residents (mean age, 85 ± 7.7 years) who completed the survey, 60% were female and 69% were born in Australia. One in three participating residents self-rated their health as fair/poor. The QOL-ACC had no missing data but had small floor effects (0.5%) and acceptable ceiling effects (7.5%). It demonstrated moderate correlation with ASCOT (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) and EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) and a stronger correlation with the QCE-ACC (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). Residents with poor self-rated health and quality of life had significantly lower scores on the QOL-ACC. The internal consistency reliability of the QOL-ACC and its dimensions was good (α = 0.70-0.77). CONCLUSIONS The QOL-ACC demonstrated good feasibility, construct validity and internal consistency reliability to assess aged care-related quality of life. Moderate correlations of the QOL-ACC and other instruments provide evidence of its construct validity and signifies that the QOL-ACC adds non-redundant and non-interchangeable information beyond the existing instruments. A stronger correlation with the QCE-ACC than other instruments may indicate that quality of life is more intimately connected with the care experience than either health- or social-related quality of life in residential aged care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Khadka
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt North, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Australia ,grid.430453.50000 0004 0565 2606Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - C Hutchinson
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt North, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Australia
| | - R Milte
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt North, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Australia
| | - J Cleland
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt North, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Australia
| | - A Muller
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - N Bowes
- Uniting AgeWell, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - J Ratcliffe
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt North, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ratcliffe J, Bourke S, Li J, Mulhern B, Hutchinson C, Khadka J, Milte R, Lancsar E. Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:1069-1079. [PMID: 35922616 PMCID: PMC9550725 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01158-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper reports on the valuation of the classification system for the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration with a large sample of older people receiving aged care services. METHODS A DCE with 160 choice sets of two quality-of-life state-survival duration combinations blocked into 20 survey versions, with eight choice sets in each version, was designed and administered through an on-line survey to older Australians receiving aged care services in home and via interviewer facilitation with older people in residential aged care settings. Model specifications investigating preferences with respect to survival duration and interactions between QOL-ACC dimension levels were estimated. Utility weights were developed, with estimated coefficients transformed to the 0 (being dead) to 1 (full health) scale to generate a value set suitable for application in quality assessment and for the calculation of quality-adjusted life-years for use in economic evaluation. RESULTS In total, 953 older people completed the choice experiment with valid responses. The estimation results from econometric model specifications indicated that utility increased with survival duration and decreased according to quality-of-life impairment levels. An Australian value set (range - 0.56 to 1.00) was generated for the calculation of utilities for all QOL-ACC states. CONCLUSION The QOL-ACC is unique in its focus on measuring and valuing quality of life from the perspective of older people themselves, thereby ensuring that the preferences of aged care service users are the primary focus for quality assessment and economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ratcliffe
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
| | - Siobhan Bourke
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Jinhu Li
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Claire Hutchinson
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Jyoti Khadka
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Emily Lancsar
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hutchinson C, Worley A, Khadka J, Milte R, Cleland J, Ratcliffe J. Do we agree or disagree? A systematic review of the application of preference-based instruments in self and proxy reporting of quality of life in older people. Soc Sci Med 2022; 305:115046. [PMID: 35636050 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality of life is an important person-centred outcome in health and aged care settings. Due to an increasing prevalence of cognitive decline and dementia in ageing populations, a proportion of older people receiving health and aged care services may not be able to reliably assess their own quality of life, highlighting the need for proxy assessment. This systematic review sought to investigate the level of agreement between self and proxy-report of older people's quality of life using established preference-based instruments of quality of life suitable for economic evaluation. METHODS A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eight databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Econlit, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Ageline and Cochrane Library. Information was extracted on the instruments, population samples (including any cognitive thresholds applied), mean scores, type of proxy, and measures of inter-rater agreement. RESULTS A total of 50 studies using eight different preference-based quality of life instruments were identified. Most studies were cross-sectional (72%) with a wide variety of cognitive assessments and thresholds applied to define older participants with cognitive impairment. The most common proxies were family members, mostly spouses. The level of agreement between self and proxy-report was generally poor - irrespective of the instrument applied or type of proxy - with proxy-report generally indicating lower levels of quality of life than self-report. There was some evidence of stronger agreement on more observable quality of life domains e.g., physical health and mobility, relative to less observable domains e.g. emotional well-being. Few studies tracked self and/or proxy-report of quality of life longitudinally. CONCLUSIONS More research is needed to develop evidence to inform guidance on self-report versus proxy-report of quality of life for older people receiving health and aged care services. Until then, the collection of both self and proxy reports as complementary measures is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Hutchinson
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia.
