Completion pneumonectomy: a valuable option for lung cancer recurrence or new primaries

The value of completion residual lung resection in ipsilateral recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Recurrence is one of the most important challenges to manage lung cancer. Selected patients might be candidates for resection. This study assessed the outcomes and hazard factors of patients after completion of lung resection for recurrence, focusing specifically on postrecurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 63 patients who underwent complete pulmonary resection for recurrence between January 2015 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria include potentially curative first resection for primary lung cancer, histologically proven recurrent or new malignancy, and complete pathological report after both operations. PRS and OS were assessed and the influence of patient and treatment features on these endpoints was evaluated.

Results

Most of the patients recurred at stage IIIA, and nearly three-fourth received complete pneumonectomy. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates were 95% and 75%, whereas the overall 2- and 5-year postrecurrence survival rates were 55% and 36%, respectively. No patient died within 30 or 90 days after completion of residual lung resection, and no serious complications occurred during follow-up. Upon selection of clinically important variables by the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the r-stage [hazard ratio (HR), 3.35; 95% CI, 1.11–10.10; P = 0.03] and stage of primary tumor (HR, 6.26; 95% CI, 2.00–19.55; P < 0.01) were hazard factors for PRS and OS respectively.

Conclusions

Complete pulmonary resection is an acceptable option in selected patients with recurrent lung cancer after surgery. The patients with r-stage earlier than IIIA may benefit from completion pulmonary resection but not IIIB. Completion pneumonectomy failed to significantly prolong the OS. The OS in the enrolled cases was mainly affected by the p-TNM stage assessed by the first resection for primary lung cancer.

Completion Pneumonectomy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Does Induction Treatment Influence Postoperative Outcomes?

Simple Summary

In recent years there have been important improvements in surgical and adjuvant therapy for lung cancer which have led to an increasing number of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which had been previously cured by surgery being identified as having a second primary NSCLC or a recurrence of the previous tumor. In these cases, a completion pneumonectomy (CP), defined as the complete removal of the remaining lung after an ipsilateral pulmonary resection, may be performed. Although this procedure has a higher morbidity and mortality than standard pneumonectomy due to the high degree of surgical difficulty strongly associated with the previous surgery, the number of patients undergoing CP is increasing with improvement in morbidity and mortality. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study evaluating the role of induction therapy (IT) on the outcomes of patients who have undergone CP. We reviewed our single-center experience in patients receiving CP for recurrent/second NSCLC after IT and analyzed perioperative results and long-term outcomes. Our results revealed that postoperative complications were not influenced by IT, and long-term survival was adversely influenced by the absence of IT, the presence of squamous cell carcinoma, and cancers at advanced stages. Correct patient selection is crucial to evaluating possible contraindications and adopting technical details to reduce the complication rate.

Abstract

Background: Completion pneumonectomy (CP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We reviewed our experience to evaluate whether induction treatment (IT) may affect postoperative outcomes and analyzed factors influencing long-term results. Methods: Between 1998 and 2020, 69 patients with lung cancer underwent CP (50 males, median age 63 years, right CP in 47 patients). A total of 23 patients (33.3%) received IT (chemotherapy in 15, chemoradiotherapy in 7, and radiation in 1). Surgery included 25 (36.2%) extended resections and five (7.2%) tracheal sleeve CP. Results: The 30-day mortality rate was 7.2% (5/69), and overall morbidity was 37.6%. Major complications occurred in five patients (7.2%): one cardiac dislocation, one diaphragmatic hernia, one transient ischemic attack (TIA), and two bronchopleural fistulas. Minor complications occurred in 21 cases (30.4%): pulmonary in 12, cardiac in 7, and neurological in 2. The median hospital stay was 8 days (range, 5–56 days). IT did not influence postoperative morbidity and mortality. Pathological staging included 19 (27.5%) stage I, 36 (52.2%) stage II, and 14 (20.3%) stage III. Overall 5-year survival was 51.7%. Factors influencing survival were IT (p = 0.01), extension of resection (p = 0.04), histology (p = 0.01), pathological stage (p = 0.03), and T and N factors (p = 0.2, respectively). Factors affecting survival in multivariate analysis included IT (p = 0.02) and histology (p = 0.03). Conclusions: In our experience, CP had a low mortality, acceptable morbidity, and good long-term survival, which justifies this surgical procedure. Postoperative complications were not influenced by IT. Long-term survival was adversely influenced by the absence of IT, the presence of extended resection, the presence of squamous cell carcinoma, and cancers at advanced stages.

