1
|
Clemens V, Saller MM, Meller R, Neuerburg C, Kammerlander C, Boecker W, Klein M, Pedersen V. Clinical Acuity in the Emergency Department and Injury Severity Determine Hospital Admission of Older Patients with Low Energy Falls: Outcomes from a Prospective Feasibility Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093144. [PMID: 37176584 PMCID: PMC10179013 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low energy falls (LEF) in older adults constitute a relevant cause for emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admission and in-hospital mortality. Patient-reported outcome measures containing information about patients' medical, mental and social health problems might support disposition and therapy decisions. We investigated the value of a tablet-based (self-)assessment in predicting hospital admission and in-hospital mortality. METHODS Patients 65 years or older, consecutively presenting with LEF to our level I trauma center ED (from November 2020 to March 2021), were eligible for inclusion in this prospective observational study. The primary endpoint was hospital admission; secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and the use of the tablet for self-reported assessment. Multivariate logistic regression models were calculated to measure the association between clinical findings and endpoints. RESULTS Of 618 eligible patients, 201 patients were included. The median age was 82 years (62.7% women). The hospital admission rate was 45.3% (110/201), with an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.6% (4/110). Polypharmacy (odds ratio (OR): 8.48; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.21-59.37, p = 0.03), lower emergency severity index (ESI) scores (OR: 0.33; 95%CI 0.17-0.64, p = 0.001) and increasing injury severity score (ISS) (OR: 1.54; 95%CI 1.32-1.79, p < 0.001) were associated with hospital admission. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.60; 95%CI: 1.17-5.81, p = 0.03). Increasing age (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, p = 0.03) and frailty (OR: 0.71; 95%CI: 0.51-0.99, p = 0.04) were associated with the incapability of tablet use. CONCLUSIONS The severity of fall-related injuries and the clinical acuity are easily accessible, relevant predictors for hospital admission. Tablet-based (self-)assessment may be feasible and acceptable during ED visits and might help facilitate comprehensive geriatric assessments during ED stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Clemens
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian M Saller
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rupert Meller
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Menzinger Str. 44, 80638 Munich, Germany
| | - Carl Neuerburg
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Boecker
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Klein
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Pedersen
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
To Admit or Not to Admit to the Emergency Department: The Disposition Question at a Tertiary Teaching and Referral Hospital. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11050667. [PMID: 36900670 PMCID: PMC10000447 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11050667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disposition decision-making in the emergency department (ED) is crucial to patient safety and quality of care. It can inform better care, lower chance of infections, appropriate follow-up care, and reduced healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to examine correlates of ED disposition among adult patients at a teaching and referral hospital based on patients' demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics. METHOD A cross-sectional study conducted at the ED of the King Abdulaziz Medical City hospital in Riyadh. A two-level validated questionnaire was used-a patient questionnaire and healthcare staff/facility survey. The survey employed a systematic random sampling technique to recruit subjects at a pre-specified interval as patients arrived at the registration desk. We analyzed 303 adult patients visiting the ED, who were triaged, consented to participate in the study, completed the survey, and admitted to a hospital bed or discharged home. We used descriptive and inferential statistics to summarize and determine the interdependence and relationships of variables. We used logistic multivariate regression analysis to establish relationships and the odds of admission to a hospital bed. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 50.9 (SD = 21.4, Range 18 to 101). A total of 201 (66%) were discharged home while the rest were admitted to a hospital bed. Results of the unadjusted analysis suggest that older patients, males, patients with low level of education, and those with comorbidities and middle-income were more likely to be admitted to the hospital. The results of the multivariate analysis suggest that patients with comorbidities, urgent conditions, prior history of hospitalization, and higher triage levels were more likely to be admitted to a hospital bed. CONCLUSIONS Having proper triage and timely stopgap review measures in the admission process can help new patients to locations that best support their needs and improve the quality and efficiency of the facility. The findings may be a sentinel indicator that informs overuse or inappropriate use of EDs for non-emergency care, which is a concern in the Saudi Arabian publicly funded health system.
