Assessment of denosumab treatment effects and imaging response in patients with giant cell tumor of bone

Management of RANKL-mediated Disorders With Denosumab in Children and Adolescents: A Global Expert Guidance Document

CONTEXT

Denosumab is an effective treatment for many receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL)-mediated disorders but there are potential safety considerations and limited data to guide its use in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

This document seeks to summarize the evidence and provide expert opinion on safe and appropriate use of denosumab in pediatric RANKL-mediated disorders.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten experts in pediatric bone and mineral medicine from 6 countries with experience in the use of denosumab participated in the creation of this document.

EVIDENCE

Data were sourced from the published literature, primarily consisting of case reports/series and review articles because of the lack of higher level evidence. Expert opinion of the authors was used substantially when no published data were available.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab is an effective treatment for RANKL-mediated disorders in children and adolescents but is often not curative and, in some cases, is best used in conjunction with surgical or other medical treatments. Careful multidisciplinary planning is required to define the goals of treatment and expert oversight needed to manage the risk of mineral abnormalities. Substantive, collaborative research efforts are needed to determine optimal treatment regimens and minimize risks.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

Effect of denosumab in treatment of unresectable spine and sacrum giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare tumor of the bone that is locally invasive. Surgery is the primary treatment that is usually done by intralesional curettage. In pelvis and spine surgery may be associated with high rate of complications, recently, Denosumab has been proposed for the treatment of these tumors in latter anatomical regions. Denosumab may be administered alone or as an adjuvant to surgery. This study aimed to assess the treatment effects of Denosumab in patients with unresectable GCTB. This study was a case series. Patients with unresectable GCTB of vertebra and sacrum were enrolled in this study. Patients received 120 mg of monthly Denosumab and additional doses on days 8th and 15th of treatment. Images of patients before and after treatment were evaluated. Nine patients with a median age of 30 years with spine and sacrum GCTB were included in this study. The median time of treatment with denosumab was 28 months (range: 3-67). Tumor control was seen in all patients. According to Inverse Choi density/size (ICDS), criteria objective response (complete response and partial response) was seen in 8 patients, and one had stable disease. Based on CT scan images, in 4 patients (44.44%), less than 50% of the transverse diameter of the tumor became ossified, and in the other five patients (55.55%), more than 50% of the tumor's transverse diameter became ossified. The median tumor volume before treatment was 829 cm3, and after treatment was 504 cm3 which was significantly reduced (P = 0.005). No complication related to therapy was seen. Tumor response was seen in all patients, and tumor control according to ICDS criteria was evident in all cases. This finding was in line with previous studies. Clinical improvement of signs and symptoms was also seen in all patients. Generally, our study demonstrates a sustained clinical benefit and tumor response with Denosumab, as tumor response ≥ 24 weeks was evident in all cases. No side effects were seen in patients despite long-term treatment with Denosumab.

Interferons as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Giant Cell Tumor: A Hospital-Based Prospective Pilot Study

Introduction Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now considered an effective way to treat Campanacci grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors (GCTs). Assessment of these drugs is essential clinically, radiologically, and pathologically. This study analyzes the early results of angiogenesis inhibitors (interferons) in the aggressive GCT of bone.

Methodology A prospective pilot study was conducted from January 2021 to July 2022 including eight biopsy-proven GCT patients subjected to interferon therapy. Radiological assessment was done with changes on plain radiograph, computerized tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging. Histopathological examination was done by changes in the biopsy and resected segment.

Results Out of the eight patients included in the study, 26% (n = 3) were males and 62% (n = 5) were females, with mean age of the patients being 24.6 ± 8.48 years (range: 22–38). There was significant reduction of the size of swelling (p-value: 0.049), significant reduction in Visual Analog Scale score (p-value: 0.011), significant decrease in swelling size on radiograph (p-value: 0.012), significant marginal sclerosis (p-value: 0.001), significant neocortex formation on radiographs (p-value: 0.001), significant result in and osteoid formation (p-value: 0.001) on histology. Whereas Campanacci grade on plain radiographs, number of viable cells, and number of viable stromal cell were not statistically different in comparison with pretherapy and posttherapy status.

Conclusion Interferon therapy in a GCT has potential beneficiary effect in terms of clinical, radiological, and pathological outcomes. It might prove to be an effective alternative to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of aggressive GCT of bones.

Level of Evidence III.

The efficacy and safety of short-course neoadjuvant denosumab for en bloc spondylectomy in spinal giant cell tumor of bone: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether short course of neoadjuvant denosumab treatment for spinal GCTB could (1) Induce radiological and histological response? (2) Facilitate en bloc resection? (3) Achieve satisfactory oncological and functional outcomes?

METHODS

The clinical information of ten consecutive patients between 2018 and 2022 with spinal GCTB treated with short course of neoadjuvant denosumab (≤ 5 doses) and en bloc spondylectomy was retrospectively reviewed. The radiological and histological response, operative data, oncological and functional outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean doses of neoadjuvant denosumab were 4.2 (range 3-5 doses). After neoadjuvant denosumab, there were 9 cases showing new ossification and 5 cases with reappearance of cortical integrity. The values of Hounsfield units (HU) of the soft tissue component were increased by > 50% in 7 cases. The signal intensity (SI) ratios of tumor/muscle in T2WI of plain MRI were decreased by > 10% in 60% of the cases. Shrinkage of soft tissue mass by > 10% was observed in 4 cases. The mean duration of operation was 575 ± 174 min, and the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2790 ± 1934 ml. No obvious adhesion to dura mater or major vessels was encounter intraoperatively. There is no tumor collapse or breakage during surgery. Multinucleated giant cells were decreased in 6 cases (60%) with the remaining 4 cases showing absence of multinucleated giant cells. Mononuclear stromal cells existed in most of the cases (8 cases, 80%). New bone formation was noticed in 8 cases (80%). No patient had a worsening of neurologic function after surgery. No tumor recurrence was noticed within the mean follow-up of 24 ± 20 months.

