1
|
Quantifying the Limitations of Clinical and Technology-based Flap Monitoring Strategies using a Systematic Thematic Analysis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3663. [PMID: 34262835 PMCID: PMC8274739 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Multiple techniques exist to monitor free flap viability postoperatively, varying with practical and personal preference, yet the limitations of each technique remain unquantified. This systematic review aims to identify the most commonly reported limitations of these techniques in clinical practice. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science with search criteria for postoperative free flap monitoring techniques. Search results were independently screened using defined criteria by two authors and a senior clinician. Limitations of the techniques found in the discussion section of eligible articles were recorded and categorized using thematic analysis. Results A total of 4699 records were identified. In total, 2210 articles met the eligibility criteria and were subsequently reviewed, with 195 papers included in the final analysis. The most frequently reported limitations of clinical monitoring were interpretation requiring expertise (25% of related papers), unsuitability for buried flaps (21%), and lack of quantitative/objective values (19%). For noninvasive technologies, the limitations were lack of quantitative/objective values (21%), cost (16%), and interpretation requiring expertise (13%). For invasive technologies, the limitations were application requiring expertise (25%), equipment design and malfunction (13%), and cost (13%). Conclusions This is the first systematic review to quantify the limitations of different flap monitoring techniques, as reported in the literature. This information may enhance the choice in monitoring strategy for a reconstructive service, and inform the development and refinement of new flap monitoring technologies.
Collapse
|
2
|
Molina-Recio G, Molina-Luque R, Jiménez-García AM, Ventura-Puertos PE, Hernández-Reyes A, Romero-Saldaña M. Proposal for the User-Centered Design Approach for Health Apps Based on Successful Experiences: Integrative Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e14376. [PMID: 32319965 PMCID: PMC7203616 DOI: 10.2196/14376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Different strategies encompassed within mHealth have shown themselves to be effective for maintaining good health or controlling certain diseases. However, there is usually a very high rate of abandonment of health apps. Therefore, it would seem obvious that there is a need for involving the end users (whether they are health professionals, patients, or both) in the design process from the early stages in order to enable their needs and characteristics to be identified. In this sense, it is common knowledge that focusing on the user permits the consideration of valuable details aimed at making the correct adjustment between the patient, the technology, and the organization of attention. Objective The goal of the research was to propose a methodology based on the review of previous successful user experiences in setting up health apps by using qualitative techniques (focus groups and discussion groups) that includes the participation of information technology and health professionals and the patients themselves. Methods An integrative review was made of studies in which a qualitative methodology was employed mainly through focus and/or discussion groups for the design and development of health apps, consulting diverse databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Proquest) with the following search strategy: “mHealth AND apps AND focus group OR discussion group.” A total of 69 papers were included in the review. Results A proposal structured in 4 sessions of variable duration was made in which information technology and health professionals and patients take part: composing, preparing, and organizing contents (session 1); testing structure and usability (session 2); does the app fit the needs of end users? (session 3); and last testing—keep on improving (session 4). Throughout the sessions, we propose studying aspects like previous user experiences in mHealth, barriers to the adoption of mHealth, interface contents, management and browsability, usability, perceived quality, security and privacy, capacity to self-manage disease with the app, ergonomics, and glanceability, etc. Specific tools that have proved useful in previous research for measuring these aspects are presented. Conclusions These work sessions would be based on predominantly qualitative methodologies although, as they evolve, validated questionnaires permitting the assessment of the objectivity of certain technical aspects could be incorporated. With this proposal, a project centered on end users could be effected, responding to their needs. However, this requires validation that will be made via implementation in the development of health apps, with the subsequent measurement of results in terms of adherence and improvement in the clinical variables of the end users.
Collapse
|
3
|
Jeffs L, Jamieson T, Saragosa M, Mukerji G, Jain AK, Man R, Desveaux L, Shaw J, Agarwal P, Hensel JM, Maione M, Onabajo N, Nguyen M, Bhatia R. Uptake and Scalability of a Peritoneal Dialysis Virtual Care Solution: Qualitative Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2019; 6:e9720. [PMID: 30990460 PMCID: PMC6488957 DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.9720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Early research in the area of virtual care solutions with peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has focused on evaluating the outcomes and impact of these solutions. There has been less attention focused on understanding the factors influencing the uptake, usability, and scalability of virtual care for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients receiving PD at home. Objective In this context, a study was undertaken to (1) assess and understand the factors influencing the uptake of a virtual care solution and (2) provide recommendations for the scalability of a virtual care solution aimed at enhancing CKD patients’ outcomes and experiences. Methods This study used a qualitative design with semistructured interviews and a thematic analysis approach. A total of 25 stakeholders—6 patients and 3 caregivers, 6 health care providers, 2 vendors, and 8 health system decision makers—participated in this study. Results The following three primary mechanisms emerged to influence the usability of the virtual care solution: (1) receiving hands-on training and ongoing communication from a supportive team, (2) adapting to meet user needs and embedding them into workflow, and (3) being influenced by patient and caregiver characteristics. Further, two overarching recommendations were developed for considerations around scalability: (1) co-design locally, embed into the daily workflow, and deploy over time and (2) share the benefits and build the case. Conclusions Study findings can be used by key stakeholders in their future efforts to enhance the implementation, uptake, and scalability of virtual care solutions for CKD and managing PD at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Jeffs
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Trevor Jamieson
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marianne Saragosa
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Geetha Mukerji
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arsh K Jain
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Man
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Desveaux
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James Shaw
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Payal Agarwal
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer M Hensel
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nike Onabajo
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Megan Nguyen
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Bhatia
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Campling NC, Pitts DG, Knight PV, Aspinall R. A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (ii) barriers to uptake of telehealthcare devices. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:466. [PMID: 28683733 PMCID: PMC5501529 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2270-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Monitoring health and care needs through the use of telehealthcare devices has been proposed to help alleviate funding concerns in a climate of limited budgets. As well as improving cost effectiveness, such an approach could be used to help individuals live at home for longer. In practice however, these devices often go unused. A qualitative study was carried out to determine the barriers to uptake of these devices from both the perspective of the end user and from key players in the healthcare supply chain. Methods A qualitative approach was used involving focus groups and interviews. Two UK-based focus groups were held with users and potential users, to assess their views on the wide array of devices available. 27 individuals were involved in the groups, all over the age of 60. Additionally 27 telephone interviews were conducted with key supply chain players to ascertain their views on the barriers to uptake of these devices. A semi-structured interview guide was used. All data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach. Results Users were generally unaware of the wide array of devices available and when shown a selection, were often unclear as to their purpose. The interviews revealed extensive barriers to uptake due to lack of awareness, unfamiliar terminology, complex supply routes and costs, resistance from professionals to device usage and lack of expertise. Conclusions Public and professional awareness campaigns are required with appropriate funding mechanisms for users to gain access to devices. The numerous barriers identified require systematically addressing, so that device usage is better promoted, enabling individuals to live at home successfully for longer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha C Campling
- Faculty of Health Sciences Building 67, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David G Pitts
- Cranfield Biotechnology Centre, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK
| | - Paul V Knight
- Cranfield Biotechnology Centre, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK
| | - Richard Aspinall
- Health and Wellbeing Academy, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|