1
|
Bland MD, Moore JL, Anderl E, Eikenberry M, McCarthy A, Olivier GN, Rice T, Siles A, Zeleznik H, Romney W. Knowledge Translation Task Force for core measures clinical practice guideline: a short report on the process and utilization. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:43. [PMID: 38641675 PMCID: PMC11027410 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00580-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of the 2018 Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG): A Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults with Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation, a Knowledge Translation (KT) Task Force was convened. The purpose of this short report was to (1) demonstrate the potential impact of a CPG KT Task Force through a practical example of efforts to implement a CPG into neurologic physical therapy practice and (2) describe the process to convene a KT Task Force and develop products (KT Toolkit) to facilitate implementation of the CPG. METHODS To describe the process used by the KT Task Force to develop and review a KT Toolkit for implementation of the CPG. RESULTS Utilizing the Knowledge-To-Action Cycle framework, eight tools were developed as part of the KT Toolkit and are available with open access to the public. Findings indicate that the Core Outcome Measures Homepage, which houses the KT Toolkit, has had greater than 70,000 views since its publication. CONCLUSIONS This short report serves as an example of the efforts made to implement a CPG into physical therapy practice. The processes to facilitate KT and the tools developed can inform future implementation efforts and underscore the importance of having a KT Task Force to implement a CPG. Moving forward, KT Task Forces should be convened to implement new or revised guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marghuretta D Bland
- Physical Therapy, Neurology, & Occupational Therapy, Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Moore
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN, USA
- Regional Center for Knowledge Translation in Rehabilitation, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Megan Eikenberry
- College of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA
| | - Arlene McCarthy
- PT, MS, DPT, Board Certified in Neurologic Physical Therapy, Former Program Director of Neurologic Physical Therapy Residency, Rehabilitation Services, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Geneviève N Olivier
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tracy Rice
- Department of Human Performance, Division of Physical Therapy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Amelia Siles
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Services, Physical Therapy Division, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Hallie Zeleznik
- Strategic Initiatives and Professional Development, UPMC Centers for Rehab Services Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Wendy Romney
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bar-Nizan T, Rand D, Lahav Y. Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice and Burnout Among Occupational Therapists: The Role of Self-Efficacy. Am J Occup Ther 2024; 78:7801205190. [PMID: 38175805 DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for ensuring optimal quality care and obtaining positive outcome in treatment. Occupational therapists generally hold positive attitudes toward EBP; however, EBP is not always fully implemented. OBJECTIVE To explore the mediating role of self-efficacy on the relationship between implementing EBP and burnout among occupational therapists. DESIGN A cross sectional study. SETTING Data were collected through social media and WhatsApp groups using an online survey accessible through Qualtrics, a secured web-based data collection system; responses were anonymous. PARTICIPANTS The final sample consisted of 261 female Israeli occupational therapists (ages 24-65 yr, with 1-40 yr of clinical experience). OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The following questionnaires assessed EBP implementation, burnout, and self-efficacy, respectively: the EBP Implementation Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and the Occupational Therapy Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Demographic data were also collected. RESULTS EBP implementation was low (0-43 points out of a maximum 72 points), moderate levels of burnout and high levels of self-efficacy were reported. Significant associations with medium effect sizes were found between EBP implementation and burnout: the higher the levels of EBP implementation, the lower the levels of burnout frequency and intensity. Moreover, self-efficacy mediated these relationships. EBP implementation was related to elevated self-efficacy, which, in turn, was associated with lower burnout. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE EBP implementation may serve as an important tool to limit burnout among occupational therapists by fostering their trust in their ability to handle clinical challenges. Further research is needed. Plain-Language Summary: This study explored implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) and its relationships to burnout and work-related self-efficacy among occupational therapists. The study found that self-efficacy mediated the relationships between implementing EBP and burnout. Implementing EBP was associated with higher self-efficacy, which, in turn, was associated with lower burnout among occupational therapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Bar-Nizan