CONCLUSION

Short-term neoadjuvant denosumab could yield radiological and histological responses and might facilitate en bloc spondylectomy by hardening the tumor and causing less adhesion to segmental vessels, major vessels and nerve roots, which was beneficial to achieve the optimal oncological and functional outcomes.

Characterization of denosumab treatment response in giant cell tumors of bone with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used neo-adjuvantly in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) to facilitate surgery, or long term for axial tumors where surgery comes with high morbidity. Time intervals for treatment effects to occur are unclear and monitoring tools are limited, complicating optimal drug dose titration. We assessed changes in time intensity curve (TIC) - derived perfusion features on DCE-MRI in GCTB during denosumab treatment and evaluated the duration of treatment effects on tumor perfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with GCTB who underwent dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI before (t = 0) and after 3 (t = 3), 6 (t = 6) or 12 (t = 12) months of denosumab treatment were retrospectively included in a single center. Regions of interest were placed on tumor compartments with visually most intense enhancement and TICs were created. Time-to-enhancement (TTE), wash-in rate (WIR), maximal relative enhancement (MRE), and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were calculated. Differences in perfusion features were calculated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

In all 24 patients decreased perfusion on DCE-MRI after start of denosumab treatment was seen. TTE increased between t = 0 and t = 3 (p < 0.001). WIR, MRE and AUC decreased between t = 0 and t = 3 (p < 0.001, p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). No significant differences in features were found between t = 3 and t = 6 or t = 6 and t = 12. No significant perfusion differences in primary versus recurrent, or axial versus appendicular tumors, were found.

CONCLUSION

MRI perfusion significantly changed in GCTB within 3 months of denosumab treatment compared to baseline. No further significant change occurred between 3 and 6, and 6 and 12 months of treatment. These findings suggest that evaluation of treatment response and subsequent consideration of maintenance with lower doses of denosumab, may already be indicated after 3 months. In cases where long term denosumab is the preferred therapy, monitoring change in tumor characteristics on DCE-MRI may aid optimal drug dose titration, minimizing side effects.

Current concepts in targeted therapies for benign tumors of the jaw - A review of the literature

The aim of our study was to review current concepts in targeted therapies for benign tumors of the jaw. Benign odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors often require radical surgery, with consequent morbidity that impacts patients' postsurgical quality of life. Currently, targeted therapies and novel nonsurgical therapeutics are being explored for management of non-resectable tumors, with the aim of avoiding surgery or minimizing surgical scope. However, data on clinical applications of targeted therapies for benign tumors of the jaw remain sparse. Therefore, a literature review was conducted, based on the PubMed database, which included in vivo human clinical studies describing clinical application of targeted therapy for benign tumor of the jaw. The review assessed the outcomes of BRAF and MEK inhibitors for treatment of ameloblastoma, RANKL monoclonal antibody for treatment of giant cell tumor, cherubism, aneurysmal bone cyst, and fibrous dysplasia, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treatment of odontogenic myxoma and cherubism. Targeted therapies decreased tumor size, slowed down tumor progression, and reduced bone pain. Surgery remains the gold standard, but targeted therapies are promising adjuvant or alternative treatment options for reducing tumor progression and morbidity of tumor surgery.

Case Report: Unresectable pulmonary metastases of a giant cell tumor of bone treated with denosumab: a case report and review of literature

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) sometimes metastasize to distant organs. In this case report, we present pulmonary metastases of GCTB mimicking malignancies. A 49-year-old man underwent two surgical treatments for a GCTB of the right proximal radius. At the time of the second surgery, no lesions were observed on chest radiography. Three years after surgery, the patient presented with cough and dyspnea, and chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple lung nodules. Positron emission tomography/CT revealed a high accumulation of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) in multiple lesions. Based on the rapid growth and accumulation of 18F-FDG, a metastatic malignant tumor was suspected. CT-guided needle biopsy was performed, and the histology showed proliferation of spindle cells and multinuclear giant cells without malignant changes. Denosumab was administered because multiple lung lesions were unresectable. One month after denosumab treatment, CT showed marked shrinkage of the lesions, and the symptoms significantly improved. Eighteen months after the initial treatment with denosumab, the patient had no symptoms or tumor growth. Although its long-term efficacy and safety remain unclear, denosumab may be a treatment option for patients with unresectable pulmonary GCTB.

Current therapies and future prospective for locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors

Locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of soft tissue and bone tumors with intermediate histology, incompletely understood biology, and highly variable natural history. Despite having a limited to absent ability to metastasize and excellent survival prognosis, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors can be symptomatic, require prolonged and repeat treatments including surgery and chemotherapy, and can severely impact patients' quality of life. The management of locally aggressive tumors has evolved over the years with a focus on minimizing morbid treatments. Extensive oncologic surgeries and radiation are pillars of care for high grade sarcomas, however, play a more limited role in management of locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors, due to propensity for local recurrence despite resection, and the risk of transformation to a higher-grade entity following radiation. Patients should ideally be evaluated in specialized sarcoma centers that can coordinate complex multimodal decision-making, taking into consideration the individual patient's clinical presentation and history, as well as any available prognostic factors into customizing therapy. In this review, we aim to discuss the biology, clinical management, and future treatment frontiers for three representative locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors: desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). These entities challenge clinicians with their unpredictable behavior and responses to treatment, and still lack a well-defined standard of care despite recent progress with newly approved or promising experimental drugs.

