Does high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the biliary duct margin affect the prognosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis

High-grade dysplasia of the cystic duct margin: how should this be managed?

High-grade dysplasia (HGD) in the cystic duct is a rare epithelial lesion that may lead to biliary tract malignancy. Due to its association with aggressive multifocal cholangiocarcinoma, it is important to investigate for concurrent malignancy, remove all areas of HGD and monitor for recurrence or metastasis.We present a case of a woman in her 60s with cholecystitis who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. On histopathology, the patient was found to have incidental HGD involving the cystic duct margin. After ensuring the absence of concurrent malignancy on cross-sectional imaging, she underwent further resection until the margins were clear of dysplasia. In the absence of clear follow-up guidelines, the patient was closely monitored with outpatient scans for up to 5 years.

Pathological survey of precursor lesions in cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To clarify the pathological significance of two precursors (high-grade biliary intraepithelial neoplasm [BilIN] and intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct [IPNB]) in cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs).

METHODS

Ninety-one cases of CCA (47 distal CCAs [dCCAs], 31 perihilar CCAs [pCCAs] and 13 intrahepatic CCAs of large duct type [LD-iCCAs]) were examined for their association with precursors. Neoplastic intraepithelial lesions without underlying infiltrating carcinoma in the surrounding mucosa of CCAs were considered to reflect high-grade BilIN. High-grade BilIN and IPNB were subdivided into gastric, biliary, intestinal and oncocytic subtypes, while CCAs were subdivided into gastrobiliary, intestinal and oncocytic subtypes. The postoperative overall survival (OS) was examined.

RESULTS

Fifty-four and 8 of 91 CCAs were associated with high-grade BilIN and IPNB, respectively, while these precursors were unidentifiable in the remaining CCAs. A majority of CCAs were of the gastrobiliary subtype, while the intestinal subtype was occasionally detected, and the oncocytic subtype was rare. CCAs with high-grade BilIN showed a similar postoperative OS to CCAs without precursors, while CCAs with IPNB showed a favorable postoperative OS compared to CCAs without precursors.

CONCLUSIONS

CCAs were frequently associated with precursors; high-grade BilIN may be a major precursor and IPNB a minor one. CCAs with IPNB showed a favorable postoperative OS compared to CCAs with high-grade BilIN.

Converted-hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for an intraoperative positive ductal margin after pancreatoduodenectomy in distal cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for distal cholangiocarcinoma, and a negative ductal margin (DM0) is indispensable for the long-term survival. When intraoperative frozen sections of ductal margin after PD are positive, converted-hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (C-HPD) is the final option available to gain an additional ductal margin. However, the efficacy of C-HPD remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PD or C-HPD for distal cholangiocarcinoma between 2002 and 2019 were analyzed. The type of hepatectomy in C-HPD was restricted to left hepatectomy to prevent posthepatectomy liver failure.

RESULTS

Of 203 patients who underwent PD for distal cholangiocarcinoma, 49 patients exhibited intraoperative positive ductal margin (DM1) after PD. Eleven patients underwent C-HPD for intraoperative DM1 after PD, in which intraoperative DM1 with invasive carcinoma (DM1inv) was observed in 3 patients, and intraoperative DM1 with carcinoma in situ (DM1cis) was observed in 8 patients. The median additional ductal margin yielded by C-HPD was 9 mm (interquartile range 7-13 mm). C-HPD eradicated intraoperative DM1inv in 3 patients, with 2 patients showing DM0 and 1 patient showing DM1cis. Regarding 8 patients who underwent C-HPD for intraoperative DM1cis, 4 patients had DM0, but the others had DM1cis. C-HPD was associated with a high complication rate, but no mortality was observed. The median survival time of patients who underwent C-HPD was 48.8 months.

CONCLUSION

C-HPD was able to safely eradicate intraoperative DM1inv after PD. However, the length of the resected bile duct according to C-HPD may not be sufficient to remove intraoperative DM1cis after PD.

Cancerization of ducts in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Invasive cancers that arise from ductal structures can infiltrate and colonize pre-existing ducts in a process referred to as cancerization of ducts (COD). COD in cholangiocarcinoma is an under-studied process whose clinical significance remains poorly understood. Even though both cancerized ducts and biliary intraepithelial neoplasias (BilINs) show dysplastic changes, hallmarks of COD are (i) an abrupt transition from the normal/reactive epithelium to severe dysplasia and (ii) close proximity to invasive carcinoma with similar cytologic features. We investigated 113 cases of surgically resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma and identified COD in 37 cases (33%). Using immunohistochemistry, we found that COD and adjacent invasive carcinoma had a concordant pattern of p53 and SMAD4 staining in 95% (21/22) and 100% (21/21) of cases, respectively. In contrast, BilINs and cancerized ducts showed significantly lower levels of concordance in p53 and SMAD4 staining at 44% (8/18) and 47% (8/17) of cases, respectively (P = 0.0007 and 0.0001, respectively). By univariate analysis, positive lymph node metastasis (P = 0.027), positive final bile duct margin (P = 0.021), and the presence of COD (P = 0.020) were associated with decreased overall survival. We further performed multivariate analysis to demonstrate that positive lymph node metastasis (P = 0.031), positive final bile duct margin (P = 0.035), and COD (P = 0.0051) were correlated with decreased overall survival. Together, our study highlights that COD is a clinically significant process in hilar cholangiocarcinoma that can be identified using morphological criteria in conjunction with p53 and SMAD4 immunolabeling.

Significance of dysplasia in bile duct resection margin in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical resection is the only indicator associated with survival in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). However, limited data are available regarding the implications of dysplasia at the resection margin following surgery.

