1
|
Miller LR, Divers R, Reed C, Cherry J, Patrick A, Calamia M. Value-consistent rehabilitation is associated with long-term psychological flexibility and quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2024; 34:955-973. [PMID: 37708399 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2023.2256964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Meaningful steps have been taken toward using holistic approaches in outpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI) (i.e., treating the whole individual); however, research and practice continue to disproportionately focus on adapting to physical and cognitive changes. Research suggests treatment focusing on individual values may be important for psychological adjustment after TBI. The current study sought to explore individual values across multiple life domains in those with TBI as well as what values outpatient rehabilitation was helpful for, and to examine discrepancies between these factors (i.e., value-consistent rehabilitation) in relation to important long-term treatment outcomes. 215 adults with a history of TBI who had participated in outpatient rehabilitation completed online surveys assessing how consistent outpatient rehabilitation was with individual values, psychological flexibility, and quality of life. The life domains with the greatest discrepancies between individual importance and rehabilitation helpfulness were spirituality, intimate relations, and family relations. Greater value-consistent rehabilitation was associated with higher levels of psychological flexibility and quality of life beyond demographics and injury characteristics. Our findings provide further support in favour of holistic, client-centred approaches that are facilitated by neurological rehabilitation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke R Miller
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | - Ross Divers
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | - Christopher Reed
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | - Jared Cherry
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Abihail Patrick
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | - Matthew Calamia
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levine R, Zingelman S, McSween MP, Shrubsole K, Hill AJ, Copland DA. Allied Health Clinicians' Uptake of Evidence in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Determinants Targeted in Implementation Studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:988-999. [PMID: 37666287 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether targeting specific implementation determinants is associated with allied health clinicians' uptake of evidence when implemented within stroke rehabilitation settings. DATA SOURCES 7 key databases were searched to identify articles published between 1990 and 2022 for inclusion. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand searched. STUDY SELECTION Studies were independently screened by 2 authors and included if the implementation intervention targeted allied health clinical practice in any stroke rehabilitation context and reported at least 1 quantitative measure of evidence uptake. Thirty studies met inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION Data were independently extracted by the first and second author. Implementation outcomes for each study were categorized as either mostly successful, partially successful, or not successful based on the degree of evidence uptake achieved. Determinants targeted were categorized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). DATA SYNTHESIS Patterns between the degree of evidence uptake and determinants targeted across studies were analyzed by the first and second authors in 1 of 3 groups: A (pre-post statistical analysis), B (pre-post descriptive analysis), or C (post-only descriptive analysis). Patterns between evidence uptake and determinants targeted were first identified within groups A and B, with group C consulted to support findings. All studies categorized as "mostly successful" targeted facilitation in combination with establishing face-to-face networks and communication strategies. Conversely, no studies rated "not successful" targeted either of these determinants. Studies rated "partially successful" targeted either 1, but seldom both, of these determinants. CONCLUSIONS This review has provided descriptive evidence of determinants which may be important to target for allied health clinicians' uptake of evidence within stroke rehabilitation settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Levine
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Sally Zingelman
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marie-Pier McSween
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirstine Shrubsole
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland Australia
| | - Annie Jane Hill
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - David A Copland
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sand-Svartrud AL, Berdal G, Aanerud GJ, Azimi M, Bjørnerud AM, Nygaard Dager T, Van den Ende CHM, Johansen I, Lindtvedt Valaas H, Dagfinrud H, Kjeken I. Delivery of a quality improvement program in team-based rehabilitation for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:1602-1614. [PMID: 37118986 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2204247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate how a quality improvement program (BRIDGE), designed to promote coordination and continuity in rehabilitation services, was delivered and perceived by providers in routine practice for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. METHODS A convergent mixed methods approach was nested within a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial. The intervention program was developed to bridge gaps between secondary and primary healthcare, comprising the following elements: motivational interviewing; patient-specific goal setting; written rehabilitation-plans; personalized feedback on progress; and tailored follow-up. Data from health professionals who delivered the program were collected and analyzed separately, using two questionnaires and three focus groups. Results were integrated during the overall interpretation and discussion. RESULTS The program delivery depended on the providers' skills and competence, as well as on contextual factors in their teams and institutions. Suggested possibilities for improvements included follow-up with sufficient support from next of kin and external services, and the practicing of action and coping plans, standardized outcome measures, and feedback on progress. CONCLUSIONS Leaders and clinicians should discuss efforts to ensure confident and qualified rehabilitation delivery at the levels of individual providers, teams, and institutions, and pay equal attention to each component in the process from admission to follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Lene Sand-Svartrud
