Interstitial pneumonitis associated with combined regimen of immunotherapy and conventional therapies-pharmacovigilance database analysis with real-world data validation

Pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis associated with bevacizumab-related treatment regimens: a retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database

Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is widely used in routine cancer treatment and clinical therapy in combination with many other agents. This study aims to describe and analyse post-market cases of pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis reported with different BV treatment regimens by mining data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Data were collected from the FAERS database between 2004 Q1 and 2023 Q1. Disproportionality analysis including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) was employed to quantify the signals of disproportionate reporting of pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis adverse events (AEs) associated with BV-related treatment regimens. The demographic characteristics, time to onset and outcomes were further clarified. Results: A total of 55,184 BV-associated reports were extracted from the FAERS database, of which 497 reports related to pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis. Overall, the median onset time of pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis AEs was 43 days (interquartile range (IQR) 15-117 days). In the subgroup analysis, BV plus targeted therapy had the longest median onset time of 90.5 days (IQR 34-178.5 days), while BV plus chemotherapy had the shortest of 40.5 days (IQR 14-90.25). BV plus chemotherapy disproportionately reported the highest percentage of death (148 deaths out of 292 cases, 50.68%). Moreover, the BV-related treatments including four subgroups in our study demonstrated the positive signals with the association of disproportionate reporting of pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis. Notably, BV plus chemotherapy showed a significant higher reporting risk in pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis signals of disproportionate reporting in comparison to BV monotherapy (ROR 5.35 [95% CI, 4.78-6.02] vs. ROR 4.19 [95% CI, 3.56-4.91], p = 0.0147). Conclusion: This study characterized the reporting of pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis, along with the time to onset and demographic characteristics among different BV-related treatment options. It could provide valuable evidence for further studies and clinical practice of BV.

Clinical predictors of severe radiation pneumonitis in patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer

Background

Severe radiation pneumonitis (RP), one of adverse events in patients with lung cancer receiving thoracic radiotherapy, is more likely to lead to more mortality and poor quality of life, which could be predicted by clinical information and treatment scheme. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical predict model for severe RP.

Methods

We collected information on lung cancer patients who received radiotherapy from August 2020 to August 2022. Clinical features were obtained from 690 patients, including baseline and treatment data as well as radiation dose measurement parameters, including lung volume exceeding 5 Gy (V5), lung volume exceeding 20 Gy (V20), lung volume exceeding 30 Gy (V30), mean lung dose (MLD), etc. Among them, 621 patients were in the training cohort, and 69 patients were in the test cohort. Three models were built using different screening methods, including multivariate logistics regression (MLR), backward stepwise regression (BSR), and random forest regression (RFR), to evaluate their predictive power. Overoptimism in the training cohorts was evaluated by four validation methods, including hold-out, 10-fold, leave-one-out, and bootstrap methods, and test cohort was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model. Model calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and evaluation of the nomograms for the three models were completed.

Results

Severe RP was up to 9.4%. The results of multivariate analysis of logistics regression in all patients showed that patients with subclinical (untreated and asymptomatic) interstitial lung disease (ILD) could increase the risk of severe RP, and patients with a better lung diffusion function and received standardized steroids treatment could decrease the risk of severe RP. The three models built by MLR, BSR, and RFR all had good accuracy (>0.850) and moderate κ value (>0.4), and the model 2 built by BSR had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) in three models, which was 0.958 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.932-0.985]. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the predicted and actual values, and the DCA showed a positive net benefit for the model 2 which drew the nomogram. The model 2 included subclinical ILD, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), ipsilateral lung V20, and standardized steroid treatment, which could affect the incidence of severe RP.

Conclusions

Subclinical ILD, DLCO, ipsilateral lung V20, and with or not standardized steroid treatment could affect the incidence of severe RP. Strict lung dose limitation and standardized steroid treatment could contribute to a decrease in severe RP.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic literature review of published case reports and disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database

Background: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has been reported with ICIs but limited to case reports. The clinical features of PJP with ICIs remain mostly unknown. This study aims to investigate the association of PJP with ICIs and describe clinical features.

Methods: Reports of PJP recorded in FAERS (January 2004–December 2022) were identified through the preferred term “Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia”. Demographic and clinical features were described, and disproportionality signals were assessed through the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Information Component (IC), using traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapy as comparators, and adjusting signals by excluding contaminant immunosuppressive drugs and pre-existing diseases. A systematic literature review was conducted to describe clinical features of published PJP reports with ICIs. Bradford Hill criteria was adopted for global assessment of the evidence.

Results: We identified 677 reports of PJP associated with ICIs, in which 300 (44.3%) PJP cases with fatal outcome. Nivolumab (IC025 2.05), pembrolizumab (IC025 1.88), ipilimumab (IC025 1.43), atezolizumab (IC025 0.36), durvalumab (IC025 1.65), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (IC025 1.59) have significant signals compared to other drugs in FAERS database. After excluding pre-existing diseases and immunosuppressive agents which may increase susceptibility of PJP, the signals for PJP associated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab plus ipilimumab remained robust (IC025 > 0). When compared to other anticancer regimens, although all ICIs showed a lower disproportionate signal for PJP than chemotherapy, nivolumab (IC025 0.33, p < 0.001), pembrolizumab (IC025 0.16, p < 0.001), both PD-1 inhibitors, presented a higher signal for PJP than targeted therapy. Male gender (IC025 0.26, p < 0.001) and age >65 years (IC025 0.38, p < 0.001) were predominant in PJP cases associated with across all ICIs. In literature, 15 PJP cases associated with ICIs were reported in 10 published case reports. 12 of 15 (80.0%) of cases received PD-1 inhibitors before PJP was diagnosed.

Conclusion: By the combined analysis of post-marketing data from FAERS and published case reports, we identified ICIs may be associated with PJP, especially in males aged >65years. After accounting for confounders, PD-1 inhibitors emerged with a robust disproportionality signal when compared to PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitors as well as targeted therapy. Further research is warranted to validate our findings.