Ten-year cardiovascular risk in diabetes patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: a retrospective Western Denmark cohort study

Absence of Coronary Artery Disease is a Strong Negative Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Purpose

To investigate the interplay between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).

Patients and Methods

Patients with suspected CCS who underwent first-time coronary angiography in Western Denmark between 2003 and 2016 were included in this cohort study. Moreover, an age- and sex-matched general population cohort was established. Patients were stratified according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Presence of CAD was defined as ≥1 obstructive stenosis or non-obstructive diffuse disease. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiac death.

Results

A total of 42,611 patients were included with a median follow-up of 7.3 years. Patients without and with CAD had MACE rates per 100 person-years that were 0.52 and 1.67 for eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2, 0.68 and 2.09 for eGFR 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2, 1.27 and 3.85 for eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 2.27 and 6.92 for eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Comparing to eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2, the adjusted incidence rate ratios for MACE were 1.29 (1.10-1.51) for eGFR 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2, 1.86 (1.49-2.33) for eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 3.57 (1.92-6.67) for eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 in patients without CAD, and 1.11 (1.03-1.20), 1.71 (1.55-1.90), and 2.46 (1.96-3.09) in patients with CAD. The inverse relationship between kidney function and risk of MACE was confirmed when comparing patients with and without CAD to matched individuals in the general population.

Conclusion

Absence of CAD is a strong negative predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CKD.

CT-Based Leiden Score Outperforms Confirm Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events for Diabetic Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVE

Evidence supports the efficacy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based risk scores in cardiovascular risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to compare two CCTA-based risk score algorithms, Leiden and Confirm scores, in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and suspected CAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center prospective cohort study consecutively included 1241 DM patients (54.1% male, 60.2 ± 10.4 years) referred for CCTA for suspected CAD in 2015-2017. Leiden and Confirm scores were calculated and stratified as < 5 (reference), 5-20, and > 20 for Leiden and < 14.3 (reference), 14.3-19.5, and > 19.5 for Confirm. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite outcomes of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization. The Cox model and Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate the effect size of the risk scores on MACE. The area under the curve (AUC) at the median follow-up time was also compared between score algorithms.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 31 months (interquartile range, 27.6-37.3 months), 131 of MACE were recorded, including 17 cardiovascular deaths, 28 nonfatal MIs, 64 unstable anginas requiring hospitalization, and 22 strokes. An incremental incidence of MACE was observed in both Leiden and Confirm scores, with an increase in the scores (log-rank p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, compared with Leiden score < 5, the hazard ratios for Leiden scores of 5-20 and > 20 were 2.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53-3.69; p < 0.001) and 4.39 (95% CI: 2.40-8.01; p < 0.001), respectively, while the Confirm score did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with the risk of MACE. The Leiden score showed a greater AUC of 0.840 compared to 0.777 for the Confirm score (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CCTA-based risk score algorithms could be used as reliable cardiovascular risk predictors in patients with DM and suspected CAD, among which the Leiden score outperformed the Confirm score in predicting MACE.

Clinical Characteristics Predicting Worse Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA)

Non-obstructive coronary artery disease occurs in 3.5–15% of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. This group of patients has a poor prognosis. Identification of factors that predict worse outcomes in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is therefore important. Patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA (n = 110) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective registry. Follow-up was performed 12, 24 and 36 months after discharge. The primary composite endpoint was defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke or TIA, all-cause death, or hospital readmission due to any cardiovascular event. The mean age of the study group was 64.9 (± 13.5) years and 38.2% of patients were male. The occurrence of the primary composite endpoint was 36.4%. In a COX proportional hazards model analysis, older age (p = 0.027), type 2 diabetes (p = 0.013), history of neoplasm (p = 0.004), ST-segment depression (p = 0.018) and left bundle branch block/right bundle branch block (p = 0.004) by ECG on discharge, higher Gensini score (p = 0.022), higher intraventricular septum (p = 0.007) and posterior wall thickness increases (p = 0.001) were shown to be risk factors for primary composite endpoint occurrence. Our study revealed that several factors such as older age, type 2 diabetes, ST-segment depression and LBBB/RBBB in ECG on discharge, higher Gensini score, and myocardial hypertrophy and history of neoplasm may contribute to worse clinical outcomes in MINOCA patients.

