Comparing methods to estimate incremental inpatient costs and length of stay due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Alberta, Canada

Comparison of disease and economic burden between MRSA infection and MRSA colonization in a university hospital: a retrospective data integration study

BACKGROUND

Although there is a growing concern and policy regarding infections or colonization caused by resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the prognosis of MRSA infections compared to that of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections remains controversial. Moreover, there have not been any studies comparing both the burden of disease and its impact on the healthcare economy between MRSA infection and colonization while adjusting for confounding factors. These comparisons are crucial for developing effective infection control measures and healthcare policies. We aimed to compare the disease and economic burden between MRSA and MSSA infections and between MRSA infection and colonization.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated data of 496 in-patients with MRSA or MSSA infections and of 1178 in-patients with MRSA infections or MRSA colonization from a university hospital in Japan from 2016 to 2021. We compared in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges between in-patients with MRSA and MSSA infections and those with MRSA infections and MRSA colonization using multiple regressions. We combined surveillance data, including all microbiological test results, data on patients with infections, treatment histories, and clinical outcomes, to create the datasets.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality rates between matched MRSA vs. MSSA infections and MRSA infection vs. colonization. On the contrary, the adjusted effects of the MRSA infection compared to those of MSSA infection on length of stay and hospital charges were 1.21-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.42, P = 0.019) and 1.70-fold (95% CI 1.39-2.07, P < 0.00001), respectively. The adjusted effects of the MRSA infection compared to those of MRSA colonization on length of stay and hospital charges were 1.41-fold (95% CI 1.25-1.58, P < 0.00001) and 1.53-fold (95% CI 1.33-1.75, P < 0.00001), respectively. Regarding confounding factors, hemodialysis or hemofiltration was consistently identified and adjusted for in the multiple regression analyses comparing MRSA and MSSA infections, as well as MRSA infection and MRSA colonization.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA infection was associated with longer length of stay and higher hospital charges than both MSSA infection and MRSA colonization. Furthermore, hemodialysis or hemofiltration was identified as a common underlying factor contributing to increased length of stay and hospital charges.

The High Stakes of Outsourcing in Health Care

Outsourcing in health care has become increasingly common as health system administrators seek to enhance profitability and efficiency while maintaining clinical excellence. When clinical services are outsourced, however, the outsourcing organization relinquishes control over its most important service value: high-quality patient care. Farming out work to an external service provider can have many unintended results, including inconsistencies in standards of care; harmful medical errors; declines in patient and employee satisfaction; and damage to clinicians' morale and income, and to the health organization's culture, reputation, and long-term financial performance. Research on outsourcing in the areas of emergency medicine, radiology, laboratory services, and environmental services provides concerning evidence of potentially large downsides when outsourcing is driven by short-term cost concerns or is planned without diligently considering all of the ramifications of not keeping key clinical and nonclinical services in-house. To better equip health system leaders for decision-making about outsourcing, we examine this body of literature, identify common pitfalls of outsourcing in specific clinical and nonclinical health services and scenarios, explore alternatives to outsourcing, and consider how outsourcing (when necessary) can be done in a strategic manner that does not compromise the values of the organization and its commitment to patients.

Activatable MRI probes for the specific detection of bacteria

Activatable fluorescent probes have been successfully used as molecular tools for biomedical research in the last decades. Fluorescent probes allow the detection of molecular events, providing an extraordinary platform for protein and cellular research. Nevertheless, most of the fluorescent probes reported are susceptible to interferences from endogenous fluorescence (background signal) and limited tissue penetration is expected. These drawbacks prevent the use of fluorescent tracers in the clinical setting. To overcome the limitation of fluorescent probes, we and others have developed activatable magnetic resonance probes. Herein, we report for the first time, an oligonucleotide-based probe with the capability to detect bacteria using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The activatable MRI probe consists of a specific oligonucleotide that targets micrococcal nuclease (MN), a nuclease derived from Staphylococcus aureus. The oligonucleotide is flanked by a superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION) at one end, and by a dendron functionalized with several gadolinium complexes as enhancers, at the other end. Therefore, only upon recognition of the MRI probe by the specific bacteria is the probe activated and the MRI signal can be detected. This approach may be widely applied to detect bacterial infections or other human conditions with the potential to be translated into the clinic as an activatable contrast agent.

Evaluating the economic effects of genomic sequencing of pathogens to prioritise hospital patients competing for isolation beds

Objective This study compared the costs and patient movements of a new hospital protocol to discontinue contact precautions for patients with non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (nmMRSA), based on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of pathogens with current practice. Methods A hybrid simulation model was constructed and analysed over a 12-month time horizon. Six multidrug-resistant organisms and influenza were modelled concurrently where infected patients competed for isolation beds. Model inputs included pathogen incidence, resources for WGS, staff and contact precautions, hospital processes, room allocations and their associated costs. Data were sourced from aggregated records of patient admissions during 2017-18, clinical records and published reports. Results The WGS protocol resulted in 389 patients isolated (44% of current practice), 5223 'isolation bed days' (56%) and 268 closed-bed days (88%). Over 1 year, the mean (±s.d.) total cost for the WGS protocol was A$749243±126667; compared with current practice, the overall cost savings were A$690864±300464. Conclusion Using WGS to inform infection control teams of pathogen transmission averts patients from isolation rooms and reduces significant resources involved in implementing contact precautions. What is known about the topic? There are an estimated 265000 hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in Australia each year. WGS can accurately identify the genetic lineage among HAIs and determine transmission clusters that can help infection control staff manage patients. Economic appraisals are lacking to inform whether pathogen genomics services should be adopted within already-stretched hospital budgets. What does this paper add? An isolation protocol using pathogen genomics to provide additional information on the relatedness of a pathogen between colonised patients showed favourable results for healthcare costs and patient flow. Using WGS, in a confirmatory role, to discontinue certain patients from contact precautions and isolation rooms resulted in cost savings of A$690864 across 1 year for a single major hospital. What are the implications for practitioners? Using pathogen WGS services for infection control potentially curbs hospital spending, averts patient isolations and improves patient flow within hospitals.

Budget impact analysis of routinely using whole-genomic sequencing of six multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens in Queensland, Australia

OBJECTIVE

To predict the cost and health effects of routine use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of bacterial pathogens compared with those of standard of care.

DESIGN

Budget impact analysis was performed over the following 5 years. Data were primarily from sequencing results on clusters of multidrug-resistant organisms across 27 hospitals. Model inputs were derived from hospitalisation and sequencing data, and epidemiological and costing reports, and included multidrug resistance rates and their trends.

SETTING

Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalised patients.

INTERVENTIONS

WGS surveillance of six common multidrug-resistant organisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter sp and Acinetobacter baumannii) compared with standard of care or routine microbiology testing.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Expected hospital costs, counts of patient infections and colonisations, and deaths from bloodstream infections.

RESULTS

In 2021, 97 539 patients in Queensland are expected to be infected or colonised with one of six multidrug-resistant organisms with standard of care testing. WGS surveillance strategy and earlier infection control measures could avoid 36 726 infected or colonised patients and avoid 650 deaths. The total cost under standard of care was $A170.8 million in 2021. WGS surveillance costs an additional $A26.8 million but was offset by fewer costs for cleaning, nursing, personal protective equipment, shorter hospital stays and antimicrobials to produce an overall cost savings of $30.9 million in 2021. Sensitivity analyses showed cost savings remained when input values were varied at 95% confidence limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard of care, WGS surveillance at a state-wide level could prevent a substantial number of hospital patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms and related deaths and save healthcare costs. Primary prevention through routine use of WGS is an investment priority for the control of serious hospital-associated infections.