Surgical Management and Denosumab for Aneurysmal Bone Cysts of the Spine in an Australian Tertiary Paediatric Centre

Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) are rare osteolytic, benign but often locally aggressive tumours of the long bones or vertebrae. For spinal ABC, surgical management, embolisation or sclerotherapy alone often carry high morbidity and/or high recurrence rates. Interruption of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) signalling holds promise as an effective therapeutic strategy for these tumours. We aimed to review the approach to surgical management and evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab for ABC of the spine in children. Retrospective review of 7 patients treated with denosumab using a standardised protocol for ABC of the spine in a tertiary paediatric centre. Surgical intervention was only conducted if there was spinal instability or significant neurological impairment. Denosumab 70 mg/m² was given 4-weekly for at least 6 months, followed by 2 doses of zoledronate 0.025 mg/kg, aiming to prevent rebound hypercalcaemia. All patients achieved stability of the spine and resolution of neurological impairment, if present. Six patients achieved metabolic remission and have ceased denosumab without recurrence to date; the other showed clinical and radiological improvement without complete metabolic remission. Three patients developed symptomatic hypercalcaemia 5-7 months after cessation of denosumab, requiring additional bisphosphonate treatment. We present our algorithm for the surgical and medical management of paediatric spinal ABC. Denosumab produced a radiological and metabolic response in all patients, with complete remission in most. Follow-up time was not long enough to evaluate the endurance of response after cessation in some patients. Incidence of rebound hypercalcaemia in this paediatric cohort was high, prompting a change to our protocol.

Outcome of re-operation for local recurrence following pre-operative denosumab administration and curettage for giant cell tumour of bone with difficult joint preservation

PURPOSE

Denosumab enables joint-sparing surgery (curettage) and surgical downstaging in patients with giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), where joint preservation is not possible. However, denosumab treatment causes osteosclerosis of the lesion, making it difficult to curet the lesion, leaving the tumour behind, and increasing the local recurrence rate. We performed a three-centre retrospective study to investigate the postoperative local re-recurrence rate, joint preservation status, and functional outcomes of locally recurrent lesions after preoperative denosumab treatment and curettage in patients with difficult joint preservation.

METHODS

We included 38 of 142 patients with primary GCTB of the extremities who underwent preoperative denosumab and curettage between 2009 and 2021 with local recurrence. Preoperative denosumab was indicated in patients with minimal residual periarticular and subchondral bones, large extraosseous lesions (Campanacci stage 3), and pathological fractures that made joint preservation difficult.

RESULTS

Local re-recurrence occurred in 6 (15.8%) of the 38 patients. In 29 patients who underwent re-curettage, local re-recurrence occurred in six patients (20.7%); however, in nine patients who underwent en bloc resection, no local re-recurrence was observed. The joint preservation rate was 63.2% (24 of 38 patients), with a median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 28 (interquartile range: 26.8-29.0). The median follow-up period after surgery for local recurrence was 63.5 months (interquartile range: 42.5-82.4).

CONCLUSION

Since the local re-recurrence rate after re-curettage for local recurrence was low, and the joint preservation rate and affected limb function were good, preoperative denosumab administration may be considered in patients who require downstaging to maintain good limb function (joint preservation).

Progress on Denosumab Use in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Dose and Duration of Therapy

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an aggressive non-cancerous bone tumor associated with risks of sarcoma and metastasis. Once malignancy occurs, the prognosis is generally poor. Surgery remains the main treatment for GCTB. Multidisciplinary management is a feasible option for patients wherein surgical resection is not an option or for those with serious surgery-related complications. Denosumab is an anti-nuclear factor kappa B ligand approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bone metastases, and advanced or inoperable GCTB. However, the guidelines for treating GCTB are unclear; its short-term efficacy and safety in inoperable patients have been demonstrated. Lengthier therapies (high cumulative doses) or pre-operative adjuvant therapy may be associated with severe complications and high local recurrence rates. Short-term administration helps attain satisfactory local control and functionality. As a result, lately, the impact of different doses and lengths of treatment on the efficacy of denosumab in GCTB treatment, the incidence of complications, and recurrence rates have gained attention. The efficacy and safety of denosumab against GCTB, its impact on imaging assessment, related complications, and recurrence of GCTB were previously reviewed. For further research direction, this paper reviews the progress of studies evaluating the impact of the dose and duration of denosumab therapy for GCTB.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Review of Literature and the Experience of a Referral Centre

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a benign, locally aggressive primary bone neoplasm that represents 5% of all bone tumours. The principal treatment approach is surgery. Although generally GCTB is considered only a locally aggressive disease, it can metastasise, and lung metastases occur in 1–9% of patients. To date, only the use of denosumab has been approved as medical treatment for GCTB. Even more rarely, GCTB undergoes sarcomatous transformation into a malignant tumour (4% of all GCTB), but history of this malignant transformation is unclear and unpredictable. Considering the rarity of the event, the data in the literature are few. In this review, we summarise published data of GCTB malignant transformation and we analyse three cases of malignant transformation of GCTB, evaluating histopathology, genetics, and radiological aspects. Despite the rarity of this event, we conclude that a strict follow up is recommended to detect early malignant transformation.

Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and the Association with Denosumab Treatment: A Radiology and Pathology Perspective

Objective

Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone (mGCTB) is categorized as primary (concomitantly with conventional GCTB) or secondary (after radiotherapy or other treatment). Denosumab therapy has been suggested to play a role in the etiology of secondary mGCTB. In this case series from a tertiary referral sarcoma center, we aimed to find distinctive features for malignant transformation in GCTB on different imaging modalities. Furthermore, we assessed the duration of denosumab treatment and lag time to the development of malignancy.

Methods

From a histopathology database search, 6 patients were pathologically confirmed as having initial conventional GCTB and subsequently with secondary mGCTB.