Guiding Principles in the Management of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Multiple lung cancers can be found simultaneously, with incidence ranging from 1% to 8%. Documentation of more than 1 pulmonary lesion can be challenging, because these solid, ground-glass, or mixed-density tumors may represent multicentric malignant disease or intrapulmonary metastases. If mediastinal nodal and distant deposits are excluded, surgery should be contemplated. After surgical treatment of lung cancer, patients should be followed closely for an undetermined period of time. Good clinical judgment is of outmost importance in deciding which individuals will benefit from those surgical interventions and which are candidates for alternate therapies. Every case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Comparison of perioperative and survival outcomes between sublobar resection and lobectomy of patients who underwent a second pulmonary resection

Background

Repeat pulmonary resection is widely accepted in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) with lobectomy in the treatment of patients who underwent a second pulmonary resection.

Methods

This study retrospectively included patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection for second pulmonary resection. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance selection bias. Clinicopathological features, perioperative and survival outcomes of lobectomy and sublobar resection were compared.

Results

A total of 308 patients who underwent second pulmonary resection were identified: 71 (23.1%) who underwent lobectomy and 237 (76.9%) who underwent sublobar resection. After PSM, 58 patients for each group were selected with well‐balanced clinicopathological characteristics. In patients who underwent sublobar resection, significantly shorter chest tube duration (days) (median, 4 vs. 2, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (days) (median, 6 vs. 4, p < 0.001) were observed. There was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups after the second and first surgery (p = 0.65, p = 0.98), respectively. Subgroup analysis according to the type of the first resection showed consistent results.

Conclusions

Sublobar resection may be considered as an alternative option for second pulmonary resection due to its perioperative advantages and similar survival outcomes compared with lobectomy.

Completion Pneumonectomy for Second Primary/Primary Lung Cancer and Local Recurrence Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Completion pneumonectomy (CP) for second primary/primary lung cancer (SPLC) and local recurrence lung cancer (LRLC) is still controversial. Although several case series on such a practice exist, the oncological benefit is under debate. The purpose of this study was to review available literatures on CP for SPLC and LRLC and evaluate postoperative and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science were reviewed for eligible studies in January 2021. Studies were included if they indicated outcomes of patients with lung cancer undergoing CP. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary end point; secondary end points included operative morbidity and 30-day mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis based on a binomial distribution was used to create pooled estimates.

RESULTS

Thirty-two eligible studies including 1,157 patients were identified. These studies were uniformly retrospective reports. Pooled estimates for 3- and 5-year OS were 50.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.7-66.5] and 38.9% [95% CI 32.2-46.1] in SPLC patients. When the SPLC was a stage I tumor, pooled 5-year OS was favorable with 60.7% [95% CI 43.2-75.9]. In LRLC, pooled 3- and 5-year OS were 47.6% [95% CI 36.1-59.4] and 33.8% (95% CI 26.8-41.5). Pooled morbidity and 30-day mortality was reported in 38.2% (95% CI 32.0-44.9), and 10.0% (95% CI 8.1-12.3).

CONCLUSIONS

CP for SPLC and LRLC is a challenging procedure with significant perioperative morbimortality. However, published evidence indicates good long-term survival for selected patients. Further studies are needed to identify patient subgroups which benefit most from CP.

A path toward the clinical translation of nano-based imaging contrast agents

Recently, nanoparticles have evolved ubiquitously in therapeutic applications to treat a range of diseases. Despite their regular use as therapeutic agents in the clinic, we have yet to see much progress in their clinical translation as diagnostic imaging agents. Several clinical and preclinical studies support their use as imaging contrast agents, but their use in the clinical setting has been limited to off-label imaging procedures (i.e., Feraheme). Since diagnostic imaging has been historically used as an exploratory tool to rule out disease or to screen patients for various cancers, nanoparticle toxicity remains a concern, especially when introducing exogenous contrast agents into a potentially healthy patient population, perhaps rationalizing why several nano-based therapeutic agents have been clinically translated before nano-based imaging agents. Another potential hindrance toward their clinical translation could be their market potential, as most therapeutic drugs have higher earning potential than small-molecule imaging contrast agents. With these considerations in mind, perhaps a clinical path forward for nano-based imaging contrast agents is to help guide/manage therapy. Several studies have demonstrated the ability of nanoparticles to produce more accurate imaging preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. These applications illustrate a more reliable method of cancer detection and treatment that can prevent incomplete tumor resection and incorrect assessment of tumor progression following treatment. The aim of this review is to highlight the research that supports the use of nanoparticles in biomedical imaging applications and offer a new perspective to illustrate how nano-based imaging agents have the potential to better inform therapeutic decisions. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging.

