Quantitative CT-based image registration metrics provide different ventilation and lung motion patterns in prone and supine positions in healthy subjects

Prone position PET/CT is useful in reducing gravity-dependent opacity-related [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether performing [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the prone position could reduce [18F]FDG uptake in dependent lungs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT in both supine and prone positions from October 2018 to September 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. [18F]FDG uptake of dependent and nondependent lungs was analysed visually and semi-quantitatively. A linear regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the mean standardised uptake value (SUVmean) and the Hounsfield unit (HU).

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients (median age, 66 years [interquartile range: 58-75 years]; 80 men) were included. Dependent lungs showed significantly higher SUVmean and HU than nondependent lungs on supine position PET/CT (sPET/CT, 0.59 ± 0.14 vs. 0.36 ± 0.09, p < 0.001; - 671 ± 66 vs. - 802 ± 43, p < 0.001, respectively) and prone position PET/CT (pPET/CT, 0.45 ± 0.12 vs. 0.42 ± 0.08, p < 0.001; - 731 ± 67 vs. - 790 ± 40, p < 0.001, respectively). Linear regression analysis revealed a strong association between the SUVmean and HU in sPET/CT (R = 0.86, p < 0.001) and moderate association in pPET/CT (R = 0.65, p < 0.001). One hundred and fifteen patients (85.2%) had visually discernible [18F]FDG uptake in the posterior lung on sPET/CT, which disappeared on pPET/CT in all but one patient (0.7%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

[18F]FDG uptake of the lung had moderate-to-strong associations with HU. Gravity-dependent opacity-related [18F]FDG uptake can be effectively reduced on prone position PET/CT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Prone position PET/CT effectively reduces gravity-dependent opacity-related [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the lung, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy in evaluating nodules in dependent lungs and offering a more accurate assessment of lung inflammation parameters in interstitial lung disease evaluations.

KEY POINTS

• The study evaluated whether performing [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT could reduce [18F]FDG uptake in lungs. • In prone and supine position PET/CT, the [18F]FDG uptake and Hounsfield unit were moderately to strongly associated. • Prone position PET/CT can reduce gravity-dependent opacity-related [18F]FDG uptake by the posterior lung.

Is Prone Position [18F]FDG PET/CT Useful in Reducing Respiratory Motion Artifacts in Evaluating Hepatic Lesions?

Prone position is useful in reducing respiratory motion artifacts in lung nodules on 2-Deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). However, whether prone position PET/CT is useful in evaluating hepatic lesions is unknown. Thirty-five hepatic lesions from 20 consecutive patients were evaluated. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of both standard supine position PET/CT and additional prone position PET/CT were evaluated. No significant difference in SUVmax (4.41 ± 2.0 vs. 4.23 ± 1.83; p = 0.240) and MTV (5.83 ± 6.69 vs. 5.95 ± 6.24; p = 0.672) was observed between supine position PET/CT and prone position PET/CT. However, SUVmax changes in prone position PET/CT varied compared with those in supine position PET/CT (median, -4%; range: -30-71%). Prone position PET/CT was helpful when [18F]FDG uptake of the hepatic lesions was located outside the liver on supine position PET/CT (n = 4, SUVmax change: median 15%; range: 7-71%) and there was more severe blurring on supine position PET/CT (n = 6, SUVmax change: median 11%; range: -3-32%). Unlike in lung nodules, prone position PET/CT is not always useful in evaluating hepatic lesions, but it may be helpful in individual cases such as hepatic dome lesions.

CT-based lung motion differences in patients with usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia

We applied quantitative CT image matching to assess the degree of motion in the idiopathic ILD such as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). Twenty-one normal subjects and 42 idiopathic ILD (31 UIP and 11 NSIP) patients were retrospectively included. Inspiratory and expiratory CT images, reviewed by two experienced radiologists, were used to compute displacement vectors at local lung regions matched by image registration. Normalized three-dimensional and two-dimensional (dorsal-basal) displacements were computed at a sub-acinar scale. Displacements, volume changes, and tissue fractions in the whole lung and the lobes were compared between normal, UIP, and NSIP subjects. The dorsal-basal displacement in lower lobes was smaller in UIP patients than in NSIP or normal subjects (p = 0.03, p = 0.04). UIP and NSIP were not differentiated by volume changes in the whole lung or upper and lower lobes (p = 0.53, p = 0.12, p = 0.97), whereas the lower lobe air volume change was smaller in both UIP and NSIP than normal subjects (p = 0.02, p = 0.001). Regional expiratory tissue fractions and displacements showed positive correlations in normal and UIP subjects but not in NSIP subjects. In summary, lung motionography quantified by image registration-based lower lobe dorsal-basal displacement may be used to assess the degree of motion, reflecting limited motion due to fibrosis in the ILD such as UIP and NSIP.

CT-derived 3D-diaphragm motion in emphysema and IPF compared to normal subjects

Image registration-based local displacement analysis enables evaluation of respiratory motion between two computed tomography-captured lung volumes. The objective of this study was to compare diaphragm movement among emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and normal subjects. 29 normal, 50 emphysema, and 51 IPF subjects were included. A mass preserving image registration technique was used to compute displacement vectors of local lung regions at an acinar scale. Movement of the diaphragm was assumed to be equivalent to movement of the basal lung within 5 mm from the diaphragm. Magnitudes and directions of displacement vectors were compared between the groups. Three-dimensional (3D) and apico-basal displacements were smaller in emphysema than normal subjects (P = 0.003, P = 0.002). Low lung attenuation area on expiration scan showed significant correlations with decreased 3D and apico-basal displacements (r = - 0.546, P < 0.0001; r = - 0.521, P < 0.0001) in emphysema patients. Dorsal-ventral displacement was smaller in IPF than normal subjects (P < 0.0001). The standard deviation of the displacement angle was greater in both emphysema and IPF patients than normal subjects (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, apico-basal movement of the diaphragm is reduced in emphysema while dorsal-ventral movement is reduced in IPF. Image registration technique to multi-volume CT scans provides insight into the pathophysiology of limited diaphragmatic motion in emphysema and IPF.