PROPEL: implementation of an evidence based pelvic floor muscle training intervention for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation and outcomes study protocol

Effect of midwife-led pelvic floor muscle training on prolapse symptoms and quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse in Ethiopia: A Cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that can significantly impact a woman's quality of life. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is recommended as a first-line conservative treatment for prolapse, but evidence on its effectiveness from low-resource settings is limited. This study aimed to assess the effect of midwife-led PFMT on prolapse symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among women with mild-to-moderate POP in Ethiopia.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A community-based, parallel-groups, two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in Dale and Wonsho districts of Sidama Region, Ethiopia. Women with symptomatic POP stages I-III were randomized by cluster to receive either midwife-led PFMT plus lifestyle counseling (intervention group) or lifestyle counseling alone (control group). The participants and counselors knew what the women were receiving, but they were not aware of the other group. The outcome assessors, who collected data at the end of intervention, were blinded to the participants' treatment allocation. The primary outcomes were changes in prolapse symptom score (POP-SS) and prolapse quality of life (P-QoL). Mixed-effects generalized linear model was used to determine the effect of PFMT on prolapse symptoms and P-QoL at 99% confidence level. Adjusted β coefficients were used as effect measures. The level of significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons. A total of 187 women were randomized to intervention (n = 86) from four clusters and control (n = 101) arms from another four clusters. At sixth months, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements both in prolapse symptoms and P-QoL. The mean change difference in POP-SS was -4.11 (99% CI [-5.38, -2.83]; p <  0.001). Similarly, the mean change difference was: -8.86 (99% CI [-13.84, -3.89]; p < 0.001) in physical domain of P-QoL; -11.18 (99% CI [-15.03, -7.32]; p < 0.001) in psychological domain of P-QoL, and -9.01 (99% CI [-10.49, -5.54]; p < 0.001) in personal relationship domain of P-QoL. A significantly higher proportion (83.72%) of women in the intervention group perceived their condition as "better" after the intervention as compared to 41.58% in the control group. Women with earlier stages of prolapse (stages I and II) experienced higher benefits compared to those in stage III.

CONCLUSIONS

A midwife-led PFMT combined with lifestyle counseling significantly improves prolapse symptoms and quality of life in mild-to-moderate POP. This strategy can be integrated into the existing maternal and reproductive health programs to address POP in low-income settings where access to trained specialist is limited.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za) database, with the registration number PACTR202302505126575 (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=24311).

Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and the associated quality of life among institutionalized and noninstitutionalized elderly women: A cross-sectional study

Background

An increase in life expectancy has led to an increased elderly population. In turn, this aging population is more likely to develop health conditions, such as pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of these disorders and the associated quality of life in institutionalized and noninstitutionalized elderly women.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 80 female participants older than 60 years, divided into 2 groups: institutionalized and noninstitutionalized participants. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short-Form and a sociodemographic questionnaire were used. A chi-squared test was used to assess the differences in prevalence between groups.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the prevalence of PFDs or quality of life. In this study, the prevalence of PFDs was higher than that reported previously. In institutionalized women, a higher prevalence of PFDs and impaired quality of life were expected, although not observed.

Conclusions

There was a higher prevalence of pelvic disorders and impaired quality of life due to these disorders in elderly women.

Unpacking economic programme theory for supervision training: Preliminary steps towards realist economic evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Cost studies are increasingly popular given resource constraints. While scholars stress the context-dependent nature of cost, and the importance of theory, cost studies remain context-blind and atheoretical. However, realist economic evaluation (REE) privileges context and the testing/refinement of economic programme theory. This preliminary REE serves to test and refine economic programme theory for supervision training programmes of different durations to better inform future programme design/implementation.

METHODS

Our preliminary REE unpacked how short (half-day) and extended (12 week) supervision training programmes in Victoria, Australia, produced costs and outcomes. We employed mixed methods: qualitative realist and quantitative cost methods. Economically optimised programme models were developed guided by identified cost-sensitive mechanisms and contexts.

