Effects of non-medical health coaching on multimorbid patients in primary care: a difference-in-differences analysis

Characteristics of self-management education and support programmes for people with chronic diseases delivered by primary care teams: a rapid review

BACKGROUND

Primary care actors can play a major role in developing and promoting access to Self-Management Education and Support (SMES) programmes for people with chronic disease. We reviewed studies on SMES programmes in primary care by focusing on the following dimensions: models of SMES programmes in primary care, SMES team's composition, and participants' characteristics.

METHODS

For this mixed-methods rapid review, we searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to identify articles in English and French that assessed a SMES programme in primary care for four main chronic diseases (diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease and/or respiratory chronic disease) and published between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2021. We excluded articles on non-original research and reviews. We evaluated the quality of the selected studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We reported the study results following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 68 studies in the analysis. In 46/68 studies, a SMES model was described by focusing mainly on the organisational dimension (n = 24). The Chronic Care Model was the most used organisational model (n = 9). Only three studies described a multi-dimension model. In general, the SMES team was composed of two healthcare providers (mainly nurses), and partnerships with community actors were rarely reported. Participants were mainly patients with only one chronic disease. Only 20% of the described programmes took into account multimorbidity. Our rapid review focused on two databases and did not identify the SMES programme outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the limited implication of community actors and the infrequent inclusion of multimorbidity in the SMES programmes, despite the recommendations to develop a more interdisciplinary approach in SMES programmes. This rapid review identified areas of improvement for SMES programme development in primary care, especially the privileged place of nurses in their promotion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021268290 .

Integrated care for older multimorbid heart failure patients: protocol for the ESCAPE randomized trial and cohort study

ESCAPE

Evaluation of a patient-centred biopsychosocial blended collaborative care pathway for the treatment of multimorbid elderly patients.

THERAPEUTIC AREA

Healthcare interventions for the management of older patients with multiple morbidities.

AIMS

Multi-morbidity treatment is an increasing challenge for healthcare systems in ageing societies. This comprehensive cohort study with embedded randomized controlled trial tests an integrated biopsychosocial care model for multimorbid elderly patients.

HYPOTHESIS

A holistic, patient-centred pro-active 9-month intervention based on the blended collaborative care (BCC) approach and enhanced by information and communication technologies can improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease outcomes as compared with usual care at 9 months.

METHODS

Across six European countries, ESCAPE is recruiting patients with heart failure, mental distress/disorder plus ≥2 medical co-morbidities into an observational cohort study. Within the cohort study, 300 patients will be included in a randomized controlled assessor-blinded two-arm parallel group interventional clinical trial (RCT). In the intervention, trained care managers (CMs) regularly support patients and informal carers in managing their multiple health problems. Supervised by a clinical specialist team, CMs remotely support patients in implementing the treatment plan-customized to the patients' individual needs and preferences-into their daily lives and liaise with patients' healthcare providers. An eHealth platform with an integrated patient registry guides the intervention and helps to empower patients and informal carers. HRQoL measured with the EQ-5D-5L as primary endpoint, and secondary outcomes, that is, medical and patient-reported outcomes, healthcare costs, cost-effectiveness, and informal carer burden, will be assessed at 9 and ≥18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

If proven effective, the ESCAPE BCC intervention can be implemented in routine care for older patients with multiple morbidities across the participating countries and beyond.

Impact of a case-management intervention for reducing emergency attendance on primary care: randomised control trial

BACKGROUND

The impact on primary care workload of case-management interventions to reduce emergency department (ED) attendances is unknown.

AIM

To examine the impact of a telephone-based case-management intervention targeting people with high ED attendance on primary care use.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A single-site data extract from a larger randomised control trial, using the patient-level data from primary care electronic health records (2015-2020), was undertaken.

METHOD

A total of 363 patients at high risk of ED usage were randomised to receive a 6-month case-management intervention (253 patients) or standard care (110 patients). Poisson regression models were used to calculate monthly rates of primary care use over time for the 2 years post-randomisation, comparing both arms. Usage was subclassified into face-to-face, telephone, letter, and community and secondary care referrals, stratified by patient demographics.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the mean annual rate of primary care events between the intervention and control arms (P = 0.70). Secondary care referrals saw a 26% reduction in the mean annual referral rate (incident rate ratio [IRR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.86, P<0.001) and letters sent increased by 6% in the intervention arm compared with the control arm (IRR 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.11, P = 0.01). In the case-managed arm, in patients aged ≥80 years there was a 33% increase in primary care usage (IRR 1.33, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.40, P<0.001); with a corresponding 10% decrease in patients aged <80 years when compared with controls (IRR 0.90, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.92, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A targeted case-management intervention to reduce ED attendances did not increase overall primary care use. Redistribution of usage is seen among some patient groups, particularly older people, which may have important implications for primary healthcare planning.

The effect of a single visit to a health coach on perceived health in 50-year old residents in a high-income country - a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the one-year-effect of a single visit to a health coach on perceived health and exercise level in 50-year-old citizens.

DESIGN

One factor design randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Participants were randomly selected from the Swedish Population Register.

SUBJECTS

50-year-old residents of the town of Alingsås, Sweden (n = 105).

INTERVENTION

The intervention group (n = 52) received a single one-hour visit to a health coach. The control group (n = 53) received no intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change over 12 months in the SF-36 dimensions physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health, physical component summary and mental component summary. Reported health transition at follow-up. Change in exercise level.

RESULTS

The control group changed their perceived health more favourable than the intervention group in the following dimensions of the SF-36; general health (p = 0.0055-0.025), role-emotional (p = 0.034-0.040) and mental component summary (p = 0.033-0.073).