Results

At the time of mGCTB diagnosis, 2 cases were treated with denosumab only, 2 with denosumab and surgery, 1 with multiple curettages and radiotherapy, and 1 with surgery only. In the 4 denosumab treated patients, the mean lag time to malignant transformation was 7 months (range 2–11 months). Imaging findings suspicious of malignant transformation related to denosumab therapy are the absence of fibro-osseous matrix formation and absent neocortex formation on CT, and stable or even increased size of the soft tissue component.

Conclusion

In 4 patients treated with denosumab, secondary mGCTB occurred within the first year after initiation of treatment. Radiotherapy-associated mGCTB has a longer lag time than denosumab-associated mGCTB. Close clinical and imaging follow-up during the first months of denosumab therapy is key, as mGCTB tends to have rapid aggressive behavior, similar to other high-grade sarcomas. Nonresponders should be (re) evaluated for their primary diagnosis of conventional GCTB.

Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in Cases of Surgically Unsalvageable Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Randomized Clinical Trial

•

Denosumab and zoledronic acid had similar tumor responses and clinical benefits.

•

Disease progression was observed in patients in the DB group (12.5%) than ZA group (15.0%).

•

Denosumab treatment was markedly more expensive than zoledronic acid treatment (p < 0.0001).

•

The recurrence-free survival rate at 4-year follow-up is higher in DB group (p = 0.035).

Background

Giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a relatively benign, but locally aggressive osteoclastogenic stromal tumour of the bone. Although denosumab has been approved as an monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand for the treatment of GCTB, few clinical trials of the benefit in tumor response have been conducted to prove the efficiency in Chinese population.

Objectives

In this multicentric, random controlled, clinical trial, 160 patients were enrolled to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid treatment in patients with surgically unsalvageable GCTB.

Methods

Between 2nd Jan 2015 and 1st Jan 2018, 160 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ①surgically unsalvageable GCTB, ②surgically salvageable GCTB with planned surgery expected to result in severe morbidity were included in this randomized clinical trial. Patients received either subcutaneous denosumab (DB group; 120 mg once every 4 weeks with loading doses of 120 mg subcutaneously admininstered on days 8 and 15; n = 80) or intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA group; 4 mg once every 4 weeks; n = 80) for six cycles. Disease status, clinical benefits, treatment-emergent adverse effects, overall survival, and cost of treatment were evaluated during the follow-up period. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Denosumab and zoledronic acid had similar tumor responses (p = 0.118) and clinical benefits (p = 0.574). Disease progression was observed in fewer patients in the DB group (12.5%) than ZA group (15.0%). Denosumab caused fatigue (p = 0.001) and back pain (p < 0.0001), while zoledronic acid caused hypocalcemia (p < 0.0001), flu-like symptoms (p = 0.059) and hypotension (p = 0.059). Denosumab treatment was markedly more expensive than zoledronic acid treatment (p < 0.0001). The cost to manage treatment-emergent adverse effects was the same for the ZA group and the DB group (p = 0.425). The accumulate recurrence-free survival rate at 4-year follow-up is higher in DB group (p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Denosumab is a safe but costly alternative to zoledronic acid for treatment of surgically unsalvageable GCTB.

Denosumab for central giant cell granuloma in an Australian tertiary paediatric centre

BACKGROUND

Central giant cell granulomas (CGCG) are rare osteolytic, benign but often locally aggressive tumours of bone. Surgical curettage may not be possible in extensive lesions and resection carries high morbidity, especially in growing children, and previous medical therapies have had variable efficacy and high recurrence rates. Interruption of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) signalling holds promise as an effective therapeutic strategy for these tumours.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of our protocol for denosumab treatment of CGCG in children.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 4 patients treated with denosumab using a standardised protocol for CGCG in a tertiary paediatric centre. Denosumab 70 mg/m² was given 4-weekly, followed by 2 doses of zoledronate 0.025 mg/kg, aimed at preventing rebound hypercalcaemia.

RESULTS

Treatment of CGCG resulted in metabolic remission in all patients, but recurrence, detected by positron emission tomography (PET), occurred at 6 months in three patients and 12 months in one patient. Three patients developed symptomatic hypercalcaemia 4-5 months and one patient asymptomatic hypercalcaemia 7 months after cessation of denosumab, with 3 requiring additional bisphosphonate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab produced a radiological and metabolic response in our patients, but metabolic recurrence occurred in all patients. PET imaging was effective for monitoring treatment response and early detection of recurrence. Incidence of rebound hypercalcaemia in this paediatric cohort was high. We present proposed changes to our protocol with the aim of producing sustained remission and preventing rebound hypercalcaemia.

An evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of extremities: PERCIST versus RECIST 1.1 criteria after long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the recent Positron emission tomography (PET) Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria for evaluating the response of osteosarcoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of the extremities.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then surgical resection at Peking University People's Hospital. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed prior to chemotherapy and before surgical resection. Therapeutic response was assessed separately by the PERCIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria. The association between the data acquired by the PERCIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria was then analyzed by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. The association between the PERCIST criteria and the pathological necrosis rate was analyzed by Fisher's exact test. Finally, the impact of a range of clinicopathological factors on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

We recruited 68 patients with a median follow-up of 74 months (range 45-102 months). The evaluations resulting from the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST criteria were significantly different (p = 0.000). Only two responders were identified according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. However, 34 responders were identified by the PERCIST criteria. Data arising from the PERCIST criteria were in accordance with the pathological necrosis rate. Survival analysis showed that metastasis at diagnosis, poor pathological response, and disease progression (according to the RECIST 1.1 or PERCIST criteria) were all associated with a poor prognosis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that the PERCIST criteria are significantly more sensitive than RECIST 1.1 criteria to identify more responders when evaluating the response of osteosarcoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

State of the Art and New Concepts in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Imaging Features and Tumor Characteristics

Simple Summary

The 2020 World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumors classified the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) as an intermediate malignant tumor, with locally aggressive behavior and high recurrence rate. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the assessment of GCTB, and this review tries to summarize the main concepts about GCTB histopathogenesis and new biomarkers, describing those GCTB imaging findings which could possibly be explained by tumor molecular alterations. We have illustrated pre-operative imaging features related to prognosis and radiological findings for response evaluation after surgical treatment and denosumab administration. We have also reported the results described in literature regarding the role of radiomics in aiding GCTB diagnosis, predicting possible post-treatment recurrence and providing a quantitative assessment of the response to denosumab treatment.