RESULTS

As part of identified context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) for both training programmes, we found a wider diversity of positive outcomes but greater costs for the extended programme (11 outcomes; AU$3069/learner) compared with the short programme (7 outcomes; $385/learner). We identified four shared cost-sensitive mechanisms for both programmes (training duration, learner protected time, learner engagement, and facilitator competence) and one shared cost-sensitive context (learners' supervisory experience). We developed two economically optimised programme models: (1) short programme for experienced supervisors facilitated by senior educators ($406/learner); and (2) extended programme for inexperienced supervisors facilitated by junior educators ($2104/learner).

DISCUSSION

Our initial economic programme theory was somewhat supported, refuted and refined. Results were partly consistent with previous research, but also extended it through unpacking cost-sensitive mechanisms and contexts. Although our preliminary REE fills a pressing gap in the methodology literature, conducting REE was challenging given our desire to integrate economic and realist analyses fully, and remain faithful to realist principles. Attention to training duration and experience levels of the facilitator-learner dyad may help to balance the cost and outcomes of training programmes.

Clinical effect of electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy combined with pelvic floor functional exercise on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy combined with pelvic floor functional exercise on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

One hundred and four patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse were randomly divided into two groups. There were 52 patients in the control group who were given pelvic floor function exercise. Another 52 patients in the study group were given electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy combined with pelvic floor functional exercises. The clinical efficacy, pelvic floor pressure (contraction pressure, resting pressure, contraction duration), improvement of pelvic floor prolapse, pelvic floor surface muscle potential, quality of sex life and quality of life (PFIQ-7 score and PFDI-20 score) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After the therapy, the total effective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The contraction pressure, resting pressure and vaginal contraction duration of the two groups all increased, and the indexes of the study group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The pelvic floor prolapse degree of the two groups tended to be 0 degrees and I light, and the improvement of the study group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The average and maximum average values of the resting stage, endurance test stage and re-resting stage of the two groups all increased, and the fast muscle contraction time, fast muscle relaxation time and variability value all decreased, and the improvement of the study group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The scores of sexual satisfaction, sexual anxiety, sexual communication, sexual reaction, sexual attitude and sexual body image of the two groups all increased, and the scores of the study group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The scores of PFIQ-7 and PFDI-20 in the two groups all decreased, and the scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy combined with pelvic floor functional exercise has a noticeable curative effect and can significantly alleviate pelvic floor prolapse and improve the sex life and quality of life of patients.

Can effective supervised pelvic floor muscle training be provided by primary care nurses? A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To determine whether primary care nurses with no prior experience can, after training, provide effective supervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) by a three-group parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT): primary care nurse, urogynaecology nurse specialist and controls undertaken in 11 primary care/general practices, covering urban and rural settings in SW England. The sample consisted of 337 women with weak pelvic floor muscles (Modified Oxford Score 2 or less) in a randomly sampled survey.

METHODS

Following detailed instruction and training, primary care nurses recruited patients who were randomized to PFMT provided by them, a urogynaecology nurse specialist or a 'no training' control group. The primary outcome measure to assess the effectiveness of training was pelvic floor muscle strength as measured by perineometry.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty women aged 19 to 76 (median 49) years were recruited. After 3 months there was an increase in strength in both intervention groups compared with controls: median differences (95% CI) were 3.0 (0.3, 6.0) cmH₂O higher for the primary care nurse group (n = 50) compared to the control group (n = 56; p = 0.02) and 4.3 (1.0, 7.3) cmH₂O for the urogynaecology nurse specialist group (n = 53) compared to control (p < 0.01); there was no difference between the primary care nurse and urogynaecology nurse specialist groups [1.3 (-2.0,4.7; p = 0.70].

CONCLUSIONS

PFMT provided by trained primary care nurses achieved improvements in pelvic floor muscle strength compared with controls (and comparable to that of a urogynaecology nurse specialist). This could have implications for the provision of PFMT for all women and potentially help in the prevention of pelvic floor dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier NCT01635894. This was done retrospectively to conform to current registration requirements. When the trial commenced (2003), there was no requirement to register; this was introduced in 2005. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) decided that from July 1, 2005, no trials would be considered for publication unless they are included on a clinical trials registry, hence the retrospective registration.

Pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: the PROPEL realist evaluation

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse is estimated to affect 41–50% of women aged > 40 years. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of individualised pelvic floor muscle training found that pelvic floor muscle training was effective in reducing symptoms of prolapse, improved quality of life and showed clear potential to be cost-effective. Provision of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse has continued to vary across the UK, with limited availability of specialist physiotherapists to deliver it.

Objectives

This project aimed to study the implementation and outcomes of different models of delivery to increase the service provision of pelvic floor muscle training, and to follow up treatment outcomes for the original trial participants.

Design

A realist evaluation of pelvic floor muscle training implementation conducted within three full case study sites and two partial case study sites; an observational prospective cohort study comparing patient-reported outcomes pre and post intervention in all five sites; and a long-term follow-up study linking previous trial participants to routine NHS hospital data.

Setting

The setting for the realist evaluation was pelvic floor muscle training service delivery models in three NHS sites. The setting for the patient-reported outcome measures study was pelvic floor muscle training services in five NHS sites.

Methods

Realist evaluation qualitative data were collected at four time points in three case study sites to understand the implementation models, uptake, adherence and impact. Interviews involved service managers/leads, consultants, staff delivering pelvic floor muscle training and women receiving pelvic floor muscle training.

Main outcomes measures

Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months across five sites, including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score, health-related quality of life (measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, questionnaire), prolapse severity (measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System), urinary incontinence (measured using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and need for further treatment.

Results

A total of 102 women were recruited to the patient-reported outcome measures cohort study (target, n = 120), and 65 women had matched baseline and 6-month Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Scores. The mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score was 10.18 (standard deviation 5.63) at baseline and 6.98 (standard deviation 5.23) at 6 months, representing a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes obtained from delivery by specialist physiotherapists and the outcomes obtained from delivery by other health-care professionals (mean change in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score: –3.95 vs. –2.81, respectively). Services delivered using higher-band physiotherapists only were more costly than services delivered using other staff mixes. The effect of the original pelvic floor muscle training intervention, over a post-intervention period of > 10 years, was a reduction in the odds of any treatment during follow-up (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.99). The realist evaluation revealed stark differences in implementation. The site with a specialist physiotherapy service resisted change because of perceived threats to the specialist role and concerns about care quality. Pelvic floor muscle training delivery by other health-care staff was easier when there was a lack of any existing specialist service; staff had prior training and interest in pelvic health; staff had support, autonomy, time and resources to deliver pelvic floor muscle training as part of their core role; and surrounding services supported a flow of pelvic floor muscle training referrals.

Limitations

The number of available matched pre and post outcomes for women and the lack of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System examinations were limitations of this study.

Conclusions

It is possible to train different staff to effectively deliver pelvic floor muscle training to women. Women’s self-reported outcomes significantly improved across all service models. Training should be adequately tailored to differential skill mix needs.

Future work

Future work should include further implementation of pelvic floor muscle training and should include pre- and post-outcome data collection using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score.

Study registration

This study is registered as Research Registry 4919.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 47. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models

BACKGROUND

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) has been shown to be effective for pelvic organ prolapse in women, but its implementation in routine practice is challenging due to lack of adequate specialist staff. It is important to know if PFMT can be delivered by different staff skill mixes, what barriers and facilitators operate in different contexts, what strategies enable successful implementation and what are the underlying mechanisms of their action. PROPEL intervention was designed to maximise the delivery of effective PFMT in the UK NHS using different staff skill mixes. We conducted a realist evaluation (RE) of this implementation to understand what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why.

METHODS

Informed by the Realist and RE-AIM frameworks, the study used a longitudinal, qualitative, multiple case study design. The study took place in five, purposively selected, diverse NHS sites across the UK and proceeded in three phases to identify, test and refine a theory of change. Data collection took place at 4 time points over an 18 month implementation period using focus groups and semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders including service leads/managers, senior practitioners, newly trained staff and women receiving care in the new service models. Data were analysed using thematic framework approach adapted to identify Context, Mechanism and Outcome (CMO) configurations of the RE.

