1
|
Schilstra CE, Sansom-Daly UM, Ellis SJ, Trahair TN, Anazodo AC, Amiruddin A, Lindsay T, Maguire F, Wakefield CE, Lah S, Bland E, Lenthen K, Rifkin A, Awan A, Kittos T, Hanbury N, Tsalidis S, Patterson P, McDonald F, Fardell JE. Guidelines for Caring for the Social Well-Being of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer in Australia. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:8-29. [PMID: 37367208 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
More than 1000 Australian adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are diagnosed with cancer annually. Many report unmet social well-being needs, which impact their mental health. Australian AYA cancer care providers lack guidance to address these needs well. We aimed to develop guidelines for caring for the social well-being of AYAs with cancer in Australia. Following the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidance, we formed a multidisciplinary working group (n = 4 psychosocial researchers, n = 4 psychologists, n = 4 AYA cancer survivors, n = 2 oncologists, n = 2 nurses, and n = 2 social workers), defined the scope of the guidelines, gathered evidence via a systematic review, graded the evidence, and surveyed AYA cancer care providers about the feasibility and acceptability of the guidelines. The guidelines recommend which AYAs should have their social well-being assessed, who should lead that assessment, when assessment should occur with which tools/measures, and how clinicians can address AYAs' social well-being concerns. A key clinician, who is knowledgeable about AYAs' developmental needs, should lead the assessment of social well-being during and after cancer treatment. The AYA Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool is recommended to screen for social well-being needs. The HEADSSS Assessment (Home, Education/Employment, Eating/Exercise, Activities/Peer Relationships, Drug use, Sexuality, Suicidality/Depression, Safety/Spirituality Assessment) can be used for in-depth assessment of social well-being, while the Social Phobia Inventory can be used to assess social anxiety. AYA cancer care providers rated the guidelines as highly acceptable, but discussed many feasibility barriers. These guidelines provide an optimal care pathway for the social well-being of AYAs with cancer. Future research addressing implementation is critical to meet AYAs' social well-being needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa E Schilstra
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Ursula M Sansom-Daly
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sarah J Ellis
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Toby N Trahair
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Antoinette C Anazodo
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Azhani Amiruddin
- Western Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, Australia
| | | | - Fiona Maguire
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Suncica Lah
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Bland
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | | | - Allison Rifkin
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Adry Awan
- Cancer Survivor and Advisor, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Pandora Patterson
- Canteen, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona McDonald
- Canteen, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joanna E Fardell
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- Western Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wayant C, Bixler K, Garrett M, Mack JW, Wright D, Vassar M. Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Positive Psychosocial Constructs in Children and Adolescent/Young Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2022; 11:78-94. [PMID: 33983839 PMCID: PMC8864417 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer are a vulnerable population in whom improvements in psycho-oncology care would be valuable. We previously published a scoping review exploring what is known about positive psychological constructs in this population. A key finding was that evidence-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were needed to standardize psycho-oncology research. Methods: We undertook a systematic review of measurement properties focused on PROMs in the pediatric and adolescent/young adults (AYAs) with cancer populations. We searched for PROMs that measured at least 1 of 15 previously identified, key positive constructs. This systematic review followed COSMIN guidelines, considered the gold standard manual for systematic reviews of measurement properties. Results: We identified 20 (22 if proxy reports are counted separately) unique PROMs that met inclusion criteria. Of those, only five were recommended for use given the current evidence. The remainder may be used if no alternative exists. Only eight PROMs had any evidence of content validity, considered the most important psychometric property by COSMIN. Many studies were at risk of bias owing to incomplete or suboptimal methods. Discussion: Five PROMs are considered reliable for the pediatric and AYA with cancer populations. A number of PROMs require additional research to ensure their items and instructions are comprehensive, relevant, and comprehensible to children and AYAs. Given the overall lack of research, this review may be considered a starting point for the future refinement of a core set of PROMs to measure positive psychological constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole Wayant
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.,Address correspondence to: Cole Wayant, DO, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK 74107, USA
| | - Kaylea Bixler
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Morgan Garrett
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Drew Wright
- Department of Information Technologies and Services, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Matt Vassar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Richter D, Mehnert A, Schepper F, Leuteritz K, Park C, Ernst J. Correction to: Validation of the German version of the late adolescence and young adulthood survivorship-related quality of life measure (LAYA-SRQL). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018; 16:26. [PMID: 29382346 PMCID: PMC5791337 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-0852-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D Richter
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - A Mehnert
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - F Schepper
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Hemostaseology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - K Leuteritz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - C Park
- Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Psychological Sciences Department, Bousfield Psychology Building, 406 Babbidge Road, Unit 1020, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA
| | - J Ernst
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|