Abstract

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is classified as an intermediate malignant tumor due to its locally aggressive behavior, burdened by high local recurrence rate. GCTB accounts for about 4–5% of all primary bone tumors and typically arises in the metaphysis and epiphyses of the long tubular bones. Mutation of gene H3F3A is at the basis of GCTB etiopathogenesis, and its immunohistochemical expression is a valuable method for practical diagnosis, even if new biomarkers have been identified for early diagnosis and for potential tumor recurrence prediction. In the era of computer-aided diagnosis, imaging plays a key role in the assessment of GCTB for surgical planning, patients’ prognosis prediction and post treatment evaluation. Cystic changes, penetrating irregular margins and adjacent soft tissue invasion on preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have been associated with a higher rate of local recurrence. Distance from the tumor edge to the articular surface and thickness of unaffected cortical bone around the tumor should be evaluated on Computed Tomography (CT) as related to local recurrence. Main features associated with local recurrence after curettage are bone resorption around the graft or cement, soft tissue mass formation and expansile destruction of bone. A denosumab positive response is represented by a peripherical well-defined osteosclerosis around the lesion and intralesional ossification. Radiomics has proved to offer a valuable contribution in aiding GCTB pre-operative diagnosis through clinical-radiomics models based on CT scans and multiparametric MR imaging, possibly guiding the choice of a patient-tailored treatment. Moreover, radiomics models based on texture analysis demonstrated to be a promising alternative solution for the assessment of GCTB response to denosumab both on conventional radiography and CT since the quantitative variation of some radiomics features after therapy has been correlated with tumor response, suggesting they might facilitate disease monitoring during post-denosumab surveillance.

Denosumab Does Not Decrease Local Recurrence in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treated With En Bloc Resection

We performed a systematic analysis of existing studies to determine whether preoperative denosumab reduces the risk of local recurrence for patients with giant cell tumor of bone treated with en bloc resection and to address the optimal duration of preoperative denosumab with respect to the risk of local recurrence after en bloc resection. Denosumab did not decrease the risk of local recurrence after en bloc resection; the proportion of patients with local recurrence was 3.6% (2 of 56) in the en bloc resection with preoperative denosumab group vs 14.2% (40 of 280) in the en bloc resection alone group, with an overall pooled odds ratio of 0.76 (P=.67). Meta-regression models revealed no association between the duration of preoperative denosumab and the odds of local recurrence after en bloc resection (P=.83). Administration of denosumab for 3 months before en bloc resection is appropriate for sufficient bone hardening to reduce tumor cell spillage and does not result in denosumab-related complications. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):326-332.].

Denosumab in the management of Aneurysmal bone cyst

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a benign, locally aggressive tumour that arises predominantly in long bones and spine. Following the encouraging results of denosumab use in Giant Cell Tumors (GCT) and the histological similarities between ABC and GCT, the interest on the role of denosumab in the therapeutic arsenal of the most advanced ABC is growing. The purpose of this literature review is to investigate the current state of knowledge about the use of denosumab in ABCs.

METHODS

A literature research was conducted through PUBMED, COCHRANE and GOOGLE SCHOLAR using the keywords "aneurysmal bone cyst" AND "denosumab". Seventeen articles were included.

RESULTS

A total of 43 cases were reported in the literature. There were 23 males, 20 females. The mean age was 15,9±8,1 year. Pain relief and neurological improvement were rapid and sustained. Radiological assessment showed ossification and/or volume reduction in 36/39 patients. Eight patients (18,6%) presented a recurrence after or during denosumab therapy of whom 7 were adults. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients, 5 of them were admitted to the intensive care unit due to hypercalcemia.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab use in non-surgical ABCs has shown a positive impact in pain and neurological symptoms. The oncological outcome remains unclear with a recurrence rate of 18,6% during/after denosumab therapy, mostly in adults. However, regarding the potential clinical benefits, its use might be discussed in the most advanced cases. Further research and clinical trials are mandatory to precise its belonging in the therapeutic arsenal.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone

Simple Summary

According to the 2020 World Health Organization classification, a giant cell tumor of bone is an intermediate malignant bone tumor. Denosumab treatment before curettage should be avoided due to the increased risk of local recurrence. Administration of denosumab before en bloc resection of the giant cell tumors of the pelvis and spine facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for giant cell tumors of the sacrum. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable giant cell tumors of the pelvis, spine, and sacrum. A wait-and-see approach is recommended for lung metastases at first, then denosumab should be administered to the growing lesions. Radiotherapy is not recommended owing to the risk of malignant transformation. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant giant cell tumors of bone.

Abstract

The 2020 World Health Organization classification defined giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) as intermediate malignant tumors. Since the mutated H3F3A was found to be a specific marker for GCTB, it has become very useful in diagnosing GCTB. Curettage is the most common treatment for GCTBs. Preoperative administration of denosumab makes curettage difficult and increases the risk of local recurrence. Curettage is recommended to achieve good functional outcomes, even for local recurrence. For pathological fractures, joints should be preserved as much as possible and curettage should be attempted. Preoperative administration of denosumab for pelvic and spinal GCTBs reduces extraosseous lesions, hardens the tumor, and facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for sacral GCTBS. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable pelvic, spinal, and sacral GCTBs. It is recommended to first observe lung metastases, then administer denosumab for growing lesions. Radiotherapy is associated with a risk of malignant transformation and should be limited to cases where surgery is impossible and denosumab, zoledronic acid, or embolization is not available. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant GCTBs.

