Keeping up with the 'omics: non-equilibrium models of gene regulation

Exploring dissipative sources of non-Markovian biochemical reaction systems

Many biological processes including important intracellular processes are governed by biochemical reaction networks. Usually, these reaction systems operate far from thermodynamic equilibrium, implying free-energy dissipation. On the other hand, single reaction events happen often in a memory manner, leading to non-Markovian kinetics. A question then arises: how do we calculate free-energy dissipation (defined as the entropy production rate) in this physically real case? We derive an analytical formula for calculating the energy consumption of a general reaction system with molecular memory characterized by nonexponential waiting-time distributions. It shows that this dissipation is composed of two parts: one from broken detailed balance of an equivalent Markovian system with the same topology and substrates, and the other from the direction-time dependence of waiting-time distributions. But, if the system is in a detailed balance and the waiting-time distribution is direction-time independent, there is no energy dissipation even in the non-Markovian case. These general results provide insights into the physical mechanisms underlying nonequilibrium processes. A continuous-time random-walk model and a generalized model of stochastic gene expression are chosen to clearly show dissipative sources and the relationship between energy dissipation and molecular memory.

Fundamental principles of energy consumption for gene expression

How energy is consumed in gene expression is largely unknown mainly due to complexity of non-equilibrium mechanisms affecting expression levels. Here, by analyzing a representative gene model that considers complexity of gene expression, we show that negative feedback increases energy consumption but positive feedback has an opposite effect; promoter leakage always reduces energy consumption; generating more bursts needs to consume more energy; and the speed of promoter switching is at the cost of energy consumption. We also find that the relationship between energy consumption and expression noise is multi-mode, depending on both the type of feedback and the speed of promoter switching. Altogether, these results constitute fundamental principles of energy consumption for gene expression, which lay a foundation for designing biologically reasonable gene modules. In addition, we discuss possible biological implications of these principles by combining experimental facts.