- Tal Bar-Nizan, MSc, OT, is Occupational Therapist, Department of Occupational Therapy, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. At the time of the research, Bar-Nizan was Graduate Student, Department of Occupational Therapy, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Debbie Rand
- Debbie Rand, PhD, OT, is Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael Lahav
- Yael Lahav, PhD, is Clinical Psychologist, Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Landsverk NG, Olsen NR, Brovold T. Instruments measuring evidence-based practice behavior, attitudes, and self-efficacy among healthcare professionals: a systematic review of measurement properties. Implement Sci 2023; 18:42. [PMID: 37705031 PMCID: PMC10500884 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01301-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based practice (EBP) is well known to most healthcare professionals. Implementing EBP in clinical practice is a complex process that can be challenging and slow. Lack of EBP knowledge, skills, attitudes, self-efficacy, and behavior can be essential barriers that should be measured using valid and reliable instruments for the population in question. Results from previous systematic reviews show that information regarding high-quality instruments that measure EBP attitudes, behavior, and self-efficacy in various healthcare disciplines need to be improved. This systematic review aimed to summarize the measurement properties of existing instruments that measure healthcare professionals' EBP attitudes, behaviors, and self-efficacy. METHODS We included studies that reported measurement properties of instruments that measure healthcare professionals' EBP attitudes, behaviors, and self-efficacy. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, HaPI, AMED via Ovid, and Cinahl via Ebscohost were searched in October 2020. The search was updated in December 2022. The measurement properties extracted included data on the item development process, content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, and measurement error. The quality assessment, rating of measurement properties, synthesis, and modified grading of the evidence were conducted in accordance with the COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews. RESULTS Thirty-four instruments that measure healthcare professionals' EBP attitudes, behaviors or self-efficacy were identified. Seventeen of the 34 were validated in two or more healthcare disciplines. Nurses were most frequently represented (n = 53). Despite the varying quality of instrument development and content validity studies, most instruments received sufficient ( +) ratings on content validity, with the quality of evidence graded as "very low" in most cases. Structural validity and internal consistency were the measurement properties most often assessed, and reliability and measurement error were most rarely assessed. The quality assessment results and overall rating of these measurement properties varied, but the quality of evidence was generally graded higher for these properties than for content validity. CONCLUSIONS Based on the summarized results, the constructs, and the population of interest, several instruments can be recommended for use in various healthcare disciplines. However, future studies should strive to use qualitative methods to further develop existing EBP instruments and involve the target population. TRIAL REGISTRATION This review is registered in PROSPERO. CRD42020196009. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020196009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Gunnar Landsverk
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Nina Rydland Olsen
- Department of Health and Functioning, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Therese Brovold
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balzer J, Jung A, Gerhard J, Reinecke S, Mijic M, Fichtmüller A, Jahjah A, Eggert M, Koch M, Ernst K, Haring R. Psychometric properties of questionnaires to assess evidence-based practice among occupational, physical and speech therapists: A systematic review. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2023; 176:1-11. [PMID: 36702639 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an important aspect of healthcare work, but the clinical implementation is complex. To be able to facilitate EBP implementation, valid measurement of the "EBP status quo" is essential. Therefore, we aimed to identify valid tools for EBP status assessment among occupational, physical and speech therapists in Germany. METHODS The databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were systematically searched from August 2011 until July 2022. Methodological quality and evidence level were scored by two independent raters via: i) the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, ii) updated criteria for good measurement properties, and iii) modified GRADE criteria. RESULTS Overall, 57 reports describing the development or validation of 31 EBP questionnaires were included. Six questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for content validity, three questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for reliability, two questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for structural validity as well as internal consistency, and nine questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for construct validity. Most questionnaires demonstrated moderate or low-quality evidence for the psychometric properties tested. DISCUSSION Overall, the present review found a lack of sufficient evidence on the psychometric properties of most questionnaires. The Evidence-Based Practice Inventory (EBPI), the Evidence-based Practice Confidence (EPIC) scale and the Health Sciences-Evidence-Based Practice (HS-EBP) questionnaire were the only questionnaires with "sufficient" content validity and, in addition, "sufficient" reliability or "sufficient" internal consistency. CONCLUSION Although a lack of high-quality psychometric properties of EBP tools became apparent, the EBPI, the EPIC scale and the HS-EBP questionnaire currently appear to be the best validated tools to assess EBP behavior/attitude and implementation in occupational, physical and speech therapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Balzer