Radiological Assessment of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone in the Sacrum: From Diagnosis to Treatment Response Evaluation

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) typically occurs in young adults from 20-40 years old. Although the majority of lesions are located in the epi-metaphyses of the long bones, approximately one third of tumours is located in the axial skeleton, of which only 4% in the sacrum. Sacral tumours tend to be large at the time of presentation, and they present with aggressive features such as marked cortical destruction and an associated soft tissue component. The 2020 World Health Organisation classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours describes GCTB as neoplasm which is locally aggressive and rarely metastasizing. The tumour contains three different cell types: neoplastic mononuclear stromal cells, macrophages and osteoclast-like giant cells. Two tumour subtypes were defined: conventional GCTB and malignant GCTB. Only 1-4% of GCTB is malignant. In this review article, we will discuss imaging findings at the time of diagnosis to guide the musculoskeletal radiologist in reporting these tumours. In addition, imaging for response evaluation after various treatment options will be addressed, such as surgery, radiotherapy, embolization and denosumab. Specific findings will be presented per imaging modality and illustrated by cases from our tertiary sarcoma referral center. Common postoperative and post radiotherapy findings in GCTB of the sacrum on MRI will be discussed.

Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone: analysis of an open-label phase 2 study of denosumab

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare osteoclastogenic stromal tumor. GCTB can rarely undergo malignant transformation. This post hoc analysis evaluated and classified malignancies in patients with GCTB who received denosumab.

Methods

This analysis was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed GCTB and measurable active disease treated with denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks, with loading doses on study days 8 and 15, as part of a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study. We identified potential cases of malignancy related to GCTB through an independent multidisciplinary review or medical history, associated imaging or histopathologic reports, and disease course. The findings were summarized and no statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty of five hundred twenty-six patients (3.8%) who received at least one dose of denosumab were misdiagnosed with GCTB that was later discovered to be malignancies: five primary malignant GCTB, five secondary malignant GCTB, four sarcomatous transformations, and six patients with other malignancies (giant cell-rich osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of mixed connective tissue type, and fibrosarcoma/malignant fibrous histiocytoma). Many malignancies were present before denosumab was initiated (8 definitive cases, 7 likely cases), excluding potential involvement of denosumab in these cases. Signs associated with potential misdiagnoses of GCTB included poor mineralization with denosumab treatment, rapid relapse in pain, or a failure of the typical dramatic improvement in pain normally observed with denosumab.

Conclusions

Although rare, GCTB can undergo malignant transformation, and rates in this study were consistent with previous reports. Signs of poor mineralization or lack of response to denosumab treatment may warrant close monitoring.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, (NCT00680992). Registered May 20, 2008.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07739-8.

Should Denosumab or Radical Surgery Be Recommended for a Spinal Giant Cell Tumour in a Fertile Female?

Giant cell tumour (GCT) of the spine is a benign aggressive tumour with high recurrence rates. Patients can be asymptomatic due to the slow growth rate and present with localized pain or neurological dysfunction. Current management strategies include intralesional curettage, total en-bloc resection (TER) and denosumab therapy. Treatment strategies can be particularly challenging in women of childbearing age who wish to conceive, as the risks of tumour recurrence need to be balanced against the fetal complications associated with adjuvant denosumab therapy. This case report discusses the management options and controversies for women of childbearing age with GCT of the thoracic spine. Clinicians need to be aware of the complications associated with TER and denosumab treatment when managing GCTs of the spine in young females.

Outcome of lung metastases due to bone giant cell tumor initially managed with observation

Background

The outcomes of patients with lung metastases from giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) vary from spontaneous regression to uncontrolled growth. To investigate whether observation is an appropriate first-line management approach for patients with lung metastases from GCTB, we evaluated the outcomes of patients who were initially managed by observation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 22 patients with lung metastases from histologically confirmed GCTB who received observation as a first-line treatment approach. The median follow-up period was 116 months.

Results

Disease progression occurred in 12 patients (54.5%). The median interval between the discovery of lung metastases and progression was 8 months. Eight patients underwent metastasectomy following initial observation. The median interval between the discovery of lung metastases and treatment by metastasectomy was 13.5 months. None of the patients experienced spontaneous regression. Of the 22 patients, 36.4% needed a metastasectomy, and 9.1% required denosumab treatment during the course of the follow-up period. Disease progression occurred in 45.5% of the 11 patients with lung nodules ≤ 5 mm, while all five of the patients with lung nodules > 5 mm experienced disease progression. Progression-free survival was significantly worse in the group with lung nodules > 5 mm compared to the group with lung nodules ≤ 5 mm (p = 0.022).

Conclusions

Observation is a safe first-line method of managing patients with lung metastases from GCTB. According to radiological imaging, approximately half of the patients progressed, and approximately half required a metastasectomy or denosumab treatment. However, patients with lung nodules > 5 mm should receive careful observation because of the high rate of disease progression in this group.

Denosumab Therapy for Giant-cell Tumor of the Lumbar Spine: A Case Report and Immunohistochemical Examination

Introduction

Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa (RANK) ligand, has been reported to reduce tumor size and progression, promote bone mineralization reconstruction, and increase bone density in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB). However, information regarding the histopathological findings of spinal GCTB following denosumab therapy and the time course of the treatment is limited.

