1
|
Paul ED, Huraiová B, Valková N, Birknerova N, Gábrišová D, Gubova S, Ignačáková H, Ondris T, Bendíková S, Bíla J, Buranovská K, Drobná D, Krchnakova Z, Kryvokhyzha M, Lovíšek D, Mamoilyk V, Mančíková V, Vojtaššáková N, Ristová M, Comino-Méndez I, Andrašina I, Morozov P, Tuschl T, Pareja F, Čekan P. Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.12.05.23299341. [PMID: 38105959 PMCID: PMC10723508 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.05.23299341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
On a retrospective cohort of 1,082 FFPE breast tumors, we demonstrated the analytical validity of a test using multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided laser capture microdissection (LCM) coupled with RNA-sequencing (mFISHseq), which showed 93% accuracy compared to immunohistochemistry. The combination of these technologies makes strides in i) precisely assessing tumor heterogeneity, ii) obtaining pure tumor samples using LCM to ensure accurate biomarker expression and multigene testing, and iii) providing thorough and granular data from whole transcriptome profiling. We also constructed a 293-gene intrinsic subtype classifier that performed equivalent to the research based PAM50 and AIMS classifiers. By combining three molecular classifiers for consensus subtyping, mFISHseq alleviated single sample discordance, provided near perfect concordance with other classifiers (κ > 0.85), and reclassified 30% of samples into different subtypes with prognostic implications. We also use a consensus approach to combine information from 4 multigene prognostic classifiers and clinical risk to characterize high, low, and ultra-low risk patients that relapse early (< 5 years), late (> 10 years), and rarely, respectively. Lastly, to identify potential patient subpopulations that may be responsive to treatments like antibody drug-conjugates (ADC), we curated a list of 92 genes and 110 gene signatures to interrogate their association with molecular subtype and overall survival. Many genes and gene signatures related to ADC processing (e.g., antigen/payload targets, endocytosis, and lysosome activity) were independent predictors of overall survival in multivariate Cox regression models, thus highlighting potential ADC treatment-responsive subgroups. To test this hypothesis, we constructed a unique 19-feature classifier using multivariate logistic regression with elastic net that predicted response to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; AUC = 0.96) better than either ERBB2 mRNA or Her2 IHC alone in the T-DM1 arm of the I-SPY2 trial. This test was deployed in a research-use only format on 26 patients and revealed clinical insights into patient selection for novel therapies like ADCs and immunotherapies and de-escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan D. Paul
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Barbora Huraiová
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Natália Valková
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
- Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostics, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Natalia Birknerova
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Daniela Gábrišová
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Sona Gubova
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Helena Ignačáková
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Tomáš Ondris
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Silvia Bendíková
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Jarmila Bíla
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Katarína Buranovská
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Diana Drobná
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Zuzana Krchnakova
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Maryna Kryvokhyzha
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Lovíšek
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Viktoriia Mamoilyk
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Veronika Mančíková
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Nina Vojtaššáková
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Michaela Ristová
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
- Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Iñaki Comino-Méndez
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Igor Andrašina
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, East Slovakia Institute of Oncology, Košice, Slovakia
| | - Pavel Morozov
- Laboratory for RNA Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York NY, USA
| | - Thomas Tuschl
- Laboratory for RNA Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York NY, USA
| | - Fresia Pareja
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pavol Čekan
- MultiplexDX, s.r.o., Comenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia
- MultiplexDX, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eriksson P, Marzouka NAD, Sjödahl G, Bernardo C, Liedberg F, Höglund M. A comparison of rule-based and centroid single-sample multiclass predictors for transcriptomic classification. Bioinformatics 2021; 38:1022-1029. [PMID: 34788787 PMCID: PMC8796360 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Gene expression-based multiclass prediction, such as tumor subtyping, is a non-trivial bioinformatic problem. Most classifier methods operate by comparing expression levels relative to other samples. Methods that base predictions on the expression pattern within a sample have been proposed as an alternative. As these methods are invariant to the cohort composition and can be applied to a sample in isolation, they can collectively be termed single sample predictors (SSP). Such predictors could potentially be used for preprocessing-free classification of new samples and be built to function across different expression platforms where proper batch and dataset normalization is challenging. Here, we evaluate the behavior of several multiclass SSPs based on binary gene-pair rules (k-Top Scoring Pairs, Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping and a new Random Forest approach) and compare them to centroids built with centered or raw expression values, with the criteria that an optimal predictor should have high accuracy, overcome differences in tumor purity, be robust across expression platforms and provide an informative prediction output score. RESULTS We found that gene-pair-based SSPs showed excellent performance on many expression-based classification tasks. The three methods differed in prediction score output, handling of tied scores and behavior in low purity samples. The k-Top Scoring Pairs and Random Forest approach both achieved high classification accuracy while providing an informative prediction score. Although gene-pair-based SSPs have been touted as being cross-platform compatible (through training on mixed platform data), out-of-the-box compatibility with a new dataset remains a potential issue that warrants cohort-to-cohort verification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION Our R package 'multiclassPairs' (https://cran.r-project.org/package=multiclassPairs) (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab088) is freely available and enables easy training, prediction, and visualization using the gene-pair rule-based Random Forest SSP method and provides additional multiclass functionalities to the switchBox k-Top-Scoring Pairs package. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nour-al-dain Marzouka
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Gottfrid Sjödahl
- Urology - urothelial cancer, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Carina Bernardo
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Urology - urothelial cancer, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Mattias Höglund
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lal S, McCart Reed AE, de Luca XM, Simpson PT. Molecular signatures in breast cancer. Methods 2017; 131:135-146. [PMID: 28669865 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of molecular signatures to add value to standard clinical and pathological parameters has impacted clinical practice in many cancer types, but perhaps most notably in the breast cancer field. This is, in part, due to the considerable complexity of the disease at the clinical, morphological and molecular levels. The adoption of molecular profiling of DNA, RNA and protein continues to reveal important differences in the intrinsic biology between molecular subtypes and has begun to impact the way patients are managed. Several bioinformatic tools have been developed using DNA or RNA-based signatures to stratify the disease into biologically and/or clinically meaningful subgroups. Here, we review the approaches that have been used to develop gene expression signatures into currently available diagnostic assays (e.g., OncotypeDX® and Mammaprint®), plus we describe the latest work on genome sequencing, the methodologies used in the discovery process of mutational signatures, and the potential of these signatures to impact the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Lal
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Amy E McCart Reed
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Xavier M de Luca
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Peter T Simpson
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|