| | - Anthea Worley
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia
| | - Jyoti Khadka
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia
| | - Jenny Cleland
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Health and Social Care Economics Group, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2849-2865. [PMID: 35680733 PMCID: PMC9181894 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the construct (convergent and known group) validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC), an older-person-specific quality-of-life measure designed for application in quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. METHODS Convergent validity was assessed by examining relationships with other validated preference-based measures (EQ-5D-5L, ASCOT), quality of aged care experience (QCE-ACC) and life satisfaction (PWI) through an online survey. Known-group validity was assessed by testing the ability to discriminate varying levels of care needs, self-reported health and quality of life. RESULTS Older people (aged ≥ 65 years) receiving community-aged care (N = 313) responded; 54.6% were female, 41.8% were living alone and 56.8% were receiving higher-level care. The QOL-ACC and its six dimensions were low to moderately and significantly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (correlation co-efficient range, ρ = 0.39-0.56). The QOL-ACC demonstrated moderate and statistically significant correlations with ASCOT (ρ = 0.61), the QCE-ACC (ρ = 0.51) and the PWI (ρ = 0.70). Respondents with poorer self-reported health status, quality of life and/or higher-level care needs demonstrated lower QOL-ACC scores (P < 0.001), providing evidence of known-group validity. CONCLUSIONS The study provides evidence of the construct validity of the QOL-ACC descriptive system. A preference-weighted value set is currently being developed for the QOL-ACC, which when finalised will be subjected to further validation assessments.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lewis LK, Henwood T, Boylan J, Hunter S, Lange B, Lawless M, Milte R, Petersen J. Re-thinking reablement strategies for older adults in residential aged care: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:667. [PMID: 34847860 PMCID: PMC8638477 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02627-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of older adults in residential aged care is increasing. Aged care residents have been shown to spend most of the day sedentary and have many co-morbidities. This review aimed to systematically explore the effectiveness of reablement strategies in residential aged care for older adults' physical function, quality of life and mental health, the features of effective interventions and feasibility (compliance, acceptability, adverse events and cost effectiveness). METHOD This scoping review was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines (extension for scoping reviews). Five e-databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL) were searched from 2010 onwards. Randomised controlled trials investigating reablement strategies addressing physical deconditioning for older adults (mean age ≥ 65 yrs) in residential aged care on physical function, quality of life or mental health were included. Feasibility of the interventions (compliance, acceptability, satisfaction, adverse events and cost effectiveness) was explored. RESULTS Five thousand six hundred thirty-one citations were retrieved, and 63 studies included. Sample sizes ranged from 15 to 322 and intervention duration from one to 12 months. Exercise sessions were most often conducted two to three times per week (44 studies) and physiotherapist-led (27 studies). Interventions were predominately multi-component (28 studies, combinations of strength, balance, aerobic, functional exercises). Five interventions used technology. 60% of studies measuring physical function reported significant improvement in the intervention versus control, 40% of studies measuring quality of life reported significant improvements in favour of the intervention, and 26% of studies measuring mental health reported significant intervention benefits. Over half of the studies measured compliance and adverse events, four measured acceptability and none reported cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS There has been a research surge investigating reablement strategies in residential aged care with wide variability in the types and features of strategies and outcome measures. Few studies have measured acceptability, or cost effectiveness. Exploration of core outcomes, mapping stakeholders and co-designing a scalable intervention is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospectively registered review protocol (Open Science Framework: DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7NX9M ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy K Lewis
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| | - Tim Henwood
- Southern Cross Care (SA, NT & Vic) Inc., PO Box 155, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
| | - Jo Boylan
- Southern Cross Care (SA, NT & Vic) Inc., PO Box 155, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
| | - Sarah Hunter
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Belinda Lange
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Michael Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| | - Jasmine Petersen
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beaupre LA, Lier D, Magaziner JS, Jones CA, Johnston DWC, Wilson DM, Majumdar SR. An Outreach Rehabilitation Program for Nursing Home Residents After Hip Fracture May Be Cost-Saving. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021; 75:e159-e165. [PMID: 32215562 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glaa074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the cost-effectiveness of 10 weeks of outreach rehabilitation (intervention) versus usual care (control) for ambulatory nursing home residents after hip fracture. METHODS Enrollment occurred February 2011 through June 2015 in a Canadian metropolitan region. Seventy-seven participants were allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive a 10-week rehabilitation program (intervention) or usual care (control) (46 intervention; 31 control). Using a payer perspective, we performed main and sensitivity analyses. Health outcome was measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), using the EQ5D, completed at study entry, 3-, 6-, and 12-months. We obtained patient-specific data for outpatient visits, physician claims, and inpatient readmissions; the trial provided rehabilitation utilization/cost data. We estimated incremental cost and incremental effectiveness. RESULTS Groups were similar at study entry; the mean age was 87.9 ± 6.6 years, 54 (71%) were female and 58 (75%) had severe cognitive impairment. EQ5D QALYs scores were nonsignificantly higher for intervention participants. Inpatient readmissions were two times higher among controls, with a cost difference of -$3,350/patient for intervention participants, offsetting the cost/intervention participant of $2,300 for the outreach rehabilitation. The adjusted incremental QALYs/patient difference was 0.024 favoring the intervention, with an incremental cost/patient of -$621 for intervention participants; these values were not statistically significant. A sensitivity analysis reinforced these findings, suggesting that the intervention was likely dominant. CONCLUSION A 10-week outreach rehabilitation intervention for nursing home residents who sustain a hip fracture may be cost-saving, through reduced postfracture hospital readmissions. These results support further work to evaluate postfracture rehabilitation for nursing home residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Doug Lier
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jay S Magaziner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - C Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Donna M Wilson
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Developing dimensions for a new preference-based quality of life instrument for older people receiving aged care services in the community. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:555-565. [PMID: 32989683 PMCID: PMC7886721 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02649-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To identify the salient quality of life characteristics relevant to older people in receipt of community aged care services in order to develop dimensions for a draft descriptive system for a new preference-based quality of life instrument. Methods Forty-one in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with older people (65 years and over) receiving community aged care services across three Australian states to explore quality of life characteristics of importance to them. The data were analysed using framework analysis to extract broader themes which were organised into a conceptual framework. The data were then summarised into a thematic chart to develop a framework matrix which was used to interpret and synthesise the data. Care was taken throughout to retain the language that older people had adopted during the interviews to ensure that appropriate language was used when identifying and developing the quality of life dimensions. Results The analysis resulted in the identification of five salient quality of life dimensions: independence, social connections, emotional well-being, mobility, and activities. Conclusion This research finds that quality of life for older people accessing aged care services goes beyond health-related quality of life and incorporates broader aspects that transcend health. The findings represent the first stage in a multiphase project working in partnership with older people to develop a new preference-based instrument of quality of life for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in community aged care. In future work, draft items will be developed from these dimensions and tested in face validity interviews before progressing to further psychometric testing.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tchouaket É, Kilpatrick K, Jabbour M. Effectiveness for introducing nurse practitioners in six long-term care facilities in Québec, Canada: A cost-savings analysis. Nurs Outlook 2020; 68:611-625. [PMID: 32713732 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, most studies have focused on quality and safety in long-term care. However, studies focusing on the economic evaluation of quality and security in long-term care are sparse. Moreover, the economic evaluation of nurse practitioner care in long-term care is lacking, particularly in Québec Canada where roles are new. PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of introducing nurse practitioners in six long-term care facilities in Québec using a cost-savings analysis in terms of reduction of nurse practitioner sensitive events (NPSEs). METHODS A cost savings analysis was completed using a prospective observational study. All residents (n = 538) under the care of teams that included nurse practitioners who experienced at least one of the following NPSEs: falls, pressure ulcers, short-term transfers, and a change in the time needed to administer the medications consumed were included. Data were collected from September 1st 2015 to August 31st 2016. Descriptive statistics identified numbers of cases for falls, pressure ulcers, short-term transfers, and the number of medications consumed. A literature analysis was used to estimate excess median long-term care facility related costs of these NPSEs. Costs were calculated in 2016 Canadian dollars. The cost savings with the reductions that occurred for falls, pressure ulcers, short term transfers, and the time needed to administer medications after the implementation of a primary healthcare nurse practitioner role in the six long term care facilities were also estimated. FINDINGS The median cost of 341 cases of falls, 32 cases of pressure ulcers and 53 cases of short-term transfers in the six long-term facilities would range between CAD 4,516,337.8 and CAD 5,281,824.4. Moreover, the total costs savings from the reduction of adverse events including the reduction of nursing administration time for medications would be between CAD 1,942,533.6 and CAD 3,254,403.4. DISCUSSION This is the first study to present the financial consequence of adverse events sensitive to nurse practitioner care in long-term care. Important cost savings were generated from the reduction of adverse events after the implementation of nurse practitioner roles in long-term care. Government should consider these results for prevention and improvements in quality and safety in long-term care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Éric Tchouaket
- Department of Nursing, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Saint-Jérôme, Canada.
