Effect of preoperative jaundice on long-term prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma with radical resection

Textbook outcomes in liver surgery for gallbladder cancer patients treated with curative-intent resection: a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy, hepatectomy, and lymphadenectomy are recommended as the curative treatment for resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Textbook outcomes in liver surgery (TOLS) is a novel composite measure that has been defined by expert consensus to represent the optimal postoperative course after hepatectomy. This study aimed to determine the incidence of TOLS and the independent predictors associated with TOLS after curative-intent resection in GBC patients.

METHODS

All consecutive GBC patients who underwent curative-intent resection between 2014 and 2020 were enrolled from a multicenter database from 11 hospitals as the training and the internal testing cohorts, and Southwest Hospital as the external testing cohort. TOLS was defined as no intraoperative grade greater than or equal to 2 incidents, no grade B/C postoperative bile leaks, no postoperative grade B/C liver failure, no 90-day postoperative major morbidity, no 90-day readmission, no 90-day mortality after hospital discharge, and R0 resection. Independent predictors of TOLS were identified using logistic regression and were used to construct the nomogram. The predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve and calibration curves.

RESULTS

TOLS was achieved in 168 patients (54.4%) and 74 patients (57.8%) from the training and internal testing cohorts, and the external testing cohort, respectively. On multivariate analyses, age less than or equal to 70 years, absence of preoperative jaundice (total bilirubin≤3 mg/dl), T1 stage, N0 stage, wedge hepatectomy, and no neoadjuvant therapy were independently associated with TOLS. The nomogram that incorporated these predictors demonstrated excellent calibration and good performance in both the training and external testing cohorts (area under the curve: 0.741 and 0.726).

CONCLUSIONS

TOLS was only achieved in approximately half of GBC patients treated with curative-intent resection, and the constructed nomogram predicted TOLS accurately.

Impact of Preoperative Jaundice and Biliary Drainage on Short- and Long-term Outcomes among Patients with Gallbladder Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the prognostic implication of jaundice and preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcomes among patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) undergoing surgical resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection of GBC identified from a multicenter database between January 2000 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on clinical and pathological details, as well as short- and long-term overall survival (OS), were obtained and compared among patients with and without preoperative jaundice and biliary drainage.

RESULTS

Among 449 patients with GBC, median and 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 17.4 months, 63.7%, 28.4%, and 22.1%, respectively. Patients who presented with preoperative jaundice (n = 100, 22.3%) were more likely to have advanced disease, a lower incidence of R0 resection (29.0% vs. 69.1%, p < 0.001), as well as a higher incidence of postoperative liver failure (4% vs. 0, p = 0.002), and worse long-term survival versus patients without jaundice (median OS, 10.4 vs. 27.1 months, p < 0.001). Preoperative biliary drainage was performed for the majority of jaundiced patients (77.0%) and was associated with decreased risk of postoperative liver failure (1.3% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.041); preoperative biliary drainage failed to improve long-term survival (median OS, 10.2 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.679). On multivariable analysis, R0 resection (17.5 vs. 7.6 months, p < 0.001) and adjuvant therapy (15.6 vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.027) were associated with improved long-term survival among jaundiced patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While preoperative biliary drainage of jaundiced GBC patients decreased the risk of postoperative liver failure, it did not impact long-term outcomes. Rather, preoperative jaundice was associated with a lower chance at R0 resection and worse long-term survival.

Insights From the Analysis of Clinicopathological and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Gallbladder Cancer

Aims

To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of primary gallbladder cancer (GBC) treated by radical surgery.

Methods

The clinical and pathological data of 168 patients with primary gallbladder cancer admitted and treated in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan Meier method was used to draw the survival curve and evaluate the survival rate. Chi-square test was used for univariate analysis and binary logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

94 cases showed symptoms of abdominal pain and abdominal distension. 7 cases showed symptoms of fatigue and weight loss. Jaundice occurred in 10 patients. Fever occurred in 6 patients. 51 patients had no symptoms at all. The median survival time of 168 patients was 35.0 (1.0 ~ 142.0) months. The overall 1-, 2- and 3-year cumulative survival rates were 69.6%, 55.4% and 48.8% respectively. The univariate analysis indicated that preoperative bilirubin, tumor size, tumor location, pathological type, degree of differentiation, liver invasion, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, surgical margin, filtration depth and N staging were significant factors influencing prognosis of patients with primary GBC (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis demonstrated that degree of differentiation, nerve invasion, filtration depth and N staging were independent risk factors for prognosis of patients with primary GBC (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with risk factors of gallbladder cancer should be more active in early cholecystectomy to avoid the malignant transformation of benign diseases. Degree of differentiation, nerve invasion, filtration depth and N staging were important factors for poor prognosis of patients with primary GBC. For T4 staging patients, preoperative evaluation should be more comprehensive, and patients and surgeons should be more prudent in adopting appropriate clinical treatment. The primary purpose should be prolonging the survival time and improving the quality of life.

The effect of preoperative jaundice in the surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An updated meta-analysis was performed on the significance of preoperative jaundice in the surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).

METHODS

A thorough database searching was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library for comparative studies between jaundiced and non-jaundiced GBC patients. RevMan5.3 and Stata 13.0 software were used for statistical analysis. A total of nine measured outcomes were identified: resectability, R0 resection rate, concurrent bile duct resection, major hepatectomy, vital vascular reconstruction, combined adjacent organ resections, postoperative morbidities, mortalities, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were finally included. Newcastle- Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used for evaluating the quality of all included studies and the details were recorded in Table S1. Our pooled results revealed that preoperative jaundice was associated with a significantly lower resectability (p < 0.00001), a significantly lower R0 resection rate (p < 0.00001), a significantly higher concurrent bile duct resection rate (p < 0.00001), major hepatectomy rate (≥3 segments) (p < 0.00001), and vital vascular reconstruction rate (portal vein or hepatic artery) (p < 0.00001). Moreover, jaundiced patients experienced more postoperative morbidities (p < 0.00001), mortalities (p < 0.0001), and worse OS (p < 0.00001). However, jaundice was not related to combined adjacent organ resections (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative jaundice in GBC patients seems to be contraindicated to curative resection and the optimal therapeutic strategies should be identified via multidisciplinary team rather than surgery alone. Candidates for curative surgery should be highly selected and experienced centers are preferred. More significant well-designed studies are required for further exploration.