One in six physiotherapy practices in primary care offer musculoskeletal ultrasound - an explorative survey

Exploring the integration of diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging into clinical practice by physical therapists

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) use for diagnostic purposes is expanding in physical therapy practice. Identifying and describing physical therapy-specific approaches to incorporating MSK-US into the evaluation process is needed. Musculoskeletal ultrasound extends the physical exam to allow clinicians to visualize anatomy and pathophysiology both statically and dynamically. Purpose: To document 1) weekly use of diagnostic MSK-US; and 2) clinical reasoning approach used in challenging patient cases by physical therapists (PTs) registered by Inteleos in musculoskeletal sonography (RMSK-certified).

METHODS

Longitudinal, observational, cohort study using mixed methods for data collection and analysis. All 23 currently RMSK-certified PTs using MSK-US in clinical practice across the United States were contacted, and 16 participated. Data were collected using an online survey created with the Research Electronic Data Capture System. Participants documented MSK-US clinical use and significant cases using weekly, reflective, online journals for three months. Demographic data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Case data were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Participating RMSK-certified PTs performed 1110 MSK-US examinations over 110 weeks. Clinicians averaged 7 (range 1-25) MSK-US examinations weekly, representing 28% of an average caseload. Examinations contributed significant anatomical/ pathological information 100% of the time. The most common joints scanned were the knee (n = 281), shoulder (n = 254), and wrist (n = 228). Case data revealed three themes: 1) augmenting the clinical evaluation to extend or narrow a diagnosis; 2) outcomes guiding action; and 3) lessons learned from clinical findings.

CONCLUSION

RMSK-certified PTs regularly used MSK-US to validate and refine their clinical diagnoses and treatment. Ultrasound imaging directly influenced patient care by informing the diagnostic process, guiding treatment, and appropriately identifying referrals.

Convergent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of Multimodal Ultrasonography and Related Clinical Measures in People With Chronic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

To assess the test-retest reliability of diagnostic ultrasonography measurements of the bilateral biceps brachii (BB), brachial artery, medial gastrocnemius (MG), and popliteal artery in survivors of stroke and their convergent validity with related clinical comparators.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

All procedures were conducted in a university laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-five community dwelling adults (N=65; 26 women, 39 men) with an average age of 60.9±7.7 years and stroke duration of 5.7±3.9 years participated in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures of muscle structure (ie, thickness, cross-sectional area, fascicle length, pennation angle), stiffness, and intramuscular blood perfusion were conducted using B-mode, elastography and color flow Doppler ultrasonography modes, respectively. Convergent validity was assessed by examining correlations between ultrasonography measures and assessments of related constructs (ie, dynamic stiffness, isometric peak torque, spasticity, and systemic vascular function using myotonometry, dynamometry, the Composite Spasticity Scale, and the Ankle-Brachial Index, respectively). A 2-way random-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model (ICC_2,3) was used to determine agreement between intersession measures among a smaller cohort of participants with stroke (n=20).

RESULTS

ICC estimates ranged from moderate to excellent for muscle stiffness (paretic: ICC=0.74-0.89; nonparetic: ICC=0.66-0.88), structure (paretic: ICC=0.87-0.99; nonparetic: ICC=0.81-0.98), and blood perfusion measures (paretic: ICC=0.74-0.84; nonparetic: ICC=0.73-0.88). Weak to moderate associations were found between myotonometry and elastography measures of the bilateral BB (r=0.29-0.52, P≤.05) and MG muscles (r=0.31-0.69, P≤.05). The correlations between elastography measures and spasticity scores for the paretic upper (r=0.35-0.63, P≤.05) and lower limbs (r=0.25-0.37, P≤.05) were also weak to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Elastography demonstrated mostly weak to moderate correlation with measures of stiffness using myotonometry as well as scores of paretic upper and lower limb spasticity. The results also indicate acceptable intersession reliability for muscle and vascular measures using several ultrasonography modalities among individuals with chronic stroke.

