Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Skill-qualified surgeons positively affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a survey of the National Clinical Database of Japan

BACKGROUND

Proficiency of the operating surgeon is one of the most critical factors potentially associated with reductions in complications and surgery-related mortality. With video-rating systems having shown potential for assessing laparoscopic surgeons' proficiency, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was developed by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery to subjectively assess the proficiency of laparoscopic surgeons by rating applicants' non-edited case videos. We conducted a study to evaluate how ESSQS skill-qualified (SQ) surgeon involvement influences short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy performed for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Data from the National Clinical Database regarding laparoscopic distal and total gastrectomy performed for gastric cancer between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed. Operative mortality, defined as 30-day mortality or 90-day in-hospital mortality, and anastomotic leakage rates were compared per involvement vs. non-involvement of an SQ surgeon. Outcomes were also compared per involvement of a gastrectomy-, colectomy-, or cholecystectomy-qualified surgeon. The association between the area of qualification and operative mortality/anastomotic leakage was also analyzed with a generalized estimating equation logistic regression model used to account for patient-level risk factors and institutional differences.

RESULTS

Of 104,093 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies, 52,143 were suitable for inclusion in the study; 30,366 (58.2%) were performed by an SQ surgeon. Of 43,978 laparoscopic total gastrectomies, 10,326 were suitable for inclusion; 6501 (63.0%) were performed by an SQ surgeon. Gastrectomy-qualified surgeons outperformed non-SQ surgeons in terms of both operative mortality and anastomotic leakage. They also outperformed cholecystectomy- and colectomy-qualified surgeons in terms of operative mortality or anastomotic leakage in distal and total gastrectomy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ESSQS appears to discriminate laparoscopic surgeons who can be expected to achieve significantly improved gastrectomy outcomes.

Endoscopic instruments and techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a less invasive local treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC).Areas covered: Japanese guidelines have recently expanded the endoscopic treatment indications for EGC. ESD is sometimes performed for lesions with a relative indication that has not previously been considered for ESD. ESD procedures are technically difficult, especially for larger and more invasive lesions. Complete resection and accurate histological assessment of EGC lesions are essential to evaluate endoscopic curability. Various endoscopic instruments, including three types of endoscopic knives and specific hemostatic forceps, have been developed, and endoscopic techniques, including the traction method, have been modified to simplify the procedure.Expert opinion: An insulated-tip knife with large tissue contact allows us to perform faster incisions, while a needle-type knife with minimal tissue contact allows us to perform precise incisions. Furthermore, a scissor-type knife with grasping tissues allows us to perform more secure incision. The traction method enables the operator to proceed with submucosal dissection procedures. In cases with small lesions, snaring can be used, as well as knife dissection. Understanding the features of each endoscopic instrument and technique is essential because appropriate selection and usage contribute to successful and safe ESD procedures.

Clinical Characteristics of Intramucosal Gastric Cancers with Lymphovascular Invasion Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

INTRODUCTION

In patients with intramucosal gastric cancer (MGC) who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), lymphovascular invasions (LVIs) such as lymphatic invasion or venous invasion are considered risk factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, the rate of LNM in MGCs with LVI and their clinicopathological features are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the rate of LNM and clinical characteristics of MGCs with LVI as compared to MGCs without LVI and minimally invasive submucosal gastric cancers (mSMGCs) with LVI.

METHODS

Among the early gastric cancers excluding the remnant stomach who underwent ESD at our hospital from July 2003 to September 2018, the MGCs with LVI were included as the target in this study. MGCs without LVI and mSMGCs with LVI were also included as control.

RESULTS

Seventeen lesions in 17 patients with MGCs with LVI, 1,149 lesions in 865 patients with MGCs without LVI, and 29 lesions in 29 patients with mSMGCs with LVI were analyzed. LVI was noted in 1.5% (17/1,166) of MGC cases. During follow-up of the MGC cases with LVI, there were no LNM or recurrences reported, and 14 patients survived and 3 died of other diseases. However, LNM occurred in 2 cases of mSMGC. Among the MGC cases, univariate analysis showed that the pap component, elevated type, and tumor diameters of 20 mm or more were statistically significant factors with respect to LVI, while multivariate analysis showed that the pap component was the only significant factor.

CONCLUSION

Careful follow-up may be appropriate for MGCs with LVI due to the low risk of LNM. Additionally, the pap component is a significant factor in MGCs with LVI.

Factors associated with overall survival in early gastric cancer patients who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists about the benefit of additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC).