Collapse
|
3
|
Emergency department use and length of stay by younger and older adults: Nottingham cohort study in the emergency department (NOCED). Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34:2873-2885. [PMID: 36074240 PMCID: PMC9453701 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02226-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Younger and older adults attending the Emergency Department (ED) are a heterogeneous population. Longer length of ED stay is associated with adverse outcomes and may vary by age. AIMS To evaluate the associations between age and (1) clinical characteristics and (2) length of ED stay among adults attending ED. METHODS The NOttingham Cohort study in the Emergency Department (NOCED)-a retrospective cohort study-comprises new consecutive ED attendances by adults ≥ 18 years, at a secondary/tertiary care hospital, in 2019. Length of ED stay was dichotomised as < 4 and ≥ 4 h. The associations between age and length of ED stay were analysed by binary logistic regression and adjusted for socio-demographic and clinical factors including triage acuity. RESULTS 146,636 attendances were analysed; 75,636 (51.6%) resulted in a length of ED stay ≥ 4 h. Attendances of adults aged 65 to 74 years, 75 to 84 years and ≥ 85 years, respectively, had an increased risk (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of length of ED stay ≥ 4 h of 1.52 (1.45-1.58), 1.65 (1.58-1.72), and 1.84 (1.75-1.93), compared to those of adults 18 to 64 years (all p < 0.001). These findings remained consistent in the subsets of attendances leading to hospital admission and those leading to discharge from ED. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION In this real-world cohort study, older adults were more likely to have a length of ED stay ≥ 4 h, with the oldest old having the highest risk. ED target times should take into account age of attendees.
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie F, Ong MEH, Liew JNMH, Tan KBK, Ho AFW, Nadarajan GD, Low LL, Kwan YH, Goldstein BA, Matchar DB, Chakraborty B, Liu N. Development and Assessment of an Interpretable Machine Learning Triage Tool for Estimating Mortality After Emergency Admissions. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2118467. [PMID: 34448870 PMCID: PMC8397930 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Triage in the emergency department (ED) is a complex clinical judgment based on the tacit understanding of the patient's likelihood of survival, availability of medical resources, and local practices. Although a scoring tool could be valuable in risk stratification, currently available scores have demonstrated limitations. OBJECTIVES To develop an interpretable machine learning tool based on a parsimonious list of variables available at ED triage; provide a simple, early, and accurate estimate of patients' risk of death; and evaluate the tool's predictive accuracy compared with several established clinical scores. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-site, retrospective cohort study assessed all ED patients between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2016, who were subsequently admitted to a tertiary hospital in Singapore. The Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) tool was derived using a machine learning framework. To estimate mortality outcomes after emergency admissions, SERP was compared with several triage systems, including Patient Acuity Category Scale, Modified Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score, Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage, Rapid Acute Physiology Score, and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score. The initial analyses were completed in October 2020, and additional analyses were conducted in May 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Three SERP scores, namely SERP-2d, SERP-7d, and SERP-30d, were developed using the primary outcomes of interest of 2-, 7-, and 30-day mortality, respectively. Secondary outcomes included 3-day mortality and inpatient mortality. The SERP's predictive power was measured using the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS The study included 224 666 ED episodes in the model training cohort (mean [SD] patient age, 63.60 [16.90] years; 113 426 [50.5%] female), 56 167 episodes in the validation cohort (mean [SD] patient age, 63.58 [16.87] years; 28 427 [50.6%] female), and 42 676 episodes in the testing cohort (mean [SD] patient age, 64.85 [16.80] years; 21 556 [50.5%] female). The mortality rates in the training cohort were 0.8% at 2 days, 2.2% at 7 days, and 5.9% at 30 days. In the testing cohort, the areas under the curve of SERP-30d were 0.821 (95% CI, 0.796-0.847) for 2-day mortality, 0.826 (95% CI, 0.811-0.841) for 7-day mortality, and 0.823 (95% CI, 0.814-0.832) for 30-day mortality and outperformed several benchmark scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this retrospective cohort study, SERP had better prediction performance than existing triage scores while maintaining easy implementation and ease of ascertainment in the ED. It has the potential to be widely applied and validated in different circumstances and health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Xie
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | - Marcus Eng Hock Ong
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | - Andrew Fu Wah Ho
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Lian Leng Low
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Family Medicine and Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yu Heng Kwan
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Alan Goldstein
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David Bruce Matchar
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bibhas Chakraborty
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Liu
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
- Health Service Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
