Systematic review of pragmatic randomised control trials assessing the effectiveness of professional pharmacy services in community pharmacies

Bridging the gap: Enhancing pharmacist-physiscian collaboration through the provision of comprehensive medication reviews in community pharmacy

Background

Collaborative practice between physicians and pharmacists is particularly important in the provision of pharmacy services, such as Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMR), which often require a close coordination between these professionals. Understanding the level and nature of this collaboration can assist in the development of strategies to enhance integrated care.

Objectives

(1) To evaluate the changes in level of collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians in the context of a CMR service compared to usual practice, from the perspective of community pharmacists, and (2) to explore the determinants of such collaborative practice.

Design

This research was conducted alongside a 12-months prospective longitudinal observational study.

Methods

Community pharmacists providing CMR and pharmacists providing usual care (nCMR) from six provinces in Spain participated in the study. To measure the level of collaborative practice from the perspective of the community pharmacist, a previously validated tool was used. Collaborative practice was assessed at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. A multiple regression analysis was undertaken.

Results

323 pharmacists participated in the study. At the 12-month time point there were statistical differences between CMR and nCMR groups for all factors considered in the level of collaborative practice. Determinants which showed positive significant differences between groups included: rural location of the pharmacy, pharmacists being a pharmacy owner, and female gender of the physician. The age of the pharmacist was negatively associated with higher levels of collaborative practice.

Conclusion

The study provides novel evidence on the level and nature of the collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians.

Comments, suggestions, and criticisms of the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 design tool: a citation analysis

INTRODUCTION

The pragmatic explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS) tool, initially published in 2009 and revised in 2015, was created to assist trialists to align their design choices with the intended purpose of their randomised controlled trial (RCT): either to guide real-world decisions between alternative interventions (pragmatic) or to test hypotheses about intervention mechanisms by minimising sources of variation (explanatory). There have been many comments, suggestions, and criticisms of PRECIS-2. This summary will be used to facilitate the development of to the next revision, which is PRECIS-3.

METHODS

We used Web of Science to identify all publication types citing PRECIS-2, published between May 2015 and July 2023. Citations were eligible if they contained 'substantive' suggestions, comments, or criticism of the PRECIS-2 tool. We defined 'substantive' as comments explicitly referencing at least one PRECIS-2 domain or a concept directly linked to an existing or newly proposed domain. Two reviewers independently extracted comments, suggestions, and criticisms, noting their implications for the update. These were discussed among authors to achieve consensus on the interpretation of each comment and its implications for PRECIS-3.

RESULTS

The search yielded 885 publications, and after full-text review, 89 articles met the inclusion criteria. Comments pertained to new domains, changes in existing domains, or were relevant across several or all domains. Proposed new domains included assessment of the comparator arm and a domain to describe blinding. There were concerns about scoring eligibility and recruitment domains for cluster trials. Suggested areas for improvement across domains included the need for more scoring guidance for explanatory design choices.

DISCUSSION

Published comments recognise PRECIS-2's success in aiding trialists with pragmatic or explanatory design choices. Enhancing its implementation and widespread use will involve adding new domains, refining domain definitions, and addressing overall tool issues. This citation review offers valuable user feedback, pivotal for shaping the upcoming version of the PRECIS tool, PRECIS-3.

Exploring stakeholders' perspectives on the quality of services provided through community pharmacies

INTRODUCTION

It is important to understand the factors impacting the quality of services provided through community pharmacies. Exploring how key stakeholders perceive good quality in these services is a logical first step. This could also inform the development of quality measures, such as quality indicators (QIs).

AIM

To identify key stakeholders' perspectives on the quality of services provided through community pharmacies in Norway, specifically by exploring their experiences and perceptions about what constitutes good service quality.

METHODS

A convenient sampling approach was used to recruit participants for five semi-structured focus groups from Facebook, pharmacy chains, and patient organizations. The interviews with twenty-six participants were conducted via Microsoft Teams. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and an inductive thematic analysis with a reflexive approach was used.

