Prognostic value of metformin for non-small cell lung cancer patients with diabetes

Metformin Protects Radiation-Induced Early Brain Injury by Reducing Inflammation and DNA Damage

Radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI) is one of the most common and fatal complications of cranial radiation therapy (CRT); however, no effective intervention is available currently. Metformin has been reported to have anti-RIBI activity as a first-line anti-diabetic drug. However, the mechanism of action is unclear. An RIBI mice model and an in vitro cell model under 30 and 10 Gy ⁶⁰Co γ-rays exposure were established to investigate the mechanism of metformin in RIBI. The results showed that pre-treatment with metformin protects hippocampal neurogenesis in the brain of mice and improves learning and memory ability after irradiation. Further investigations revealed that metformin pretreatment reduces inflammation and decreases DNA damage in the in vitro BV2 cell line. In addition, we observed that metformin inhibits the activation of IκB and IRF-3, which are downstream components of the cGAS-STING pathway. These findings suggest that metformin might protect the brain from RIBI, at least partly, through the cGAS pathway, making it a potential therapeutic drug for RIBI.

Prognostic value of metformin in cancers: An updated meta-analysis based on 80 cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Experiments have shown that metformin can inhibit cancer cell growth, but clinical observations have been inconsistent, so we pooled the currently available data to evaluate the impact of metformin on cancer survival and progression.

METHODS

PubMed, web of science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were identified using a random-effects model to estimate the strength of the association between metformin and survival and progression in cancer patients.

RESULTS

We incorporated 80 articles published from all databases which satisfied the inclusion criterion. It showed that metformin was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0. 81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.77-0.85]) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.79; 95% CI: [0.73-0.86]), and metformin was associated with progression-free survival (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: [0.66-0.87]). In patients with diabetes mellitus, the HR of overall survival was 0.79(95% CI: [0.75-0.83]), progression-free survival was 0.72(95% CI: [0.60-0.85]), and the cancer-specific survival was 0.76(95% CI: [0.68-0.86]). It was proposed that metformin can improve the prognosis of cancer patients with diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

Based on cohort studies, metformin therapy has potential survival benefits for patients with malignancy, especially with the greatest benefits seen in breast cancer on overall survival, progression-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. And metformin also showed potential benefits in cancer-specific survival in colorectal and prostate cancer.

Metformin and Cancer, an Ambiguanidous Relationship

The deregulation of energetic and cellular metabolism is a signature of cancer cells. Thus, drugs targeting cancer cell metabolism may have promising therapeutic potential. Previous reports demonstrate that the widely used normoglycemic agent, metformin, can decrease the risk of cancer in type 2 diabetics and inhibit cell growth in various cancers, including pancreatic, colon, prostate, ovarian, and breast cancer. While metformin is a known adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) agonist and an inhibitor of the electron transport chain complex I, its mechanism of action in cancer cells as well as its effect on cancer metabolism is not clearly established. In this review, we will give an update on the role of metformin as an antitumoral agent and detail relevant evidence on the potential use and mechanisms of action of metformin in cancer. Analyzing antitumoral, signaling, and metabolic impacts of metformin on cancer cells may provide promising new therapeutic strategies in oncology.

Advances in metformin‑based metabolic therapy for non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Therapeutic approaches that target the metabolism of tumor cells have been a popular research topic in recent years. Previous studies have demonstrated that glycolysis inhibitors reduce the proliferation of non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells by interfering with the aerobic glycolytic pathway. However, the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway in tumor cells has also been implicated in lung cancer metabolism. Metformin, a known inhibitor of mitochondrial OXPHOS, has been indicated to reduce NSCLC morbidity and mortality in clinical studies. The present article reviewed the therapeutic effects of metformin against NSCLC, both as a single agent and combined with other anticancer treatments, in order to provide a theoretical basis for its clinical use in adjuvant therapy for NSCLC.