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunnhild Berdal
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Turid Nygaard Dager
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Inger Johansen
- Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Hanne Dagfinrud
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingvild Kjeken
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doig E, Prescott S, Pick V, Turner B, Suleman S, Douglas D, Foster M. Normalising interdisciplinary role-based goal setting in inpatient brain injury rehabilitation: reflections and recommendations of clinicians. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:673-683. [PMID: 35282717 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2040612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Person-centred goal setting with people with brain injury, by interdisciplinary teams has benefits including improved communication between patients, families and clinicians, person-centred care, and improved engagement in rehabilitation. Exploring the experiences of team members who have adopted interdisciplinary, person-centred goal setting may assist in understanding what is needed to implement this complex, core component of rehabilitation practice. This study explored experiences of clinicians working in an extended inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit about implementing a role-based goal planning approach within an interdisciplinary team. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews with 13 clinicians working at the rehabilitation unit explored their experiences about the cognitive participation and collective actions required to carry out the practice, with data analysed using inductive content analysis guided by Normalisation Process Theory. RESULTS Three primary themes were identified: putting the person at the centre, accepting the mind-shift to participation focused goals and working collaboratively. CONCLUSIONS This study has elucidated some key processes that occurred and were necessary to carry out goal setting. A mind-shift towards holistic, participation-focussed goal setting was described as "unlearning" discipline-specific goal setting. Development and ownership by the team, acceptance of team members and willingness to share, and structured processes and resources were necessary.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONNormalising interdisciplinary role-based goal setting in multi-professional teams requires a mind-shift away from traditional, discipline-specific goal setting.Implementation of interdisciplinary, collaborative team goal setting within health service settings requires collective actions including collaborative working by team members, structured processes including organised time for collaborative team and family meetings, practical resources and training to support processes.Clinicians perceived the goal setting approach to put the person at the centre resulting in a deep understanding of the person, shared understanding, and motivation for rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmah Doig
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sarah Prescott
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Valerie Pick
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ben Turner
- Acquired Brain Injury Outreach Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sameera Suleman
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David Douglas
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michele Foster
- The Hopkins Centre, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown SE, Scobbie L, Worrall L, Mc Menamin R, Brady MC. Access G-AP: development of an accessible goal setting and action planning resource for stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil 2022:1-11. [PMID: 35695078 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2085331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Goal setting is key to stroke rehabilitation, but access for people with aphasia is challenging. Based on the Goal setting and Action Planning (G-AP) framework, we developed an accessible goal setting resource (Access G-AP). METHODS Access G-AP was designed using a three-phase, user-centred design process. Phase 1: Access G-AP Draft A was designed using evidence-based recommendations. Phase 2: Draft A was reviewed by stroke survivors with aphasia (focus groups 1&2) and rehabilitation staff (questionnaire). Phase 3: Suggested recommendations informed Access G-AP Draft B, which was further reviewed by stroke survivors with aphasia (focus group 3). The final version of Access G-AP was approved by stroke survivors with aphasia at a debrief meeting. Data were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS Recommended design improvements included reducing text, adding bullet points, and diversifying images. Both participant groups highlighted that Access G-AP should be used collaboratively to support stroke survivor involvement. Staff recommended Access G-AP training and additional resources to support stroke survivors with severe aphasia. CONCLUSIONS Access G-AP was co-developed to support people with aphasia to access and engage in stroke rehabilitation goal setting. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of Access G-AP in clinical practice.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONEvidence-based accessible formatting strategies and an iterative design process can inform the design of accessible goal setting resources.Accessible goal setting materials should be relevant to stroke survivors with aphasia and responsive to their needs.Rehabilitation staff require training and support to use accessible goal setting resources (like Access G-AP) with stroke survivors with aphasia, especially those with severe aphasia.Evaluation of the feasibility of Access G-AP in clinical practice is now required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lesley Scobbie
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Linda Worrall
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Marian C Brady
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.,School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|