| | - Kelley Kilpatrick
- Susan E. French Chair in Nursing Research and Innovative Practice, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal-Hôpital, Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CIUSSS-EMTL-HMR), Montréal, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Palese A, Grassetti L, Bressan V, Decaro A, Kasa T, Longobardi M, Hayter M, Watson R. A path analysis on the direct and indirect effects of the unit environment on eating dependence among cognitively impaired nursing home residents. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:775. [PMID: 31666063 PMCID: PMC6822399 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4667-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to estimate the direct and indirect effects of the unit environment alongside individual and nursing care variables on eating dependence among residents who are cognitively impaired and living in a nursing home. METHOD A multicentre observational study was carried out in 2017: 13 Italian nursing homes were involved in data collection. Included residents were aged > 65 at baseline, living in the considered facility for the last 6 months and during the entire study period and having received at least one comprehensive assessment. Data were collected (a) at the individual level: eating dependence using the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia Scale and other clinical variables; (b) at the nursing care level with daily interventions to maintain eating independence assessed with a checklist; and (c) at the nursing home level, using the Therapeutic Environment Screening Survey for Nursing Homes. RESULTS One thousand twenty-seven residents were included with an average age of 85.32 years old (95% CI: 84.74-85.89), mainly female (781; 76%). The path analysis explained the 57.7% variance in eating dependence. Factors preventing eating dependence were: (a) at the individual level, increased functional dependence measured with the Barthel Index (β - 2.374); eating in the dining room surrounded by residents (β - 1.802) as compared to eating alone in bed; and having a close relationship with family relatives (β - 0.854), (b) at the nursing care level, the increased number of interventions aimed at promoting independence (β - 0.524); and (c) at the NH level, high scores in 'Space setting' (β - 4.446), 'Safety' (β - 3.053), 'Lighting' (β - 2.848) and 'Outdoor access' (β - 1.225). However, environmental factors at the unit level were found to have also indirect effects by influencing the degree of functional dependence, the occurrence of night restlessness and the number of daily interventions performed by the nursing staff. CONCLUSION Eating dependence is a complex phenomenon requiring interventions targeting individual, nursing care, and environmental levels. The NH environment had the largest direct and indirect effect on residents' eating dependence, thus suggesting that at this level appropriate interventions should be designed and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvisa Palese
- Department of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria, 20, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Luca Grassetti
- Department of Economics and Statistics, Udine University, Via Francesco Tomadini, 30, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Valentina Bressan
- Department of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria, 20, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Alessandro Decaro
- Department of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria, 20, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Tea Kasa
- Department of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria, 20, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Melania Longobardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Udine University, Viale Ungheria, 20, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Mark Hayter
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hull University, Hull, HU6 7RX UK
| | - Roger Watson
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hull University, Hull, HU6 7RX UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kontrimiene A, Sauseriene J, Liseckiene I, Valius L, Jaruseviciene L. Insights into the system of care of the elderly with mental disorders from the perspective of informal caregivers in Lithuania. Int J Ment Health Syst 2019; 13:55. [PMID: 31417610 PMCID: PMC6692936 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-019-0311-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Changes in the demographics and respective growth of life expectancy and social needs make informal caregiving crucial component of comprehensive health and social care network, which substantially contributes to the health and well-being of the elderly. The purpose of this paper is to understand the system of care of elderly patients with mental disorders from the perspective of informal caregivers in Lithuania. Methods We conducted five semi-structured focus group discussions with 31 informal caregivers attending to elderly patients with mental disorders. The data were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was subsequently performed. Results Five thematic categories were established: (1) the current state of care-receivers: representation of the complexity of patients' physical and mental condition. (2) The current state of caregivers: lack of formal caregivers' integration as a team; inadequate formal involvement of informal caregivers. (3) Basic care needs: the reflection of the group needs relating directly to the patient, care organisation and the caretaker. (4) The (non-) Readiness of the existing system to respond to the needs for care: long-term care reliance on institutional services, lack of distinction between acute/immediate care and nursing, lack of integration between the medical sector and the social care sector. (5) Potential trends for further improvement of long-term care for the elderly with mental disorders. Conclusions Strengthening of the care network for elderly patients with mental disorders should cover more than a personalised and comprehensive assessment of the needs of patients and their caregivers. Comprehensive approaches, such as formalization of informal caregivers' role in the patient care management and planning, a more extensive range of available services and programs supported by diverse sources of funding, systemic developments and better integration of health and social care systems are essential for making the system of care more balanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ausrine Kontrimiene
- Department of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Mickeviciaus 9, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Jolanta Sauseriene
- Department of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Mickeviciaus 9, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ida Liseckiene
- Department of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Mickeviciaus 9, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Leonas Valius
- Department of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Mickeviciaus 9, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Lina Jaruseviciene
- Department of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Mickeviciaus 9, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dyer SM, Liu E, Gnanamanickam ES, Milte R, Easton T, Harrison SL, Bradley CE, Ratcliffe J, Crotty M. Clustered domestic residential aged care in Australia: fewer hospitalisations and better quality of life. Med J Aust 2018; 208:433-438. [DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M Dyer
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | - Enwu Liu
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Emmanuel S Gnanamanickam
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | - Rachel Milte
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- Institute for Choice, University of South Australia Business School, Adelaide, SA
| | - Tiffany Easton
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | - Stephanie L Harrison
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | - Clare E Bradley
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
- Institute for Choice, University of South Australia Business School, Adelaide, SA
| | - Maria Crotty
- Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| |
Collapse
|