Preoperative endoscopic tattooing to mark the tumour site does not improve lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Assessing the Association Between Endoscopic Tattooing and Lymph Node Yield in Rectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing is an effective tool for intraoperative tumor localization in colon cancer. Endoscopic tattooing in rectal cancer may have unidentified benefits on lymph node yield, making it easier for pathologists to identify nodes during histopathologic assessment. There remains concern that tattoo ink may alter anatomical planes, increasing surgical difficulty.

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews from 2016 to 2021 of n = 170 patients presenting with rectal cancer were divided into two groups: with (n = 79) and without (n = 91) endoscopic tattoos. Demographics, operative details, tumor characteristics, prior chemoradiation, and pathologic details were collected. Primary outcome was total lymph node yield. Secondary outcomes were rates of adequate (> 12) nodes, margin status, and operative variables including operative time.

RESULTS

No differences between pathologic stage, tumor height, high inferior mesenteric artery ligation, operative times, conversion rate, or surgical approach (open versus minimally invasive) were noted between groups. Receipt of neoadjuvant chemoradiation was less frequent in the endoscopic tattooing group (53.2% versus 76.9%, P ≤ 0.001). Total node number and rate of adequate lymph node yield were higher with endoscopic tattooing (20.5 ± 7.6 versus 16.8 ± 6.6 lymph nodes and 100.0% versus 83.5% adequate lymph node harvest, both P ≤ 0.001). Rates of positive circumferential and distal margins and complete total mesorectal excision were also similar. Regression analysis identified endoscopic tattooing (Incidence Risk Ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.31) and operative time more than 300 min (Incidence Risk Ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.99) had significant effects on lymph node harvest. Removal of patients with inadequate lymph node yield resulted in similar rates of total and positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic rectal tattooing is associated with increased lymph node yield (including after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy) without sacrificing oncologic or perioperative outcomes, although this effect is inconsistent when only considering patients with an adequate lymph node yield.

Inking outside the box: systematic review on the utility of tattooing lesions in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Endoscopic tattooing in rectal cancer is infrequently utilized for fear of tattoo ink obscuring anatomical planes, increasing the difficulty of surgical excision. Colon cancer tattooing has demonstrated increased lymph node yields and increased accuracy in establishing adequate margins. Rectal cancer tattooing may be especially helpful after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, where complete clinical responses could limit lesion identification and lymph node yields are typically less robust. We seek to review and identify the effects of tattooing in rectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Studies on endoscopic tattooing with cohorts consisting of at least ≥ 25% of rectal cancer patients were selected. Studies focusing solely on rectal cancer were also reviewed separately.

RESULTS

Of 416 studies identified, 10 studies encompassing 2460 patients were evaluated. Seven studies evaluated lymph node yields; five reported beneficial effects of endoscopic tattooing, while two reported no significant difference. Among four studies reporting lesion localization, successful localization rates were between 63 and 100%. Rates of intraoperative endoscopy performed to reevaluate lesion location ranged from 5.7 to 20%. The distal margin was evaluated in two studies, which reported more accurate placement of the distal resection margin after tattooing. When complications of tattooing were documented (7 studies with 889 patients), only five direct complications of endoscopic tattooing were observed (0.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the data is heterogenous, it suggests that endoscopic tattooing in rectal cancer may improve lymph node yields and assist in determining accurate distal margins without high rates of complication. Further research must be completed before practice management guidelines can change.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

No. CRD42021271784.

Tattooing or Metallic Clip Placement? A Review of the Outcome Surrounding Preoperative Localization Methods in Minimally Invasive Anterior Resection Performed at a Single Center

BACKGROUND

For minimally invasive colorectal surgery, preoperative localization is a typical procedure. We here aimed to analyze compared 2 different localization methods in terms of short-term outcomes, like the operative outcome and postoperative complication rates based on real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis study conducted at a medical center. We enrolled patients who were presented with colonic tumor between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, and they had undergone laparoscopic anterior resection in a single institution. Data included patient characteristics, operative outcome, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The preoperative localization group had a better resection margin (4 vs. 3 cm; P<0.001) and fewer procedures of intraoperative colonoscopy (4.67% vs. 18.22%; P=0.002). Lymph node harvest occurred more in patients with endoscopic tattooing procedures than with metallic clip procedures (25 vs. 20; P=0.031). No significant difference was found regarding postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative localization in a laparoscopic anterior resection led to better surgical planning and resection margin. The metallic clip placement was helpful in the preoperative localization and setting. The endoscopic tattooing method had a larger lymph node harvest and with fewer intraoperative colonoscopy.