Alternative Energy: Breaking Down the Diverse Metabolic Features of Lung Cancers

Metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer initiation, progression, and relapse. From the initial observation that cancer cells preferentially ferment glucose to lactate, termed the Warburg effect, to emerging evidence indicating that metabolic heterogeneity and mitochondrial metabolism are also important for tumor growth, the complex mechanisms driving cancer metabolism remain vastly unknown. These unique shifts in metabolism must be further investigated in order to identify unique therapeutic targets for individuals afflicted by this aggressive disease. Although novel therapies have been developed to target metabolic vulnerabilities in a variety of cancer models, only limited efficacy has been achieved. In particular, lung cancer metabolism has remained relatively understudied and underutilized for the advancement of therapeutic strategies, however recent evidence suggests that lung cancers have unique metabolic preferences of their own. This review aims to provide an overview of essential metabolic mechanisms and potential therapeutic agents in order to increase evidence of targeted metabolic inhibition for the treatment of lung cancer, where novel therapeutics are desperately needed.

The role of metformin on lung cancer survival: the first systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of metformin use on lung cancer (LC) survival according to summarized results from observational studies (OBs) and randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic databases and, to our knowledge, for the first time, RCTs were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis about the role of metformin on LC survival. We carried out meta-analyses separately for OBs and RCTs. Analyses for overall survival (OS) concerning OBs were stratified by studies with and without time-dependent approach. Subgroup analyses were adopted for OBs to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Included studies were assessed for quality.

RESULTS

We identified ten OBs and four RCTs. For OBs, metformin use was associated with improved OS for LC patients. Only two studies used time-dependent approach in which a higher ratio was found when compared to the non-use of the time-dependent analysis in eight studies. OBs were classified as high quality but the risk of bias was "unclear" in eight OBs due to absence of the time-dependent analysis. For RCTs, metformin use was not beneficial for OS and neither for progression-free survival. Heterogeneous quality was found among RCTs. Sources of bias that could alter significantly the results or raise doubts were identified in RCTs.

CONCLUSION

Time-dependent analysis should be considered an appropriate strategy for OBs focused on the metformin use for LC patients' survival, and further studies applying this approach are required. More well-designed RCTs are needed to provide consistent results for the association between metformin use and LC survival.

Metformin use and lung cancer survival: a population-based study in Norway

BACKGROUND

We assessed associations between metformin use and survival in a nationwide Norwegian cohort of lung cancer (LC) patients.

METHODS

The study linked 22,324 LC patients from the Cancer Registry of Norway diagnosed 2005-2014 with the Norwegian Prescription Database. We estimated associations of pre- and post-diagnostic metformin use with overall survival (OS) and LC-specific survival (LCSS) using multivariable time-fixed and time-dependent Cox regression.

RESULTS

Pre-diagnostic metformin use was not associated with improved survival in all patients. Nevertheless, pre-diagnostic metformin use was associated with better LCSS in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.99) and in patients with regional stage SCC (HR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.47-0.95). Post-diagnostic metformin use was associated with improved LCSS in all patients (HR = 0.83; 95%CI 0.73-0.95), in patients with SCC (HR = 0.75; 95%CI 0.57-0.98), regional stage LC (HR = 0.74; 95%CI 0.59-0.94), and regional stage SCC (HR = 0.57; 95%CI 0.38-0.86). OS showed similar results. Analyses of cumulative use showed a dose-response relationship in all patients, patients with adenocarcinoma and SCC, and with regional and metastatic LC.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin use was associated with improved survival, especially LCSS in patients with regional stage SCC. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the role of metformin in LC treatment.

The Effect of Metformin on Survival Outcomes of Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

There are still inconsistencies about the role of metformin on breast cancer. This study was designed to assess metformin's effect on the prognosis of female breast cancer patients with type II diabetes.

METHODS

The present research was carried out as a retrospective cohort study between 2003 and 2014. Breast cancer patients with pre-existing type II diabetes mellitus were included. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were measured as the main endpoints. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to calculate survival rates.

RESULTS

217 patients were included with a mean age of 53.32±11.10 years. 148 (68.2%) patients were prescribed metformin and 69 (31.8%) took other antidiabetic drugs (non-metformin group). Five-year OS and RFS rates for all patients were 82.5% (95% CI: 76.0%-87.4%) and 71.1% (95% CI: 64.2%-77.0%) respectively. Log-rank test showed that the metformin group had a significant advantage over the non-metformin group in terms of both OS and RFS rates (p.