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic significance of dysplasia-positive margins in patients diagnosed with EHCC.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients who had undergone surgery for EHCC with curative intent between January 2013 and July 2017. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 116 patients followed for longer than 3 years. The status of resection margin was used to classify patients into negative low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/carcinoma in situ (CIS) categories.

RESULTS

Based on postoperative status, 72 patients underwent resection with negative margins, 19 had LGD-positive margins, and 25 showed HGD/CIS-positive margins. The mean survival rates of the patients with negative margins, LGD margins, and HGD/CIS margins were 49.1 ± 4.5, 47.3 ± 6.0, and 20.8 ± 4.4 mo, respectively (P < 0.001). No difference in survival was found between groups with LGD margins and negative margins (P = 0.56). In the multivariate analysis, age > 70 years and HGD/CIS-positive margins were significant independent factors for survival (hazard ratio = 1.90 and 2.47, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HGD/CIS margin in resected EHCC is associated with a poor survival. However, the LGD-positive resection margin is not a significant indicator of survival in patients with EHCC.

Comparison of oncologic outcomes of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma according to tumor location: perihilar cholangiocarcinoma versus distal bile duct cancer

Purpose

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is distinguished into perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) and distal bile duct cancer (DBC). The studies for each subtype have been conducted separately. This study compared oncological outcomes between PHC and DBC.

Methods

From 2001 to 2017, patients who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital for PHC or DBC were enrolled. T stage was reclassified for tumor extent as ‘confined to’ or ‘beyond’ the bile duct (BD). In survival analysis, stage matching was performed based on tumor extent and lymph node (LN) metastasis.

Results

There were 680 patients enrolled: 295 with PHC and 385 with DBC. The R0 resection rate was higher in DBC (77.3% vs. 89.9%, P = 0.001). Tumors confined to BD were more common in PHC (61.7% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.001). The 5-year survival rate (5YSR) was higher in DBC patients (30.8% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.001). After stage matching, DBC patients showed better 5YSR for tumors confined to BD/LN(–) (47.1% vs. 64.3%), confined to BD/LN(+) (22.0% vs. 35.0%), beyond BD/LN(–) (21.9% vs. 49.8%), and beyond BD/LN(+) (9.6% vs. 26.9%). The overall recurrence rate was higher in PHC (59.7% vs. 51.9%, P = 0.045), with no difference in the recurrence types between two groups. Radiation therapy was effective for patients with advanced stage disease (5YSR: 35.8% vs. 29.5%, P = 0.022); adjuvant chemotherapy was effective for patients receiving R1 resection (5YSR: 37.3% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.040).

Conclusion

Differences were identified in oncological outcomes between PHC and DBC, including pathologic findings and survival outcomes.

A novel method for predicting perineural invasion of distal cholangiocarcinoma on multidetector-row computed tomography

PURPOSE

Excessive perineural invasion (PNI) is associated with a high risk of radial margin (RM) positivity and a poor prognosis for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). This study evaluates a new method of predicting the extent of PNI preoperatively.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 201 patients who underwent resection for DCC between 2002 and 2018. This study identified the 'periductal enation sign' (PES), defined as the surrounding soft tissue enhancement that appears as an enation from the circumference of the enhanced extrahepatic bile duct on multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) scans, as a predictor of PNI. We analyzed the outcomes of the patients in relation to the presence or absence of the PES on MDCT scans.

RESULTS

The PES in the PNI-positive group was significantly longer than that in the PNI-negative group. As the length of the PES extended, the grade of PNI increased. A positive PES was defined as a PES length of ≥ 2.0 mm. Patients with a positive PES were more frequently positive for RM (23.7% vs. 2.1%) and locoregional recurrence (23.7% vs. 6.3%) and exhibited significantly poorer overall survival than those with a negative PES (30.2% vs. 54.6% at 5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence and extent of PNI can be predicted easily and effectively by the PES length. A positive PES was associated with poor local controllability and a poor prognosis.

Does additional resection of a positive microscopic ductal margin benefit patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The incidence of a positive microscopic ductal margin (R1) after surgical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) remains high, but the beneficial of additional resection has not been confirmed by any meta-analysis and randomized clinical trials (RCT), which also increased the risk of morbidity and mortality. Hence, a systematic review is warranted to evaluate the clinical value of additional resection of intraoperative R1 for pCCA.

Methods

Eligible studies were searched by PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, from Jan.1^st 2000 to Nov.30^th 2019, evaluating the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of additional resection of intraoperative pathologic R1 for pCCA. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size by a randomized-effect model.

Results

Eight studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 179 patients in the secondary R0 group, 843 patients in the primary R0 group and 253 patients in the R1 group. The pooled OR for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rate between secondary R0 group and primary R0 group were 1.03(95%CI 0.64~1.67, P = 0.90), 0.92(95%CI 0.52~1.64, P = 0.78), and 0.83(95%CI 0.37~1.84, P = 0.65), respectively. The pooled OR for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rate between secondary R0 group and R1 group were 2.14(95%CI 1.31~3.50, P = 0.002), 2.58(95%CI 1.28~5.21, P = 0.008), and 3.54(95%CI 1.67~7.50, P = 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of the West showed that the pooled OR for the 1-, and 3-year OS rate between secondary R0 group and R1 group were 2.05(95%CI 0.95~4.41, P = 0.07), 1.91(95%CI 0.96~3.81, P = 0.07), respectively.

Conclusion

With the current data, additional resection should be recommended in selected patients with intraoperative R1, but the conclusion is needed further validation.