Short- and long-term direct and indirect costs of illness after ostomy creation - a Swedish nationwide registry study

Post-surgical acute care utilization and cost of care among cancer survivors with an ostomy: Findings from three large hospital systems in the United States

PURPOSE

To describe patterns of 6-month total cost of care and acute care utilization among cancer survivors who received ostomy surgeries in 3 large hospital systems in the United States between 2018 and 2022 and to identify reasons for acute care utilization.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records and the corresponding hospital revenue data obtained from 3 geographically diverse hospital systems in the United States was performed. 6-month all-cause post-surgical encounters subsequent to respective ostomy surgery dates were included. Clinical reasons for acute care utilization were captured and examined via available diagnosis codes.

RESULTS

Mean six-month total cost of care per patient varied greatly by hospital and by payer type, ranging between $18,000 and $80,000. Inpatient care was the largest driver of these cost, accounting for 70 % of the total cost of care. In the sample, 56 % of the patients experienced one or more post-surgical inpatient admissions over a six-month period. Moreover, 26 % of the acute care events were associated with primary or secondary diagnosis codes potentially attributable to post-surgical ostomy-related complications, accounting for approximately 18 % of the total cost. Patients who received urostomy and/or had metastatic cancer had higher rates of acute care utilization, although statistical significances were not achieved.

CONCLUSION

The results are indicative of significant financial burdens as well as morbidities associated with post-surgical ostomy care that are common across hospital systems. Some of these cost burdens are potentially avoidable with improved ostomy follow-up care.

Economic burden of pelvic sepsis after anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cost-of-illness analysis

AIM

Anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery remains a challenging complication, with a nonhealing rate of approximately 50% at 1 year. Pelvic sepsis may require tertiary treatment that encompasses additional admissions, extensive surgery and other types of interventions. The aim of this study is to analyse the financial burden of pelvic sepsis in a tertiary hospital.

METHOD

From 2010 until 2020, all patients referred to a tertiary centre for pelvic sepsis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer were prospectively registered and retrospectively reviewed. The cost analysis adhered to Dutch National Healthcare Institute guidelines and covered hospital-imposed medical costs from salvage surgery to the last registered intervention, adjusted for inflation and priced in euros.

RESULTS

This analysis included 126 patients, with an average total cost per patient of €31 131. Salvage surgery accounted for €21 326, with an additional €9805 for reinterventions and readmissions. Salvage surgery comprised nonrestorative surgery in 48% and restorative salvage surgery in the remaining cases. Length of hospital stay averaged 9.6 days on the general ward and 0.8 days in the intensive care unit. Common reinterventions included endoscopic vacuum sponge changes (n = 153), stoma closures (n = 59) and radiological abscess drainages (n = 51). Total costs did not differ significantly between nonrestorative surgery and restorative surgery (mean = €31 950 vs. €30 362, respectively; p = 0.893).

CONCLUSION

Treating pelvic sepsis after rectal cancer resection in a tertiary hospital carries a substantial economic burden, averaging €31 131 per patient, and this work helps to quantify the potential economic impact of innovative care to reduce anastomotic leakage.

When Is Diversion Indicated After Right-Sided Colon Resections?

INTRODUCTION

Ileocolonic anastomoses have a low anastomotic leak (AL) risk, resulting in infrequent diverting loop ileostomy use. Identifying patients who warrant diverting loop ileostomy with right-sided resection is challenging due to this low incidence of AL. Therefore, a multicenter database was used to develop an AL risk score to help inform when diversion should be strongly considered after right-sided resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing elective right-sided resections within the 2012-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted colectomy participant user files were identified. Multivariable logistic regression identified AL risk factors that were then converted to point values to develop an AL risk score. The developed AL risk score was then assessed for visual correspondence and analyzed for internal validity.

RESULTS

42,176 patients underwent right-sided resection without diversion, and the incidence of AL was 2.4%. The risk calculator exhibited excellent calibration and fair discrimination. Strong visual correspondence was observed for predicted and actual AL rates within the 95% confidence interval for nine of ten risk score deciles.

CONCLUSIONS

An internally validated AL risk score for elective ileocolic resections was developed. Most patients had scores that categorized them at a low risk of AL. The diversion after elective right-sided resections should be reserved for extreme cases.

The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a burdensome complication following colorectal surgery, with increased morbidity, oncological compromise, and mortality. AL may impose a substantial financial burden on hospitals and society due to extensive resource utilization. Estimated costs associated with AL are important when exploring preventive measures and treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on (socio)economic costs associated with AL after colorectal surgery, appraise their quality, compare reported outcomes, and identify knowledge gaps.

METHODS

Health economic evaluations reporting costs related to AL after colorectal surgery were identified through searching multiple online databases until June 2023. Pairs of reviewers independently evaluated the quality using an adapted version of the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Extracted costs were converted to 2022 euros (€) and also adjusted for purchasing power disparities among countries.

RESULTS

From 1980 unique abstracts, 59 full-text publications were assessed for eligibility, and 17 studies were included in the review. The incremental costs of AL after correcting for purchasing power disparity ranged from €2250 (+39.9%, Romania) to €83,633 (+ 513.1%, Brazil). Incremental costs were mainly driven by hospital (re)admission, intensive care stay, and reinterventions. Only one study estimated the economic societal burden of AL between €1.9 and €6.1 million.

CONCLUSIONS

AL imposes a significant financial burden on hospitals and social care systems. The magnitude of costs varies greatly across countries and data on the societal burden and non-medical costs are scarce. Adherence to international reporting standards is essential to understand international disparities and to externally validate reported cost estimates.

The clinical and economic burden of illness in the first two years after ostomy creation: a nationwide Danish cohort study

BACKGROUND

Living with an ostomy is often associated with costly complications. This study examined the burden of illness the first two years after ostomy creation.

METHODS

Data from Danish national registries included all adult Danes with an ostomy created between 2002 and 2014.

RESULTS

Four cohorts consisted, respectively, of 11,385 subjects with a colostomy and 4,574 with an ileostomy, of which 1,663 subjects had inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and 1,270 colorectal cancer as cause of their ileostomy. The healthcare cost was significantly higher for cases versus matched controls for all cohorts. In the first year, the total healthcare cost per person-year was €27,962 versus €4,200 for subjects with colostomy, €29,392 versus €3,308 for subjects with ileostomy, €15,947 versus €2,216 when IBD was the underlying cause, and €32,438 versus €4,196 when it was colorectal cancer. Healthcare costs decreased in the second year but remained significantly higher than controls. Hospitalization and outpatient services were primary cost drivers, with ostomy-related complications comprising 8-16% of hospitalization expenses.

CONCLUSION

Compared to controls, subjects with an ostomy bear a significant health and financial burden attributable to ostomy-related complications, in addition to the underlying disease, emphasizing the importance of better ostomy care to enhance well-being and reduce economic strain.

Patient-Relevant Costs for Organ Preservation versus Radical Resection in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an evolving treatment schedule for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), allowing for organ preservation in a relevant number of patients in the case of complete response. Patients who undergo this so-called "watch and wait" approach are likely to benefit regarding their quality of life (QoL), especially if definitive ostomy could be avoided. In this work, we performed the first cost-effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective to compare costs for TNT with radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in the German health care system. Individual costs for patients insured with a statutory health insurance were calculated with a Markov microsimulation. A subgroup analysis from the prospective "FinTox" trial was used to calibrate the model's parameters. We found that TNT was less expensive (-1540 EUR) and simultaneously resulted in a better QoL (+0.64 QALYs) during treatment and 5-year follow-up. The average cost for patients under TNT was 4711 EUR per year, which was equivalent to 3.2% of the net household income. CRT followed by resection resulted in higher overall costs for ostomy care, medication and greater loss of earnings. Overall, TNT appeared to be more efficacious and cost-effective from a patient's point of view in the German health care system.