Case Report

We report the case of a 58-year-old woman with progressive low back pain for 3 months before admission. Radiological and histological examinations revealed L4 GCTB. The patients received 10 courses of denosumab, and the tumor was subsequently resected. The therapy resulted in reduction of tumor mass and replacement of the lesions with bone tissue, particularly at the extravertebral and intracanal mass lesions. Histological examination of resected vertebra revealed a notable decrease in the number of RANK-positive and cyclooxygenase-2-positive cells. However, few RANK-positive cells were present around the woven bone.

Conclusion

Denosumab therapy for spinal GCTB is effective for reducing the tumor stage, surgical complications, and neurological impairment progression; however, it does not lead to total elimination of GCT cells, and careful consideration is needed in terms of the surgical procedure and post-operative denosumab therapy.

Benign Osseous Tumors and Tumor-Like Conditions

We will provide an imaging-focused discussion of 3 benign bone tumors that do not fit in the categories of cartilaginous tumors or osteoid tumors. We have chosen giant cell tumor of bone, unicameral bone cyst, and fibrous dysplasia. All 3 of these entities are common enough that one does not have to be a musculoskeletal radiologist in a cancer hospital to encounter them occasionally, but none of them should be seen frequently.

Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities

Background

Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a nonmalignant neoplasm composed of multinucleated giant and mononuclear stromal cells.

This study aimed to compare imaging findings of GCT pre- and post-denosumab treatment, including lesion size, percentage of signal intensity/density change, and time of initial objective tumor response. This will have a great impact on selection of most appropriate imaging technique to accurately measure therapy response and its related complications, which would influence the physicians to tailor the treatment regimen to suit each patient.

Results

As per inverse Choi density/size (ICDS), 16 patients (84.2%) had an objective tumor response and 15 (78.9%) had an increase in density or decrease in signal intensity, and the mean of signal intensity decrease in the treated lesions was 32.4% (95% CI, 18–46.7). Only seven patients (36.8%) had tumors demonstrating ≥ 10% decrease in size, all of which showed a positive change in signal/density except for one. Moreover, 17 patients (89.4%) showed a clear demarcation/low signal intensity margin surrounding ≥ two third of the lesion periphery. The median time to first objective tumor response was approximately 23 weeks.

Conclusion

Based on the ICDS criteria, most patients with giant cell tumor of bone show objective tumor response to denosumab. Modification of ICDS to include marginal sclerosis or clear demarcation of the lesions might be considered as a separate response criterion to accurately assess the treatment response in patients with GCT.

Radiological findings of denosumab treatment for giant cell tumours of bone

Giant cell tumours of bone (GCTB) are benign giant cell-rich tumours typically occurring in the epi-metaphysis of skeletally mature patients. Despite their benign classification, GCTB may be locally aggressive with local recurrence as a challenging issue. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits osteolysis via the RANK-RANK ligand pathway. There is currently no consensus on optimal treatment duration or imaging modality for monitoring patients on denosumab therapy. This review illustrates the radiological findings of GCTB on denosumab treatment seen on plain radiographs, CT, MRI, PET-CT and DEXA, with reference to the current literature. Recognizing imaging features indicative of a positive response to denosumab is important for therapeutic decision-making. Imaging findings with respect to duration of denosumab treatment, tumour upregulation during treatment, tumour recurrence and malignant transformation are discussed. The development of a sclerotic neocortex and varying degrees of matrix osteosclerosis are seen on plain radiographs. Reconstitution of subarticular bone and articular surface irregularity are optimally evaluated on CT which can also quantify tumour density. MRI demonstrates heterogeneous low signal matrix and is useful to assess decrease in size of cystic and/or soft tissue components of GCTB. A fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive MR sequence is important to detect tumour reactivation. Reduction in ¹⁸F-FDG-PET avidity represents an early sensitive sign of response to denosumab treatment. Regardless of imaging modality, close follow-up in a specialist centre and careful evaluation of nonresponders is necessary as local recurrence after cessation of denosumab treatment and malignant transformation of GCTB have been described.

Short-term Preoperative Denosumab With Surgery in Unresectable or Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Objective

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and oncological results of combination treatment of short‐term preoperative denosumab (the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa‐B ligand inhibitor) with surgery in unresectable or recurrent cases of giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB).

Methods

Between 2016 and 2018, 11 eligible patients (1 man, 10 women, mean age 38.1 years) with grade 3 GCTB were treated with a combination of short‐term (six doses) preoperative denosumab and surgery in a single institution. The clinical, radiological, and pathological alteration after the denosumab treatment were compared. The oncological results of the combination therapy were also recorded. Meanwhile, adverse effects or complications of denosumab, if any, were reported.

Results

The median follow‐up time after surgical procedure was 30 months (range 13–45 months). After 3–4 denosumab injections, pain relief was observed in all patients. In two spine patients, the neurological status improved after four doses of treatment. Intraoperatively, the margin of the tumor became clear and the intensity of the tumor increased while the blood supply around and within the lesion decreased. Within the lesion, the typically soft and loose tissue were replaced by the tough and dense fibro‐osseous tissue. The mean diameter of the lesion before and after treatment was 61.55 ± 22.49 mm and 51.81 ± 21.12 mm, respectively, and the T‐score was 1.02 (P = 0.32). Variable calcification was observed at the periphery and within the lesion. A total of three patients experienced local recurrence in this study. In the resection group, only one extremity patient had soft tissue recurrence that was treated with en‐bloc excision. In the curettage group, two of three sacral tumor patients had local occurrence. Both refused re‐operation and restarted the monthly denosumab injection thereafter, and the lesions remained stable at the final follow up. Finally, no adverse effects or complications related to denosumab treatment were found.

Conclusion

For the unresectable or recurrent GCTB cases, short‐term (six doses) preoperative use of denosumab improved clinical symptoms, decreased the tumor size, and increased the tumor density. The changes in tumors, in turn, simplified the tumor removal manipulation and, subsequently, decreased the local recurrence for the resection surgery. For the curettage, the denosumab‐induced changes had mixed impacts, and shorter term (fewer than six doses) usage may be more appropriate. Our six‐dose regime was deemed safe, while the safety of long‐term use remains unknown.

