1
|
Schults JA, Charles KR, Harnischfeger J, Ware RS, Royle RH, Byrnes JM, Long DA, Ullman AJ, Raman S, Waak M, Lake A, Cooke M, Irwin A, Tume L, Hall L. Implementing paediatric appropriate use criteria for endotracheal suction to reduce complications in mechanically ventilated children with respiratory infections. Aust Crit Care 2024; 37:34-42. [PMID: 38142148 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endotracheal suction is used to maintain endotracheal tube patency. There is limited guidance to inform clinical practice for children with respiratory infections. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine whether implementation of a paediatric endotracheal suction appropriate use guideline Paediatric AirWay Suction (PAWS) is associated with an increased use of appropriate and decreased use of inappropriate suction interventions. METHODS A mixed-method, pre-implementation-post-implementation study was conducted between September 2021 and April 2022. Suction episodes in mechanically ventilated children with a respiratory infection were eligible. Using a structured approach, we implemented the PAWS guideline in a single paediatric intensive care unit. Evaluation included clinical (e.g., suction intervention appropriateness), implementation (e.g., acceptability), and cost outcomes (implementation costs). Associations between implementation of the PAWS guideline and appropriateness of endotracheal suction intervention use were investigated using generalised linear models. RESULTS Data from 439 eligible suctions were included in the analysis. Following PAWS implementation, inappropriate endotracheal tube intervention use reduced from 99% to 58%, an absolute reduction (AR) of 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25%, 56%). Reductions were most notable for open suction systems (AR: 48%; 95% CI: 30%, 65%), 0.9% sodium chloride use (AR: 23%; 95% CI: 8%, 38%) and presuction and postsuction manual bagging (38%; 95% CI: 16%, 60%, and 86%; 95% CI: 73%, 99%), respectively. Clinicians perceived PAWS as acceptable and suitable for use. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of endotracheal tube suction appropriate use guidelines in a mixed paediatric intensive care unit was associated with a large reduction in inappropriate suction intervention use in paediatric patients with respiratory infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Schults
- Metro North Health, Herston Infectious Disease Institute, Queensland, Australia; The University of Queensland, School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, Australia; The University of Queensland, Children's Health Research Centre, Australia; Queensland Children's Hospital, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Karina R Charles
- The University of Queensland, School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, Australia; The University of Queensland, Children's Health Research Centre, Australia; Queensland Children's Hospital, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jane Harnischfeger
- The University of Queensland, School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, Australia; Queensland Children's Hospital, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert S Ware
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ruth H Royle
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joshua M Byrnes
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Debbie A Long
- The University of Queensland, Children's Health Research Centre, Australia; Queensland Children's Hospital, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda J Ullman
- The University of Queensland, School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, Australia; The University of Queensland, Children's Health Research Centre, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sainath Raman
- The University of Queensland, Children's Health Research Centre, Australia; Queensland Children's Hospital, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michaela Waak
- The University of Queensland, Children's Health Research Centre, Australia; Queensland Children's Hospital, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna Lake
- The University of Queensland, Children's Health Research Centre, Australia
| | - Marie Cooke
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Adam Irwin
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; Infection Management and Prevention Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lyvonne Tume
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lisa Hall
- Metro North Health, Herston Infectious Disease Institute, Queensland, Australia; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberts NA, Young AM, Duff J. Using Implementation Science in Nursing Research. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151399. [PMID: 36894448 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical research continues to build knowledge that can potentially improve clinical and health service outcomes; however, integrating evidence into routine care is challenging, resulting in a knowledge practice gap. The field of implementation science is a resource available for nurses to translate evidence into their practice. This article aims to provide nurses with an overview of implementation science, illustrate its value integrating evidence into practice, and show how it can be applied with high rigor in nursing research practice. DATA SOURCES A narrative synthesis of the implementation science literature was conducted. A series of case studies were purposively selected to demonstrate the application of commonly used implementation theories, models, and frameworks across health care settings relevant to nursing. These case studies demonstrate how the theoretical framework was applied and how the outcomes of the work reduced the knowledge practice gap. CONCLUSION Implementation science theoretical approaches have been used by nurses and multidisciplinary teams to better understand the gap between knowledge and practice for better informed implementation. These can be used to understand the processes involved, identify the determinants at play, and undertake an effective evaluation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE By using implementation science research practice, nurses can also build a strong foundation of evidence about nursing clinical practice. As an approach, implementation science is practical and can optimize the valuable nursing resource.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha A Roberts
- University of Queensland, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Adrienne M Young
- University of Queensland, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jed Duff
- University of Queensland, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia; Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young HM, Bell JF, Tonkikh O, Kilaberia TR, Whitney RL, Mongoven JM, Link BM, Kelly K. Implementation of a Statewide Web-Based Caregiver Resource Information System (CareNav): Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e38735. [PMID: 35830234 PMCID: PMC9330201 DOI: 10.2196/38735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the aging population, family caregivers provide increasingly complex and intense care for older adults and persons with disabilities. There is growing interest in developing community-based services to support family caregivers. Caregiving occurs around the clock, and caregivers face challenges in accessing community-based services at convenient times owing to the demands of care. Web-based resources hold promise for accessible real-time support. CareNav (TM), a caregiver resource information system, is a web-based platform designed to support real-time universal caregiver assessment, a record of client encounters, development of a care plan, tailored information and resource content, access to web-based caregiver resources, the capacity to track service authorization and contracts, and secure communications. The assessment includes needs and health conditions of both the care recipient and caregiver; current resources; and priorities for support, information, and referral. In 2019, the California Department of Health Care Services funded the 11 nonprofit California Caregiver Resource Centers (CRCs) to expand and improve family caregiver services and enhance CRC information technology services. Deployment of a statewide information system offered a unique opportunity to examine structures and processes facilitating implementation, providing feedback to the sites as well as lessons learned for similar projects in the future. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper was to describe the statewide implementation of the comprehensive CareNav system using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as an organizing structure for synthesizing the evaluation. METHODS This mixed methods study used two major approaches to evaluate the implementation process: a survey of all staff who completed training (n=82) and in-depth qualitative interviews with 11 CRC teams and 3 key informants (n=35). We initially analyzed interview transcripts using qualitative descriptive methods and then identified subthemes and relationships among ideas, mapping the findings to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS We present findings on the outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the intervention, characteristics of the staff, and the implementation process. The critical elements for success were leadership, communication, harmonization of processes across sites, and motivation to serve clients in more accessible and convenient ways. CONCLUSIONS These findings have implications for technology deployment in diverse community-based agencies that aspire to enhance web-based services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather M Young
- Family Caregiving Institute, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Janice F Bell
- Family Caregiving Institute, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Orly Tonkikh
- Family Caregiving Institute, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Tina R Kilaberia
- Family Caregiving Institute, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Robin L Whitney
- The Valley Foundation School of Nursing, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, United States
| | - Jennifer M Mongoven
- Family Caregiving Institute, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Benjamin M Link
- Family Caregiving Institute, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Kathleen Kelly
- Family Caregiver Alliance, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|