Bilateral ultrasound findings in patients with unilateral subacromial pain syndrome

Background: Subacromial pain syndrome is a common musculoskeletal shoulder problem. The accuracy of clinical tests is low and techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have been added to set up a diagnosis. Previous researchers have usually only examined the symptomatic shoulder. However, there might be similar findings in the asymptomatic shoulder. Objective:The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of structural abnormalities of both shoulders in patients with clinically diagnosed unilateral subacromial pain syndrome using diagnostic ultrasound. Methods: Bilateral ultrasound examinations were performed in 115 consecutive patients, 54 men and 61 women. The patients were recruited from primary care centers in the area of Stockholm, Sweden. Results: Abnormal ultrasound findings were found in both shoulders and increased with age (p = .0004). Bursitis was the most common ultrasound finding and significantly more prevalent in the symptomatic shoulder compared to the asymptomatic shoulder (90%:74%; p = .0021), though 73% of the bursitis were bilateral. Supraspinatus is the most vulnerable tendon of the rotator cuff in both shoulders. In terms of partial-thickness tears and tendinosis, the tendon was affected more commonly in the symptomatic shoulder compared to the asymptomatic shoulder (30%:14%: 14%; p = .0026) and (24%:10%; p = .0054), respectively, but for calcification no significant difference between the shoulders was found (18%:12%; 0.1988). Conclusion: Ultrasound detected shoulder abnormalities were present in both symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. Bursitis and partial-thickness tears were more common in the affected shoulder when compared to the unaffected shoulder. Ultrasound as well as clinical examination findings and patient´s history should be taken into consideration when diagnosing patients with subacromial pain syndrome.

Diagnostic ultrasound in patients with shoulder pain: An inter-examiner agreement and reliability study among Dutch physical therapists

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional inter-examiner agreement and reliability study among physical therapists in primary care.

BACKGROUND

musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSU) is frequently used by physical therapists to improve specific diagnosis in patients with shoulder pain, especially for the diagnosis rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) including tears.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the inter-examiner agreement and reliability in physical therapists using MSU for patients with shoulder pain.

METHODS

Physical therapists performed diagnostic MSU in 62 patients with shoulder pain. Both physical therapists were blinded to each other's results and patients were not informed about the test results. We calculated the overall inter-examiner agreement, specific positive and negative inter-examiner agreement, and inter-examiner reliability (Cohen's Kappa's).

RESULTS

Overall agreement for detecting RC ruptures ranged from 61.7% to 85.5% and from 43.9% to 91.4% for specific positive agreement. The specific negative agreement was lower with values ranging from 44.4% to 79.1% for RC ruptures. Overall agreement for other pathology than ruptures related to SAPS, ranged from 72.6% to 93.6% and from 77.3% to 96% for specific positive agreement. The specific negative agreement was lower with values ranging from 44.4% to 79.1% for RC ruptures and 52.5%-83.3% for other pathology than ruptures related to SAPS. Reliability values varied from substantial for any thickness ruptures to moderate for partial thickness ruptures and fair for full thickness tears. Moreover, reliability was fair for cuff tendinopathy. The reliability for AC arthritis and no pathology found was fair and moderate. There was substantial agreement for the calcifying tendinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical therapists using MSU agree on the diagnosis of cuff tendinopathy and on the presence of RCT in primary care, but agree less on the absence of pathology.

Reliability and Validity of Ultrasound Elastography for Evaluating Muscle Stiffness in Neurological Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound elastography is an emerging diagnostic technology used to investigate the biomechanical properties of the musculoskeletal system. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the psychometric properties of ultrasound elastography techniques for evaluating muscle stiffness in people with neurological conditions.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using software, reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion. Peer-reviewed studies that evaluated in vivo muscle stiffness in people with neurological conditions and reported relevant psychometric properties were considered for inclusion. Twenty-one articles were included for final review. Data relevant to measurement technique, site, and neurological condition were extracted. The Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist was used to rate the methodological quality of included studies. The level of evidence for specific measurement outcomes was determined using a best-evidence synthesis approach.

RESULTS

Reliability varied across populations, ultrasound systems, and assessment conditions (ie, joint/body positions, active/passive muscle conditions, probe orientation), with most studies indicating moderate to good reliability (ICC = 0.5-0.9, n = 13). Meta-analysis results showed a good overall correlation across studies (r = 0.78, 95% confidence interval = 0.64-0.86), with no between-group difference based on population (Q1 = 0.00). Convergent validity was demonstrated by strong correlations between stiffness values and measures of spasticity (n = 5), functional motor recovery or impairment (n = 5), and grayscale or color histogram pixel intensities (n = 3). Discriminant or known-groups validity was also established for multiple studies and indicated either significant between-group differences in stiffness values (n = 12) or within-group differences between more and less affected limbs (n = 6). Responsiveness was observed in all intervention studies reporting posttreatment stiffness changes (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, ultrasound elastography techniques showed moderate reliability in evaluating in vivo muscle stiffness, good convergent validity with relevant clinical assessments, and good divergent validity in discriminating tissue changes within and between groups.

IMPACT

Ultrasound elastography has clinical utility in assessing muscle stiffness, monitoring its temporal changes, and measuring the response to intervention in people with neurological conditions.