1
|
Schnoor K, Talboom-Kamp EPWA, Hajtić M, Chavannes NH, Versluis A. Facilitators of and Barriers to the Use of a Digital Self-Management Service for Diagnostic Testing: Focus Group Study With Potential Users. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11:e45115. [PMID: 38728071 PMCID: PMC11127139 DOI: 10.2196/45115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care lags in digital transformation, despite the potential of technology to improve the well-being of individuals. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the uptake of technology in health care and increased individuals' willingness to perform self-management using technology. A web-based service, Directlab Online, provides consumers with direct digital access to diagnostic test packages, which can digitally support the self-management of health. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify the facilitators, barriers, and needs of Directlab Online, a self-management service for web-based access to diagnostic testing. METHODS A qualitative method was used from a potential user's perspective. The needs and future needs for, facilitators of, and barriers to the use of Directlab Online were evaluated. Semistructured focus group meetings were conducted in 2022. Two focus groups were focused on sexually transmitted infection test packages and 2 were focused on prevention test packages. Data analysis was performed according to the principles of the Framework Method. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to categorize the facilitators and barriers. RESULTS In total, 19 participants, with a mean age of 34.32 (SD 14.70) years, participated in the focus groups. Important barriers were a lack of privacy information, too much and difficult information, and a commercial appearance. Important facilitators were the right amount of information, the right kind of tests, and the involvement of a health care professional. The need for a service such as Directlab Online was to ensure its availability for users' health and to maintain their health. CONCLUSIONS According to the participants, facilitators and barriers were comprehension of the information, the goal of the website, and the overall appearance of the service. Although the service was developed in cocreation with health care professionals and users, the needs did not align. The users preferred understandable and adequate, but not excessive, information. In addition, they preferred other types of tests to be available on the service. For future research, it would be beneficial to focus on cocreation between the involved medical professionals and users to develop, improve, and implement a service such as Directlab Online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyma Schnoor
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Esther P W A Talboom-Kamp
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Zuyderland, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Muamer Hajtić
- Department of Medical informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Anke Versluis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bente BE, Van Dongen A, Verdaasdonk R, van Gemert-Pijnen L. eHealth implementation in Europe: a scoping review on legal, ethical, financial, and technological aspects. Front Digit Health 2024; 6:1332707. [PMID: 38524249 PMCID: PMC10957613 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1332707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The evolution of eHealth development has shifted from standalone tools to comprehensive digital health environments, fostering data exchange among diverse stakeholders and systems. Nevertheless, existing research and implementation frameworks have primarily emphasized technological and organizational aspects of eHealth implementation, overlooking the intricate legal, ethical, and financial considerations. It is essential to discover what legal, ethical, financial, and technological challenges should be considered to ensure successful and sustainable implementation of eHealth. Objective This review aims to provide insights into barriers and facilitators of legal, ethical, financial, and technological aspects for successful implementation of complex eHealth technologies, which impacts multiple levels and multiple stakeholders. Methods A scoping review was conducted by querying PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ACM Digital Library (2018-2023) for studies describing the implementation process of eHealth technologies that facilitate data exchange. Studies solely reporting clinical outcomes or conducted outside Europe were excluded. Two independent reviewers selected the studies. A conceptual framework was constructed through axial and inductive coding, extracting data from literature on legal, ethical, financial, and technological aspects of eHealth implementation. This framework guided systematic extraction and interpretation. Results The search resulted in 7.308 studies that were screened for eligibility, of which 35 (0.48%) were included. Legal barriers revolve around data confidentiality and security, necessitating clear regulatory guidelines. Ethical barriers span consent, responsibility, liability, and validation complexities, necessitating robust frameworks. Financial barriers stem from inadequate funding, requiring (commercial) partnerships and business models. Technological issues include interoperability, integration, and malfunctioning, necessitating strategies for enhancing data reliability, improving accessibility, and aligning eHealth technology with existing systems for smoother integration. Conclusions This research highlights the multifaceted nature of eHealth implementation, encompassing legal, ethical, financial, and technological considerations. Collaborative stakeholder engagement is paramount for effective decision-making and aligns with the transition from standalone eHealth tools to integrated digital health environments. Identifying suitable stakeholders and recognizing their stakes and values enriches implementation strategies with expertise and guidance across all aspects. Future research should explore the timing of these considerations and practical solutions for regulatory compliance, funding, navigation of responsibility and liability, and business models for reimbursement strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt E. Bente
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Esnchede, Netherlands
| | - Anne Van Dongen
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Esnchede, Netherlands
| | - Ruud Verdaasdonk
- Section of Health, Technology and Implementation, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Esnchede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verweij L, Metsemakers SJJPM, Ector GICG, Rademaker P, Bekker CL, van Vlijmen B, van der Reijden BA, Blijlevens NMA, Hermens RPMG. Improvement, Implementation, and Evaluation of the CMyLife Digital Care Platform: Participatory Action Research Approach. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e45259. [PMID: 37713242 PMCID: PMC10541637 DOI: 10.2196/45259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evaluation of a continuously evolving eHealth tool in terms of improvement and implementation in daily practice is unclear. The CMyLife digital care platform provides patient-centered care by empowering patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, with a focus on making medication compliance insightful, discussable, and optimal, and achieving optimal control of the biomarker BCR-ABL1. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the participatory action research approach is suitable for the improvement and scientific evaluation of eHealth innovations in daily clinical practice (measured by user experiences) combined with the promotion of patient empowerment. METHODS The study used iterative cycles of planning, action, and reflection, whereby participants' experiences (patients, health care providers, the CMyLife team, and app suppliers) with the platform determined next actions. Co-design workshops were the foundation of this cyclic process. Moreover, patients filled in 2 sets of questionnaires for assessing experiences with CMyLife, the actual use of the platform, and the influence of the platform after 3 and at least 6 months. Data collected during the workshops were analyzed using content analysis, which is often used for making a practical guide to action. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population in terms of information related to chronic myeloid leukemia and sociodemographics, and to describe experiences with the CMyLife digital care platform and the actual use of this platform. RESULTS The co-design workshops provided insights that contributed to the improvement, implementation, and evaluation of CMyLife and empowered patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (for example, simplification of language, and improvement of the user friendliness of functionalities). The results of the questionnaires indicated that (1) the platform improved information provision on chronic myeloid leukemia in 67% (33/49) of patients, (2) the use of the medication app improved medication compliance in 42% (16/38) of patients, (3) the use of the guideline app improved guideline adherence in 44% (11/25) of patients, and (4) the use of the platform caused patients to feel more empowered. CONCLUSIONS A participatory action research approach is suited to scientifically evaluate digital care platforms in daily clinical practice in terms of improvement, implementation, and patient empowerment. Systematic iterative evaluation of users' needs and wishes is needed to keep care centered on patients and keep the innovation up-to-date and valuable for users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Verweij
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter Rademaker
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Bekker
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Bas van Vlijmen
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Bert A van der Reijden
- Laboratory of Hematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathias H, Rohatinsky N, Murthy SK, Novak K, Kuenzig ME, Nguyen GC, Fowler S, Benchimol EI, Coward S, Kaplan GG, Windsor JW, Bernstein CN, Targownik LE, Peña-Sánchez JN, Lee K, Ghandeharian S, Jannati N, Weinstein J, Khan R, Im JHB, Matthews P, Davis T, Goddard Q, Gorospe J, Latos K, Louis M, Balche N, Dobranowski P, Patel A, Porter LJ, Porter RM, Bitton A, Jones JL. The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Access to and Models of Care. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2023; 6:S111-S121. [PMID: 37674496 PMCID: PMC10478809 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Rising compounding prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Kaplan GG, Windsor JW. The four epidemiological stages in the global evolution of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18:56-66.) and pandemic-exacerbated health system resource limitations have resulted in significant variability in access to high-quality, evidence-based, person-centered specialty care for Canadians living with IBD. Individuals with IBD have identified long wait times, gaps in biopsychosocial care, treatment and travel expenses, and geographic and provider variation in IBD specialty care and knowledge as some of the key barriers to access. Care delivered within integrated models of care (IMC) has shown promise related to impact on disease-related outcomes and quality of life. However, access to these models is limited within the Canadian healthcare systems and much remains to be learned about the most appropriate IMC team composition and roles. Although eHealth technologies have been leveraged to overcome some access challenges since COVID-19, more research is needed to understand how best to integrate eHealth modalities (i.e., video or telephone visits) into routine IBD care. Many individuals with IBD are satisfied with these eHealth modalities. However, not all disease assessment and monitoring can be achieved through virtual modalities. The need for access to person-centered, objective disease monitoring strategies, inclusive of point of care intestinal ultrasound, is more pressing than ever given pandemic-exacerbated restrictions in access to endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging. Supporting learning healthcare systems for IBD and research relating to the strategic use of innovative and integrative implementation strategies for evidence-based IBD care interventions are greatly needed. Data derived from this research will be essential to appropriately allocating scarce resources aimed at improving person-centred access to cost-effective IBD care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Mathias
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Noelle Rohatinsky
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Sanjay K Murthy
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital IBD Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerri Novak
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - M Ellen Kuenzig
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoffrey C Nguyen
- Mount Sinai IBD Centre of Excellence, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharyle Fowler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Coward
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gilaad G Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joseph W Windsor
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Laura E Targownik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Juan-Nicolás Peña-Sánchez
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kate Lee
- Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nazanin Jannati
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Jake Weinstein
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rabia Khan
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James H B Im
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tal Davis
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quinn Goddard
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Julia Gorospe
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kate Latos
- Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Naji Balche
- Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ashley Patel
- Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Alain Bitton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre IBD Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Jones
- Departments of Medicine, Clinical Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pedersen SS, Skovbakke SJ, Skov O, Carlbring P, Burg MM, Habibović M, Ahm R. Internet-Delivered, Therapist-Assisted Treatment for Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence-Base and Challenges. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023; 25:443-453. [PMID: 37119450 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-023-01867-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review focuses on the efficacy of internet-based psychological interventions for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and comorbid anxiety and depression. Anxiety and depression comprise barriers for treatment adherence and are associated with poorer patient-reported and clinical outcomes, and greater health care costs. RECENT FINDINGS Internet-based, therapist-assisted interventions targeting anxiety and depression can be as efficacious as face-to-face therapy and may have some advantages, as patients can do it from their own laptop/smartphone at home at a time of their convenience, which may facilitate a better integration in their lives. To enhance the field of internet-based therapy for patients with CVD, we need to involve patients in the development of interventions, focus on developing standards for adherence and assessment of fidelity, and assess and augment health literacy in patients to safeguard equality in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S S Pedersen
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark.
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - S J Skovbakke
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - O Skov
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - P Carlbring
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M M Burg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - M Habibović
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - R Ahm
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|