Quality of life correlation with socioeconomic status in Korean hepatitis-B patients: a cross sectional study

Self-Efficacy, Coping Strategies and Quality of Life among Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

This study aimed to examine the relationships of self-efficacy, coping strategies, and quality of life (QoL) among patients with chronic hepatitis B and to explore whether coping strategies play a mediating role. In this cross-sectional study, 193 patients with chronic hepatitis B from two tertiary hospitals were recruited. Data were collected using a self-report questionnaire. The results indicated that physical and mental QoL were positively associated with self-efficacy and negatively associated with resignation coping. Moreover, resignation coping partially mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and physical and mental QoL. Our findings indicated that healthcare providers can enhance self-efficacy with an emphasis on reducing the use of resignation coping to better improve QoL among patients with chronic hepatitis B.

The effect of a pay-for-performance program on health-related quality of life for patients with hepatitis in Taiwan

Purpose

Chronic viral hepatitis is a major global public health problem. The guidelines suggest the long-term performance of regular ongoing liver examinations to monitor liver inflammation and screen for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the effects of regular liver examinations on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have not been adequately evaluated. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of regular ongoing examinations on the quality of life of patients with hepatitis.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from October to December 2016 in four hospitals in northern Taiwan. A hepatitis pay-for-performance (P4P) program was launched in 2010 to ensure that hepatitis patients have regular ongoing liver examinations. The study group consisted of patients who joined and stayed in the program for more than one year. The study assessed HRQoL utilizing the five-level version of the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) and the EuroQoL visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). The responses for the EQ-5D-5L in hepatitis patients were transformed into the EQ-5D index according to the Taiwanese population’s value set. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected by questionnaire, and descriptive statistics were presented. A two-part model and generalized linear model with a Poisson distribution and a log link function, respectively, were used to examine the associations of the EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS score with participation in the hepatitis P4P program. We applied propensity score weighting with inverse probability weighting to control for selection bias.

Results

In all, 508 patients (aged 57.6 ± 11.6 years; 60.8% male) were enrolled in this study. The mean (standard deviation, SD) reported EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS scores were 0.93 (0.12) and 75.1 (13.8), and the median (interquartile range, IQR) values were 1 (0.108) and 80 (15), respectively. The study group had a moderately significantly higher EQ-VAS score (mean ratio = 1.029, P < 0.001). However, the differences in the EQ-5D index scores between the study and control groups were not significant.

Conclusion

Patients with hepatitis partially benefited from receiving hepatitis P4P in Taiwan, which featured regular ongoing liver examinations, in that their EQ-VAS scores were enhanced but not their EQ-5D index scores.

Quality of life and unmet needs in patients with chronic liver disease: A mixed-method systematic review

Background & Aims

In an attempt to uncover unmet patient needs, this review aims to synthesise quantitative and qualitative studies on patients’ quality of life and their experience of having liver disease.

Methods

Three databases (CINAHL, Embase, and PubMed) were searched from January 2000 to October 2020. The methodological quality and data extraction of both quantitative and qualitative studies were screened and appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute instruments for mixed-method systematic reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A convergent, integrated approach to synthesis and integration was used. Studies including patients with autoimmune and cholestatic liver disease, chronic hepatitis B and C, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma were considered.

Results

The searches produced 5,601 articles, of which 95 (79 quantitative and 16 qualitative) were included in the review. These represented studies from 26 countries and a sample of 37,283 patients. The studies showed that patients´ quality of life was reduced. Unmet needs for information and support and perceived stigmatisation severely affected patients’ quality of life.

Conclusions

Our study suggests changes to improve quality of life. According to patients, this could be achieved by providing better education and information, being aware of patients’ need for support, and raising awareness of liver disease among the general population to reduce misconceptions and stigmatisation.

Registration number

PROSPERO CRD42020173501.

Lay summary

Regardless of aetiology, patients with liver diseases have impaired quality of life. This is associated with disease progression, the presence of symptoms, treatment response, and mental, physical, and social factors such as anxiety, confusion, comorbidities, and fatigue, as well as limitations in daily living, including loneliness, low income, stigmatisation, and treatment costs. Patients highlighted the need for information to understand and manage liver disease, and awareness and support from healthcare professionals to better cope with the disease. In addition, there is a need to raise awareness of liver diseases in the general population to reduce negative preconceptions and stigmatisation.

•

Patients with liver disease regardless of aetiology and severity have impaired quality of life.

•

Patients call for better education and information to understand and manage their liver disease, and for increased awareness and support from healthcare professionals.

•

Owing to the limited knowledge of liver diseases among the general population, patients experience stigmatisation, resulting in loneliness and social isolation.

•

Addressing unmet needs of patients with liver disease could improve their quality of life.

Patient-reported outcomes in a large North American cohort living with chronic hepatitis B virus: a cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms associated with chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection have not been well-described in North American cohorts.

AIMS

To evaluate several PROs and associations with HBV disease activity markers.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis including 876 adults who completed PRO measures during the Hepatitis B Research Network Adult Cohort Study. Participants on HBV treatment were excluded. Outcomes included: HRQoL using the SF-36 mental component summary and physical component summary scores; symptom burden using a 10-item Total Symptom Checklist and fatigue using an instrument from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®. Covariates included laboratory markers of disease severity, virological status, comorbidities and medications.

RESULTS

Median age was 42 (range: 19-79), 51% were female, 73% Asian, 19% HBeAg (+), 2% had AST-platelet ratio index (APRI) ≥1.5 and 74% without comorbidities. Mean mental component summary T-score = 52, physical component summary T-score = 54 and PROMIS Fatigue T-score = 47. On a scale from 0 (none) to 40 (extreme), the mean Symptom Checklist score = 3 and 25% reported no symptoms. The most frequent symptoms were fatigue (60%), irritability (32%) and itching (32%). Most symptoms were 'a little bit' bothersome. In multivariable regressions, APRI ≥1.50 and more comorbidities were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes; virological markers were not. Adding the Total Symptom Checklist score to original regression models increased explanation of variation in the mental component summary score from 4% to 44% and the Physical Component Summary Score from 17% to 34%.

CONCLUSIONS

Untreated North American HBV patients with mild liver disease report favourable health-related quality of life and minimal symptoms. HBV does not impact health-related quality of life unless advanced liver disease or comorbidities are present. High symptom burden explains substantial variation in health-related quality of life. (CT.gov identifier: NCT01263587).

Mental and physical health status among chronic hepatitis B patients

PURPOSE

Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection in the United States. Our goal is to understand factors associated with HRQoL in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a survey to assess HRQoL and behavioral risks among patients with CHB infection from four large U.S. health care systems. Primary outcomes were generated from the SF-8 scale to assess HRQoL, as measured by the mental component scores (MCS) and physical component scores (PCS). The survey also measured socio-demographic information, hepatitis-related behavioral risk factors, treatment exposure/history, stress, and social support. We supplemented survey data with electronic health records data on patient income, insurance, disease severity, and comorbidities. Multivariate analysis was used to estimate and compare adjusted least square means of MCS and PCS, and examine which risk factors were associated with lower MCS and PCS.

RESULTS

Nine hundred sixty-nine patients (44.6%) responded to the survey. Current life stressors and unemployment were associated with both lower MCS and PCS results in multivariate analyses. Lower MCS was also associated with White race and low social support, while lower PCS was also associated with Medicaid insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Stressful life events and unemployment were related to mental and physical health status of CHB patients. Those who have social support have better mental health; White and Medicaid patients are more likely to have poorer mental and physical health, respectively. Management of CHB patients should include stress management, social support, and financial or employment assistance.

Burden and impacts of chronic hepatitis B infection in rural Senegal: study protocol of a cross-sectional survey in the area of Niakhar (AmBASS ANRS 12356)

INTRODUCTION

Though Senegal has one of the highest estimated prevalence rates of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection worldwide, epidemiological data in the general population are lacking and consequences of the infection remain undocumented. The ANRS-12356 AmBASS study aims at evaluating the health and socioeconomic burden of chronic HBV infection at the individual, household and population level. Its specific objectives are (1) to document the epidemiology of chronic HBV infection, including prevalence and risk factors; (2) to assess the acceptability of home-based testing and first clinic visit; (3) to investigate the repercussions of chronic HBV infection on living conditions; and (4) to estimate the public health impact of chronic HBV infection at the population level and the feasibility of a decentralised model of HBV test and treat.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multidisciplinary cross-sectional survey includes a twofold data collection: (1) home-based screening using dried blood spot (DBS) sampling and collection of sociodemographic, economic and behavioural data, and (2) additional clinical and biological data collection in chronic HBV carriers at the first clinic visit. The prevalence of chronic HBV infection will be estimated in the general population and in key subgroups. Risk factors for HBV acquisition in children will be explored using case-control analysis. HBV burden will be assessed through comparisons of health and economic outcomes between households affected by the disease versus non-affected households. Last, an economic evaluation will assess costs and health benefits of scaling-up HBV care.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Senegalese National Ethical Committee for Research in Health, and received authorisation from the Senegalese Ministry of Health and the French Commission on Information Technology and Liberties (Senegalese Protocol Number: SEN17/15). The study results will be presented in peer-review journals, international conferences and at a workshop with national stakeholders in order to contribute to the design of programmes to address the HBV pandemic.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03215732; Pre-results.

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire in viral hepatitis patients

AIM: To determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (LDQOL1.0) in viral hepatitis patients.

METHODS: The questionnaire was administered to 100 patients with viral hepatitis and 91 returned the questionnaire. Cronbach α, ceiling effect and flooring effect were calculated to test the reliability of this questionnaire. Relationship coefficients between liver disease specific dimensions and SF-36 were calculated to test the standard validity of the questionnaire. Exploring factor analysis was used to test the questionnaire's construct validity. Responsiveness was tested by comparing scores of patients with different Child Pugh scores. Pearson coefficient was used to show the relationship and ANOVA analysis was used to test responsiveness.

RESULTS: Cronbach α ranged from 0.33 (95%CI: 0.08-0.52) to 0.9 (95%CI: 0.90-0.99), and 80% of domains had a Cronbach α value higher than 0.7. Ceiling effects ranged from 0% to 39.6%, and flooring effects ranged from 0% to 34.1%, with most domains having the values less than 20%. Six of twelve domains were related closely with SF-36 (Pearson coefficient > 0.5, P < 0.05). Exploring factor analysis showed that 7 of 12 domains concurred with original imagination. Responsiveness showed that 6 of 12 domains were good (F: 0.353-21.29, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Most domains of LDQOL1.0 had good reliability, validity and responsiveness when it was used to test quality of life in Chinese patients with viral hepatitis.

Assessment of health-related quality of life and related factors in patients with chronic liver disease

Background and objectives

Assessing health-related quality of life is an important aspect of clinical practice. Thus, the present study attempts to assess the health-related quality of life of patients with chronic liver disease.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 133 chronic liver disease patients, using three instruments: a demographic questionnaire, the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease index. Variables were expressed as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. The statistical analysis included Pearson's correlation, Student's t-test, and analysis of variance (p < 0.05 was considered significant).

Results

The mean age of included subjects was 50.5 ± 13.3 years. The majority were male (66.2%), Caucasian (70.7%), and had a family income of US$329–US$658.2. Over half of the patients (56.4%) were infected by hepatitis C virus and 93.2% had low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was related to age (r = 0.185; p = 0.033). Higher mean Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire scores were obtained for emotional function (39.70/SD ± 12.98) and while lower scores were obtained for abdominal symptoms (16.00/SD ± 6.25). Fifty-two patients (39.1%) presented overall low (<5) Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire scores. Furthermore, Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score was related to family income (r = 0.187, p = 0.031).

Conclusion

Most individuals presented high mean Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire scores, indicating low health-related quality of life, especially individuals with low family income.