The role of JMJD6/U2AF65/AR-V7 axis in castration-resistant prostate cancer progression

The emerging roles of histone demethylases in cancers

Modulation of histone methylation status is regarded as an important mechanism of epigenetic regulation and has substantial clinical potential for the therapy of diseases, including cancer and other disorders. The present study aimed to provide a comprehensive introduction to the enzymology of histone demethylases, as well as their cancerous roles, molecular mechanisms, therapeutic possibilities, and challenges for targeting them, in order to advance drug design for clinical therapy and highlight new insight into the mechanisms of these enzymes in cancer. A series of clinical trials have been performed to explore potential roles of histone demethylases in several cancer types. Numerous targeted inhibitors associated with immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy have been used to exert anticancer functions. Future studies should evaluate the dynamic transformation of histone demethylases leading to carcinogenesis and explore individual therapy.

Targeting lipid biosynthesis on the basis of conventional treatments for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A promising therapeutic approach

A variety of cancer cells exhibit dysregulated lipid metabolism, characterized by excessive intracellular lipid accumulation, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most typical disease with these characteristics. As the most common malignancy of all renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), ccRCC is typically characterized by a large accumulation of lipids and glycogen in the cytoplasm and a nucleus that is squeezed by the accumulated lipid droplets and localized to the marginal areas within the cytoplasm. This lipid accumulation has been found to be critically involved in the maintenance of malignant features observed in various cancers. Firstly, it maintains the persistent proliferative and metastasis properties of cancer cells. Secondly, it acts as a buffer against lipid peroxidation, preventing lipid peroxidation-induced ferroptosis. Moreover, lipids can diminish the sensitivity of cancer cells to radiotherapy. As ccRCC is a type of cancer with high lipid synthesis, targeting lipid synthesis-related genes in cancer cells may be a promising therapeutic modality for single treatment or in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. This may revolutionize the choice of treatment modality for ccRCC patients. In this review, we concentrate on the current status and progress of research on lipid biosynthesis in ccRCC and the potential applications of targeting lipid synthesis to treat ccRCC. At last, we propose perspective and future research directions for targeting inhibition of lipid biosynthesis in combination with conventional therapeutic approaches for the treatment of ccRCC, which will help to evolve the therapeutic model.

Elucidating the role of PRMTs in prostate cancer using open access databases and a patient cohort dataset

Protein arginine methylation is an understudied epigenetic mechanism catalyzed by enzymes known as Protein Methyltransferases of Arginine (PRMTs), while the opposite reaction is performed by Jumonji domain- containing protein 6 (JMJD6). There is increasing evidence that PRMTs are deregulated in prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, the expression of two PRMT members, PRMT2 and PRMT7 as well as JMJD6, a demethylase, was analyzed in PCa. Initially, we retrieved data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to explore the differential expression of various PRMT family members in patients with PCa and then applied immunohistochemistry in a patient cohort across the spectrum of PCa, including non-neoplastic prostate tissue and lymph node metastatic foci. The results from the TCGA analysis revealed that PRMT7, PRMT6 and PRMT3 expression increased while PRMT2, PRMT9 and JMJD6 levels decreased in the tumor compared to non-neoplastic prostate. Results from the GEO datasets were similar, albeit not identical with the TCGA results, with PRMT7 and PRMT3 being upregulated and PRMT2 and JMJD6 being downregulated in the tumor compared to non-neoplastic tissue in some of them. In addition, PRMT7 levels decreased with stage and grade progression in the TCGA analysis. In the patient cohort, both PRMTs and JMJD6 were overexpressed in PCa compared to non-neoplastic tissue, and nuclear PRMT2 and JMJD6 were upregulated in lymph node metastasis, too. PRMT7 and JMJD6 expression were upregulated with the progression of stage and JMJD6 was also increased with the elevation of grade. After androgen ablation therapy, nuclear expression of PRMT7 and JMJD6 were elevated compared to untreated tumors. PRMT2, PRMT7 and JMD6 were also correlated with markers of EMT and cell cycle regulators. Finally, our findings indicate that PRMTs and JMJD6 are involved in prostate cancer progression and revealed a potential interplay of PRMTs with EMT mediators, underscoring the need for therapeutic targeting of arginine methylation in prostate cancer.

The JMJD6/HURP axis promotes cell migration via NF-κB-dependent centrosome repositioning and Cdc42-mediated Golgi repositioning

Golgi apparatus (GA) and centrosome reposition toward cell leading end during directional cell migration in a coupling way, thereby determining cell polarity by transporting essential factors to the proximal plasma membrane. The study provides mechanistic insights into how GA repositioning (GR) is regulated, and how GR and centrosome repositioning (CR) are coupled. Our previous published works reveals that PRMT5 methylates HURP at R122 and the HURP m122 inhibits GR and cell migration by stabilizing GA-associated acetyl-tubulin and then rigidifying GA. The current study further shows that the demethylase JMJD6-guided demethylation of HURP at R122 promotes GR and cell migration. The HURP methylation mimicking mutant 122 F blocks JMJD6-induced GR and cell migration, suggesting JMJD6 relays GR stimulating signal to HURP. Mechanistic studies reveal that the HURP methylation deficiency mutant 122 K promotes GR through NF-κB-induced CR and subsequently CR-dependent Cdc42 upregulation, where Cdc42 couples CR to GR. Taken together, HURP methylation statuses provide a unique opportunity to understand how GR is regulated, and the GA intrinsic mechanism controlling Golgi rigidity and the GA extrinsic mechanism involving NF-κB-CR-Cdc42 cascade collectively dictate GR.