Impact of diabetes on long-term all-cause re-hospitalization after revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the incidence, cause and probability of re-hospitalization within 30 and 365 days after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes.

METHOD

Between January 2010 and September 2014, 2763 patients with diabetes were treated with PCI at two Hospitals in Western Denmark. Reasons for readmission within 30 and 365 days were identified.

RESULTS

Readmission risks for patients with diabetes were 58% within 365 days and 18% within 30 days. Reason for readmission was ischemic heart disease (IHD) in 725 patients (27%), and non-IHD-related reasons in 826 patients (31%). IHD-related readmission within 365 days was associated with female gender (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5), and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, compared to stable angina at the index hospitalization (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6). Among patients with diabetes, increased risk of readmission due to other reasons were age (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5) and higher scores of modified Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI): CCI ≥3 (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 2.8-4.6).

CONCLUSION

More than half of the patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing PCI were readmitted within 1 year. Comorbidities were the strongest predictor for non-IHD-related readmission, but did not increase the risk for IHD-related readmissions.

A randomised controlled trial to assess the antithrombotic effects of aspirin in type 1 diabetes: role of dosing and glycaemic control

Background

The enhanced thrombotic milieu in diabetes contributes to increased risk of vascular events. Aspirin, a key antiplatelet agent, has inconsistent effects on outcomes in diabetes and the best dosing regimen remains unclear. This work investigated effects of aspirin dose and interaction with glycaemia on both the cellular and protein components of thrombosis.

Methods

A total of 48 participants with type 1 diabetes and 48 healthy controls were randomised to receive aspirin 75 or 300 mg once-daily (OD) in an open-label crossover study. Light transmittance aggregometry and fibrin clot studies were performed before and at the end of each treatment period.

Results

Aspirin demonstrated reduced inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation (PA) in participants with diabetes compared with controls, although the higher dose showed better efficacy. Higher aspirin dose facilitated clot lysis in controls but not individuals with diabetes. Collagen-induced PA correlated with glycaemic control, those in the top HbA1c tertile having a lesser inhibitory effect of aspirin. Threshold analysis suggested HbA1c levels of > 65 mmol/mol and > 70 mmol/mol were associated with poor aspirin response to 75 and 300 mg daily doses, respectively. Higher HbA1c was also associated with longer fibrin clot lysis time.

Conclusions

Patients with diabetes respond differently to the antiplatelet and profibrinolytic effects of aspirin compared with controls. In particular, those with elevated HbA1c have reduced inhibition of PA with aspirin. Our findings indicate that reducing glucose levels improves the anti-thrombotic action of aspirin in diabetes, which may have future clinical implications.

Trial registration

EudraCT, 2008-007875-26, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2008-007875-26.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-021-01427-y.

Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Versus Durable Polymer New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease With and Without Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Extended long‐term follow‐up data of new‐generation drug‐eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus is scant. The aim of this study is to assess the 10‐year clinical outcome of new‐generation biodegradable polymer‐based sirolimus‐eluting stents (Yukon Choice PC) versus permanent polymer‐based everolimus‐eluting stents (XIENCE) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Methods and Results

In a prespecified subgroup analysis, outcomes of patients with or without diabetes mellitus treated with drug‐eluting stents were compared. The primary end point of this analysis was major adverse cardiac event, the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. The analysis includes a total of 1951 patients (560 patients with and 1391 patients without diabetes mellitus) randomized to treatment with Yukon Choice PC (n=1299) or Xience (n=652). Regarding the primary end point, at 10 years patients with diabetes mellitus showed significantly higher major adverse cardiac event rates than patients without diabetes mellitus (P<0.001; hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22–1.63). There was no significant difference between patients treated with Yukon Choice PC versus Xience, neither in the subgroup of patients with (P=0.91; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79–1.30) nor without diabetes mellitus (P=0.50; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79–1.21). Rates of definite/probable stent thrombosis were 2.3% in patients with and 1.9% in patients without diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.34–2.60; P=0.52), without significant differences between study devices.

Conclusions

The clinical outcome of patients with diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention with different new‐generation drug‐eluting stents is considerably worse than that of patients without diabetes mellitus, with event rates constantly increasing out to 10 years.

Registration

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00598676.