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andrés Jung
- Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Janina Gerhard
- Gesellschaft für psychosoziale Einrichtungen gGmbH, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sarah Reinecke
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Marko Mijic
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Friedrich-Baur-Institut / Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Fichtmüller
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Marieke Eggert
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Maren Koch
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kathrin Ernst
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Robin Haring
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ehrenbrusthoff K, Braun T, Bahns C, Happe L, Kopkow C. Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1285. [PMID: 36284307 PMCID: PMC9597997 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adherence to evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered a key competence to improve healthcare quality. In this study, we aimed to describe the EBP adherence of healthcare professionals working in Germany and to explore barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of EBP in clinical practice. Methods A nationwide online survey was performed among healthcare professionals in Germany from January to April 2018 using the German version of the Evidence-based Practice Inventory (EBPI) questionnaire for a comprehensive assessment of adherence to EBP. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between demographic and professional determinants and each EBPI dimension. Results We analysed data of 889 participants, including 318 physical therapists, 154 occupational therapists, 137 midwifes and 280 participants of six other healthcare professions. Approximately 70% of the participants generally demonstrated a positive attitude towards EBP and believed that EBP was useful in clinical practice. Broadly, 80% of the respondents evaluated themselves as being able to enact EBP behaviour in clinical practice. In contrast, less than 70% preferred to use quantitative information instead of their intuition to inform their habitual clinical behaviour. Still, 20 to 30% reported that EBP did not sufficiently account for their clinical experience and differences between patients. The strongest facilitators to EBP adherence across at least three dimensions of the EBPI were the availability of ≥ 60 min for scientific literature at work (OR: 9.67; 95% CI: 5.86; 16.30), followed by a master or higher academic degree (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 5.86; 14.28) and the involvement in ≥ 1 scientific publication (OR: 7.06, 95% CI: 5.10; 9.85). Conclusions This study showed that healthcare professionals in Germany in general had a positive attitude towards EBP although they currently do not consider EBP principles in its entirety. The most important determinant positively influencing a healthcare professional’s decision to perform EBP was the time available for scientific literature at work. German healthcare professionals experience similar barriers towards the implementation of EBP in clinical practice compared to other international healthcare settings. These barriers should be targeted by future research. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013792). Registered 19 January 2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Ehrenbrusthoff
- grid.454254.60000 0004 0647 4362Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule Für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Tobias Braun
- grid.454254.60000 0004 0647 4362Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule Für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany ,grid.512879.0HSD Hochschule Döpfer GmbH (University of Applied Sciences), Waidmarkt 3 & 9, 50676 Cologne, Germany
| | - Carolin Bahns
- grid.8842.60000 0001 2188 0404Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus – Senftenberg, Universitätsplatz 1, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Lisa Happe
- grid.5560.60000 0001 1009 3608Department for Health Services Research, Assistance Systems and Medical Device Technology, Carl Von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Kopkow