RESULTS

Four main themes emerged from the analysis; 1) sufficient and substantively suitable information to cover individual needs, 2) communication skills and relationships with the pharmacy professionals, 3) customer satisfaction with knowledgeable employees and conveniently located pharmacies, and 4) factors that affect the pharmacy working environment.

CONCLUSION

This study has identified areas that pharmacy professionals and customers regard as essential to define good quality of community pharmacy services. Effective communication skills, appropriate provision of information, customer satisfaction, and working environment are all essential factors when developing quality metrics for community pharmacies.

Analysis of the characteristics and the degree of pragmatism exhibited by pragmatic-labelled trials of antineoplastic treatments

BACKGROUND

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are designed to reflect how an investigational treatment would be applied in clinical practice. As such, unlike their explanatory counterparts, they measure therapeutic effectiveness and are capable of generating high-quality real-world evidence. However, the conduct of PCTs remains extremely rare. The scarcity of such studies has contributed to the emergence of the efficacy-effectiveness gap and has led to calls for launching more of them, including in the field of oncology. This analysis aimed to identify self-labelled pragmatic trials of antineoplastic interventions and to evaluate whether their use of this label was justified.

METHODS

We searched PubMed® and Embase® for publications corresponding with studies that investigated antitumor therapies and that were tagged as pragmatic in their titles, abstracts and/or index terms. Subsequently, we consulted all available source documents for the included trials and extracted relevant information from them. The data collected were then used to appraise the degree of pragmatism displayed by the PCTs with the help of the validated PRECIS-2 tool.

RESULTS

The literature search returned 803 unique records, of which 46 were retained upon conclusion of the screening process. This ultimately resulted in the identification of 42 distinct trials that carried the 'pragmatic' label. These studies examined eight different categories of neoplasms and were mostly randomized, open-label, multicentric, single-country trials sponsored by non-commercial parties. On a scale of one (very explanatory) to five (very pragmatic), the median PCT had a PRECIS-2 score per domain of 3.13 (interquartile range: 2.57-3.53). The most and least pragmatic studies in the sample had a score of 4.44 and 1.57, respectively. Only a minority of trials were described in sufficient detail to allow them to be graded across all domains of the PRECIS-2 instrument. Many of the studies examined also had features that arguably precluded them from being pragmatic altogether, such as being monocentric or placebo-controlled in nature.

CONCLUSION

PCTs of antineoplastic treatments are generally no more pragmatic than they are explanatory.

Pharmacists' chronic disease management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Effect on health services utilization

BACKGROUND: There is limited real-world evidence on evaluation of chronic disease management initiatives provided by pharmacists to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in COPD-related health care resource utilization between patients with COPD who had pharmacist-provided chronic disease management (comprehensive annual care plan [CACP]) vs those who did not have CACP. METHODS: Patients with COPD who received a CACP in Alberta between 2012 and 2015 were identified within the Alberta Health administrative data. Each of these patients were matched with 2 control patients with COPD based on age, sex, provider, date of service, and qualifying comorbidities. Controlled interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate changes in COPD-specific hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, physician visits, and claims for pulmonary function test. Immediate and temporal changes were calculated for the difference in outcomes 1 year before and 1 year after receiving the CACP for the intervention group and matched controls. RESULTS: Eligible patients (N = 74,365), of whom 28,795 (38.7%) had received CACPs, were matched to a total of 45,570 controls. In 1 year after the CACPs implementation, the number of COPD-related hospitalization visits decreased by 174 (95% CI = -270.8 to -76.5) per 10,000 patients per month, COPD-related ED visits decreased by 123 (95% CI = -294.9 to 49.6) per 10,000 per month, general practitioner visits decreased by 153.9 per 10,000 per month (95% CI = -293.3 to -14.5), and pulmonary function test claims decreased by 19.5 per 10,000 per month (95% CI = -70.1 to 31.2) when compared with the matched controls. However, significant difference between the 2 groups was found for COPD-related hospitalizations only, which was not confirmed by the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COPD who were provided with care plans by their community pharmacists, there was no significant decrease in COPD-related hospitalizations or ED visits over 1 year compared with the matched controls who did not have a pharmacist-provided care plan. Physician visits and pulmonary function tests did not change significantly for those who had CACP compared with those who did not. There is a need to further understand how care plans can better impact other outcomes that are important in COPD management. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by a grant from the M.S.I. Foundation (Grant#895) based in Alberta, Canada. Dr Bhutani has consulted for Astra Zeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Valeo, Covis, and Sanofi. The authors declare no other relevant conflicts of interest or financial relationships. This study is based on data provided by Alberta Health. The interpretation and conclusions of the results are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent the views of the government of Alberta nor the funder (M.S.I. Foundation). All authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Clinical pharmacy services are reimbursed in Germany: challenges of real world implementation remain

Over the last two decades, community pharmacy has experienced major changes as the role of pharmacists is evolving from a product to a service and a patient focus. As part of this change, new and innovative clinical pharmacy services aimed at improving medicines use and patient outcomes have been designed, both nationally and internationally. Since June 2022, five services are reimbursed by all statutory health insurance funds and private insurance companies in Germany: medication review for patients with polymedication; blood pressure control in hypertension; assuring proper inhalation techniques for patients receiving a new device or a device change; medication review including a follow-up for patients taking oral anticancer drugs or immunosuppressants post-transplantation. Beyond reimbursement, the upscaling and sustainable provision of these professional services are now the main challenges. Implementation research will provide important information for the further development of pharmaceutical care programs.

Clinical and Humanistic Outcomes of Community Pharmacy-Based Healthcare Interventions Regarding Medication Use in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the clinical and humanistic outcomes of community pharmacy-based interventions on medication-related problems of older adults at the primary care level. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of various community pharmacy-based interventions from five electronic databases (namely, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL, APA PSYInfo, and Scopus) from January 2010 to December 2020. Consequently, we assessed these interventions’ clinical and humanistic outcomes on older adults and compared them with non-intervention. We included 13 RCTs in the current review and completed a meta-analysis with six of them. The included studies had a total of 6173 older adults. Quantitative analysis showed that patient education was significantly associated with an increase in the discontinuation of sedative–hypnotics use (risk ratio 1.28; 95% CI (1.20, 1.36) I2 = 0%, p < 0.00001). Moreover, the qualitative analysis showed that medication reviews and education with follow-ups could improve various clinical outcomes, including reducing adverse drug events, reducing uncontrolled health outcomes, and improving appropriate medication use among the elderly population. However, medication review could not significantly reduce the number of older adults who fall (risk ratio 1.25; 95% CI (0.78, 1.99) I2 = 0%, p = 0.36) and require hospitalization (risk ratio 0.72; 95% CI (0.47, 1.12) I2 = 45%, p = 0.15). This study showed that community pharmacy-based interventions could help discontinue inappropriate prescription medications among older adults and could improve several clinical and humanistic outcomes. However, more effective community pharmacy-based interventions should be implemented, and more research is needed to provide further evidence for clinical and humanistic outcomes of such interventions on older adults.

A review of pragmatic trials found a high degree of diversity in design and scope, deficiencies in reporting and trial registry data, and poor indexing

OBJECTIVE

We established a large database of trials to serve as a resource for future methodological and ethical analyses. Here, we use meta-data to describe the broad landscape of pragmatic trials including research areas, identification as pragmatic, quality of trial registry data and enrolment.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Trials were identified by a validated search filter and included if a primary report of a health-related randomized trial published January 2014-April 2019. Data were collated from MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and full text.

RESULTS

4337 eligible trials were identified from 13,065 records, of which 1988 were registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Research areas were diverse, with the most common being general and internal medicine; public, environmental and occupational health; and health care sciences and services. The term "pragmatic" was seldom used in titles or abstracts. Several domains in ClinicalTrials.gov had questionable data quality. We estimated that one-fifth of trials under-accrued by at least 15%.

CONCLUSION

There is a need to improve reporting of pragmatic trials and quality of trial registry data. Under accrual remains a challenge in pragmatic RCTs despite calls for more streamlined recruitment approaches. The diversity of pragmatic trials should be reflected in future ethical analyses.