Cellular effects induced by 17-β-estradiol to reduce the survival of renal cell carcinoma cells

Estrogen associates with female predominance in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Based on the epidemiological characteristics of susceptibility and age selectivity for women in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC), we inferred that estrogen was to be blamed. Rad54 like 2 (Rad54l2) which might be one of key effector proteins of DNA damage mediated by estrogen was downregulated in numerous cancers, however, its role in epidemiological characteristics of Xp11.2 tRCC was needed to further study. We reviewed 1005 Xp11.2 tRCC cases and collected estrogen data and then compared the onset time of Xp11.2 tRCC cases in female with estrogen changing trend. An RNA-sequencing was performed in estrogen treated HK-2 cells and subsequently bioinformatic analysis was applied based on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GEO database. The male-to-female ratio of Xp11.2 tRCC was 1:1.4 and the median age of onset was 29.7 years old. The onset trend of female was similar to estrogen physiological rhythm (r = 0.67, p < 0.01). In Xp11.2 tRCC and HK-2 cells after estrogen treatment, Rad54l2 was downregulated, and GSEA showed that pathways significantly enriched in DNA damage repair and cancer related clusters after estrogen treated, as well as GO and KEGG analysis. Downregulation of Rad54l2 was in numerous cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), in which Rad54l2 expression was significantly decreased in male, age over 60 years old, T2&T3&T4 stages, pathologic SII&SIII&SIV stages as well as histologic G3&G4 grades, and cox regression analysis proved that Rad54l2 expression was a risk factor for overall survival, disease-specific survival and progression-free interval in univariate analysis. There existed female predominance in Xp11.2 tRCC and Rad54l2 might play vital role in estrogen mediating female predominance in Xp11.2 tRCC.

Sex and Gender Differences in Kidney Cancer: Clinical and Experimental Evidence

Simple Summary

Kidney cancer is a frequent malignant tumor that accounts for approximately 5% of all cancer incidences. It affects both males and females, but males are twice as likely to develop kidney cancer than females. Evidence shows that this discrepancy takes root in individual differences, such as genetics or pathologies that affect the patient. It is then reflected in the clinical characteristics of the tumors, as males have larger and more aggressive tumors. Understanding the sex- and gender-based differences in kidney cancer is essential to be able to offer patients individualized medicine that would better cover their needs in terms of prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

Abstract

Sex and gender disparities have been reported for different types of non-reproductive cancers. Males are two times more likely to develop kidney cancer than females and have a higher death rate. These differences can be explained by looking at genetics and genomics, as well as other risk factors such as hypertension and obesity, lifestyle, and female sex hormones. Examination of the hormonal signaling pathways bring further insights into sex-related differences. Sex and gender-based disparities can be observed at the diagnostic, histological and treatment levels, leading to significant outcome difference. This review summarizes the current knowledge about sex and gender-related differences in the clinical presentation of patients with kidney cancer and the possible biological mechanisms that could explain these observations. Underlying sex-based differences may contribute to the development of sex-specific prognostic and diagnostic tools and the improvement of personalized therapies.

G-Protein-coupled Estrogen Receptor 1 Agonist G-1 Perturbs Sunitinib Resistance-related Phosphoproteomic Signatures in Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) often develops resistance to first-line targeted therapy such as sunitinib. G-Protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) agonist G-1 was recently reported to regulate RCC physiology but the role of G-1 in RCC tumorigenesis and sunitinib resistance remains largely unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parental and sunitinib-resistant 786-O cells were treated with GPER1 agonist G-1, and quantitative phosphoproteomics was performed. Bioinformatic analyses and validations, including immunoblotting, cell migration, and cell cycle distribution, were performed.

RESULTS

G-1 repressed cell proliferation and migration in both parental and sunitinib-resistant 786-O cells. Phosphoproteomic signatures, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase and protein kinase B (PI3K-AKT) as well as other pathways, were up-regulated in sunitinib-resistant cells but application of G-1 reversed this effect. Among phosphoprotein candidates, activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) Thr69/71 phosphorylation was antagonistically regulated by sunitinib resistance and G-1.

CONCLUSION

Our results open up the possibility for managing RCC and sunitinib resistance by GPER1 agonist G-1 and its regulated pathways.

The Sex Bias of Cancer

In hormone-dependent organs, sex hormones and dysregulated hormone signaling have well-documented roles in cancers of the breast and female reproductive organs including endometrium and ovary, as well as in prostate and testicular cancers in males. Strikingly, epidemiological data highlight significant differences between the sexes in the incidence of various cancers in nonreproductive organs, where the role of sex hormones has been less well studied. In an era when personalized medicine is gaining recognition, understanding the molecular, cellular, and biological differences between men and women is timely for developing more appropriate therapeutic interventions according to gender. We review evidence that sex hormones also shape many of the dysregulated cellular and molecular pathways that lead to cell proliferation and cancer in nonreproductive organs.

Estrogen-Dependent Nrf2 Expression Protects Against Reflux-Induced Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is more common in males than in females. The enhanced antioxidative capacity of estrogen in females might account for the gender difference. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) plays a pivotal role in the host defense mechanism against oxidative stress.

AIMS

This study aimed to clarify the role of Nrf2 in reflux-induced esophageal inflammation, focusing on the gender difference and nitric oxide.

METHODS

Gastroesophageal reflux was surgically induced in male and female rats. Nitrite and ascorbic acid were administered for 1 week to provoke nitric oxide in the esophageal lumen. Male rats with gastroesophageal reflux were supplemented with 17β-estradiol or tert-butylhydroquinone, an Nrf2-inducing reagent. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma KYSE30 cells were treated with 17β-estradiol. Nrf2 expression was examined by Western blotting and quantitative real-time PCR. Antioxidant gene expression profiles were examined by a PCR array.

RESULTS

In the presence of nitric oxide, reflux-induced esophageal damage was less evident, whereas esophageal expression of Nrf2 and its target genes such as Nqo1 was more evident in female or male rats supplemented with 17β-estradiol than in male rats. 17β-Estradiol increased nuclear Nrf2 expression in KYSE30 cells. tert-Butylhydroquinone increased tissue Nqo1 mRNA expression, leading to a reduction in reflux-induced esophageal damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Estrogen-dependent Nrf2 expression might contribute to protection against the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease in females.