1
|
Bos C, de Weger E, Wildeman I, Pannebakker N, Kemper PF. Implement social prescribing successfully towards embedding: what works, for whom and in which context? A rapid realist review. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1836. [PMID: 38982399 PMCID: PMC11234751 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18688-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some clients who access healthcare services experience problems due to the wider determinants of health which cannot be addressed (solely) by the medical sector. Social Prescribing (SP) addresses clients ' wider health needs and is based on linkworkers who support primary care clients in accessing social, community and voluntary care services that support their needs. Previous literature has provided valuable insights about what works (or not) in an early stage of implementing SP. However, there is limited insight into what works for the implementation of SP towards embedding. This study provides guiding principles by which SP can be successfully implemented towards the embedding stage and identifies which contextual factors and mechanisms influence these guiding principles. METHODS A Rapid Realist Review was conducted to examine what works, for whom, why, and in which contexts. A local Dutch reference panel consisting of health and care organisations helped to inform the research questions. Additionally, a workshop was held with the panel, to discuss what the international insights mean for their local contexts. This input helped to further refine the literature review's findings. RESULTS Five guiding principles were identified for successful implementation of SP at the embedding stage: • Create awareness for addressing the wider determinants of health and the role SP services can play; • Ensure health and care professionals build trusting relationships with all involved stakeholders to create a cyclical referral process; • Invest in linkworkers' skills and capacity so that they can act as a bridge between the sectors; • Ensure clients receive appropriate support to improve their self-reliance and increase their community participation; • Invest in the aligning of structures, processes and resources between involved sectors to support the use of SP services. CONCLUSION To embed SP, structural changes on a system level as well as cultural changes are needed. This will require a shift in attitude amongst health and care professionals as well as clients towards the use, role and benefit of SP services in addressing the wider determinants of health. It will also require policymakers and researchers to involve communities and include their perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bos
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Public Health, Care and Society, Department of health and Care Nationally, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands.
- Research group Innovation in Preventive Healthcare, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, Utrecht , 3584 CS, The Netherlands.
| | - E de Weger
- Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Instituut, de Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - I Wildeman
- TNO child health, Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands
| | - N Pannebakker
- TNO child health, Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands
| | - P F Kemper
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Public Health, Care and Society, Department of health and Care Nationally, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hayes D, Olsson A, Begum S, Bertotti M, Jarvis-Beesley P, Stapley E. Barriers and facilitators to social prescribing in child and youth mental health: perspectives from the frontline. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024; 33:1465-1479. [PMID: 37405485 PMCID: PMC11098893 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-023-02257-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
There is growing interest in the role of Social Prescribing (SP) to help promote mental well-being and support individuals with mental health difficulties. Yet, implementation of SP to children and young people (CYP) has proved slow and underdeveloped compared with adult populations. Understanding the barriers and facilitators will help key stakeholders to better embed SP for CYP into practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive, theoretical-led framework, underpinned by 33 behaviour change theories and 128 constructs, perceived barriers and facilitators to SP were investigated. The sample comprised of 11 Link Workers and 9 individuals involved in facilitating SP with CYP, who took part in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis, and themes were coded under each theoretical domain. Overall, 33 barriers and facilitators for SP were identified across 12 domains of the TDF. Under capability, barriers and facilitators were found for knowledge, skills, memory/attention/decision making processes, and behavioural regulation. For opportunity, barriers and facilitators were found for social/professional influences, as well as environmental context and resources. Finally, for motivation, domains covered included: beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, optimism, motivations/goals, reinforcement, and emotions. Findings suggest that a wide range of barriers and facilitators affect the implementation of CYP SP to improve mental health and well-being. Interventions which target different domains related to capability, opportunity and motivation should be developed to better facilitate CYP SP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Hayes
- Evidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, England.
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, England.
| | - A Olsson
- Evidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, England
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - S Begum
- Evidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, England
| | - M Bertotti
- Institute for Connected Communities, University of East London, London, England
| | - P Jarvis-Beesley
- Social Prescribing Youth Network (SPYN), Streetgames, Manchester, England
| | - E Stapley
- Evidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London and the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Costa A, Henriques J, Alarcão V, Madeira T, Virgolino A, Henriques A, Feteira-Santos R, Polley M, Arriaga M, Nogueira P. Social prescribing for older adults in mainland Portugal: Perceptions and future prospects. Prev Med Rep 2024; 39:102652. [PMID: 38384966 PMCID: PMC10879768 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In order to address health inequalities, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, and promote older adults' quality of life, it is necessary to explore non-medical approaches such as social prescribing. Social prescribing is a person-centered approach that allows health professionals to refer patients to services provided by the social and community sectors. This study aimed to explore older adults' perceptions of social prescribing in mainland Portugal and to identify factors associated with these perceptions, providing insights for future implementation strategies. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 613 older adults aged 65 to 93. Participants' sociodemographic, economic, and health characteristics were assessed, along with their perceptions of social prescribing's benefits and activity interest. Results Over 75% of respondents agreed that social prescribing would benefit the health system and their community. Most participants (87.7% and 89.7%, respectively) thought that activities like personal protection and development activities and cultural enrichment would be particularly relevant to them. Factors such as marital status, education, health status, and pain/discomfort levels influenced the perceived relevance of these activities. Conclusion This study reveals that older adults in mainland Portugal are open to social prescribing and suggests that tailored interventions considering individual preferences and characteristics can lead to more effective implementation and equal access to social prescribing. Further research and policy efforts should focus on integrating social prescribing into the healthcare system to support healthy aging in Portugal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreia Costa
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Lisbon 1600-190, Portugal
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
- Católica Research Centre for Psychological-Family and Social Wellbeing (CRC-W), Faculdade de Ciências Humanas, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon 1649-023, Portugal
| | - Joana Henriques
- Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, ENSP, Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, CISP, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Avenida Padre Cruz, Lisboa 1600-560, Portugal
| | - Violeta Alarcão
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-Iscte), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte), Lisboa 1649-026, Portugal
| | - Teresa Madeira
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Virgolino
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Adriana Henriques
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Lisbon 1600-190, Portugal
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rodrigo Feteira-Santos
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marie Polley
- University of Westminster, School of Social Sciences (Psychology), 115 New Cavendish Street, London W1W 6UW, United Kingdom
- Consultancy Ltd., Hitchin SG4 0AP, United Kingdom
| | - Miguel Arriaga
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
- Católica Research Centre for Psychological-Family and Social Wellbeing (CRC-W), Faculdade de Ciências Humanas, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon 1649-023, Portugal
| | - Paulo Nogueira
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Lisbon 1600-190, Portugal
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal
- Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, ENSP, Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, CISP, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Avenida Padre Cruz, Lisboa 1600-560, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|