High-Mobility Group Box 1 expression predicts survival of patients after resection of adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater

Survival benefit of adjuvant treatment for ampullary cancer with lymph nodal involvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adjuvant treatment (AT) in ampullary cancer (AmC) remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the role of AT for AmC.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Studies comparing overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients who underwent AT or not following AmC resection were included.

RESULTS

A total of 3971 patients in 21 studies were analyzed. Overall pooled data showed no significant difference in effect on the OS by AT [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.768-1.297]. No significant difference in recurrence between the AT and non-AT (nAT) groups was noted (HR = 1.158, 95% CI: 0.764-1.755). In subgroup analysis, patients who received AT showed favorable outcomes in the OS compared with those who received nAT in nodal-positive AmC (HR = 0.627, 95% CI: 0.451-0.870). Neither AT consisted of adjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy (HR = 0.804, 95% CI: 0.563-1.149) nor AT with adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.883, 95% CI: 0.642-1.214) showed any significant effect on the OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of AT in AmC on survival and recurrence did not show a significant benefit. Furthermore, effectiveness according to AT strategies did not show enhancement in survival. AT had an advantage in survival compared with nAT strategy in nodal-positive AmC. In cases of AmC with positive lymph nodal involvement, AT may be warranted regardless of detailed strategies.

Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence in ampullary adenocarcinoma patients after curative Whipple's resection: a retrospective cohort study in the National Cancer Center in China

Due to the low incidence of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA), the recurrence patterns, risk factors for recurrence and post-recurrence treatment are still debated. The purpose of this study is to clarify such clinical issues based on the retrospective data at the National Cancer Center in China. Finally, one hundred and eighty-two AA patients after curative Whipple's resection from 1998 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 27 patients had locoregional recurrence and 61 patients had systemic recurrence. However, no significant difference of clinicopathological features and survival were found between locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. In the recurrence group, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 59.1%, 29.5%, 10.2%, 88.6%, 61.6%, and 37.6%, respectively. AA patients with recurrence have a worse prognosis than those without recurrence, regardless of stage. In addition, we found that advanced T stage and lymphovascular invasion were two independent risk factors for RFS in AA patients after curative Whipple's resection. In conclusion, AA patients with recurrence have a poor prognosis. Advanced T stage and lymphovascular invasion were two independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival in AA patients after curative Whipple's resection. Nevertheless, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to fully validate.

HMGB1 enhances chemotherapy resistance in multiple myeloma cells by activating the nuclear factor-κB pathway

Chemotherapy resistance is a main obstacle in the clinical chemotherapeutic treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) has been revealed to be associated with the sensitivity of MM cells to chemotherapy, but how HMGB1 regulates chemotherapy resistance in MM has yet to be fully elucidated. In the present study, the exact molecular mechanism underlying HMGB1-mediated drug resistance in MM was explored using three chemotherapy-resistant MM cells (RPMI8226/ADR, RPMI8226/BOR and RPMI8226/DEX) that were successfully established. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed that the three chemotherapy-resistant MM cells exhibited a higher release of HMGB1 compared with the parental RPMI8226 cells. Interference with endogenous HMGB1 increased the sensitivity of drug-resistant MM cells to chemotherapy, which was supported by the low IC₅₀ value and the enlargement of cell apoptosis. Furthermore, short hairpin (sh)RNA-transfected MM cells showed an obvious elevation in phosphorylated (p)-IKKα/β, p-IκBα and p-p65 in whole cell lysate and/or nucleus, and treatment of nuclear factor (NF)-κB activator reversed the effect of shHMGB1-mediated cell viability and apoptosis in MM cells. In conclusion, HMGB1 regulates drug resistance in MM cells by regulating NF-κB signaling pathway, suggesting that HMGB1 has the potential to serve as a target for MM treatment.

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapy after curative surgery for ampullary carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ampullary carcinoma patients require radical resection for optimal survival; however, the outcomes are often unsatisfactory. The utility of adjuvant therapy among such patients is unclear, probably owing to its potential side effects. Therefore, this study investigated the benefits and safety of adjuvant therapy in resected ampullary carcinoma.

METHODS

Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for eligible studies, and those comparing adjuvant therapy and surgical treatment alone were included. Hazard ratios for survival outcomes and the number of adverse events for safety endpoints were extracted and subjected to pooled analyses through a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 27 studies involving 3,538 patients were included. Adjuvant therapy was significantly associated with decreased mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.84), especially for chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.62). Furthermore, adjuvant therapy was significantly associated with increased overall survival among high-risk patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.82) or those with the pancreaticobiliary subtype (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.85). By contrast, adjuvant therapy was not associated with improved overall survival among low-risk patients (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.52-1.68) or those with the intestinal subtype (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.57-1.95). Regarding the safety of adjuvant therapy, no intervention-related mortality occurred, and severe adverse events were within the acceptable range (risk difference, 0.04; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.08).

CONCLUSION

The present results suggest that adjuvant therapy is safe and extends survival in high-risk patients or those with the pancreaticobiliary subtype of ampullary carcinoma.