- Institute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Michalski-Monnerat C, Carron PN, Nguyen S, Büla C, Mabire C. Assessing Older Patients' Vulnerability in the Emergency Department: A Study of InterRAI ED Screener Accuracy. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:2914-2920. [PMID: 32964415 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying vulnerable older patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) who are at increased risk for adverse events and require a comprehensive geriatric assessment remains a major challenge. The interRAI Emergency Department Screener (EDS) was developed for this specific purpose, but data regarding its validity are scarce. OBJECTIVES To determine (1) convergent validity of the EDS with results of a geriatrician's assessment in defining the need for prompt versus delayed/no further geriatric assessment and (2) predictive validity of the EDS for hospital admission, prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING ED of an academic hospital in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Older patients, aged 75 years or older (N = 202), who visited the ED over a 4-month period. Patients with life-threatening conditions were excluded. MEASUREMENTS Data for EDS were collected by two clinical nurses. A brief geriatric assessment was performed separately and interpreted by a geriatrician blinded to the EDS results. Orientation after ED discharge, hospital LOS, and 30-day readmission were retrieved from the administrative database. RESULTS Participants were aged 83.2 ± 5.4 years, 56.9% were female, and 43.6% lived alone. Frequent findings at geriatric assessment were impairment in gait/balance (69.3%), polypharmacy (64.9%), cognitive impairment/delirium (48.2%), risk of malnutrition (46.0%), and mood impairment (38.1%). The proportions of participants who required prompt, delayed, and no further geriatric assessment, according to the EDS, were 27.2%, 29.2%, and 43.6%, respectively. The EDS had low sensitivity in predicting hospital admission (28.8%), prolonged LOS (26.3%), and 30-day readmission (26.1%), with the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) being 51.8%, 48.1%, and 49.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION The EDS performed poorly in both convergent and predictive validity analyses, precluding its use as a screening tool in this ED environment. Further efforts should be undertaken to better target interventions to reduce adverse health trajectories in the older ED population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Michalski-Monnerat
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare-IUFRS, University of Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Neuchâtel Hospital Network, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Pierre-Nicolas Carron
- Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sylvain Nguyen
- Service of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christophe Büla
- Service of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Mabire
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare-IUFRS, University of Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bowden T, Lyell D, Coiera E. Emergency care access to primary care records: an observational study. BMJ Health Care Inform 2020; 27:bmjhci-2020-100153. [PMID: 32830108 PMCID: PMC7445344 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure lookup rates of externally held primary care records accessed in emergency care and identify patient characteristics, conditions and potential consequences associated with access. MEASURES Rates of primary care record access and re-presentation to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days and hospital admission. DESIGN A retrospective observational study of 77 181 ED presentations over 4 years and 9 months, analysing 8184 index presentations in which patients' primary care records were accessed from the ED. Data were compared with 17 449 randomly selected index control presentations. Analysis included propensity score matching for age and triage categories. RESULTS 6.3% of overall ED presentations triggered a lookup (rising to 8.3% in year 5); 83.1% of patients were only looked up once and 16.9% of patients looked up on multiple occasions. Lookup patients were on average 25 years older (z=-9.180, p<0.001, r=0.43). Patients with more urgent triage classifications had their records accessed more frequently (z=-36.47, p<0.001, r=0.23). Record access was associated with a significant but negligible increase in hospital admission (χ2 (1, n=13 120)=98.385, p<0.001, phi=0.087) and readmission within 30 days (χ2 (1, n=13 120)=86.288, p<0.001, phi=0.081). DISCUSSION Emergency care clinicians access primary care records more frequently for older patients or those in higher triage categories. Increased levels of inpatient admission and re-presentation within 30 days are likely linked to age and triage categories. CONCLUSION Further studies should focus on the impact of record access on clinical and process outcomes and which record elements have the most utility to shape clinical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bowden
- HREC, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Lyell
- HREC, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Enrico Coiera
- HREC, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Street M, Dunning T, Bucknall T, Hutchinson AM, Rawson H, Hutchinson AF, Botti M, Duke MM, Mohebbi M, Considine J. Resuscitation status and characteristics and outcomes of patients transferred from subacute care to acute care hospitals: A multi-site prospective cohort study. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29:1302-1311. [PMID: 31793121 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To examine the relationship between resuscitation status and (i) patient characteristics; (ii) transfer characteristics; and (iii) patient outcomes following an emergency inter-hospital transfer from a subacute to an acute care hospital. BACKGROUND Patients who experience emergency inter-hospital transfers from subacute to acute care hospitals have high rates of acute care readmission (81%) and in-hospital mortality (15%). DESIGN This prospective, exploratory cohort study was a subanalysis of data from a larger case-time-control study in five Health Services in Victoria, Australia. There were 603 transfers in 557 patients between August 2015 and October 2016. The study was conducted in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology guidelines. METHODS Data were extracted by medical record audit. Three resuscitation categories (full resuscitation; limitation of medical treatment (LOMT) orders; or not-for-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) orders) were compared using chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Stratified multivariable proportional hazard Cox regression models were used to account for health service clustering effect. FINDINGS Resuscitation status was 63.5% full resuscitation; 23.1% LOMT order; and 13.4% not-for-CPR. Compared to patients for full resuscitation, patients with not-for-CPR or LOMT orders were more likely to have rapid response team calls during acute care readmission or to die during hospitalisation. Patients who were not-for-CPR were less likely to be readmitted to acute care and more likely to return to subacute care. CONCLUSIONS Two-thirds of patients in subacute care who experienced an emergency inter-hospital transfer were for full resuscitation. Although the proportion of patients with LOMT and not-for-CPR orders increased after transfer, there were deficiencies in the documentation of resuscitation status and planning for clinical deterioration for subacute care patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE As many subacute care patients experience clinical deterioration, patient preferences for care need to be discussed and documented early in the subacute care admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryann Street
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Eastern Health Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Trisha Dunning
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Barwon Health Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Tracey Bucknall
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Alfred Health Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Alison M Hutchinson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Monash Health Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Helen Rawson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Monash Health Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Anastasia F Hutchinson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Epworth HealthCare Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Mari Botti
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Epworth HealthCare Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Maxine M Duke
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Julie Considine
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Eastern Health Partnership, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kemp K, Mertanen R, Lääperi M, Niemi-Murola L, Lehtonen L, Castren M. Nonspecific complaints in the emergency department - a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28:6. [PMID: 31992333 PMCID: PMC6986144 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-0699-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonspecific complaint (NSC) is a common presenting complaint in the emergency setting, especially in the elderly population. Individual studies have shown that it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This prognostic systematic review draws a synthesis of reported outcomes for patients presenting with NSC and compares them with outcomes for patients presenting with a specific complaint. METHODS We conducted a literature search for publications, abstracts and conference presentations from Ovid, Scopus and Web of Science for the past 20 years. Studies were included which treated adult patients presenting to the Emergency Medical Services or Emergency Department with NSC. 2599 studies were screened for eligibility and quality was assessed using the SIGN assessment for bias tool. We excluded any low-quality studies, resulting in nine studies for quantitative analysis. We analysed the included studies for in-hospital mortality, triage category, emergency department length of stay, admission rate, hospital length of stay, intensive care admissions and re-visitation rate and compared outcomes to patients presenting with specific complaints (SC), where data were available. We grouped discharge diagnoses by ICD-10 category. RESULTS We found that patients presenting with NSC were mostly older adults. Mortality for patients with NSC was significantly increased compared to patients presenting with SC [OR 2.50 (95% CI 1.40-4.47)]. They were triaged as urgent less often than SC patients [OR 2.12 (95% CI 1.08-4.16)]. Emergency department length of stay was increased in two out of three studies. Hospital length of stay was increased by 1-3 days. Admission rates were high in most studies, 55 to 84%, and increased in comparison to patients with SC [OR 3.86 (95% CI 1.76-8.47)]. These patients seemed to require more resources than patients with SC. The number for intensive care admissions did not seem to be increased. Data were insufficient to make conclusions regarding re-visitation rates. Discharge diagnoses were spread throughout the ICD-10 main chapters, infections being the most prevalent. CONCLUSIONS Patients with NSC have a high risk of mortality and their care in the Emergency Department requires more time and resources than for patients with SC. We suggest that NSC should be considered a major emergency presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsi Kemp
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, and Emergency Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Reija Mertanen
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, and Emergency Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mitja Lääperi
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, and Emergency Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leila Niemi-Murola
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lasse Lehtonen
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maaret Castren
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, and Emergency Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
[Rapid increase of patients with dementia in emergency medical facilities]. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi 2019; 56:6-14. [PMID: 30760685 DOI: 10.3143/geriatrics.56.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
|