Repeated anatomical pulmonary resection for metachronous ipsilateral second non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the surgical outcomes of repeated pulmonary resection for metachronous ipsilateral second non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 104 (3.6%) patients who underwent surgical resection for ipsilateral metachronous second NSCLC. Repeated anatomical (reanatomical) resection was defined as a metachronous anatomical surgery for secondary NSCLC after ipsilateral primary major lung resection for NSCLC. Operative morbidity or other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by a multivariable model. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven (74%) patients were diagnosed as second primary cases. The 3-year OS after metachronous surgery for ipsilateral second NSCLC was 80.1%, and that of reanatomical resection was equivalent to the other procedures (reanatomical: 81.8%, others: 78.2%, P = .816), whereas reanatomical resection (n = 56) was a significant predictor of postoperative severe morbidity after ipsilateral second pulmonary resection (P = .036) that was found in 23 (41%) patients. When this procedure was classified into 2 groups, ie, completion pneumonectomy (CP; n = 26) and other reanatomical resection to avoid CP (non-CP; n = 32), non-CP was significant on the right side (P = .011), whereas intrapericardial procedure was employed frequently for both (CP: 85%, non-CP: 47%). In contrast, the oncologic outcome (3-year OS; 75.8% vs 87.1%, P = .881) and several surgical outcomes including morbidities were similar between CP and non-CP.

CONCLUSIONS

Reanatomical pulmonary resection showed acceptable oncologic outcomes for metachronous ipsilateral second NSCLC. The non-CP procedure was technically challenging; however, both oncologic and surgical results were feasible compared with the CP. This procedure might be a promising novel strategy for properly selected ipsilateral second NSCLC.

Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for post-operative oligo-recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer: A single-institution analysis of 59 patients

A standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo surgery, and subsequently develop local failure or intrathoracic oligo-recurrence, has not yet been established. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for this subgroup of patients. Consequently, a retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with NSCLC recurrence who were treated with SBRT, and previously underwent curative surgical resection between October 2011 and October 2016. Post-SBRT survival [overall survival (OS); progression-free survival (PFS); and local control (LC)] and toxicity were analyzed. Prognostic factors for OS were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 52 patients and 59 tumors were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 25 months (35 months for surviving patients), and median OS following salvage SBRT was 32 months. The 1- and 3-year OS rates were 84.4 and 67.8%, respectively. 1- and 3-year PFS rates were 80.8 and 58.7%, respectively. Only 4 patients (7.7%) developed local failure. Median LC was 71 months and 1- and 3-year LC rate were 97.9 and 94.9%, respectively. A total of 4 patients experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) and two experienced grade 5 AEs (pneumonitis and hemoptysis). Central tumor location and the possibility of re-operation were independent prognostic factors for OS. The present study indicated that post-operative salvage SBRT is a promising therapeutic option for patients with NSCLC with locoregional or intrathoracic oligo-recurrence. We regard toxicity was also acceptable. However, further research is required on the appropriate selection of subjects, and stratification of the analysis by certain risk factors would increase the accuracy of the conclusions.

Long-term outcomes of completion pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer

Background: Completion pneumonectomy (CP) is the removal of remaining lung tissue after initial resection. Our aim in this study was to investigate the factors affecting mortality, morbidity, and survival after CP. Methods: Patients who underwent CP in our clinic between January 2000 and December 2015 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients' demographic information, morbidity, mortality, histopathological characteristics, and 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival were evaluated. Results: Of the 32 non-small cell lung cancer patients in the study, 31 (96.9%) were male and one (3.1%) was female. The postoperative mortality rate was 9.4% and the morbidity rate was 46.9%. The most common complication was atrial fibrillation (31.3%). Median survival time was 67 ± 10.3 months; 5- and 10-year survival rates were 50.3 and 31.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Completion pneumonectomy involves an acceptable mortality rate but high morbidity rate. Based on the results of this study, the interval between initial resection and CP does not affect survival time.