A new computerized tomography classification to evaluate response to Denosumab in giant cell tumors in the extremities

Objectives

The aim of this study was to describe the cohort of patients who have been treated with Denosumab as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities, to evaluate the radiological responses to Denosumab comparing Choi criteria and a newly described computerized tomography (CT) classification, and to evaluate the risk of local recurrence after intralesional curettage or radical excision.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 36 patients (20 females and 16 males; mean age at diagnosis 36 years (range, 18–64)) treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities. The radiological responses to Denosumab treatment were analyzed on the preoperative images after the neoadjuvant course with the Choi criteria and with a newly proposed classification based on CT. All these images were independently reviewed by two of the researchers. Surgical intervention methods were noted and local recurrence rates were evaluated. The correlation between radiological response amount and local recurrence were analyzed for both Choi criteria and the new CT classification.

Results

Denosumab was administered for a mean of 21 weeks (range 7–133). Five patients also had a short postoperative course. According to Choi criteria there was a radiological response in 32 patients (89%), while the new CT classification identified responses in all the 36 patients (100%). The identification of changes after 7 weeks of treatment was higher using the CT classification compared to Choi criteria (p = 0.043 vs p = 0.462). The surgical interventions after Denosumab comprised curettage in 29 patients (74%) and resection in 7 (26%). Local recurrence was higher in patients managed with intralesional curettage than in those treated with en bloc resection (55.1% vs 0%, p < 0.001). At last follow up 19 patients (53%) required en bloc resections. Good responders to Denosumab (type 2C) had lower risk of local recurrence (p = 0.047) after either resection or curettage.

Conclusion

The new CT classification evaluated more accurately the response to Denosumab. Our experience suggests that the requirement for radical bone resection remains high despite the use of Denosumab.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Retrospective analysis of 51 intralesionally treated cases with progressed giant cell tumor of the bone: local adjuvant use of hydrogen peroxide reduces the risk for tumor recurrence

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCT) has high local recurrence rates and the prognosis is hard to predict. We therefore retrospectively analyzed clinical outcome and recurrences of 51 GCT cases focusing on the effects of adjuvant local use of hydrogen peroxide.

METHODS

The series enclosed 51 advanced GCT cases of the upper and lower extremities (n = 27 Campanacci grade III; n = 24 grade II; n = 39 surgery at our institution, n = 12 elsewhere). Mean follow-up was 88.3 (± 62.0) months. Surgical details, histology, metastases, recurrences, and interview-based data on satisfaction and function including the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score were evaluated. It was investigated whether hydrogen peroxide was additionally used or not to clean the tumor cavity after curettage as we hypothesized influence on recurrences. To analyze the underlying mechanisms, GCT-derived stromal cell lines were cultured in vitro and tested for cell viability and apoptosis after treatment with hydrogen peroxide. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc testing, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The whole series had 21 recurrences (41%). Eleven recurrences were found (28%) after surgery at our institution. Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative recurrence-free survival revealed at 2 years follow-up 69% (72%, only our institution) and at 10 years follow-up 54% (68%, only our institution). Intralesional resection was performed by vigorous curettage, burring, and defect filling with either polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (n = 45) or cancellous bone from the iliac crest (n = 6). Univariate chi-square analysis showed significantly lower recurrence rate after bone cement filling (2.3-fold, p = 0.024). Cleaning of the lesion cavity with hydrogen peroxide significantly reduced recurrence rate (whole collective 2.9-fold, p = 0.004; our institution 2.8-fold, p = 0.04) and significantly increased cumulative recurrence-free survival rate (whole collective at 10 years follow-up 74% versus 31%, p = 0.002; our institution 79% versus 48%, p = 0.02) compared to cases without hydrogen peroxide treatment. In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for recurrence were pathological fracture (hazard ratio 3.7; p = 0.04), high mitosis rate (hazard ratio 15.6; p = 0.01), and lack of hydrogen peroxide use (hazard ratio 6.0; p = 0.02). In vitro cell culture analyses found apoptotic nature of hydrogen peroxide induced GCT cell death.

CONCLUSIONS

The present series proved for the first time that additional cleaning of the tumor cavity with hydrogen peroxide before defect filling significantly reduced recurrence rate and significantly increased recurrence-free survival in advanced but intralesionally treated GCT cases.

Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in cases of surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although denosumab has been approved as an antiresorptive agent for giant cell tumor of bone, its efficacy has not been proven.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid treatment in patients with surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients with surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone were included in this randomized clinical trial. Patients received either subcutaneous denosumab (DB group; 120 mg per 4 weeks plus an additional 120 mg on days 8 and 15; n = 125) or intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA group; 4 mg per 4 weeks; n = 125) for six cycles. Disease status, clinical benefits, treatment-emergent adverse effects, overall survival, and cost of treatment were evaluated during the follow-up period. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Denosumab and zoledronic acid had similar tumor responses (p = 0.18) and clinical benefits (p = 0.476). Disease progression was observed in fewer patients in the DB group (1%) than ZA group (2%). Denosumab caused fatigue (p = 0.0004) and back pain (p < 0.0001), while zoledronic acid caused hypocalcemia (p < 0.0001), flu-like symptoms (p = 0.021), hypotension (p = 0.021), and hypokalemia (p = 0.021). Denosumab treatment was markedly more expensive than zoledronic acid treatment (p < 0.0001). The cost to manage treatment-emergent adverse effects was higher for the ZA group than the DB group (p = 0.0425). Overall survival was the same for both treatments (p = 0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab is a safe but costly alternative to zoledronic acid for treatment of surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone.