Development of a short scale for assessing economic environmental aspects in patients with spinal diseases using Rasch analysis

The Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool for Mobile Health (BASTmHealth): Development and Compliance in 2 Weeks of Daily Reporting in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVES

To develop and evaluate the feasibility of a short form of the Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool (BASTmHealth) for high frequency in situ self-reported assessment of neurobehavioral symptoms using mobile health technology for community-dwelling adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

Prospective, repeated-measures study of mHealth assessment of self-reported neurobehavioral symptoms in adults with and without a lifetime history of TBI over a 2-week period.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling adults with (n=52) and without (n=12) a lifetime TBI history consented to the study (N=64).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BASTmHealth subscales (2-items each): negative affect, fatigue, executive function, substance abuse, impulsivity; feasibility measured via compliance (assessments assigned/assessments completed) and participant-reported usability.

RESULTS

We developed the 10-item BASTmHealth as a screener for high frequency in situ self-reported assessment of neurobehavioral symptoms leveraging mHealth. Compliance for 2 weeks of BASTmHealth supports its feasibility. Fifty-six of 64 participants (87.5%) who completed baseline assessments completed the 2 weeks of daily assessments; all 8 participants who did not complete ecological momentary assessment had a history of TBI. Overall compliance was 81.4% (496 completed of 609 assigned assessments) among all 52 participants with TBI and 96.7% (494 completed of 511 assigned assessments) among the 44 who completed any daily measures, compared with 91.8% (135 completed of 147 assigned assessments) among those with no TBI history. Participants thought the daily surveys were easy to understand and complete and the number of prompts were reasonable.

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting daily high-frequency in situ self-reported assessment of neurobehavioral symptoms using the BASTmHealth is feasible among individuals with and without a lifetime history of TBI. Developing and evaluating self-reported assessments for community-based assessment is a critical step toward expanding remote clinical monitoring systems to improve post-TBI outcomes.

Psychometric evaluation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument using Item analysis according to the Rasch model

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) instrument assesses patient care in alignment with the chronic care model. The aim of the study was to comprehensively validate the PACIC using the Rasch model. A special focus was placed on the investigation of local dependence (LD), differential item functioning (DIF) and targeting.

METHOD

This secondary analysis utilized data of 760 patients with a diagnosis of diabetes who had participated in the Swiss CoDiab-VD cohort study. The psychometric properties of the French PACIC-version were evaluated using the Rasch model. DIF was investigated in relation to age, gender, education, year of recruitment into the CoDiab-VD cohort study, type of diabetes and whether patients got an injectable antidiabetic drug or not.

RESULTS

The initial analysis of the PACIC revealed poor fit to the Rasch model (χ² -p < 0.001) with response dependency being the most prominent problem. After combining the items into two testlets (testlet 1: Items 1-11; testlet 2: Items 12-20), good overall model fit was found (χ² -p = 0.77) as well as good reliability (Person Separation Index = 0.85) and targeting. DIF with regard to whether patients got an injectable antidiabetic drug or not was found for testlet 2. However, the size of this DIF was regarded as not being substantial.

CONCLUSION

The PACIC is a well-targeted, reliable unidimensional instrument to assess patient care in alignment with the chronic care model in patients with diabetes. It is free of substantial DIF. The PACIC-20 sum score can hence be used in clinical practice for individual diagnostic. For evaluation purposes like assessment of change or group evaluations, the usage of the interval-scale level person parameters is recommended as it permits using parametric statistical analyses and provides a more accurate picture about the actual amount of change.

Development of the German social attitude barriers and facilitators to participation-scales: an analysis according to the Rasch model

BACKGROUND

Social attitudes experienced by people with disabilities can strongly impact upon their health and quality of life. The extent to which social attitude measurement transcends specific cultures is unknown. Thus, the aim of the study was to develop German item banks to assess social attitude barriers and facilitators to participation and compare the construct definition with that developed in the United States.

METHODS

The American version of the two item banks assessing social attitudes that act as barriers and facilitators in persons with disabilities was translated into German and culturally adapted. The sample consisted of 410 in- and outpatients treated for spinal diseases at a German University Hospital. The psychometric properties of the resulting 53 items-item pool were evaluated using Rasch analysis. A special focus was placed on the investigation of unidimensionality, local independence, differential item functioning (DIF) and targeting. To evaluate convergent and divergent validity correlations with perceived social support, depression and pain interference were calculated.