[Research Advance in Anti-lung Cancer Mechanism of Metformin]

二甲双胍作为治疗2型糖尿病的一线用药，安全性及有效性得到证实。近年来流行病学研究发现二甲双胍具有抑制肺癌细胞增殖及转移等特性，有望成为一种新的抗肺癌药物。肺癌是一种严重危害人类健康的疾病，其发病率和死亡率一直居所有恶性肿瘤之首，且预后差。近年来大量证据表明二甲双胍能降低肺癌等肿瘤的发病风险及死亡率，其机制主要包括激活单磷酸腺苷活化的蛋白激酶通路、改善高胰岛素血症及胰岛素抵抗、促进肺癌细胞凋亡、抑制相关炎症反应等。本文就二甲双胍对肺癌的研究做一综述。

Metformin and Malignant Tumors: Not Over the Hill

Malignant tumors are a major cause of death, and their incidence is increasing worldwide. Although the survival rate for some cancers has improved, treatments for other malignant tumors are limited, and their mortality rate continues to increase. People with type 2 diabetes have a higher risk of malignant tumors and a higher mortality rate than those without diabetes. Metformin is a commonly used hypoglycemic drug. In recent years, a growing number of studies have indicated that metformin has antitumor effects and increases the sensitivity of malignant tumors to chemotherapy. However, the effect of metformin on different tumors is currently controversial, and the mechanism of metformin's antitumor action is not fully understood. Insights into the effect of metformin on malignant tumors and the possible mechanism may contribute to the development of antitumor drugs.

Mogroside V Inhibits Hyperglycemia-induced Lung Cancer Cells Metastasis through Reversing EMT and Damaging Cytoskeleton

BACKGROUND

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) accelerates progress of lung cancer. Hyperglycemia, a critical feature of DM, promotes lung cancer metastasis. Mogroside V is a triterpenoid glycoside from Siraitia grosvenorii. Interestingly, mogroside V not only plays an anti-diabetic role, but also has anti-tumor effects.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the metastatic efficiency of mogroside V in lung cancer cells cultured in hyperglycemia.

METHODS

Two lung cancer cell lines-A549 and H1299 were cultured in normoglycemia (5.5mM glucose) and hyperglycemia (25mM glucose). Cellular proliferation was tested by MTT, invasion was examined by transwell assay, migration was measured by wound healing assay, cytoskeleton was stained by Phalloidin-TRITC and the expressions of EMT markers and Rho-GTPase family protein were detected by western blot.

RESULTS

Hyperglycemia promoted the invasion and migration of A549 and H1299 cells compared with normoglycemia. Mogroside V inhibited the hyperglycemia-induced invasion and migration. Hyperglycemia promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), while mogroside V could reverse this process through up-regulating E-Cadherin expression and down-regulating N-Cadherin, Vimentin, Snail expressions. Furthermore, mogroside V fractured microfilaments and reduced Rho A, Rac1, Cdc42 and p-PAK1 expressions under hyperglycemic conditions.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that mogroside V inhibits hyperglycemia-induced lung cancer cells migration and invasion through reversing EMT and damaging cytoskeleton.

The effect of metformin on lung cancer risk and survival in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Metformin has received increasing attention owing to its potential protective effect against cancer. We aimed to summarize evidence regarding the association between metformin and the risk or survival in lung cancer patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We selected observational studies examining the association between exposure to metformin and the risk or survival in lung cancer. Available publications were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Wiley and SpringerLink databases. Meta-analysis was performed with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) as effect measures for risk or survival in lung cancer.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (eight on lung cancer risk and ten on lung cancer survival) were included. Metformin treatment was associated with decreased lung cancer incidence (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.86) and increased lung cancer survival (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.55-0.77). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a significant protective effect of metformin use on lung cancer risk was observed among Asian patients (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.56-0.76), but not in European patients. On the other hand, the protective effect of metformin use on lung cancer survival was observed in both Asian (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.49-0.66) and non-Asian (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.71-0.88) patients. In the subgroup analysis by histology, a protective effect of metformin on lung cancer survival was observed in both non-small-cell lung cancer (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.84) and small-cell lung cancer (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.39-0.69). Funnel plot showed that no significant publication bias existed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that metformin is significantly associated with a decreased risk and increased survival in lung cancer.