RESULTS

A heightened awareness of the service need among staff and management was a mechanism for change, particularly in areas where there was a shortage of skilled staff. In contrast, the most established specialist physiotherapist-delivered PFMT service activated feelings of role protection and compromised quality, which restricted the reach of PFMT through alternative models. Staff with some level of prior knowledge in women's health and adequate organisational support were more comfortable and confident in new role. Implementation was seamless when PFMT delivery was incorporated in newly trained staff's role and core work.

CONCLUSION

Roll-out of PFMT delivery through different staff skill mixes is possible when it is undertaken by clinicians with an interest in women's health, and carefully implemented ensuring adequate levels of training and ongoing support from specialists, multi-disciplinary teams and management.

Using Implementation Frameworks to Provide Proactive Physical Therapy for People With Parkinson Disease: Case Report

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

European clinical practice guidelines recommend physical therapy for people with Parkinson disease (PD) soon after diagnosis to provide education, physical activity advice, and individualized interventions when needed. However, therapy is frequently not used until after gait and balance problems occur. The purpose of this administrative case study is to present the application of a proactive physical therapy (PAPT) approach at 1 rehabilitation center using implementation frameworks to support the (1) implementation process, (2) determinants of implementation success, and (3) implementation evaluation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The PAPT program targeted people with PD before the onset of significant mobility dysfunction. It was initiated in 1 outpatient neurological rehabilitation center. The program used shared decision-making to promote long-term maintenance of independent exercise. The Knowledge-to-Action Framework was used by champions to plan implementation processes. Implementation barriers were addressed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The program was evaluated using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework with mixed methods.

OUTCOMES

In the program's first year, 38 people were referred, 28 were evaluated, and 20 participated in the 6-month program evaluation. Following PAPT, the number of participants reporting regular participation in aerobic, strengthening, and flexibility exercise approximately doubled, while those engaging in balance activities increased from 1 to 8. They reported a median of 140 minutes of aerobic exercise per week. Implementation barriers included location, insurance coverage, and difficulty scheduling long-term follow-up visits. Participants reported physical and emotional benefits of the program.

DISCUSSION

Implementation frameworks assisted with the implementation and evaluation of a PAPT delivery model that helped people with PD to increase and maintain independent exercise participation.

Uptake of a primary care atrial fibrillation screening program (AF-SMART): a realist evaluation of implementation in metropolitan and rural general practice

Background

Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in people aged ≥65 years is recommended by international guidelines. The Atrial Fibrillation Screen, Management And guideline-Recommended Therapy (AF-SMART) studies of opportunistic AF screening in 16 metropolitan and rural general practices were conducted from November 2016–June 2019. These studies trialled custom-designed eHealth tools to support all stages of AF screening in general practice.

Methods

A realist evaluation of the AF-SMART studies, which aimed to explain the circumstances in which the program worked (or not) to increase the proportion of people screened for AF. The initial program theory was based on our previous research, policy documents and screening studies. To test this, we conducted 45 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners (GPs), nurses and practice managers across all participating practices, and collected observational and quantitative screening data. These data were analysed and interpreted to refine the program theory.

Results

GPs/nurses liked the eHealth tools, although technical problems sometimes disrupted screening. Time was the main barrier to screening for GPs/nurses, so systems need to be very efficient. Practices with leadership from a senior GP ‘screening champion’ had broader uptake, especially from the nursing team. Providing regular feedback on screening data was beneficial for quality improvement and motivation. Clear protocols for follow-up of abnormal results were required for successful nurse-led screening in a hierarchical system. Participation in the program had broader benefits of improving AF knowledge and raising the profile of cardiovascular health in the practice. Screening for a shorter, more intense period (eg during influenza vaccination) worked well for practices where sufficient staff time was allocated.

Conclusions

Introducing an AF screening program is likely to be successful in contexts where there is a senior GP ‘screening champion’, a clear protocol exists for abnormal results, and there is regular data reporting to staff. These contexts link to mechanisms around motivation, leadership, empowerment of nurses, and efficient screening systems. The contexts and mechanisms contribute to the longer-term outcomes of increasing the proportion of people screened and treated for AF, which is recommended by guidelines as a key strategy for the prevention of AF-related stroke.

Trial registrations

AF SMART (metropolitan): ACTRN12616000850471 (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).

AF SMART II (rural): ACTRN12618000004268 (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).

Women's experiences of receiving care for pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common urogenital condition affecting 41-50% of women over the age of 40. To achieve early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, it is important that care is sensitive to and meets women's needs, throughout their patient journey. This study explored women's experiences of seeking diagnosis and treatment for prolapse and their needs and priorities for improving person-centred care.

METHODS

Twenty-two women receiving prolapse care through urogynaecology services across three purposefully selected NHS UK sites took part in three focus groups and four telephone interviews. A topic guide facilitated discussions about women's experiences of prolapse, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, interactions with healthcare professionals, overall service delivery, and ideals for future services to meet their needs. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged relating to women's experiences of a) Evaluating what is normal b) Hobson's choice of treatment decisions, and c) The trial and error of treatment and technique. Women often delayed seeking help for their symptoms due to lack of awareness, embarrassment and stigma. When presented to GPs, their symptoms were often dismissed and unaddressed until they became more severe. Women reported receiving little or no choice in treatment decisions. Choices were often influenced by health professionals' preferences which were subtly reflected through the framing of the offer. Women's embodied knowledge of their condition and treatment was largely unheeded, resulting in decisions that were inconsistent with women's preferences and needs. Physiotherapy based interventions were reported as helping women regain control over their symptoms and life. A need for greater awareness of prolapse and physiotherapy interventions among women, GPs and consultants was identified alongside greater focus on prevention, early diagnosis and regular follow-up. Greater choice and involvement in treatment decision making was desired.

CONCLUSIONS

As prolapse treatment options expand to include more conservative choices, greater awareness and education is needed among women and professionals about these as a first line treatment and preventive measure, alongside a multi-professional team approach to treatment decision making. Women presenting with prolapse symptoms need to be listened to by the health care team, offered better information about treatment choices, and supported to make a decision that is right for them.

An International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF)-based investigation of movement impairment in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Background

There is little evidence on movement impairment of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the movement impairments and interactions between the PFM and abdominal muscles in POP.

Method

The PFM and abdominal muscles of 100 conveniently sampled South African women with POP were assessed by ultrasonography, electromyography (EMG), the PERFECT scale, Sahrmann scale and a Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU). A demographic questionnaire determined contextual factors (exercise and medical history) and Visual Faces Scale pain intensities. Data were analysed descriptively and with Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results

Participants (59 ± 9.31 years) were mostly unemployed (80%), physically inactive (85%), with comorbidities, heart or vascular disease, hypothyroidism and depression. The mean levator hiatus at rest (56.38 mm, standard deviation [SD] 9.95), thickness (5.1 mm, SD 1.41), amount of movement (4.28 mm, SD 6.84), strength (level 1.89, SD 1.13) and endurance (4.04 s, SD 3.32) of the PFM indicated dysfunction. Median values of zero were found for the Sahrmann scale (interquartile [IQ] range [0–1]) and PBU (IQ range [0–2]) and 10.95 µV for abdominal EMG (IQ range [7.9–17.8]). Pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance, movement and EMG activity correlation was fair (r > 0.4, p < 0.001), as was PFM strength, endurance and abdominal muscle function (r > 0.4, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Movement impairment of local and global stability and mobility functions of PFM and abdominal muscles was present, as well as correlations between these functions. Addressing these impairments may affect the identified contextual factors (socio-economic, psychological and lifestyle factors) and the possible activity limitations and participation restrictions in patients with POP. Further research is needed to investigate these interactions.

Clinical implications

The findings suggest that assessment and management of patients with POP might need to be based on a comprehensive neuro-musculoskeletal assessment and a holistic approach. Standardised protocols for patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) should therefore be used with caution. Randomised controlled trials should investigate patient-specific and holistic intervention approaches.