AIM

To examine risk factors for overall survival (OS) after additional surgery in patients with EGC who initially underwent ESD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with EGC who underwent additional surgery after ESD at the Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University between August 2012 and August 2019. OS was the primary outcome. Lymph node metastasis and residual tumor were secondary outcomes. Logistic regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for further analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were evaluated, including 35 (83.3%) males and 7(16.7%) females. The mean age was 62 (range, 32-82) years. Male sex [hazard ratio (HR) = 21.906, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.762-229.250; P = 0.039), T1b invasion (HR = 3.965, 95%CI: 1.109-17.432; P = 0.047), undifferentiated tumor (HR = 9.455, 95%CI: 0.946-29.482; P = 0.049), lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.126, 95%CI: 0.002-13.266; P = 0.031), and residual tumor (HR = 4.275, 95%CI: 1.049-27.420; P = 0.043) were independently associated with OS. The follow-up duration was 4-81 mo (median: 50.7 mo). OS was 77.0 ± 12.1 mo (95%CI: 53.3-100.7 mo). The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 94.1% and 85%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Male sex, T1b invasion, undifferentiated tumor, lymph node metastasis, and residual tumor are independently associated with OS in patients with EGC who underwent additional surgery after ESD.

Establishment and verification of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely recognized by patients and doctors due to its advantages in early gastric cancer (EGC). The accurate prediction of the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC is important to select suitable treatments with this procedure for patients. Unfortunately, the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography in the diagnosis of EGC lymph node status is extremely limited. The purpose of the present study was to establish an LNM nomogram risk model of early gastric cancer patients based on clinical data, to guide treatment for clinicians.

METHODS

a retrospective examination of the records of EGC patients undergoing radical gastrectomy from August 2012 to August 2019 in the Gastrointestinal Center of Subei People's Hospital was performed. The clinicopathological data were classified into a training set and validation set according to the time. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors related to LNM. A risk model for predicting the occurrence of LNM in EGC was established and validated.

RESULTS

of the 503 EGC patients, 78 (15.5 %) had lymph node metastasis. Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that the predictive factors included sex, tumor location, tumor diameter, differentiation, ulcer and lymphatic vascular invasion. The discrimination of the LNM prediction model was satisfactory with an AUC of 0.8033 (internal validation) and 0.7353 (external validation). The correction effect of the calibration was satisfactory and the DCA decision curve analysis showed a strong clinical practicability.

CONCLUSION

the nomogram risk prediction model of LNM has been established for EGC patients to assist in formulating personalized treatment plans.

Protocol for expanded indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in China: a multicenter, ambispective, observational, open-cohort study

BACKGROUND

The main treatment methods for early gastric cancer (EGC) include endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and radical gastrectomy. However, appropriate treatment for patients who exceed the absolute indications for ESD remains unestablished. In China, evidence-based medicine for the expanding indications of ESD and accurate diagnostic staging for EGC patients are lacking. Thus, clinical studies involving Chinese patients with EGC are necessary to select appropriate treatment options and promote China's expanded indications for ESD and diagnostic staging scheme.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, ambispective, observational, open-cohort study that is expected to enroll 554 patients with EGC. The study was launched in May 2018 and is scheduled to end in March 2022. All enrolled patients should meet the inclusion criteria. Case report forms and electronic data capture systems are used to obtain clinical data, which includes demographic information, results of perioperative blood- and auxiliary examinations, surgical information, results of postoperative pathology, and the outcomes of postoperative recovery and follow-up. Patients are followed up every 6 months after surgery for a minimum of 5 years. The primary endpoint is the rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM), whereas the secondary endpoints include the following: consistency, sensitivity, and specificity of the results of preoperative examinations and postoperative pathology; cut-off values for LNM; logistic regression model of expanded indications for ESD; and incidence of postoperative complications within the 30-day and 5-year relapse-free survival rates.

DISCUSSION

This study will explore and evaluate expanded indications for ESD that match the characteristics of the Chinese population in patients with EGC and will introduce a related staging procedure and examination scheme that is appropriate for China. Ethical approval was obtained from all participating centers. The findings are expected to be disseminated through publications or presentations and will facilitate clinical decision-making in EGC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The name of the registry is ChiCTR. It was registered on May 9, 2018, with the registration number ( ChiCTR1800016084 ). The clinical trial was launched in May 2018 and will end in March 2022, with enrollment to be completed by December 2021. Trial status: Ongoing.