CONCLUSION

A single visit to a health coach does not improve perceived health or exercise-level in 50-year-old citizens. On the contrary it may make perceived health worse.Key pointsResearch on health coaching has emerged in the last 20 years, but is diverse and the characteristics of a successful health coaching intervention are still unknown.There is a lack of randomised controlled trials evaluating long-term effectiveness of health coaching.This randomised controlled trial concludes that a single visit to a health coach does not improve, but rather impairs, perceived health in 50-year olds.

Associations of primary care structures with polypharmacy and patient-reported indicators in patients with complex multimorbidity: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Evidence supporting the effects of primary care structures on the quality of care for patients with complex multimorbidity, which is one of the most important challenges facing primary care, is scarce internationally. This study aimed to examine the associations of the types of primary care facilities with polypharmacy and patient-reported indicators in patients with complex multimorbidity, with a focus on differences between community clinics and hospitals.

DESIGN

Multicentre cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A total of 25 primary care facilities (19 community clinics and 6 small- and medium-sized hospitals).

PARTICIPANTS

Adult outpatients with complex multimorbidity, which was defined as the co-occurrence of three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more different body systems within one person.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Polypharmacy, the Patient-Reported Experience Measure using the Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form (JPCAT-SF) and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure using self-rated health status (SRH).

RESULTS

Data were analysed for 492 patients with complex multimorbidity. After adjustment for possible confounders and clustering within facilities, clinic-based primary care practices were significantly associated with a lower prevalence of polypharmacy, higher JPCAT-SF scores in coordination and community orientation, and a lower prevalence of poor or fair SRH compared with hospital-based primary care practices. In contrast, the JPCAT-SF score in first contact was significantly lower in clinic-based practices. The associations between the types of primary care facilities and JPCAT-SF scores in longitudinality and comprehensiveness were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinic-based primary care practices were associated with a lower prevalence of polypharmacy, better patient experience of coordination and community orientation, and better SRH in patients with complex multimorbidity compared with hospital-based primary care practices. In the primary care setting, small and tight teams may improve the quality of care for patients with complex multimorbidity.

The Role of the Health Coach in a Global Pandemic

BACKGROUND

While medical teams were perplexed about the novel SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission and impairment of organ systems and immune function, viral infections spread worldwide. Complex intersectional issues of co-morbidities coupled with marginalized, diverse ethnic/racial populations emerged as significant risks to contracting severe COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

Since a healthy lifestyle is fundamental for lowering risk to chronic diseases, public health initiatives to manage this and future pandemics should include strategies that assist individuals to improve health status through targeted behavior changes. This conceptual paper builds a case for certified professional health coaches as primary actors in future preventive strategies, with expanded skills in addressing social determinants of health and "next generational" cultural competencies.

METHODS

This concept paper primarily synthesizes fast-tracked research in 2020 regarding the demographic impact of COVID-19, specifically those groups suffering the highest morbidity and mortality rates. Exploring these intersectional issues through a conceptual lens provides strategies for certified health coaches to contribute their expertise in behavioral change within the larger contextual settings of racial/ethnic disparities and social inequities.

RESULTS

As the co-morbidities and other chronic conditions related to COVID-19 among individuals and families in low-income communities are worsened by dual forces (lifestyle/behavioral choices and ingrained structural inequities), adding the support of certified health coaches to build trust, provide more convenient access to address vaccine hesitancy, and dispell falsehoods, is an effective means for advancing health and wellbeing. Group coaching and one-on-one coaching can work in tandem with public health initiatives for reducing chronic disease burden and addressing social determinants of health (SDoH). Skills are identified in coaching SDoH with expanded cultural competencies for health coaches.

CONCLUSION

Certified professional health coaches can make a positive impact on general risk reduction of chronic diseases within ethnic/racial minorities, thereby supporting population health in facing future contagions with greater health resilience.

Vice Chair for Education: Twelve Roles to Provide a Framework for Success

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

An increase in the administrative work in our healthcare system has led to an increase in the number of administrative positions in radiology departments. Many of these are Vice Chair roles, including Vice Chair for Education (VCEd). The responsibility of this position has expanded, often far beyond the original definition. This article defines the role and expectations of the Vice Chair for Education and provides suggestions for success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This article will review 12 vital roles that a Vice Chair for Education must play to be an effective advocate for radiology education within a department.

RESULTS

Key attributes of an educational leader are delineated, divided into 12 areas or roles.

CONCLUSION

This article summarizes key leadership skills needed by Vice Chairs for Education in order for them to be effective in their role.

A health coach-led smoking cessation program for Chinese Americans at a community health center in New York City

Introduction

A health coach-led smoking cessation program was implemented in a community of immigrant Chinese Americans. Follow-up was provided face-to-face or over-the-phone to provide support and address barriers. Free nicotine replacement treatment was provided for eligible participants.

Aim

The aim is to assess smoking cessation outcome by program components.

Methods

Quitting was defined as self-reported smoking abstention for at least 3 months. Factors contributing to successful cessation were evaluated using chi-squared tests and regression analysis. Participants were randomly surveyed to measure the helpfulness of and satisfaction with the program.

Results/Findings

The program enrolled 184 participants from November 2015 to January 2017. Participants were mostly men (89%) with a mean age of 44. An intent-to-treat analysis found that 19% quit. Phone counseling had the same success as face-to-face counseling. Each additional session attended was associated with 2.1 times the odds of quitting, P < 0.001. Among the participants who quit, 70% reported the health coach was helpful in their cessation.

Conclusions

A health coach-led smoking cessation program that offered phone-based counseling was successful in reducing smoking. Future programs should consider using a health coach to reduce physician burden and phone-based counseling for difficult-to-access patients to increase program reach.