Role of the Epigenetic Modifier JMJD6 in Tumor Development and Regulation of Immune Response

JMJD6 is a member of the Jumonji (JMJC) domain family of histone demethylases that contributes to catalyzing the demethylation of H3R2me2 and/or H4R3me2 and regulating the expression of specific genes. JMJD6-mediated demethylation modifications are involved in the regulation of transcription, chromatin structure, epigenetics, and genome integrity. The abnormal expression of JMJD6 is associated with the occurrence and development of a variety of tumors, including breast carcinoma, lung carcinoma, colon carcinoma, glioma, prostate carcinoma, melanoma, liver carcinoma, etc. Besides, JMJD6 regulates the innate immune response and affects many biological functions, as well as may play key roles in the regulation of immune response in tumors. Given the importance of epigenetic function in tumors, targeting JMJD6 gene by modulating the role of immune components in tumorigenesis and its development will contribute to the development of a promising strategy for cancer therapy. In this article, we introduce the structure and biological activities of JMJD6, followed by summarizing its roles in tumorigenesis and tumor development. Importantly, we highlight the potential functions of JMJD6 in the regulation of tumor immune response, as well as the development of JMJD6 targeted small-molecule inhibitors for cancer therapy.

High Expression of JMJD4 Is a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Histone demethylase JMJD4 is a burgeoning tumor marker, which has been proven to be associated with colon cancer, but the role it plays in kidney cancer has not yet been investigated. In the present study, we evaluated whether JMJD4 can be a prognostic marker of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) using data from public platform and in vitro experiments. Our results revealed that the expression of JMJD4 is higher in cancerous tissue than in normal tissues (p < 0.001). High expression of JMJD4 is associated with a poor overall survival (OS) of ccRCC as compared with low expression of JMJD4 (p = 0.015). JMJD4 showed significant relevance with M stage (p = 0.016), gender (p = 0.003), OS (0.018), disease-specific survival (DSS) (0.007), and percussion free interval (PFI) (0.041). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses demonstrated that high JMJD4 expression had independent predictive value for OS in ccRCC patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.563, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 1.055‐2.316, and p = 0.026). Besides, in vitro experiments confirmed that high expression of JMJD4 can significantly promote the invasion ability (p < 0.001), cloning ability (p < 0.001), and proliferation (p < 0.001) of renal cell carcinoma. In summary, high JMJD4 expression may be a prognostic marker in patients with kidney cancer.

Biomarker Identification through Multiomics Data Analysis of Prostate Cancer Prognostication Using a Deep Learning Model and Similarity Network Fusion

Simple Summary

Around 30% of men treated with adjuvant therapy experience recurrences of prostate cancer (PC). Current monitoring of the relapse of PC requires regular postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value follow-up. Our study aims to identify potential multiomics biomarkers using modern computational analytic methods, deep learning (DL), similarity network fusion (SNF), and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) dataset. Six significantly intersected omics biomarkers from the two models, TELO2, ZMYND19, miR-143, miR-378a, cg00687383 (MED4), and cg02318866 (JMJD6; METTL23) were collected for multiomics panel construction. The difference between the Kaplan–Meier curves of high and low recurrence-risk groups generated from the multiomics panels and clinical information achieve p-value = 2.97 × 10⁻¹⁵ and C-index = 0.713, and the prediction performance of five-year recurrence achieves AUC = 0.789. The results show that the multiomics panel provided valuable biomarkers for the early detection of high-risk recurrent patients, and integrating multiomics data gave us the power to detect the complex mechanisms of cancer among the interactions of different genetic and epigenetic factors.

Abstract

This study is to identify potential multiomics biomarkers for the early detection of the prognostic recurrence of PC patients. A total of 494 prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) patients (60-recurrent included) from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) portal were analyzed using the autoencoder model and similarity network fusion. Then, multiomics panels were constructed according to the intersected omics biomarkers identified from the two models. Six intersected omics biomarkers, TELO2, ZMYND19, miR-143, miR-378a, cg00687383 (MED4), and cg02318866 (JMJD6; METTL23), were collected for multiomics panel construction. The difference between the Kaplan–Meier curves of high and low recurrence-risk groups generated from the multiomics panel achieved p-value = 5.33 × 10⁻⁹, which is better than the former study (p-value = 5 × 10⁻⁷). Additionally, when evaluating the selected multiomics biomarkers with clinical information (Gleason score, age, and cancer stage), a high-performance prediction model was generated with C-index = 0.713, p-value = 2.97 × 10⁻¹⁵, and AUC = 0.789. The risk score generated from the selected multiomics biomarkers worked as an effective indicator for the prediction of PRAD recurrence. This study helps us to understand the etiology and pathways of PRAD and further benefits both patients and physicians with potential prognostic biomarkers when making clinical decisions after surgical treatment.