Neoadjuvant vs definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

The Expression of TP63 as a Biomarker of Early Recurrence in Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Esophageal cancer ranks among the ten most common cancers worldwide. Despite the adoption of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) followed by surgery as the standard treatment approach in recent years, the local recurrence rate remains high. In this study, we employed RNA-seq to investigate distinctive gene expression profiles in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with or without recurrence following a standard treatment course. Our findings indicate that recurrent ESCC exhibits heightened keratinizing and epidermis development activity compared to non-recurrent ESCC. We identified TP63 as a potential candidate for distinguishing clinical outcomes. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry confirmed the trend of TP63 overexpression in ESCC recurrence. Patients with elevated TP63 expression had poorer overall survival and lower 3-year recurrence-free survival. This study underscores the potential of TP63 as a biomarker for detecting cancer recurrence and suggests its role in guiding future treatment options.

Effect of different surgical approaches on the prognosis of patients with postoperative radiotherapy for stage IIB-IVA esophageal squamous cancer

Objective

To investigate the effect and clinical significance of different thoracic surgical approaches for patients with stage IIB–IVA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on the survival and prognosis of postoperative radiotherapy patients.

Methods

One hundred thirty-two patients with stage IIB–IVA esophageal squamous cancer who received radiotherapy after surgery were screened for baseline characteristics and survival analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curve for the follow-up data, and the log-rank test was used to compare the difference in survival rate between the two groups. The Cox regression model was used for multivariate survival analysis.

Result

For stage IIB–IVA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the results of multivariate analysis showed that different surgical methods and clinical staging were independent factors affecting the survival and prognosis of patients after radiotherapy. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients with advanced esophageal cancer through the left chest approach were 84.2%, 61.4%, and 36.8% respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients with advanced esophageal cancer through the right chest approach were 73.3%, 40.0%, and 21.3% respectively. There was no significant difference in the 1-year survival rate (P = 0.135) between the two surgical procedures. The 3-year survival rate (P < 0.05) and the 5-year survival rate (P < 0.05) were significantly different.

Conclusion

For patients with stage IIB–IVA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy after surgery, the long-term survival prognosis of patients after the left thoracic approach is significantly higher than that of the right thoracic approach.

Outcomes of oesophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy

Introduction: We report outcomes of patients with oesophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) plus surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent chemoRT from 2005 to 2017. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicities. Results: We identified 96 patients with median age of 64 years and squamous cell carcinoma in 82.3%. Twenty-nine patients (30.2%) received NACRT plus surgery, 67 patients (69.8%) received definitive chemoRT. Median follow-up was 13.5 months. The 3/5-year OS were 26.4%/13.4%, and 59.6%/51.6% in the definitive chemoRT and NACRT plus surgery groups, respectively. The 3/5-year DFS were 19.3%/12.3%, and 55.7%/37.2% in the definitive chemoRT and NACRT plus surgery groups, respectively. NACRT plus surgery significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.72, P<0.01) and DFS (subhazard ratio [SHR] 5.21, 95 CI 1.20–22.7, P=0.03). Multivariable analysis for OS in the definitive chemoRT group indicated stage (1–2 vs 3–4a; HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.15–4.11, P=0.02) and feeding tube (no tube versus tube; HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.00–3.43, P=0.05) as significantly associated with OS. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence was significantly higher in the definitive chemoRT group (SHR 5.21, 95 CI 1.2022.7, P=0.03). Nineteen patients (65.5%) had postoperative complications. Conclusion: NACRT plus surgery improved OS and DFS. However, in view of treatment-related complications, careful selection of patients is warranted. With the predominant histology of our cohort being squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), our results may be more re levant for those with SCC. Keywords: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, oesophageal cancer, surgery

Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cancer According to Hospital Volume

PURPOSE

Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is still associated with a dismal prognosis. However, surgical series have shown that high-volume hospitals have better outcomes and that the impact of center volume on definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) or CRT plus surgery (CRT + S) remains unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced stage II-III (non-T4) ESCC treated with dCRT or CRT + S in São Paulo state, Brazil. Descriptive variables were assessed with the χ2 test after categorization of hospital volume (high-volume [HV] center, top 5 higher volume, or low-volume [LV] center). Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards. Finally, an interaction test between each facility's treatments was performed.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2013, 1,347 patients were analyzed (77% treated with dCRT and 65.7% in HV centers) with a median follow-up of 23.7 months. The median OS for dCRT was 14.1 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 15.3 months) and for CRT + S, 20.6 months (95% CI, 16.1 to 24.9 months). In the multivariable analysis, dCRT was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.61; P < .001) compared with CRT + S. HV hospitals were associated with better OS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P = .004) compared with LV hospitals. Importantly, CRT + S superiority was restricted to HV hospitals (dCRT v CRT + S: HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.29 to 1.89; P < .001), while in LV hospitals, there was no statistically significant difference (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.43; P = .350), with a significant interaction test (Pinteraction = .035).

CONCLUSION

Our data show that CRT + S is superior to dCRT in the treatment of ESCC exclusively in HV hospitals, which favors the literature trend to centralize the treatment of ESCC in HV centers.

Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy in the modern era: a population-based propensity-score-matched retrospective cohort study in Asia

Background

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) is one of the standard-of-care options for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESqCC). The optimal interval between nCCRT and esophagectomy is unknown.

Methods

We constructed a propensity-score-matched [1:1 for long (8–12 weeks) vs short (4–7 weeks) intervals] cohort of LA-ESqCC patients who were diagnosed from 2011 to 2015 and treated with nCCRT via the Taiwan Cancer Registry and related databases. We compared the hazard ratios (HRs) of death using a robust variance estimator. We also evaluated alternative covariables, outcomes, and interval definitions.

Results

Our study population included 80 patients for each group; groups were balanced with respect to the observed covariables. There was no significant difference for the HR of death [1.22; 95% confidence interval 0.78–1.91, P = 0.39] when the long interval group was compared to the short interval group. There were also no significant differences when alternative covariables, outcomes, or interval definitions were evaluated.

Conclusions

In this population-based study in modern Asia, we found that for LA-ESqCC patients treated with nCCRT and esophagectomy, overall survival was similar for either long or short intervals between nCCRT and esophagectomy. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify this finding.

Effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population-based propensity score-matched analysis

AIM

The effects of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population-based propensity score (PS)-matched analysis.

METHODS

We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS-matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non-IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account.

RESULTS

Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70-1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non-IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings.

CONCLUSION

For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.