Efficacy of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing with indocyanine green on lymph node harvest and factors associated with inadequate lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer

Objective: Adequate lymph node harvest (LNH) in colorectal cancer is closely related to survival. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing (PCT) with indocyanine green (ICG) on adequate LNH in colorectal cancer. Materials and methods: A total of 1079 patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer were divided into two groups: a tattooing group and a non-tattooing group. The patients were retrospectively analyzed for the number and adequacy of LNH according to tumor locations and stages. Univariate and multivariate analysis for factors associated with adequate LNH were done. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number and adequacy of LNH according to tumor locations. However, T1 colorectal cancer in the tattooing group had significantly higher adequate LNH (91.6% vs 82.1%, OR 2.370, p = .048) and T1 and N0 rectal cancer in the tattooing group also had higher adequate LNH although there was no statistical significance (100% vs 82.4%, OR 12.088, p = .095; 96.9% vs 84.8%, OR 5.570, p = .099) when compared to the non-tattooing group. Male sex and T1 stage were significantly associated with inadequate LNH in multivariate analysis (OR 0.556 (95% CI 0.340-0.909), p = .019; OR 0.555 (95% CI 0.339-0.910), p = .019, respectively). Conclusion: PCT with ICG did not improve adequate LNH in colorectal cancer but effectively improved adequate LNH in early colorectal cancer. Male sex and early cancer were risk factors for inadequate LNH in colorectal cancer, so PCT is needed for adequate LNH in these patients.

Factors influencing the number of retrieved lymph nodes after colorectal resection: a retrospective study from a single institute

Accurate diagnosis of lymph node (LN) metastasis is important to determine the staging and consequent treatment of resected colorectal cancer. Therefore, factors influencing the number of retrieved LNs were explored. This study included 400 patients that underwent surgical resection for Stage 0-III colorectal cancer from 2009 to 2014 in Kochi Medical School. In all cases, surgeons retrieved the LNs within the resected mesentery immediately after the operation without fixation. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Association Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores, tumor locations, maximum tumor diameters, nodal status, and pathological tumor types were extracted as patient and tumor factors. The extent of LN dissection and surgical approaches (laparoscopic or laparotomy) were extracted as operative factors. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictive factors for LN number retrieved, after potential influential factors were explored by univariate analysis. As results, we found that the median number of retrieved LNs was 13, ranging from 1 to 50. Approximately 60% of the patients thus received an adequate examination (LN number of 12 or more). Multivariate analysis using the remaining factors of univariate analysis identified BMI, tumor diameter, nodal status, and extent of dissection as independent predictive factors for the number of retrieved LNs (P < 0.05). If any or all these factors are present, a vigorous search for LNs using additional measures, such as visual enhancement and fat dissolution method, should be considered.

Tattooing improves the detection of small lymph nodes and increases the number of retrieved lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy: A randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In rectal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy, the number of Lymph nodes (LNs) required remains unclear. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether preoperative tattooing increases the number of LNs and enhances the detection rate of metastatic LNs.

METHODS

Eighty patients with rectal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive no tattooing (C group) or to receive tattooing (T group).

RESULTS

The number of LNs was significantly higher in the T group (13.3 ± 7.4, mean ± SD) than in the C group (8.8 ± 5.9, p < 0.001), however, the number of positive LNs did not differ (0.5 ± 1.3 vs. 0.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.882). The long-axis diameter of LNs was significantly smaller in the T group than in the C group (3.4 ± 1.8 vs. 3.9 ± 2.3 mm, p < 0.001), however, the long-axis diameter of positive LNs did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Tattooing increased the number of retrieved LNs by 51%, however, there was no increase in the number of positive LNs.

Endoscopic tattooing of early colon carcinoma enhances detection of lymph nodes most prone to harbor tumor burden

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs result in the detection of early-stage asymptomatic carcinomas suitable to be surgically cured. Lymph nodes (LN) from early CRC are usually small and may be difficult to collect. Still, at least 12 LNs should be analyzed from colectomies, to ensure a reliable pN0 stage. Presurgical endoscopic tattooing improves LN procurement. In addition, molecular detection of occult LN tumor burden in histologically pN0 CRC patients is associated with a decreased survival rate. We aimed to study the impact of presurgical endoscopic tattooing on the molecular detection of LN tumor burden in early colon neoplasms.

Methods

A prospective cohort study from a CRC screening-based population was performed at a tertiary academic hospital. LNs from colectomies with and without preoperative endoscopic tattooing were assessed by two methods, hematoxylin and eosin (HE), and RT-LAMP, to detect tumor cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA. We compared the amount of tumor burden and LN yields from tattooed and non-tattooed specimens.

Results

HE and RT-LAMP analyses of 936 LNs were performed from 71 colectomies containing early carcinomas and endoscopically unresectable adenomas (8 pT0, 17 pTis, 27 pT1, 19 pT2); 47 out of 71 (66.2 %) were tattooed. Molecular positivity correlated with the presence of tattoo in LN [p < 0.001; OR 3.1 (95 % CI 1.7–5.5)]. A significantly higher number of LNs were obtained in tattooed specimens (median 17 LN vs. 14.5 LN; p = 0.019).

Conclusions

Endoscopic tattooing enables the analysis of those LNs most prone to harbor tumor cells and improves the number of LN harvested.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5026-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.