A Cohort Study of Exposure to Antihyperglycemic Therapy and Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer

We evaluated the effect of antihyperglycemic therapy on the survival of patients with lung cancer (LC). The analysis included patients with LC and concomitant type 2 diabetes. 15,929 patients were classified into five groups: metformin users, insulin users, metformin and insulin users, sulphonylurea users and non-diabetic group. A multivariate analysis showed that exposure to either metformin or to insulin was associated with a lower risk of LC-specific mortality, and this approached statistical significance (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–92 for metformin and HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44–95 for insulin). When deaths from all causes were considered, only metformin exposure was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.92). Users of sulphonylurea were at a higher risk of LC-specific and overall mortality (HRs 1.19, 95% CI 0.99–1.43 and 1.22, 95% CI 1.03–1.45). Our study shows a positive effect of metformin on the survival of patients with LC. Moreover, our results show that exposure to insulin was associated with a lower risk of LC-specific mortality, but not with deaths from all causes. The study results suggested that users of sulphonylurea may be at a higher risk of LC-specific and overall mortality.

Diabetic lung disease: fact or fiction?

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic, progressive, incompletely understood metabolic disorder whose prevalence has been increasing steadily worldwide. Even though little attention has been paid to lung disorders in the context of diabetes, its prevalence has recently been challenged by newer studies of disease development. In this review, we summarize and discuss the role of diabetes mellitus involved in the progression of pulmonary diseases, with the main focus on pulmonary fibrosis, which represents a chronic and progressive disease with high mortality and limited therapeutic options.

Long-term metformin use may improve clinical outcomes in diabetic patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Metformin may protect against hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM

To investigate whether long-term use of metformin improves survival and reduces liver-related outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

METHODS

A total of 191 diabetic patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis were retrospectively identified at Indiana University Medical Center between October 2004 and January 2016. Of them, 110 were users and 81 never-users of metformin. Primary outcomes were transplant-free survival, development of hepatocellular carcinoma or a first event of hepatic decompensation.

RESULTS

Cirrhosis was present in 85% of metformin users and 88% of nonusers. Metformin dose was greater than or equal to 1 g/d in 104 out of 110 users and its median duration of use was 6 (95% CI: 4.4-7.9) years. The mean follow-up was 6.92 and 6.80 years for metformin users and non-users, respectively. During follow-up, 28 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma (metformin users: 7, nonusers: 21), and 52 died (metformin users: 7, nonusers: 24) or were transplanted (metformin users: 13, non-users: 13). Metformin use was associated with lower risk of overall mortality or transplant (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.74, P = 0.003) and hepatocellular carcinoma (sHR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.11-0.58, P = 0.001), and remained independently associated with both outcomes after propensity-score and covariate-adjusted analyses. No instances of hepatotoxicity or lactic acidosis were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated an association between long-term metformin use and reduced the risk of all-cause mortality/transplant and hepatocellular carcinoma in diabetics with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis.

Diabetes and Lung Disease: A Neglected Relationship

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a systemic disorder associated with inflammation and oxidative stress which may target many organs such as the kidney, retina, and the vascular system. The pathophysiology, mechanisms, and consequences of diabetes on these organs have been studied widely. However, no work has been done on the concept of the lung as a target organ for diabetes and its implications for lung diseases.

AIM

In this review, we aimed to investigate the effects of diabetes and hypoglycemic agent on lung diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, and lung cancer. We also reviewed the potential mechanisms by which these effects may affect lung disease patients.

RESULTS

Our results suggest that diabetes can affect the severity and clinical course of several lung diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the diabetes-lung association is epidemiologically and clinically well-established, especially in asthma, the underlying mechanism and pathophysiology are not been fully understood. Several mechanisms have been suggested, mainly associated with the pro-inflammatory and proliferative properties of diabetes, but also in relation to micro- and macrovascular effects of diabetes on the pulmonary vasculature. Also, hypoglycemic drugs may influence lung diseases in different ways. For example, metformin was considered a potential therapeutic agent in lung diseases, while insulin was shown to exacerbate lung diseases; this suggests that their effects extend beyond their hypoglycemic properties.