- grid.8842.60000 0001 2188 0404Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus – Senftenberg, Universitätsplatz 1, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fernández-Domínguez JC, De Pedro-Gómez JE, Jiménez-López R, Romero-Franco N, Bays Moneo AB, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á, Sesé-Abad A. Physiotherapists’ Evidence-Based Practice profiles by HS-EBP questionnaire in Spain: A cross-sectional normative study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269460. [PMID: 35658062 PMCID: PMC9165824 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a cost-effective approach for improving the quality of clinical care and implementing only well-tested evidence. Health professions, especially physiotherapy, must embrace EBP principles. This paper presents normative data from the Spanish physiotherapist population using the Health-Sciences Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire and explores EBP clusters/profiles of professionals in practice. An intentional sample of 419 practicing physiotherapists was recruited from the Spanish Professional Council of Physiotherapy. Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey with 60 Likert items (scale 1–10) measuring 5 dimensions: 1) Beliefs and attitudes, 2) Results from literature, 3) Professional practice, 4) Assessment of results, and 5) Barriers and Facilitators. The protocol also included sociodemographic, training, and practice-related contrast variables. Normative data were estimated and tabulated for each dimension and then a K-means clustering procedure was implemented using the contrast variables. Results for normative data showed, in descending order, the following 50th percentile values for the five EBP factors: Beliefs and attitudes (8.25), Professional practice (8.00), Assessment of results (7.42), Results from literature (6.71), and EBP Barriers and Facilitators (5.17); all expressed on a scale of 1 to 10. Academic degree, EBP training level, and work time shared in healthcare activity, research, or teaching activity were all statistically significant for discriminating EBP dimension scores. Finally, six different clusters showed that when EBP level is low, the scores in all dimensions are equally low, and vice-versa. The EBP dimensions "Beliefs and attitudes", "Professional practice", and "Evaluation of results" obtained better normative scores overall than "Search for bibliographic evidence and its inclusion in practice" and especially "Perception of EBP barriers", which had the worst score. Normative data are useful for comparing individual scores and the reference population, and information about clusters will enable appropriate global EBP intervention programs to be designed and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C. Fernández-Domínguez
- Care, Chronicity and Health Evidence (CurES) Research Group, Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain
| | - Joan E. De Pedro-Gómez
- Care, Chronicity and Health Evidence (CurES) Research Group, Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain
| | - Rafael Jiménez-López
- Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
- Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Natalia Romero-Franco
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain
| | - Ana B. Bays Moneo
- Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Ángel Oliva-Pascual-Vaca
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
- Escuela de Osteopatía de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Albert Sesé-Abad
- Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
- Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Implementation of an Acute Care COPD Exacerbation Patient Mobilization Tool. A Mixed-Methods Study. ATS Sch 2021; 2:249-264. [PMID: 34409419 PMCID: PMC8362741 DOI: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0129oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Improving the mobility of hospitalized patients with
an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a
priority of care. AECOPD-Mob is a clinical decision-making tool for physical
therapists, especially those who are newly graduated or are new to caring
for patients with AECOPDs in acute care settings. Although this tool has
been available for several years, dissemination via publication is not
sufficient to implement it in clinical practice. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to develop,
implement, and evaluate different formats of AECOPD-Mob in an acute care
setting. Methods: We used a mixed-methods, convergent parallel design. In
addition to the paper format of AECOPD-Mob, we developed a smartphone app, a
web-based learner module, and an in-service learning session. Newly
graduated physical therapists (PTs) or PTs new to the practice area were
recruited from urban acute care hospitals. Participants used the different
formats for 3 weeks and then completed the Post-Study System Usability
Questionnaire. User data were retrieved for the learning module.
Participants participated in focus groups at 3 weeks and 3 months. Results: Eighteen (72% of eligible PTs, 100% female, 94%
graduated within 3 yr) PTs participated. Post-Study System Usability
Questionnaire scores for the learning module and smartphone indicated that
participants were satisfied with these formats (median score 2.0 on
1–7 Likert Scale for both technology formats, lower scores indicating
greater satisfaction). However, the participants reported in the focus group
that the paper format was preferred over other formats. Concerns with the
smartphone app included infection control and the perception of lack of
professionalism when using a smartphone during clinical practice. The
learning module and in-service were considered helpful as an introduction
but not as an ongoing support. The paper format was seen as the most
efficient way to access the necessary information and to facilitate
communication between other members of the care team about the importance of
mobility for hospitalized patients with AECOPDs. Conclusion: Newly graduated PTs strongly preferred the paper
format of the AECOPD-Mob tool in the acute care setting. Future research
will focus on knowledge translation strategies for other health
disciplines.
Collapse
|