Virtual visits at the Helsinki Head and Neck Center during the COVID-19 pandemic: patient safety incidents and the experiences of patients and staff

A prospective cohort study: The effects of preoperative E-health on the postoperative course of tonsillectomy patients

PURPOSE

At our clinic, a significant portion of tonsillectomy (TE) preoperative assessments are conducted remotely. The aim of our study was to examine the variation in TE complications, contact rates, and reasons for patient contact between those evaluated preoperatively at the outpatient clinic (OPC), or remotely through virtual visits (VV), or via a digital care pathway (DCP). This investigation is critical for optimizing patient flow through the volume-intensive process of TE.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 422 patients who underwent TE at Helsinki University Hospital ENT clinic to investigate their 30-day postoperative course. We extracted information on postoperative contacts, complications, and demographic data. Postoperative contact rate was the primary outcome measure to evaluate whether telehealth patients suffered fewer postoperative issues.

RESULTS

Patients from the OPC were least likely to seek medical assistance in the 30-day postoperative period. However, no significant difference was discovered compared to the remotely assessed DCP patients, and over entire TE episodes, the DCP patients had the fewest unplanned contacts compared to the VV and OPC cohorts. Furthermore, the care paths shared similar complication and contact method profiles with comparable post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage incidence.

CONCLUSION

A preoperative DCP for TE appeared to carry similar postoperative contact and complication rates, as well as comparable contact method profiles compared to the OPC model. Given the high patient satisfaction and cost-consciousness associated with the DCP, our findings encourage a broader implementation of highly developed DCPs in preoperative assessment for TE.

Post-pandemic paradigm shift toward telemedicine and tele-education; an updated survey of the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on neurosurgery residents in United States

Background

Several strategies were implemented during the Covid-19 pandemic to enhance residency training and patient care.

Objective

This study aims to assess the post-pandemic landscape of neurosurgical training and practice.

Method

A survey consisting of 28 questions examining the challenges faced in neurosurgery and the adaptive measures was conducted among US neurosurgery residents from May 2022 to May 2023.

Results

This study encompassed 59 neurosurgical residents, predominantly male (72.9%) and in later years of training (66.1%) and were distributed across 25 states. Telemedicine and tele-education were pivotal during the pandemic, with virtual lecture series, standalone lectures, and virtual discussions highly favored. Remote didactic learning increased for nearly half of the residents, while 54.2% resumed in-person instruction. Telemedicine was deemed effective by 86.4% for evaluating neurosurgical patients. Access to teaching environments was restricted for 61.0% of residents, impacting their training. The pandemic significantly influenced elective surgeries, with complete cancellations reported by 42.4%. Reduced faculty engagement was noted by 35.6% of residents, while 47.5% reported a negative impact on the overall resident experience. The majority (76.3%) considered changes to their training reasonable given the global health situation.

Conclusions

Strategies implemented during the peak of the pandemic remain crucial in shaping neurosurgery training. Telemedicine has become indispensable, with widespread adoption. Tele-education has also expanded, providing additional learning opportunities. However, traditional didactic courses and hands-on experiences remain essential for comprehensive training. Balancing technology-driven methods with established approaches is crucial for optimizing neurosurgical education and maintaining high-quality patient care.