RESULTS

Unlike the American version, both the barriers and facilitators item banks had to be divided into two subscales assessing attitudes that individuals with disabilities experience as being directed towards them (individual perception) or attitudes that respondents experience as being directed towards people with disabilities as a social group (societal perception). Four unidimensional scales were constructed. Fit to the Rasch model required item deletion and forming testlets to account for extensive local dependence. There was no evidence of DIF with regard to gender or age. Targeting of the subscales was moderate to good.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support a distinction between social attitudes at the individual and societal level, allowing a more specific assessment than is possible when this distinction is ignored.

Psychological factors outmatched morphological markers in predicting limitations in activities of daily living and participation in patients with lumbar stenosis

BACKGROUND

Recent demographic changes have led to a large population of older adults, many of whom experience degenerative disc diseases. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is associated with considerable discomfort and limitations in activities of daily living (ADL). Symptomatic DLSS is one of the most frequent indications for spinal surgery. The aim of this study was to identify sociodemographic variables, morphological markers, depression as well as fear of movement that predict ADL performance and participation in social life in patients with DLSS.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with DLSS (mean age 62.5 years [11.7], 50.7% females) participated in the study. Predictor variables were age, gender, duration of disease, three morphological markers (severity of the lumbar stenosis, the number of affected segments and presence of spondylolisthesis) as well as self-reported depression and fear of movement. Dependent variables were pain interference with the performance of ADLs, ADLs and participation in social life. Correlations between predictor and dependent variables were calculated before stepwise, linear regression analyses. Only significant correlations were included in the linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Variance explained by the predictor variables ranged between 12% (R2 = .12; pain interference-physical) and 40% (R2 = .40; ADL requiring lower extremity functioning; participation). Depression and fear of movement were the most powerful predictors for all dependent variables. Among the morphological markers only stenosis severity contributed to the prediction of ADLs requiring lower extremity functioning.

CONCLUSION

Depression and fear of movement were more important predictors of the execution of ADLs and participation in social life compared to morphological markers. Elevated depressive symptoms and fear of movement might indicate limited adaptation and coping regarding the disease and its consequences. Early monitoring of these predictors should therefore be conducted in every spine centre. Future studies should investigate whether psychological screening or a preoperative psychological consultation helps to avoid operations and enables better patient outcomes.

Development of Rasch-based short screenings for the assessment of treatment motivation in patients with cardiovascular diseases

Purpose: The aim of the study was to develop unidimensional test-fair and economic short screenings to assess treatment motivation in patients with cardiovascular diseases using the Rasch analysis.Materials and methods: After pretesting for relevance and comprehension, a pool of 132 items on treatment motivation was completed by a sample consisting of 1168 patients with cardiovascular diseases recruited in two German cardiological rehabilitation centers. Confirmatory factor analyses and the Rasch analyses were conducted.Results: The confirmatory factor analyses confirmed a three-factor structure of the treatment motivation construct with task self-efficacy, outcome expectancies and intention as factors. Using the Rasch analysis for each of the three factors and removing items with misfit, differential item functioning and local response dependency reduced the initial item pool to the three short screenings. The short screenings fit to the Rasch model with a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = 0.021 (task self-efficacy; seven items); RMSEA = 0.024 (outcome expectancies; 12 items), RMSEA = 0.027 (intention; nine items). Person-separation reliability was 0.81, 0.82, and 0.73. Unidimensionality could be verified.Conclusions: The calibrated, unidimensional short screenings provide a psychometrically sound option for an initial- and follow-up assessment of treatment motivation in rehabilitation patients with cardiovascular diseases. Further testing in other cardiovascular diseases populations is needed to increase generalizability.Implications for rehabilitationNew short screenings for the assessment of treatment motivation: task self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, intention in rehabilitation patients with cardiovascular diseases are available.Treatment motivation short screenings_{self-efficacy/outcome expectancies/intention} consist of seven items (treatment motivation short screening_{self-efficacy}), 12 items (treatment motivation short screening_{outcome expectancies}), nine items (treatment motivation short screening_intention) and are therefore especially timesaving.The short screenings demonstrate good psychometric properties, cover a wide spectrum of task self-efficacy, outcome expectancies and intention, and are free of local dependencies and of differential item functioning regarding to gender, age and cardiovascular diagnoses.Using a Rasch based unidimensional short screening is a test-fair and economic method to assess patients' treatment motivation, which might help to improve rehabilitation health care tailored to patients' needs.